Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lindie Fredericks
#1(5)
The author Leora Tanenbaum, who writes articles about social issues for the Huffington Post, is
addressing the different experiences men and women have when it comes to expressing their
sexuality. The word for this is slut-shaming. Girl or women slut-shaming happens to all ages. It is
a complete double standard because men/boys can do the exact same thing and get congratulated
for their actions while girls are shamed. It is becoming more of an issue because of the increasing
number of suicides happening because of it. Slut-shaming is a form of sexual assault and once a
girl is called names like ho or slut she is automatically subjected to that. She accounts of a story
of a woman who was raped and her experience. in 2013 was vilified by strangers and peers on
Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube; they could make sense of the horrible crime only by
assigning the drunken slut label to the victim.(Tanenbaum). It doesnt even have to be a
sexual thing done by a woman to trigger forceful and rude comments from others. The author
recalls a story that has to do with that as well. All in all slut-shaming is less about actual sexual
activities and more about men asserting themselves and being dominant because apparently
women cant.
This articles seems like a really reliable source to speak on slut-shaming. The author does
a good job of stating facts, stating popular opinion, and showing why that isnt right. It might be
a little biased because the author is a women and it barely touches on others opinions but I think
because she does touch on them it is good. The source is well documented and written. It is more
popular because slut-shaming is really prominent these days because of social media like
instagram and snapchat.A quote I really like from the article was, A number of teenage girls
and young women Ive spoken with have referred to themselves as sluts to indicate they were
comfortable with their sexuality trying to wrest control over the term for
themselves(Tanenbaum).
This information can help my essay because it gives great examples and shows
how this is something that only women face.It is well balanced between opinion and
facts. You obviously know her view of it all but it doesnt seem forces of you. This source
will be good for examples and a good starting point for the topic of slut-shaming.
#2(1)
The book Gender: The Basics by Hilary M. Lips who is a famous writer in
London.The book talks about the impact of cultural, historical, biological, psychological
and economic forces on the qualities which have come to be defined as masculine or
feminine in particular contexts. The writer really tries to focus on the fact that gender is
more than a biological difference, especially in society. Some examples of this are
gender-related violence, public health, or even the aging process. In the 2nd chapter
differences between women and men have consequences(Lips). This quote was at the
beginning of the chapter just to set the tone of what the chapter will be about.
Stereotypes are such a pervasive part of our social environment that often we dont even
see them as stereotypes, but rather as the way things are(Lips).This resonated with me
because of how true it is. The book gives examples and different experiments people have
done to prove gender stereotypes. For example two sociologists, Parsons and Bales,
surveyed a group of people from 25 countries and 75% of them associated six
and 3 adjectives (sentimental, submissive, superstitious) with women. Lips also speaks on
stereotypes done in it. I wouldnt consider this book to be biased at all because it is very
fact based and truthful not many opinions included.The source is well documented and
written. It is popular but also informative because the struggle women go through to be
equal is a day to day thing. A quote that I liked was It is commonly thought that
stereotypes contain a grain of truth. I like it because people like to use stereotypes and
say there must be some truth to them if theyre a stereotype but this is not true. Not every
This information can help my essay because it gives great examples and shows how this
is something that only women face.It is well developed and integrates facts and
experiments . The opinion of the author isn't clear which is a good thing. This source will
Sanday, Peggy Reeves. Female Power and Male Dominance: On the Origins of Sexual
This book was written by professor Peggy Sanday and she describes an extraordinary
examination of power and dominance between males and females. Also talks about the
origin of society's outlook on interaction between the sexes. She asks questions like,
Why do some societys clothe sacred symbols of creative power in the guise of one sex
and not of the other?(Reeves). After going over the different cultural issues society is
puzzled over professor Sanday offers her own solutions by using cross cultural research
(done on over 150 tribal societies). Using a specific system she describes the differences
in male and female power role and then things that can help explain this variation. Not
accepting the generalization of females being subordinate she states that, male
dominance is not inherent in human relations but is a solution to various kinds of cultural
strains.(Reeves).
Quote: Those who are thought to embody, be in touch with, or control the creative forces
of nature are perceived as powerful This is very powerful because of how true it is. The
idea of power cant be assigned to a gender it is more about the individual. Power and
dominance in a group of people doesnt deal with gender either but a peoples adaptation
and stress in an environment. She shows this with different case studies of the effects of
European migration, colonialism, and food stress. Also it is supported by the abundance
connections sexual inequality can stem from. I wouldnt consider this book to be biased
at all because it is very fact based and truthful not many opinions included.The source is
well documented and written, including graphs and different case studies to back up
made.The author does a good job of making this a book without an expiration date.
This information can help my essay because it makes great connections to history and
cause and effect of environments on people help the argument it is making . The opinion
of the author isn't clear which is a good thing. This source will be good for evidence of
Taylor, M. G. (1996). The development of children's beliefs about social and biological
Taylor, Marianne G. is the author of this journal titled Child development. She is an
author of many other scholarly journals some similar to this one. Marianne started with
two studies that display a child's belief of gender roles and their origin. The studies lead
to two significant questions that she asked. The questions were, (1) What age-related
changes are there in children's beliefs about the contributions of nature & nurture to the
development of gender roles? & (2) Do children differentiate between aspects of gender
The first Study , 160 children (4-10) & 32 adults from Ann Arbor, MI,were shown picture
sets & asked to answer a series of questions from a questionnaire about a child's view of
gender roles depending on their upbringing or other variables. Up until age 9/10, kids
think the gender-stereotypes they associate with gender roles develop in children as
young as infant no matter what. The 2nd study they took 24 children ,age 4, they partook
in very similar tasks as the last study. This was different stereotypes, gender-
cases, are biased and to them gender categories as predictive of necessary , hidden gender
similarities, but then start to realise the importance of other mechanisms to shape how
question because it speaks on how gender stereotypes are just encrypted in your mind
from such a young age. Media does have a hand in it but it is also just something that is
there at a very young age. The source might help other pursuing child psychology. The
authors stance doesnt seem biased at all it is a very clear professionally written article.
#5
Kulik, L. (1995). The impact of ethnic origin and gender on perceptions of gender roles:
The israeli experience. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 199-214.
Retrieved from
Liat Kulik, the author of this journal and the whole Journal of Social Behavior and
gender culture has a greater impact on attitudes toward gender roles & sex-typing of
occupations, drawing on questionnaire data from 92 Israelis & 104 immigrants from the
former USSR enrolled in Israeli universities (Kulik). After doing the testing they found
that the Israeli students feelings towards gender roles were liberal compared to the
immigrants feelings. Also, the Israelis correlated a lot of jobs as feminine. It was also
found that females were more liberal when it came to gender roles and were more likely
to correlate higher position jobs with females. It was found that, in the process of
cultural transition, ethnic culture has a greater impact on work attitudes than gender
culture(Kulik).
The target audience is a student, scholar, or someone researching social behavior and
the how gender stereotypes and roles affect a community's. Also shows how different
types of people respond to gender roles. The source would really help someone who is
specifically interested in social behaviors and personalities. I dont feel as though it is
biased at all. It is quite informative. The source will be good to show gender roles affect
on the world and not just America. I dont know how much of this source will be in my
Ria Chinchankar, the speaker in this TED Talk, starts the talk off with an activity asking the
audience adjectives that they associate with women versus men. Also she asked what makes an
ideal man or women. The audience answered stereotypical answers. She then goes on to talk
about different experiments that have been done on this topic. A study from Princeton University
found that these stereotypes have a higher impact on people than originally thought. The study
says that stereotypes create set roles in our minds which then creates gender roles people feel like
they have to stay in. This can contribute to something called a stereotype threat which is, the
fear of proving stereotypes about yourself correct(TEDxTalks). Stereotype threats affect people
who feel as though they are expected to perform badly. The university of Chicago did a study on
the stereotype threat and found that people who are associated with stereotypes and do tasks that
are associated with stereotypes the stereotype takes up memory space in the brain leaving less
space to complete the task. Other universities like Stanford and the University of Washington did
Gender stereotypes/roles lead to industries taking advantage of this. She talked about nursing and
how it is a female dominated field because females are seen as caretakers, kinds, etc. How
industrys promote things to people is very gender focused. An example is the computer science.
Although women were pioneers in the field because of media and industry the field was guided
more towards men. She even goes into how gender roles can be traced back as far as Aristotle
and Plato. They are quoted to say things like, the relation of male to female is by nature a
relation of superior to inferior and ruler to ruled, and, the man who acquits himself well in war
should be given more liberal opportunities to sleep with a wife(TEDxTalks). The idea of gender
roles and stereotypes arent new but she came up with 3 steps for society to move on. The steps
are, step 1 change your mindset , view men as people view women as people, teach your
children all the skills that they need to know to survive , and step three to establishing a new
Quote:
gender equality is more than a goal in itself it's a precondition for reducing poverty sustainable
development and building good governance
The target audience is students, and people who listen to TED talks. The source applies to my
source because it is talking about all the different ways the world is affected by gender roles.
Also it introduced me to the term stereotype threats that is a serious thing that subconsciously
affects peoples performance. The source will help with a lot of examples and references that
show the effects of stereotypes. It wasnt a biased source specifically because it touches on
negative stereotypes on men and not just woman which is something my paper will need.
#7
The author is Curt Hoffman, a scholarly article writer. He proposed that gender stereotypes
began to split up the sexes in different social roles. An experiment took two fictional categories
together. One had 80% city workers and 20% child raisers and the other experiment having
the roles reversed. Later on , to add some depth to the experiment, they added personality to each
category and subgroup. It was found that, Stronger stereotypes arose when the categories were
biologically defined or when Ss attempted to explain the categoryrole correlation. The basic
effect was replicated using roles that are not differentially linked to familiar human
groups.(Pardon Our Interruption). The experiments show that stereotypes can occur only when
The target audience for the scholarly article can be students, teachers, scholars, or just people
that want a new perspective on gender roles. I particularly chose this source for the contrasting
views. Most of my other sources just show what gender stereotypes are and how theyre bad ect.
This source in a way shows an experiment that reveals that maybe gender roles are necessary for
the world to go round. Just like me this can help others with a different perspective. I dont feel a
biased approach in the paper it seems very straightforward and clearly about the facts.