Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Applying to Graduate
School
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3
METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................... 3
TASKS ......................................................................................................................................................... 3
EQUIPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................. 3
METRICS...................................................................................................................................................... 3
RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
TASK 1: PERFORM A GENERAL SEARCH ...................................................................................................... 4
TASK 2: FIND A LIST OF PROGRAMS OFFERED............................................................................................. 5
TASK 3: FIND A PROGRAM IN MY FIELD ..................................................................................................... 6
TASK 4: FIND PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................... 6
TASK 5: FIND LIST OF FACULTY IN MY DEPARTMENT................................................................................. 7
TASK 6: FIND EACH FACULTY MEMBERS RESEARCH PROGRAM ................................................................ 8
TASK 7: FIND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................... 8
TASK 8: FIND ENTRY REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................... 9
TASK 9: FILL OUT APPLICATION FORM ....................................................................................................... 9
TASK 10: SUBMIT ADDITIONAL MATERIALS ............................................................................................... 9
CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 10
BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDICE ............................................................................................................................................... 12
APPENDIX A: RAW DATA ......................................................................................................................... 12
3
Introduction
University websites have become the go-to tool for searching for and applying to graduate
programs. The University of Exeter and the University of Oregon both have excellent Masters
programs in the field of Biology. This white paper presents the results of a usability test that
compared the ease of finding and applying to a Masters program at each of these schools.
Methodology
Tasks
Ten tasks were chosen that are typical of the average student searching for and
applying to a graduate program.
1. Perform a general search.
2. Find a list of programs offered.
3. Find a program in a specific field.
4. Find program requirements.
5. Find list of faculty for a specific department.
6. Find a description of the research program for each faculty member.
7. Find application requirements.
8. Find entry requirements.
9. Fill out online application.
10. Submit additional materials.
Equipment and Environment
The equipment used for this test included an Asus laptop with Windows 8 OS and
equipped with Microsoft Excel for recording data. This test was conducted within
two sessions while sitting in a quiet corner of the library at the University of
Idaho.
Metrics
Each task was evaluated using a fixed-response Likert scale with the following
qualifying statements.
1. I was able to complete the task.
2. I was able to quickly complete the task.
3. The websites layout made it easy to find what I was looking for.
4. When I made errors, the website provided useful feedback for correcting
them.
5. It was easy to learn how to complete the task.
Each of these statements were scored 1-5 based upon the following scale.
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Somewhat Disagree
4
Results
Task 1: Perform a general search
Both universities had a clearly visible search bar on their homepage that made
conducting a search very easy.
When a poor query was made, the University of Exeter returned an error page that
lists the common sources of errors. The University of Oregon provided no
guidance for correcting mistakes.
5
The scores for each website for task 1 are listed in the table below.
Task: Perform a general search Exeter Oregon
Effectiveness: I was able to complete the task. 5 5
Efficiency: I was able to quickly complete the task. 5 5
Engagement: The website's layout made it easy to find what
I was looking for. 5 5
Error Tolerance: When I made errors, the website provided
useful feedback for correcting them. 5 1
Easy to learn: It was easy to learn how to complete the task. 5 5
The University of Oregon was also relatively simple. However, their website
combines both graduate and undergraduate programs even though not all
programs have graduate options.
The scores for each website for task 2 are listed below. Both universities received
low scores in error tolerance for several categories simply because the system has
no means of detecting errors during the attempt to find particular information.
Task: Find a list of programs offered Exeter Oregon
Effectiveness: I was able to complete the task. 5 5
Efficiency: I was able to quickly complete the task. 5 5
Engagement: The website's layout made it easy to find what I
was looking for. 5 4
Error Tolerance: When I made errors, the website provided
useful feedback for correcting them. 1 1
Easy to learn: It was easy to learn how to complete the task. 5 5
For the University of Oregon, the user only needed to select Masters or PhD
program and the requirements were listed.
The scores for each website for task 4 are listed below.
Task: Find program requirements Exeter Oregon
Effectiveness: I was able to complete the task. 5 5
Efficiency: I was able to quickly complete the task. 4 5
Engagement: The website's layout made it easy to find what I
was looking for. 4 3
Error Tolerance: When I made errors, the website provided
useful feedback for correcting them. 1 1
Easy to learn: It was easy to learn how to complete the task. 4 5
Conclusion
Both the University of Exeter and the University of Oregon have websites that make it relatively
simple for the user to find and apply to a graduate program. The University of Exeter makes
finding information much easier by placing important information near the top of the page and
highlighting it with bright high contrast colors. The University of Oregon makes the application
process much easier by having an all-inclusive application process. Each of these websites would
do well to learn from the other.
11
Bibliography
University of Exeter. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2017. <http://www.exeter.ac.uk/>.
"University of Oregon." University of Oregon | University of Oregon. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Apr.
2017. <http://uoregon.edu/>.
12
Task: Discover the research that each faculty member does Exeter Oregon
13