Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I teach in a small school, with seventy students and about twelve full time
teachers. The teachers run the school and create curricula as a cooperative
venture. One of the important decisions we have taken is that we will not
have any tests or examinations till the students appear for their recognized
certificate at the end of Class 10 or Class 12. No class tests, no surprise
quizzes, no midterm exams, no final exams, nothing! What exactly does this
mean? Our students do class work and homework assignments which are
corrected and for which feedback is given, and we do use tick marks and
crosses, and red pens like in any other school. But the important difference is
that no qualitative or quantitative ranking system is used. We do not give the
students any convenient handle with which to compare themselves with
each other.
This central aspect of our educational philosophy raises many questions, and
in this article I will try to address them to the best of my ability. However,
there is one valid question that I always find difficult to answer, and I will
mention it at the start. The reader could always say, well, yours is a small,
alternative school and what you do is not replicable in my classroom or in my
school. True enough. But the insights into learning that form the basis of our
decisions are also real and true. In fact, over the years, people have often
told us that understanding our reasons for doing things in a particular way
helps them clarify their own thinking about education. And who knows where
that may lead?
He may slack off, not work hard, and make it obvious that he did not
work. Then when he does not perform well, it can always be explained
away as I never worked anyway. This interesting phenomenon is
called self-handicapping and it is surprisingly common among bright
students who dont want to appear to be losers. They fear that even if
they work hard, they may not come out on top. So the best strategy
to save face is to slack off.
He might even resort to cheating or copying answers.
These three outcomes are clearly undesirable. But at an even more basic
level, as we all know, tests create anxiety in students. Not only is anxiety
completely superfluous to the learning process, it can actually cause damage
to those parts of the brain which are concerned with memory and learning. In
most school systems in India, performance testing is almost a constant factor
of the school year. Psychological research has clearly shown that chronic
stress has permanent effects on our ability to learn new things. At CFL, we
looked at our educational intentions, and we realized that we wanted our
students to love learning and enjoy it because it is inherently rewarding. We
did not want them to develop a blinkered focus on performance and
outcomes, and we certainly did not want to make anxiety the dominant
emotion in their lives. So we made a conscious decision that we would not
subject them to comparative evaluationand several challenges
immediately arose. How would we evaluate students understanding, for the
purposes of feedback? How would we report a students grasp and level of
mastery of a subject, to the parents or to other teachers? How would we
motivate students to work hard, if not to aim for high marks or avoid low
marks.