Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ethylene Glycol
SIEGFRIED REBSDAT, Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Gendorf, Federal Republic
of Germany
DIETER MAYER, Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt, Federal Republic of Germany
1,3-Dioxolanes can also be formed from industrially since these homologues are formed
ethylene glycol by transacetalization. Examples as byproducts during the production of ethylene
are the reactions of ethylene glycol with ortho- glycol (cf. Section 4.1.1).
formates [11]:
mixture is preheated to ca. 200 C, whereby the approximation for the reaction without a catalyst.
ethylene oxide is converted to ethylene glycol. Thus, in practice almost 90 % of the ethylene
Di-, tri-, tetra-, and polyethylene glycols are also oxide can be converted to monoethylene glycol,
produced, but with respectively decreasing the remaining 10 % reacts to form higher homo-
yields (see also Chap. 3). logues:
The formation of these higher homologues is
inevitable because ethlyene oxide reacts with
ethylene glycols more quickly than with water;
their yields can, however, be minimized if an
excess of water is used a 20-fold molar excess is
usually employed. Figure 7 shows the composi-
tion of the resulting product mixture as a function
of the ratio of water to ethylene oxide. Although
the values were determined by using sulfuric acid After leaving the reactor, the product mix-
as a catalyst [17], they also apply as a good ture is purified by passing it through successive
distillation columns with decreasing pressures.
Water is first removed and returned to the
reactor, the mono-, di-, and triethylene glycols
are then separated by vacuum distillation. The
yield of tetraethylene glycol is too low to
warrant separate isolation. The heat liberated
in the reactor is used to heat the distillation
columns. A side stream must be provided to
prevent the accumulation of secondary pro-
ducts, especially small amounts of aldehydes,
which are produced during hydrolysis. The
shape of the reactor affects the selectivity
of the reaction. Plug-flow reactors are superior
to both agitator-stirred tanks and column
reactors [18].
importance. It is simple, but has some major double the molar quantity of water is required for
drawbacks: this reaction.
A more recently developed catalyst system is In recent years, increasing attention has been
based on the use of Pd(II) complexes [31]. A paid to Pd(II) systems as catalysts for the direct
mixture of PdCl2, LiCl, and NaNO3 in acetic oxidation of ethylene to ethylene glycol. In spite
acid and acetic anhydride has been shown to of the widespread interest in this alternative,
give a 95 % selectivity for glycol monoacetate industrial applications have yet to be realized.
and glycol diacetate formation (60 100 C,
3.04 MPa) [32]. During this process, Pd(II) is
reduced to Pd(0). The precipitation of Pd(0) is 4.2.2. Synthesis from C1 Units
prevented because it is reoxidized to Pd(II) by
the nitrate ions. The available oxygen finally The long-term shortage and increased price of
regenerates the nitrate, thus providing a com- crude oil have led to an intensive search for
plete catalytic system. methods of producing organic intermediates
The formation of ethylene glycol monoacetate from C1 units (i.e., methods based on coal). Many
[542-59-6] (50 % yield) and ethylene glycol dia- publications have appeared on the synthesis of
cetate [111-55-7] (7 % yield) has also been in- ethylene glycol by this approach. Only the most
vestigated using the catalyst system PdCl important methods that rely on synthesis gas or
NO2 CH3CN dissolved in acetic acid. Studies carbon monoxide [630-08-0] are discussed here;
with radioactive isotopes showed that the NO2 they are summarized in Figure 8.
functions as an oxidizing agent [33]. Vinyl ace- At a high pressure, carbon monoxide and
tate is formed as a byproduct (20 % yield). How- hydrogen react directly to produce ethylene gly-
ever, the catalytic action of this system is quickly col [35, 36]. However, the reaction is slow and
exhausted due to the precipitation of palladium the catalyst is both sensitive and expensive [37].
compounds. Other methods involve the formation of formal-
If a PdCl2 CuCl2 CuOCOCH3 system is dehyde [50-00-0], methanol [67-56-1] [38], or
used, the reaction proceeds under mild condi- esters of oxalic acid [144-62-7] as intermediates
tions (65 C, 0.5 MPa) without the formation of [37, 39]. The only method to attain industrial
a precipitate; a yield of over 90 % is obtained importance was that employed by Du Pont from
[34]. 1940 to 1963, which used formaldehyde and
Figure 8. Production of ethylene glycol from carbon monoxide (percentages indicate approximate yields)
538 Ethylene Glycol Vol. 13
glycolic acid [79-14-1] as intermediates. High [45]. The UV absorption of fiber-grade glycol is
operating pressure and temperature were re- often used as an additional parameter for quality
quired, however (48 MPa, 220 C). This process control.
was significantly improved by the introduction of Gas chromatography is commonly used for
hydrogen fluoride [7664-39-3] as a catalyst (1 the quantitative determination of ethylene gly-
2 MPa, 60 C) [40]. col. Monoethylene glycol can be detected by
At the present time, none of the described oxidation with periodic acid even if di- and
methods based on C1 units can compete with the triethylene glycols are also present; however,
ethylene ! ethylene oxide ! glycol pathway. aldehydes, glycerol, and monopropylene glycol
However, if crude oil prices increase, the synthe- falsify the results [4].
sis of ethylene glycol from C1 units will become
more economically attractive [41].
7. Storage and Transportation
5. Environmental Protection and
Pure anhydrous ethylene glycol is not aggressive
Ecology toward most metals and plastics. Since ethylene
glycol also has a low vapor pressure and is
Ethylene glycol is readily biodegradable [42]; noncaustic, it can be handled without any prob-
thus, disposal of wastewater containing this com- lems; it is transported in railroad tank cars, tank
pound can proceed without major problems. The trucks, and tank ships. Tanks are usually made of
high LC50 values of over 10 000 mg/L [43, 44] steel; high-grade materials are only required for
account for its low water toxicity: LC50 crayfish special quality requirements. Nitrogen blanket-
(Procambarus) 91 000 mg/L, LC50 fish (Lepo- ing can protect ethylene glycol against oxidation.
mis macrochirus) 27 540 mg/L. At ambient temperatures, aluminum is resis-
tant to pure glycol. Corrosion occurs, however,
6. Quality Specifications and Analysis above 100 C and hydrogen is evolved. Water,
air, and acid-producing impurities (aldehydes)
Since ethylene glycol is produced in relatively accelerate this reaction. Great care should be
high purity, differences in quality are not ex- taken when phenolic resins are involved, since
pected. The directly synthesized product meets they are not resistant to ethylene glycol.
high quality demands (fiber grade). The eth-
ylene glycol produced in the wash water that is
used during ethylene oxide production is normal- 8. Derivatives
ly of a somewhat inferior quality (antifreeze
grade). The quality specifications for mono-, di-, Only the most important of the many derivatives
and triethylene glycols are compiled in Table 2 of ethylene glycol will be discussed in this sec-
Table 3. Physical properties of mono-, di-, tri-, and tetraethylene glycols [4, 5, 46]
tion, namely di-, tri-, and polyethylene glycols, with the appropriate alcohol. A mixture of homo-
the methyl, ethyl, and butyl glycol ethers and the logues is obtained, all displaying the following
acetate esters. general structure:
RO(CH2CH2O)nH
8.1. Di-, Tri-, Tetra-, and Polyethylene
Glycols The glycol monoethers can be converted to
diethers by alkylation with common alkylating
The higher homologues of ethylene glycol are agents, such as dimethyl sulfate or alkyl halides
formed as byproducts during the synthesis of (Williamson synthesis). Glycol dimethyl ethers
ethylene oxide and monoethylene glycol or are are formed by treatment of dimethyl ether with
prepared directly by reacting monoethylene ethylene oxide [48]. The properties of some
glycol with ethylene oxide. Di-, tri-, and possi- ethylene glycol mono- and diethers are shown
bly tetraethylene glycol can be purified by dis- in Tables 5 and 6, respectively; they are mainly
tillation. For quality specifications of these used as solvents.
compounds, see Table 2; Table 3 shows some
of their physical properties. The temperature Esters. Ethylene glycol esters are produced
dependence of the thermal conductivity, den- from reaction of ethylene oxide and an appropri-
sity, viscosity, and Prandtl numbers of di- and ate acid and are used also as solvents. Use of a
triethylene glycol water mixtures is described suitable catalyst can influence the outcome of the
in [46].
Poly(ethylene glycols) (PEG) [25322-68-3]
are produced as mixtures of higher molecular Table 4. Physical properties of poly(ethylene glycols) [49]
mass homologues (see also ! Polyoxyalky- Poly(ethylene fp, C Refractive Viscosity,
lenes) and are characterized by their mean mo- glycol), index, mPa s*
lecular masses (e.g., PEG 400). Physical proper- mean Mr n70
D
ties of some poly(ethylene glycol) mixtures are 200 ca. 50 1.458 (25 C) 60 70 (100 %)
listed in Table 4. 600 17 22 1.452 16 19
1000 35 40 1.453 24 29
2000 48 52 1.454 50 60
10 000 55 60 1.456 530 1000
8.2. Ethers and Esters 20 000 ca. 60 1.456 2700 3500
35 000 ca. 60 1.456 11 000 14 000
Ethers. Ethylene glycol monoethers are *
Values refer to a 50 wt % aqueous poly(ethylene glycol) solution
usually produced by reaction of ethylene oxide except where otherwise stated.
540 Ethylene Glycol Vol. 13
Table 5. Physical properties of some ethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers, RO(CH2CH2O)nH [4, 5]
R n CAS Mr fp, C bp Density Refractive Specific heat Vapor Flash point, Ignition Explosive
registry (101.3 kPa), (20 C), index, n20
D (20 C), pressure
C temperature, limits,
number
C kg/m3 J g1 K1 (20 C), Pa
C vol %
CH3 1 [109-86-4] 76.094 85.1 124.50 964.6 1.4024 2.24 930 38 285 2.4 20.6
C2H5 1 [110-80-5] 90.120 100.0 135.10 929.7 1.4079 2.32 530 40 215 1.8 15.7
C4H9 1 [111-76-2] 118.172 70.4 171.20 900.8 1.4194 2.44 80 66 225 1.1 10.6
CH3 2 [111-77-3] 120.146 50.0 194.10 1021.0 1.4265 2.15 24 90 215 1.6 16.1
C2H5 2 [111-90-0] 134.172 54.0 201.90 989.0 1.4275 2.31 17 93 190 1.8 12.2
C4H9 2 [112-34-5] 162.224 68.1 230.60 953.0 1.4316 2.29 4 99 195 0.7 5.9
CH3 3 [112-35-6] 164.198 38.2 249.00 1047.5 1.4381 2.18 118
C2H5 3 [112-50-5] 178.224 18.7 255.50 1020.0 1.4380 2.17 (15 C) 0.4 195
Table 6. Physical properties of some ethylene glycol dialkyl ethers RO(CH2CH2O)n-R [2, 4, 50]
R n CAS Mr fp, C bp Density Refractive Specific heat Vapor Flash point, Ignition Lower
registry (101.3 kPa), (20 C), index, n20
D (20 C), pressure
C temperature, explosive
number
C kg/m3 J g1 K1 (20 C), Pa
C limit,
vol %
CH3 1 [110-71-4] 90.120 58.0 85.2 867.0 1.3796 8100.0 6 200 1.6
C2H5 1 [629-14-1] 118.172 74.0 121.4 841.0 1.3920 1250.0 35 205
C4H9 1 [112-48-1] 174.276 69.1 203.6 836.0 1.4131 2.01 27.0 85
CH3 2 [111-96-6] 134.172 64.0 163.0 944.0 1.4078 2.04 267.0 51 1.4
C2H5 2 [112-36-7] 162.224 44.3 188.4 906.6 1.4115 2.10 (15 C) 51.0 82
C4H9 2 [112-73-2] 218.328 60.2 254.6 883.8 1.4233 1.80 (13 C) 1.3 118
CH3 3 [112-35-6] 178.224 45.0 216.0 987.0 1.4233 120.0 113 195 0.7
Vol. 13 Ethylene Glycol 541
Table 7. Physical properties of some ethylene glycol acetates and ether acetates [4]
Ethylene glycol monoacetate [542-59-6] 104.10 80.0 182.0 1110 1.4209 102 7.8 27.7
Ethylene glycol diacetate [111-55-7] 146.10 31.0 190.5 1106 1.4159 105
Ethylene glycol methyl ether acetate [110-49-6] 118.13 65.1 145.0 1006 1.4019 410 49 1.7 8.2
Ethylene glycol ethyl ether acetate [111-15-9] 132.16 61.7 156.4 974 1.4058 390 54 3.18 10.1
Ethylene glycol butyl ether acetate [112-07-2] 160.21 63.5 192.3 942 1.4138 355 74 1.66 8.37
Diethylene glycol methyl ether acetate [629-38-9] 162.19 99.3 209.1 1041 1.4209 110
Diethylene glycol ethyl ether acetate [112-15-2] 176.21 25.0 217.4 1011 1.4213 112
Diethylene glycol butyl ether acetate [124-17-4] 204.26 32.2 246.7 981 1.4262 290 116
Ethylene glycol is also a commercially im- agents), and in ceramics (e.g., bonding agents
portant raw material for the manufacture of and plasticizers) [57].
polyester fibers, chiefly poly(ethylene tere-
phthalate) (! Fibers, 4. Synthetic Organic).
This application consumes ca. 40 % of the total 10. Economic Aspects
ethylene glycol production. Polyesters are,
however, used for other purposes, e.g., for Ethylene glycol is one of the major products of
producing recyclable bottles (! Polyesters). the chemical industry. Its economic importance
Other minor uses of ethylene glycol are as a is founded on its two major commercial uses as
humectant (moisture-retaining agent), plasti- an antifreeze and for fiber production. Since
cizer, softener, hydraulic fluid, and solvent ethylene glycol is currently produced exclusively
[52]. from ethylene oxide (! Ethylene Oxide), pro-
duction plants are always located close to plants
Ethylene Glycol Derivatives, mainly the that produce ethylene oxide. The proportion
ethers and esters, are frequently employed as of ethylene oxide that is converted to glycol
reaction media, as absorption fluids, and as depends on the local conditions, such as transport
solvents for dyes, lacquers, and various cellulose facilities and the market situation. Almost all of
products (cellulose esters, ethers, and nitrocellu- the ethylene oxide produced in recently installed
lose) [53]. plants in Saudi Arabia is, for example, converted
to ethylene glycol because the domestic market
Diethylene Glycol serves as a solvent, soft- for ethylene oxide is negligible and because
ener (cork, adhesives, paper, etc.), dye additive ethylene glycol is easier to transport than ethyl-
(printing and stamping inks), deicing agent for ene oxide.
runways and aircraft [54], and a drying agent for Detailed information about the glycol capac-
gases (e.g., natural gas) [55]. ities of individual plants is difficult to obtain, but
an estimated 60 % of the total world production
Triethylene Glycol is used for the same of ethylene oxide is converted to ethylene
purposes as diethylene glycol (e.g., as a solvent, glycol. Therefore, the worldwide ethylene oxide
plasticizer, and drying agent for gases) [56]. production capacity of 8 106 t corresponds to
an annual ethylene glycol production of
Poly(ethylene Glycols) with varying mo- 6.7 106 t.
lecular masses find numerous uses in the phar- About 50 % of the ethylene glycol that is
maceutical industry (e.g., in ointments, liquids, produced is used in antifreeze. Another 40 % is
and tabletting) and the cosmetic industry (e.g., channeled into the fiber industry. Consequently,
creams, lotions, pastes, cosmetic sticks, and the ethylene glycol demand is closely connected
soaps). They are also used in the textile industry to the development of these two sectors. Surplus
(e.g., cleaning and dyeing aids), in the rubber capacities and growing competition for market
industry (e.g., lubricants and mold parting shares are expected on account of increasing
542 Ethylene Glycol Vol. 13
glycol capacities not only in Saudi Arabia, but Inhalation. The inhalative toxicity of an
also in the Eastern Bloc. Japan has already atmosphere saturated with ethylene glycol
reduced its glycol capacities considerably [58]. (0.5 mg/L) is low. Rats tolerated this concentra-
In view of the increasing price of crude oil, tion for four weeks without any permanent
alternative production methods based on synthe- injuries, only mild narcosis was observed [69].
sis gas hitherto still in the experimental phase No adverse effects were detected in rats,
are likely to become more important and increas- rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs, and monkeys exposed
ingly competitive. to an ethylene glycol concentration of 57 mg/L
for six weeks [70]. Monkeys survived after
inhaling concentrations of 600 mg/m3 adminis-
11. Toxicology and Occupational tered as an aerosol over a period of several
Health months.
Human volunteers exposed to maximal con-
11.1. Ethylene Glycol centrations of 67 mg/m3 for one month reported
some irritation of the nasal mucous membranes
Oral Toxicity. The oral LD50 values of and occasionally headache. The presence of eth-
ethylene glycol are 14 15 g/kg [59, 60] for ylene glycol in the inhaled atmosphere was per-
mice and ca. 8 g/kg [61] for rats. Oral toxicity in ceived at concentrations above 140 mg/m3 [71].
humans is higher, 1.4 g/kg can be lethal [59]. A concentration of 200 mg/m3 was found to be
In rats, long-term administration of ethylene intolerable [72]. Rats, rabbits, dogs, and mon-
glycol in food at concentrations of 10.0 and keys that inhaled pure oxygen containing
20.0 g/kg led to formation of bladder stones 100 mL/m3 of ethylene glycol at a pressure of
(calcium oxalate), damage to the renal tubules, 34.5 kPa for three weeks did not show any
and centrolobular fatty degeneration of the liver adverse effects apart from local irritation [73].
[62]. In other investigations, comparable changes
were already apparent at a concentration of 5.0 g/ Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity. Ethyl-
kg, no changes were observed at 2.0 g/kg [63]. ene glycol gives a negative result in the Ames
No changes were observed in the kidneys of test [74, 75]. Many studies have been
monkeys fed a diet providing a maximal daily performed on its carcinogenicity [64, 76, 77].
dose of 0.17 g/kg of body mass over a period of Rats were fed with diets containing ethylene
three years [64]. However, addition of ethylene glycol concentrations corresponding to 1000,
glycol to the drinking water given to monkeys at a 200, and 40 mg/kg of body mass; no carcino-
concentration corresponding to a daily dose of genic effects were observed. However, typical
0.24 g/kg of body mass led to the formation of formation of oxalate crystals in the kidneys and
oxalate crystals in the kidneys after about five other organs was found [78]. Similar experi-
months. Oxalate crystals were also formed in the ments did not increase the incidence of tumor
brains of monkeys given very high doses formation in mice [79].
(10 wt %) in drinking water [65].
Reproduction. In a study extending over
Eye and Skin Irritation. Introduction of a three generations, ethylene glycol was added to
single dose of ethylene glycol into the conjunc- the diet fed to rats at a concentration of 0.04, 0.2,
tival sac does not affect the rabbit eye [66], but and 1.0 g kg1 d1. The fertility and viability of
repeated administration leads to mild conjunc- the offspring were not affected by this treatment
tivitis [67]. Ethylene glycol vapor at a concen- [80].
tration of 17 mg/m3 produces ocular damage in Teratogenic effects were not detected in rats
humans [68]. No effects were observed in the receiving maximal feed concentrations of
eyes of monkeys exposed to a vapor concentra- 1000 mg/kg, only a mild fetal toxicity was ob-
tion of 265 mg/m3 [68]. served [81]. Teratogenic and fetotoxic effects
Ethylene glycol has not been shown to irritate were produced in mice and rats after administra-
mucous membranes. Repeated exposure of the tion of very high doses (1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 g/kg
skin to ethylene glycol can cause mild irritation, of body mass) in the form of a bolus with the aid
similar to that produced by glycerol. of an esophageal probe [82].
Vol. 13 Ethylene Glycol 543
Table 8. Toxicity data and exposure limits for ethylene glycols and ethylene glycol derivatives
Ethylene glycols
Monoethylene glycol 8 [61] 10 50
Diethylene glycol 20.8 [61] 10
Triethylene glycol 22.1 [61]
Tetraethylene glycol 30.8* [83, p. 3843]
Monoethylene glycol derivatives
Monomethyl ether 3.4 [84] 5 5
(methoxyethanol)
Monomethyl ether acetate 3.93 [61] 5 5
(methoxyethyl acetate)
Monoethyl ether 5.5 [84] 5 5
(ethoxyethanol)
Monoethyl ether acetate 5.1 [61] 5 5
(ethoxyethyl acetate)
Monobutyl ether 2.5 [84] 20 25
(butoxyethanol)
Monobutyl ether acetate 20
(butoxyethyl acetate)
*
mL/kg
544 Ethylene Glycol Vol. 13
the skin, pure poly(ethylene glycols) do not cause 25 UCC, PCT Int. Appl., WO 8 504 393, 1985 (B. T.
sensitization [98, 100, 101] and are nontoxic Keen). Nippon Shokubai Kagaku, BE 878 902, 1979
[98]. Poly(ethylene glycols) with a molecular (T. Kumarawa, T. Yamamoto, H. Odanaka).
26 UCC, PCT Int. Appl., WO 8 504 406, 1985 (J. Robert,
mass < 1000 are absorbed in the intestine and
J. H. Robson).
excreted in the urine and feces. Intestinal absorp- 27 Texaco, EP-A 0 123 709, 1983 (F. L. Jonson, L. W.
tion decreases markedly as the molecular mass Watts).
increases [102104]. 28 Mitsubishi Petrochem. KK, JP 6 0061545-A, 1983.
29 Halcon, DE-OS 3 321 448, 1983 (V. S. Bhise).
30 Halcon, DE-OS 2 757 067, 1977 (A. Peltzman).
31 A. Mitsutani, CEER Chem. Econ. Eng. Rev. 5 (1973)
References no. 3, 32 35.
32 E. J. Mistrik, A. Mateides, Chem. Tech. (Leipzig) 35
1 A. Wurtz, Ann. Chem. Pharm. 55 (1859) no. 3, 406. (1983) no. 2, 90 94.
2 G. O. Curme: Glycols, Rheinhold Publ. Co., New York 33 F. Mares, S. E. Diamond, F. J. Regina, J. P. Solar, J. Am.
1952. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) no. 12 , 3545 52.
3 J. Ariddick, B. Bunger: Techniques of Chemistry, 3rd 34 G. Lu, G. Huang, Y. Guo, R. Wang, Q. Bai, C. Li, H. Qi,
ed., vol. II, Wiley-Interscience, New York 1970, p. 198. Shiyou Huagong 14 (1985) no. 5, 262 266. Chem.
4 Ullmann, 4th ed., vol. 8, 200 210. Abstr. 104 (1986) 170513 c.
5 Kirk-Othmer, 9, 11, 933 956. 35 B. D. Dombek, Adv. Catal. 32 (1983) 325 416.
6 Merkblatt Losemittel Hoechst, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 36 S. Nowak, I. Eichhorn, I. Ohme, B. Lucke, Chem. Tech.
1984. (Leipzig) 36 (1984) no. 2, 55 57.
7 D. Bohne, S. Fischer, E. Obermeier, Ber. Bundesges. 37 J. Kollar, CHEMTECH 8 (1984) 504 511.
Phys. Chem. 88 (1984) 739 742. 38 J. B. Saundby, I. Chem. Symp. (1986) 133 166.
8 A. Nath, E. Bender, J. Chem. Eng. Data 28 (1983) no. 4, 39 S. Nowak, Chem. Tech. (Leipzig) 36 (1984) no. 4, 144
370 375. 146.
9 K. K. Sengupta, D. K. Khamrui, D. C. Mukherjee, Indian 40 Chevron, US 3 911 003, 1975 (S. Susuki).
J. Chem. 13 (1975) 348 351. I. Bhatia, K. K. Banerji, 41 A. Aquilo, J. S. Alder, D. N. Freeman, R. J. H. Voor-
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1983 no. 10, 1577 hoeue, Hydrocarbon Process. 62 (1983) no. 3, 57
1580. 65.
10 F. A. J. Meskens, Synthesis 7 (1981) 501 522. 42 J. Costa, J. Soley, J. Mata, J. Masides, Effluent Water
11 M. Ando, M. Ohhara, K. Takase, Chem. Lett. 6 (1986) Treat. J. 25 (1985) no. 12, 429 434. P. Schoberl,
879 882. Tenside Deterg. 23 (1986) no. 5, 255 266.
12 S. A. Miller: Ethylene and its Industrial Derivatives, 43 R. A. Conway, G. T. Waggy, M. H. Spiegel, R. L.
Ernest Benn Limited, London 1969. Berglund, Environ. Sci. Technol. 17 (1983) no. 2,
13 P. Cardillo, A. Girelli, Chim. Ind. (Milan) 64 (1982) 107 110.
no. 12, 781 784. 44 G. A. Kolry, A. A. Abdelghani, A. C. Anderson,
14 DuPont, US 2 285 448, 1942 (D. J. Loder). A. Monkiene, Trace Subt. Environ. Health 23 (1990)
15 A. M. Brownstein, Hydrocarbon Process. 71 (1975) 371 378.
no. 9, 72 76. 45 Merkblatt Glykole, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 1972.
16 G. E. Weismantel, Chem. Eng. (N. Y.) 86 (1978) no. 2, 46 E. Obermeier, S. Fischer, D. Bohne, Ber. Bunsenges.
67 70. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 805 809.
17 C. Matignon, H. Moureu, M. Dode, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 47 Merkblatt Glykole, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 1988.
5 (1934) no. 1, 1308 1317. 48 Hoechst AG, DE 2 640 506, 1978 (G. Schefel,
18 J. H. Miller, T. E. Corrigan, Hydrocarbon Process. 46 R. Obermeier).
(1967) no. 4, 176 178. 49 Merkblatt Polyglykole, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 1986.
19 J. Bronsted, M. Kilpatrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51 (1929) 50 Merkblatt Ethylenglykoldimethylether, Hoechst AG,
428. Frankfurt, 1986.
20 H. J. Lichtenstein, G. H. Twigg, Trans. Faraday Soc. 44 51 Merkblatt Genantin, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 1982.
(1948) 905. 52 Merkblatt Glykole, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 1972.
21 G. Lamaty, R. Maleq, C. Selve, A. Sivade, J. Wylde, J. 53 Merkblatter Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Losemittel, 1984;
Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1975 no. 10, 1119 1124. Methylglykol, 1978;Methyldiglykol, 1970; Butyldigly-
22 D. F. Othmer, M. S. Thakar, Ind. Eng. Chem. 50 (1958) kol, 1970;Ethylenglykoldimethylether, 1986.
no. 9, 1235 1244. 54 Merkblatt Hoechst 1704 LTV (Flugzeugenteisung)
23 L. Klein, H. Fehrecke, Chem. Ing. Tech. 52 (1980) 1985; Merkblatt Hoechst 1678 (Landebahnenenteisung)
no. 10, 818 820. Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 1985.
24 G. E. Mamilton, A. B. Metzner, Ind. Eng. Chem. 49 55 Merkblatt Diethylenglykol, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt,
(1957) no. 5, 838 846. 1986.
Vol. 13 Ethylene Glycol 545
56 Merkblatt Triethylenglykol, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Toxicology, 3rd ed., vol. 2C, Wiley-Interscience,
1984. New York 1963.
57 Merkblatt Polyglykole Hoechst, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, 84 C. P. Carpenter, U. C. Pozzan, C. S. Weil, J. H. Nair, III,
1986. G. A. Keck, H. F. Smyth, Jr., AMA Arch. Ind. Health 14
58 Chem. Week, 134 (1984) March 7, 32 35. (1956) 114.
59 E. P. Laug, H. O. Calvery, H. J. Morris, G. Woodard, J. 85 H. O. Calvery, T. G. Klumpp, Southern Med. J. 32 (1939)
Ind. Hyg. Toxicol, 21 (1939) 173. 1105.
60 G. Bornmann, Arzneim. Forsch. 4 (1954) 643. 86 O. G. Fitzhugh, A. A. Nelson, J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 28
61 H. F. Smyth, Jr., J. Seaton, L. F. Fischer, J. Ind. Hyg. (1946) 40.
Toxicol. 23 (1941) 259. 87 C. S. Weil, C. P. Carpenter, H. F. Smyth, Jr., Arch.
62 H. J. Morris, A. A. Nelson, H. O. Calvery, J. Pharmacol. Environ. Health 11 (1965) 569.
Exp. Therap. 74 (1942) 266. 88 C. S. Weil, C. P. Carpenter, H. F. Smyth, Jr., Ind. Med.
63 F. R. Blood, Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 3 (1965) 229. Surg. 36 (1967) 55.
64 F. R. Blood, G. A. Elliott, M. S. Wright, Toxicol. Appl. 89 G. Bornmann, Arzneim. Forsch. 5 (1955) 38.
Pharmacol. 4 (1962) 489. 90 A. Loesser, G. Bornmann, L. Grosskinsky, G. Hess, R.
65 J. A. Roberts, H. R. Seibold, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. Kopf, K. Ritter, A. Schmitz, E. Sturner, H. Wegener,
15 (1969) 624. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Exp. Pathol. Pharmakol.
66 C. P. Carpenter, H. F. Smyth, Jr., Am. J. Ophthalmol. 29 221 (1954) 14.
(1946) 1363. 91 V. P. Plugin, Gig. Sanit. 33 (1968) 16.
67 T. O. McDonald, M. D. Roberts, A. R. Borgmann, 92 C. P. Carpenter, H. F. Smyth, Jr., Am. J. Ophthalmol. 29
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 21 (1972) 143. (1946) 1363.
68 W. M. Grant: Toxicology of the Eye, 2nd ed., Charles C. 93 P. J. Hanzlik, W. S. Lawrence, J. K. Fellows, F. P.
Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1974. Luduena, G. L. Lacqueur, J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 29
69 E. Browning: Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial (1947) 325.
Solvents, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1965. 94 H. Wegener, Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Exp. Pathol.
70 R. A. Coon, R. A. Jones, L. J. Jenkins, Jr., J. Siegel, Pharmakol. 220 (1953) 414.
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 16 (1970) 646. 95 E. H. Pfeiffer, H. Dunkelberg, Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 18
71 J. H. Wills, F. Coulston, E. S. Harris, E. W. McChes- (1980) 115.
ney, J. C. Russell, D. M. Serrone, Clin. Toxicol. 7 96 W. M. Lauter, V. L. Vrla, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 29 (1940)
(1974) 463. 5.
72 E. Harris: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on 97 E. G. Stenger, L. Aeppli, E. Peheim, F. Roulet, Arzneim.
Atmospheric Contamination in Confined Spaces, Forsch. 18 (1968) 1536.
AMRL TR-69130, paper no. 8, Aerospace Med. Res. 98 H. F. Smyth, Jr., C. P. Carpenter, C. S. Weil, J. Am.
Lab., Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 1969, Pharm. Assoc. Sci. Ed. 39 (1950) 349.
p. 9. 99 H. F. Smyth, Jr., C. P. Carpenter, C. S. Weil, J. Am.
73 M. Felts: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Pharm. Assoc. Sci. Ed. 44 (1955) 27.
Atmospheric Contamination in Confined Spaces, 100 The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Polyethylene
AMRL TR-69130, paper no. 9, Aerospace Med. Res. Glycols (1959) .
Lab., Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 1969, 101 C. P. Carpenter, M. D. Woodside, E. R. Kinkead, J. M.
p. 105. King, L. J. Sullivan, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 18
74 J. McCann, E. Choi, E. Yamasaka, B. N. Ames, Proc. (1971) 35.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72 (1975) 5135. 102 C. B. Shaffer, F. H. Critchfield, J. Am. Pharm. As-soc.
75 E. H. Pfeiffer, H. Dunkelberg, Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 18 Sci. Ed. 36 (1947) 152.
(1980) 115. 103 C. B. Shaffer, F. H. Critchfield, J. H. Nair, J. Am. Pharm.
76 M. M. Mason, C. C. Cate, J. Baker, Clin. Toxicol. 4 Assoc. Sci. Ed. 39 (1950) 340.
(1971) 185. 104 A. H. Principe, J. Forensic Sci. 13 (1968) 90.
77 P. H. Derse, U. S. C. F. S. T. I. PBRep. 195 153
(1969) .
78 BRRC Project Report 44 109, 08. 03. 82.
79 BRRC Project Report 46 89, 11. 04. 84. Further Reading
80 L. R. DePass, M. D. Woodside, R. R. Maronpot, C. S.
Weil, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 7 (1986) 566. G. P. Chiusoli, P. M. Maitlis (eds.): Metal-catalysis in Indus-
81 BRRC Project Report 43 54, 25. 07. 80. trial Organic Processes, Royal Society of Chemistry,
82 B. Ballantyne, A summary of studies conducted on the Cambridge, UK 2006.
long-term toxicology of ethylene glycol, UCC, R. J. Farn (ed.): Chemistry and Technology of Surfactants,
4. 22. 1985. Blackwell, Oxford, UK 2006.
83 V. K. Rowe, M. A. Wolf in G. D. Clayton, F. E. M. W. Forkner, J. H. Robson, W. M. Snellings, A. E. Martin,
Clayton (eds.): Pattys Industrial Hygiene and F. H. Murphy, T. E. Parsons: Glycols, Kirk Othmer
546 Ethylene Glycol Vol. 13
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, John Wiley & H. K. Phlegm: The Role of the Chemist in Automotive Design,
Sons, Hoboken, NJ, online DOI: 10.1002/ CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL 2009.
0471238961.0520082506151811.a01.pub2. J. Tulla-Puche, F. Albericio: The Power of Functional
J. Hagen: Industrial Catalysis, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Resins in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Weinheim 2006. 2008.
M. Kjellin, I. Johansson (eds.): Surfactants from Renewable U. Zoller, P. Sosis: Handbook of Detergents, CRC Press,
Resources, Wiley, Chichester 2010. Boca Raton, FL 2009.