Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • 10-07-22 Galdjie V Darwish (B163970) - California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - Pretense Appeal #1 S

    Загружено:

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    112 просмотров11 страниц
    10-07-22 Complaint for Public Corruption and racketeering against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, RE: Conduct of pretense appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – alleged real estate fraud and racketeering by the LA Superior Court. Executive Summary Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights. Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal. Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”. Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding Comments 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…” 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing Receiver. The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third - voluntarily dismissed. California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order. Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed: a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002. b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all. c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District Appeal # “Judgment Date” * Notice of Appeal Trial Court Judge California Court of Appeal Justices Disposition 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, DanielVogel, Charles (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinalSigned Published113 Cal.App.4th 1331 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, DanielEpstein, Norman (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinal 3 B191327 04/26/06 05/18/06 Segal, John None Listed Volunta

    Оригинальное название

    10-07-22 Galdjie v Darwish (B163970) - California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - Pretense Appeal #1 s

    Авторское право

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Доступные форматы

    PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    10-07-22 Complaint for Public Corruption and racketeering against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, RE: Conduct of pretense appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – alleged real estate fraud and racketeering by the LA Superior Court. Executive Summary Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights. Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal. Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”. Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding Comments 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…” 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing Receiver. The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third - voluntarily dismissed. California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order. Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed: a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002. b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all. c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District Appeal # “Judgment Date” * Notice of Appeal Trial Court Judge California Court of Appeal Justices Disposition 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, DanielVogel, Charles (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinalSigned Published113 Cal.App.4th 1331 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, DanielEpstein, Norman (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinal 3 B191327 04/26/06 05/18/06 Segal, John None Listed Volunta

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    112 просмотров11 страниц

    10-07-22 Galdjie V Darwish (B163970) - California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - Pretense Appeal #1 S

    Загружено:

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    10-07-22 Complaint for Public Corruption and racketeering against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, RE: Conduct of pretense appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – alleged real estate fraud and racketeering by the LA Superior Court. Executive Summary Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights. Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal. Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”. Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding Comments 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…” 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing Receiver. The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third - voluntarily dismissed. California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order. Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed: a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002. b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all. c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District Appeal # “Judgment Date” * Notice of Appeal Trial Court Judge California Court of Appeal Justices Disposition 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, DanielVogel, Charles (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinalSigned Published113 Cal.App.4th 1331 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, DanielEpstein, Norman (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinal 3 B191327 04/26/06 05/18/06 Segal, John None Listed Volunta

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 11

    Digitally signed

    by Joseph Zernik
    Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
    Zernik, o, ou,
    PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@
    Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net earthlink.net,
    c=US
    Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2010.07.22
    Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert 14:57:27 +03'00'

    10-07-22 Galdjie v Darwish (B163970) – pretense Appeal at the California Court of


    Appeals, 2nd District – records from the online public access system.

    TOC
    Executive Summary of Complaint filed with US Attorney Office.
    1. Case Summary
    2. Trial Court
    3. Parties and Attorneys
    4. Docket (Register of Actions)
    5. Schedule
    6. Briefs
    7. Disposition
    Executive Summary 1
    Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert
    (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging
    public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish
    (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and
    racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court.
    Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of
    Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer
    Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public
    corruption and deprivation of rights.
    Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk
    colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and
    racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on
    the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge”
    conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a
    declaration that it was Judge John Segal.
    Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner
    required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”.
    Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los
    Angeles Superior Court
    Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Comments
    Proceeding
    1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment.
    “As to the first cause of action, the court
    enters judgment in favor of defendants and
    against plaintiff…”
    2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing
    Receiver.

    1
    For ease of access to the hyperlinks provided in instant complaint, an online copy was also posted online at:
    z Page 2/2 July 22, 2010 TOC

    The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third
    - voluntarily dismissed.
    California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when
    Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order.
    Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed:
    a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither
    proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as
    December 19, 2002.
    b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all.
    c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or
    filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow”
    nd
    Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2
    District
    Appeal # “Judgment Notice of Trial Court California Court of Appeal Disposition
    Date” * Appeal Judge Justices
    1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, Daniel Affirmed in full
    Vogel, Charles (Concur) Final
    Hastings, J. (Concur) Signed Published
    113 Cal.App.4th 1331
    2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, Daniel Affirmed in full
    Epstein, Norman (Concur) Final
    Hastings, J. (Concur)
    3 B191327 04/26/06 05/18/06 Segal, John None Listed Voluntary dismissal
    Final
    * The public access system of the California Court of Appeal does not list any Dates of Entry of Judgments
    The complaint alleged that the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, in the conducted such pretense appeals committed
    numerous serious violations of the law.
    The complaint further alleged that the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, through a series of decisions over more
    than a decade colluded with the Los Angeles Superior Court in ambiguation of both entry of judgment and notice of entry
    of judgment.
    The complaint further alleged that in such pretense appeals, the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, joined forces with
    the Los Angeles Superior Court in efforts to establish “oral modifications of real estate contracts” as permitted by law.
    Los Angeles County was distinguished already in the early 2000s in FBI reports as “ the epicenter of the epidemic of real
    estate and mortgage fraud”. The complaint alleged that the courts themselves were central in propelling the County to
    such distinction.
    The complaint further noted that the online public access system of the California Courts of Appeals failed to include any
    registration of the Dates of Entry of Judgments. Therefore, the online public access system was alleged as the enabling
    tool for racketeering by collusion of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District.
    The complaint against the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, was copied to the United Nations and the US State
    Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses
    by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and
    report are scheduled for November 2010.
    Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the
    justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special
    emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of
    integrity of the justice system in the United States.
    _______________
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Case Summary
    Trial Court Case: SC052737
    Court of Appeal Case: B163970
    Division: 4
    Case Caption: Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Case Type:
    Filing Date: 12/19/2002
    Oral Argument Date/Time: 10/20/2003 09:00 AM

    Cross Referenced Cases


    B179667 Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    B191327 Galdjie v. Darwish et al.

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/…/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dis… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Trial Court
    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B163970
    Trial Court Name: Los Angeles County Superior Court
    County: Los Angeles
    Trial Court Case Number: SC052737
    Trial Court Judge: Segal, John
    Trial Court Judgment Date: 09/05/2002

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/trialCourt.cfm?… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Parties and Attorneys


    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B163970
    Party Attorney
    Galdjie, Manouchehr : Plaintiff and G. Richard Green
    Respondent Green & Marker
    1925 Century Park East
    Suite 1750
    Los Angeles, CA 90067

    Darwish, David : Defendant and Appellant Mitchel J. Ezer


    Ezer Williamson & Brown
    1888 Century Park East
    Suite 1550
    Los Angeles, CA 90067-1720

    Darwish, Barbara Kramar : Defendant Mitchel J. Ezer


    and Appellant Ezer Williamson & Brown
    1888 Century Park East
    Suite 1550
    Los Angeles, CA 90067-1720

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/…/partiesAndAttorneys.cfm… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Docket (Register of Actions)


    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B163970
    Date Description Notes
    01/06/2003 Notice of appeal n/a 12/19/02 David Darwish, et al.
    lodged/received.
    01/16/2003 Civil case information
    statement filed.
    04/22/2003 Record on appeal filed. C-1, R-2/See event #130 re: Clerk's
    transcript is to be ignored.
    Applts. appendix is to used instead.
    04/30/2003 Requested - extension of time Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Darwish, Barbara
    Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Darwish, David
    05/01/2003 Granted - extension of time. Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Darwish, Barbara
    Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Darwish, David
    06/20/2003 Appellant's opening brief. Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Darwish, Barbara
    Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Darwish, David
    06/23/2003 Returned document for non- Appellant's appendix.
    conformance. (Appellant must file motion to aug. to
    include add'l documents)
    06/30/2003 Motion/application to augment by appellant, documents submitted
    record filed. along with motion in one vol.
    07/18/2003 Augmentation granted. (See Applts./to include 1 vol. of applts.
    order.) appendix/Applts. have requested
    to ignore the clerk's transcript filed 4-
    22-03.
    07/23/2003 Respondent notified pursuant
    to rule 17(a)(2) or 37(b).
    07/24/2003 Respondent's brief. Attorney: Green, G.
    Party: Galdjie, Manouchehr
    08/06/2003 Appellant's reply brief. Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    …ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?d… 1/2
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…
    Party: Darwish, Barbara
    Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Darwish, David
    08/07/2003 Case fully briefed.
    10/20/2003 Cause argued and submitted.
    12/04/2003 Opinion filed.
    12/19/2003 Rehearing petition filed. by appellants.
    12/23/2003 Filed letter from: Miller Starr & Regalia dated 12/16/03
    re: request for modification
    of opinion
    12/23/2003 Mod. of opinion filed (no and denial of petition for rehearing
    change in judgment).
    02/05/2004 Remittitur issued.
    02/05/2004 Case complete.
    12/10/2007 Record in Box # 360390114
    08/06/2008 Shipped to state retention 12/10/src # 1161948
    center, box # / list #:

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?d… 2/2
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Future Scheduled Actions


    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B163970

    No information found.

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/…/scheduledActions.cfm?di… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Briefs
    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B163970
    Due Date Party and
    Brief Notes
    Date Filed Attorney
    Appellant's 06/20/2003 Defendant and Appellant: Darwish, Attorney:
    opening brief. David Ezer,
    Mitchel
    Attorney: Mitchel J. Ezer Defendant Party:
    and Appellant: Darwish, Barbara Darwish,
    Kramar Barbara
    Attorney:
    Attorney: Mitchel J. Ezer Ezer,
    Mitchel
    Party:
    Darwish,
    David

    Respondent's 07/24/2003 Plaintiff and Respondent: Galdjie, Attorney:


    brief. Manouchehr Green, G.
    Party:
    Attorney: G. Richard Green Galdjie,
    Manouchehr

    Appellant's 08/06/2003 Defendant and Appellant: Darwish, Attorney:


    reply brief. David Ezer,
    Mitchel
    Attorney: Mitchel J. Ezer Defendant Party:
    and Appellant: Darwish, Barbara Darwish,
    Kramar Barbara
    Attorney:
    Attorney: Mitchel J. Ezer Ezer,
    Mitchel
    Party:
    Darwish,
    David

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/briefing.cfm?d… 1/2
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    …ca.gov/search/case/briefing.cfm?d… 2/2
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Disposition
    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B163970
    Description: Affirmed in full
    Date: 12/04/2003
    Status: Final
    Publication Status: Signed Published
    Author: Curry, Daniel
    Participants: Vogel, Charles (Concur)
    Hastings, J. (Concur)
    Case Citation: 113 Cal.App.4th 1331

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/disposition.cf… 1/1

    Вам также может понравиться