Scavenger Hunt Website Evaluation

http://marinebio.org/oceans/marine-biology/

This website rates a 4 for a design above average because it loads quickly, there is good
organization, and no errors. It rates a 3 for navigability because the tabs for navigation links
were clearly labeled on the website. Marine Bio website rates a 4 for content because it is well
established and has clear content.

http://www.defenders.org/coral-reef/basic-facts

This website rates a 4 for design because it loads quickly, has no errors, and good
organization on the website. It rates a 3 on content because the data is adequate in content
and quality. It ranks a 4 in relevance because the website surpasses most objective
requirements for my questions and on the navigational tabs as well.

http://www.greatbarrierreef.org

This website rates a 3 in design because the organization is acceptable with no errors. It rates a
3 for content because the information on the site is adequate but it also contains information
for vacationers as well. It rates a 3 in links because it offers links relating to the Great Barrier
Reef. It rates a 4 in navigability because the navigation links are clear.

http://www.dolphins-world.com/types-of-dolphins/

This website rates a 5 in navigability because navigation links are clear and precise. It
contains a sight map and a search engine. It rates a 5 in content due to the excellent complete
coverage of the topic on the website. It rates a 4 in relevance due to the site obtaining most
objective requirements.

http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/

This website ranks a 4 in links because the site offers many reliable links that locate you to
more information on a specific topic. It rates a 3 in dates because this website contains
updated information dates. It rates a 4 in design due to no errors, good organization and it
loads quickly.

http://www.sciencekids.co.nz/sciencefacts/careers/marinebiologist.html

This website ranks a 3 in design because it is organized, has no errors, and loads adequately
but could have better organization. The website rates a 2 in content because the quality of
data is adequate for the question asked but there is only so much information.