Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
This is a necessary move to resuscitate the dying Smes and create an opportunity for
entrepreneurship in an injuredeconomy. Creation of opportunities means more people coming
into business and also the creation of favourable conditions for starting up new businesses
.This could be in the form of reduction of taxes, removal of some trade barriers and cutting
short the process of company registration.
Increased investment in infrastructure helps entrepreneurs in the sense that if energy and
power are developed Smes can perform to their full capacity without power cuts. If roads are
maintained then they can be able to access their target markets .Accessibility is also a
challenge since most roads have potholes thus not making it easy for SMEs to establish
themselves in potential markets.
Improved liquidity
Increase in the availability of funds makes business better and makes it easy for small
businesses to survive since the money is in circulation customers are able to purchase
necessary goods and services benefiting the SMEs as they will remain in business unlike
when there is a liquidity crunch most goods and services are forgone due to financial
constraints.
The look east policy can unlock the flow of potential investment which might help the SMEs
grow into large corporations with the funding and development skills from the east.
On the other hand despite its positive contribution to the success of Entrepreneurship in
Zimbabwe, the Zim Asset also poses limitations to entrepreneurship development in
Zimbabwe. There are various ways the Zim Asset as the economic blue print has restricted
and bound the development of Entrepreneurship in the Zimbabwe.
As coated in the executive summary it is written that After the landslide victory by the
ZANU PF Party in the 31st July 2013 harmonised elections, the Party was given the mandate
to govern the country for a five (5) year term.This economic blue print was developed
through a consultativeprocess involving political leadership in the ruling ZANU PF
Party,Government, Private Sector and other stakeholders.
This may have a negative impact since people in the country have different political views
those who belong to a certain political parties may feel that the document is for these people
hence they isolate themselves from participating or they may be isolated .
The ZimAsset poses limitations to the success of SMEs in that does not really address the real
factors that hinder entrepreneurship development. In Zimbabwe many SMEs are unregistered
and the ZimAsset does not outline anything on this account. It does not talk of providing
SMEs with loans without interests in order to increase their success. In short the document
does not take into account the real factors that influence the success of Small businesses that
is the availability of capital, training facilities.
Financial situation
In the ZIMASSET document they stated that funding is going to from BRICS, Brazil,
Russia, India, China, South Africa and last month we witnessed the visit of our Russia
counterparts to sign agreements that they will assist in Zimbabwe infrastructural
development. However the funding is not enough to achieve the stated objectives in the
ZimAsset.
In the 2014 government financial budget the ministry of SME and corporative development
was allocated 10% of what they actual needed hence it led to the reduction of finance of
SEDCO lending facility. This means that SEDCO will not have enough money to
entrepreneurs. A severe and persistent liquidity crunch which has made it very difficult for
local productive sectors to access sufficient credit to oil the wheels of our economy.
Unethical behaviour of the people in high level offices such as tender committee members for
instances, they recently awarded a rural hospital construction tender to a retail company and
as we speak the hospital has not been built whilst the money was paid out to the so
calledcompany. In addition the continued practises of invading taxes and duties by business
have led to the failure of the policies to reduce imports by increase duty tariffs.
The existence of many different political parties may lead to failure of the policy as
the members of parliament share different views there will be no unity of purpose.
In conclusion, it can be noted that the ZimAsset is as economic blue print which was built to
enable Zimbabwe to achieve economic growth through empowering SME and exploitation of
the countrys resources but at the moment it has failed to a greater extend due to issues we
have highlight in before. The ZimAsset if implemented successfully and if all people
participate towards achieving the goals of this document this will promote entrepreneurship
in Zimbabwe.