Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Russ Rucinski
RD/DeJ Mech.
The design calculations were done for one bracket supporting the full
weight of the heat exchanger, rounded up to 6800 pounds. The
design follows the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
Manual of steel construction, Eighth edition. All calculated stresses
and loads on welds were below allowables. See the Summary table
on the next page.
5 I 16/96 Reyision:
The hand done analysis was independently reviewed by Bob Wands
of RD/MSD and a memo with his questions and my answers are in
Appendix B. As FEA exercise, I ran a element finite element analysis
using beam elements. The information from this analysis is included
as appendix C. All stresses found in the FEA were below allowables.
Additional hand calculations (See Appendix D) for the top attachment
plate were done after Bob Wands' review. At the time of fabrication
the top plate thickness was increased from 1/4" to 3/8". The
stresses for the 3/8" thick top plate were acceptable.
) ) )
Summary of Support bracKet design analysis
Vertical member, CASE I 2.0 ksi, shear 18.4 ksi, shear not applicable
{411 x 8" x 114" wall rect. tubing} 8.7 ksi, bending 30.4 ksi, bending
_.
,--.. Lower horiz. member 1.1 ksi, compressive 27 ksi, compressive 0.357
~-'
{411 x 8" X 1/411 wall rect. tubing} 2.2 ksi, shear
9.6 ksi, bending
18.4 ksi, shear
30.4 ksi, bending
Wedge anchors, 1/2" dia. 1820 Ibs, tensile load 2400 Ibs, tensile load ftlFt"2 + fv/Fv"2 < 1.0
{Hilti Kwik bolt II} 850 Ibs, shear load 1960 Ibs, shear load 0.763
Fillet weld, top anchor plate 993 Ibsllinear inch 1909 Ibsllinear inch not applicable
{1/8" intermittent fillet weld}
Weld. upper horiz. to vert. member 4146 Ibs/linear inch 3818 Ibs/inch - 2 short sides not applicable
1/411 fillet, 1/4" groove 5250 Ibs/inch - 2 long sides
Weld, vert. to lower horiz. member 2.4 ksi, compressive 27 kSi, compressive 0.676
{1/8" groove weld} 10.8 ksi. bending 18.4 ksi. shear
Fillet weld. bottom anchor plate 993 Ibs/linear inch 1909 Ibs/linear inch not applicable
{1/8" intermittent fillet weld}
DE.~'(;a....J At-...JA'-""~'.:s
DATE
12-Z0 -94
I
REVISION DATE
~--------~----------------------------------------~----~~~~~-----~
CIo4I.C.~e.J):, ItJdJ 11.;(.tiiIi 1-12.-'S
f. x c..\o-\A"'-l6E;~ ,S ""'0 ee.. Uo u "'-'''''' e.C 0 r-J -n..+E;. WA 1..1...
e.:> 6. .....r E:;. At. T H 'THE. 50 u"" H 'AJ p.. L.. \-t.,WA'-{.. \HE:; He;;AT
E:.)(. C 1-4 A. N G E:.R.. "'JE I G.HS G::>i50 t...B~.. 'THE:. HE;AT Ex.c.\-\A.~e..1<:-
'N II...I... BE. MOW"-JT e..f> 01--1 TWO ~uPP02--r BI2.A.~T'eJ.
US/t..Jb .
-r~ H S. L-OAD .r v-.J I '- L.. C -PI. L c: t..J -po..T E. .,.. (.0\ ~ F" A c..T ct!...5
o~ '5. p, (:' e:...,-y F= 0 ~ po. \"'L- A'5 Pac.......ors o~ -r"",E:. D e..s. \C:r. N _
.I I
--++--- -------
I I
136.000
I... -I 24.000
. II
0.'2.5 -I.
ct";,,,,(
.-' i , ( 7f.()<
L 2.75.
-I -,_
47.750 /I
1
.11.lf:;S: 13.S
Cleanroam roof
I.zs
TYP.
l
-I~
~ ~~Sll \!:I
1
'v !
I... J <1.5"
HEAT EXCHANGER sur PORT
J
'N~
PROJECT 5ER1Al-cATEGORY, PAGE '
FERMI LAB
/
R AX = 1<:.12.)(, leo I'
RAY + RS'i = P
p ~ I<"y
I .-"-);aMi" 1 RJ.)C"'C,'58.5cM
~ It"x
~cy I=I<:rUIU!: ::.
~M.
~Ray
FIC:su/t", 4 ". 1="; B. I). o~ L..EoF"T a (all;p.. r S'E.c:."1'ld,..lS of
uPP~.e.. 1401.,..1,%-1)~-r41.- .... e,.....6 .. ~
C,45E:-1I
.'5E.C:'fIOtJ ~-e..
eo .. )( q" '" 1/4 " .. 6-~lS 1"'5 ')C<' S S 'STocK.. p..-r OZ.-eeo ASSf;;,MAc.<.f 8'-060,)
AI<5C MAf.JV~L. tlF' 'S'-reE;/... C-or-J'5't'I2.. .h:... '7"{<;1JV) 1&J.r7N EJ)rrfoN 15 L/~:"a
Pot- '1#1" A.vAI-T'$I~"
MA-r~.e.\Al.. I~ A Si'" M
h S5.!:E:Il\<.,S
' =. \ \ 0 \ .;
5.~~ I"""
\ 0 B) e 00 ...... Ib'5
I \. ~ IN '3
~I
FERMILAB SECTION PROJECT SERIAL-CATEGORY PAGE
HIC:~j"
~DJDtp
ENGINEERING NOTE E"e.~ At.J(:;e~
SUBJECT NAME
.:?r'1:.::: 0 K"c.:x=eS X
c.A"SE:.'I
Rc,1o! =G:'\ 51 B . S \..6 "::> "<C"li =' ~ IS ce. 5 '-6S'
Rey ~ e:, Boo ,-tiS Roc,! :::: 0
-ra. = ~
A
= 121{o psi
Sltfpn<... ~
~\SB.5
1:MPx -= ~ ~("Z.2.1.q r~ -: '2..<::> I '1 ('5 j
r:
FaA. C45&.::O:) "/F'c.. ~ 0,0.#4 < <::1.1 ~ c.DN'8,NE c;;Tn..~sS ~(JI~~-r (J '.\I .... c,.,
..ro~
f'M""'U I. b - Z.
1" ...r1c>7/F, -t -*10 '1/ F f. , .0
Q, blf .'1
.. 04'-1 + 3, '?64.f1
301 360
_ c "'C '" I 55 ~ 1.0
->7 A,-, tOMP r.) T";o ~""~E:;.SS~S A.NO c..o/wA-8 d'.~"'D 'Sri2.;e;.S~e::s ~(&.... ""HE,
ve.A..T II::..A' fvlE:MBe~ Aa..e; N- VC r-I t.,..~ wE:.II -r ~ A r-J ;... I 5c. A ........a........ A~ (...;- \ ;
SECTION SERIAL-CATEGORY PAGE
FERMILAB
1:. \NI(,!,... S~ ... c."" I-I\~T\ B~""D 5\t-.\c...e. "THI~ 1$ v..I~.a.."'I" O-"Z..e:.liLo "Tee 1-1-$
Aee. F=AM\~IA,..1t. ..... I~\-l. A~flo I!ceeA..J ')e. THe'"'! 1'tAUl: 'Kt--lOv--lN ....0 BE. &ooD
OllJA c.....,-r'1
FRJ)/II\. HI("'/\ APhIC~""'()t-l c."AJt."r"'.J HcA"'f Ocri'1 """'P & k ~A ADI-t;"<;IVe. AM::.tf-OA.
OR. M'E.C>H)M. Dt.JT''''f =-W\\t.. ~\:H..-r \, s-rvo Afo.Jc...HCQ.. yo:.. re.e !>vl'"TA & \"'60
.,..~E; C.ON c.1LE;."l"; TI"'Ie; "I ~ I t....~ !.i:- ","OUr-l'T'E::C IIo.l ,~ 4000 ps~ c:.o"",c.fIIJC:::T"f~...
r> E:lL 8<../1 c...b r"'" ~ PI.A rJS ( "No-rE: f::f\..OM PIJVIS iN P.lli'-e.NO,)C ')
(o~oo
- 6
-T"7 _
'i -
r-.A 6 -_ _M_"..:.-__-
-T--I:. ....
(33;0.025 .1' t-")
SECTION PROJECT SERIALCATEGORY PAGE
FERMILAB
J..I EI'or-r 3 S 2.3 . " 5
ENGINEERING NOTE C1"-CMA,...J&1O.L
SUBJECT NAME
\-\ e. A",," 6.)( C.\4A /lJ6E.12- S vf"PO(t...-r Ru Ss l?Vc. ,t--lS t. 1
j)ES~ '.-N A,..JA-...,YS-I S
DATE
1Z.-Z7-Cf~
I REVISION DATE
) /l.e.I:. &(,1."/.)0.1.(
\ ..... i~c....,.'O,.J 1S""~ S!'l!..Vtt"'.-.us
L \.0 ~'S/ .... tI.Jiir;r,
6'2.4 p'S,'1
(;-3-3 )
1/
.,..... e~.: \"::I ,.. C(),J~-r'A..V(..'1(()~ ~OLN-r G el.. ""':::'& I -& .
,. 4 R ~8A-1'- u? 1"2... II ~ PAC..IN~ t< I;NI'-'ltJr.. '-J E..R.:\i.::.f><t..-'- '1.
~ 5 ~ e..f,fI"fL.e I"L q
II
HE;AI'
D i: ~:"
~x c:..~A~ C::.rE;e,.
(:! NAN A.. L.. "'St.\ c.,
S U~ Po 12-""( t3 i!.A c.~.., OATE
1"Z -z."2. -q~ I
REVISION OATE
_
H6IV,u:.. i; ~(..fJ
I
+:-
"
= &1+'5 E;;
'0 ~~ (36 ooo) = 21/ "OOfs'l
SAMfi ::
~.\:::. = 0, b t:y
1i:,J"5 'LC:; A :. fA '1'A-t.,.
-::I j
,,",ss v#le. 'I-I"C' /v'I.tV1A!fVM w'eu:> St~, c:.A I.. C "'L.~ /Zeal t:> t..eN&-7 J.,I. ..
=- +="f'~If,...e- J4 .;Oi)( (.. 12 S ,... .)
1 I !
~ ~l
F'16U It..E e:. \I...l~~ ITT"C~""" wr.w:l
t PI'-"T"r;;. itNS
o AI I.J e. LO (r:tLoM
k
--~--~
8,." r
5w
=
53.J3 IN Z.
, g,e"
._'=
L
H E..I\T e:.. 'I( C,.1o-l,c...,..." 6"- I't... SvP poll-r B~A c. 4-r
'De'S I GJ,.J A t-.JA \,..., <S, So ,
DATE
I Z. - ,III -q 'f I
REVISION DATE
....,
C.~ECkeJ:)~ 7vrki /1. teiJ,f '-12-'\S'
A 1... ." ....""6 """ c..a.....o fteJr- ''''~4ot fOf' ~ l-o:J ..r.-...
,-.",'!oll.&.
,.. ie7 'lI. -t:-..1foI,.D
""'~A"'" ,. Q."11" ~ 11..(..e,.-1 I) \.J. 'To ";;'O...-tE,''1'L "1. AI,..~o 'f"H-L CASE.:r j
M~
'B:slolf:') " (4f ,,.,) -" z...r;.\D~'S" (8,...... fi-") ':" '?::>o. b~ ,tJ. I
Dc:...sffJii,jj).'1't; NG(...I> .Jb,t-lT B -ptt.. pet- F,~ 2.s of= AW5 D\,\-4'U
p .... IZ.., . , ... L. ..l 0 IN "\ Pe t-J -.:.-n,A-t"I O~ 6ftt.,8 () va vJ ~ t./)
,1'8"
H E:A-r 12
ENGINEERING NOTE 1<1) /D<;tS t:.Xc..I-1AAJ(,eJL
SUBJECT
(\At
-= -:r
B f;;N 0 'N(, 3 "='
-- A ..'-OV' A-13 '-E. = '30.
Ae...e
FO f
". v, If
S.
rot<. "T'kS vJe.,-D A"1" -rHE.. -(oP Pc....PtTli:, ... se:& P(;S". 9, roo
3. biIFOllttl' OtTAILS IIIALl CDiFORR TO Atl STAl.DARO 315-80. . FERM'LAB FURNISHED MATERIALS
1. THE R'TtIIALS AID StlvIC(S FUIIISlltD IV FEIRllAI IllL IE 'S
-. ALL COII"IIIOUS lARS SIIALL IE LAPPED 36 DllllnE? FOI .6 lARS OUTLINED II SECTIOM _.0 OF.EIIIIIIT A. SCHEDULE AND
AID PALLEI. AID U DllllnERS 'OR 11 URS UD LUGER. IHUE SlJrPWNTAAY TEIUIS AND CDlDlTIIIS. ..""
IPLICES AlE IEIUIIED. VlLEIS OTIERMIIE IOTED.
CONCRETE
1. IlattllAL AID IOI'IAISHIP SIALl IE II acCORDIlltE MnN TilE
'AILS REIUIIEIEITS Of BUIlDII' toOl FOI REIIFORCED to.cltTE Atl
STUDAID 311.
UL listed, "Pipe Hangers" (%" - 314" diameters). International Conference of Buildings Officials, ICBO Evaluation Report #4627.
Anchor Program .
~ ~, ~~
Hole Anchor Min. Hilti Std. Allowable Working Loads
Item Dia. Length Embed. Thread Drill Qty. Per Emb. 4000 psi Concrete
Number Description (In.) (In.) Depth (In.) Length Bit BoxtCtn. (In.) Tension (Ibs.) Shear (lbs.)
000453597 KB 14-134 1f4 13/4 100/900
000453605 KB 14-214 1f4 21f4 11A1 314" TE-C+ 14-6 100/900 2" 630 530
000453613 KB 14-314 1f4 314 100/400
000453621 KB 38-214 % 21f4 1% ~" TE-C+ 3.41-6 100/500 1%" 750 1470
000453639 KB 38-3 % 3 100/400
000453647 KB 38-334 % 3314 1% 11fs" TE-C+ %-6 100/400 21f2" 1370 1470
000453654 KB 38-5 % 5 50/200
000453662 KB 12-234 Ik 2314 50/20C
.. 000453670
000453688
KB 1112-334
KB 12-412
Ik
Ik
If.!
3314
41k
21f4 11f4 "
TE-C+1f2-6
TE-C+ 1f2-12
50/200
501200
31k" 2400 2450 ~
000453696 KB 12-512 51k 25/125
000453704 KB 58-334 % 3314 25/10C
TE-C+%-6
000453712 KB 58-434 % 434 25/75
2314 11k" 4" 3290 3840
000453720 KB 58-6 % 6 25/75
% TE-C+ %-12
000453738 KB 58-7 7 25/75
000453746 KB 34-434 34 434 20/80
TE-C+3f4-8
000453753 KB 34-512 34 51k 20/80
31f4 11k" 4314" 4800 5120
000453761 KB 34-7 314 7 10/40
TE-C+ 3/4-12
,
000453779 KB 34-8 314 8 10/40
000454124 KB 1-6 1 6 5/25
41k 21f4" TE-FY1-13 6" 7070 9200
000454132 KB 1-9 1 9 5/20
Values shown are for shear plane acting through the anchor bolt shank. When the shear plane is acting through the anchor bolt
threads, reduce shear values by 20%
Values shown are for a shear plane acting through the anchor bolt shank. When the shear plane is acting through the anchor bolt
threads, reduce the shear value by 12%.
All other valves shown are for shear plane acting through either body or threads.
100
44/ Design of Welded Connections
~:'~
r'------- --
-'
,!
?
lTl
1?
T3
~-.--1
1 ~R .
lAv
j LT2
Figure 2.5 (continued)- Prequalified Partial Joint Penetration Groove Welded Joints (see 2.10.1)
-,
3T
SMAW B-Plb 1/4 max +1/16,0 1/16 All - 41
Figure 2.5 - PrequaHfied Partial Joint Penetration Groove Welded Joints (see 2.10.1)
.. APP''''''' , ')C AS
.
. r.,~=._________________________ ~~L~"'I5Ii:.D s/,.,/'.4
I
i
I
II
I
Ii
f
...
,It
e
i;
!
.. u,a ~
i; 1.
~Q
LU
~ !
i
~
Ii
Il!
;I...
~~ :;;;
~
~~
u
",t ...
~
. . G.l
.a
...
!!
...
.. .. ~
..
r.l
=
!.. ~L ~
...
...
...
November 7, 1995
FERMILAB
RDlMSDlEngineering Analysis Group
I have reviewed you design calculations and believe that the basic frame design is sound. In
theory design safety factors will exceed three on the yield of the frame material, due to the
criteria of a single support carrying the entire heat exchanger weight, and the application of AISC
safety factors.
2. Is there the possibility of a horizontal load parallel to the long axis of the heat exchanger,
and how large can such a load be?
4. No estimation of the effects of prying action were presented, and given the relatively thin
plate through which the Hiltis anchor the bracket to the wall, this effect could be
significant.
5. The bracket is of unusual shape; a simple truss would be more efficient. Was this shape
driven by the need to avoid certain volumes due to cable trays, etc?
6. The calculation of vertical force on the vertical member assumes that force can be a
maximum of the heat exchanger weight. However, one simplified analysis can show that,
if the upper bracket is assumed to be pinned to the wall (simply supported) and the upper
horizontal member is loaded, there is a mechanical advantage that tends to multiply the
vertical load on the vertical member. For consistency this load should be examined as the
highest load the member will see.
7. No calculation is presented for stability of the vertical member. As this design will
transfer most of its shear to the bottom bracket via this member, (see 6 above) some
check of stability should be made.
8. Are there any plans to load test the platform to some reasonable margin over it's true
operational load?
9. No factor was included for dynamic loading during installation. Did you intend the
doubling of design load to accommodate this effect?
Overall the note was very complete, well written, and easy to follow. I doubt that answering any
of the questions above will result in a modification to the design, and as soon as I receive your
reply and we get these issues resolved the note will be approved.
November 11, 1995
C~ Fermilab
TO: Bob Wands
SUBJECT: Reply to comments on review of Heat Exchanger Support Bracket Design Calcs.
Thank you for your review of the calculations. I will address your questions and comments in
this memo. To document the information, a copy of your memo and this memo will be appended
to D-Zero engineering note 3823.115-EN417 as a revision.
ANSWERS:
I. The heat exchanger weight of 6700 lbs was obtained by weighing the heat exchanger
with a below the hook scale when the heat exchanger was initially moved into the D-Zero
assembly building. The heat exchanger was recently weighed at 7100 lbs. The weight change
was due to piping modification work. The center of gravity of the heat exchanger is
approximately 24" towards the bayonet can end. So in the final installation the support closest to
",.-. the bayonet can will see a static load of 3960 lbs. and the other will see 3140 lbs.
2. The possibility of a horizontal load parallel to the axis is only present during installation.
A calculation was done in which I estimated that each support could safely withstand a load of
1835 lbs in this direction, acting at a point 34" away from the wall mounting connection. Even
though the expected horizontal load is an order of magnitude less than this, a temporary member
is attached to one of the brackets to strengthen it in this direction during installation. Due to the
nature of the installation, the other bracket does not have a possibility of horizontal loading.
3. Some additional vertical loading will be applied to the bracket furthest from the bayonet
can end from piping being supported off of the vertical member. It is estimated that the
additional weight will be less than 500 lbs. There will probably be veIY little if any piping
supported off of the bracket nearest the bayonet can of the heat exchanger.
4. The plate through which the Hilti anchors act was increased to 3/8" thickness at the time
of fabrication. In addition, the weld attaching this plate to the rectangular tubing was made
continuous rather than intermittent. Since these changes only increased the strength of the
design, I never revised the calculations. In hindsight, I agree that an analysis of the attachment
plate should have been made. The effects of PlYing are not easily analyzed, and simple
conservative models do indicate that it may have been a concern if the plate thickness was not
increased.
5. The shape of the bracket was chosen by the installation location. The outeIlllost surface
of the vertical member matches the surfaces of concrete support columns in D-Zero.
"........ 6. The simplified analysis that you propose models the connection of the vertical member to
the upper horizontal member as pinned. I think that model is interesting and conservative. I
chose to consider that connection to be rather rigid considering the full around welding at the
joint. If I consider the mechanical advantage model. the stresses in the member are still below
allowable. I prefer not to revise the calculations for a pinned model.
2
7. The vertical member was not analyzed for buckling because it is a very short, stout
~ member with relatively low stresses.
8. We have no plan to load test the supports.
9. Yes, doubling of the design load did give me a margin to take care of any dynamic
loading during installation.
) ) )
/dks'd3s7/ms_rucioski/
RESULTS: 6-RESULTS6
STRESS COMPONENT - MAG MIN: '.8'E-ll MAX: 1.16E+O' VALUE OPTIOH:ACTUAL
1.16E+O'
1.0'E+O'
9.28E+03
8.12E+03
6.96E+03
5.80E+03
'-6'E+03
))
3.'82+03
-0
\J
~
2.32E+03 ...o
1.16E+03
Y
'&11
Page 1
I-DEAS Master Series 2.1: Simulation 02-Jan-96 10:44:39
/dks4d3s7/ms_rucinski/HXbracket2.mf1
Gr~ ID None
Re_ ....t Set 7 - RESULTS7
Report Type contour units IN
Result Type STRESS COMPONENT
Node Stress
1 4.838E-11
2 4.645E+03
3 7.603E-11
4 1.156E-10
5 2.019E-10
6 3.682E-10
7 3.553E-10
8 1.767E+03
9 3.533E+03
10 3.616E+03
11 4. 314E+03
12 5.546E+03
13 6.779E+03
14 5.786E+03
15 2. 950E+03
16 2.710E+03
17 2. 471E+03
18 2.231E+03
19 1. 991E+03
20 1.752E+03
21 1.512E+03
.;--
22 1.273E+03
23 1.033E+03
24 8.732E+02
25 4.805E+03
26 4.327E+03
27 3.850E+03
28 3.372E+03
29 2.895E+03
30 2.417E+03
31 2.087E+03
32 2.079E+03
33 2.400E+03
34 2.877E+03
35 3.355E+03
36 3.832E+03
37 4.310E+03
38 4.787E+03
39 5.265E+03
40 S.742E+03
41 6.220E+03
42 6.698E+03
43 6. 915E+03
44 4.247E+03
45 4.247E+03
46 4.247E+03
47 4.247E+03
48 4. 980E+03
Page 2
I-DEAS Master Series 2.1: Simulation 02-Jan-96 10:44:39
/dks4d3s7/ms_rucinski/HXbracket2.mf1 AP P fCt-.U::;)\ X
C.3
Node Stress
49 6.450E+03
50 7.922E+03
51 9.395E+03
52 1.087E+04
53 1.160E+04
159 8.332E+02
53
Maximum 1.160E+04
1
Minimum 4.838E-11
Average 3.742E+03
--
,eat Exchanger Bracket Results LIsting
elected 566 entities. Use "Highlight_Selection" to see all A,PPE:..ND \ 'f..
:'umber of data items : 0
:umber of data items : 0
'ata component: VON MISES STRESS
c4
~
Maximum Von Mises Stress
16 1.0 7 1 7186.2974
27 1.0 8 1 6458.7412
7 1.0 5 1 6162.7417
26 1.0 8 1 5503.6357
18 0.0 6 1 5043.6450
25 1.0 8 1 4548.5283
13 0.0 6 1 4246.6167
14 0.0 6 1 4246.6152
15 0.0 6 1 4246.6152
'hese beams stored in in the processed group
'orces on beam 555 at X - 1.999998 for analysis dataset 5
Axial force - -2634.67
Y shear force 8122.105
Z shear force 0.0002531347
~7que 0.007400619
+ moment - -0.06526328
~ending
Z bending moment - -122825.2
--
- l-\X ToP PL.A.TE.. A I-JA I....'-f SIS
c:J -- 0
l'
iTI~1
I
~-- -
IC.'S"
..I<a.x 8
,
I
() q
I I eo!!.2. II
."" 'I
a.~ "y b
)G1 .... 1.1 b y \?:>=-. 775
a.-=:.2b
I~ "'tC(l.(>o,jt"C'''if;
,,
...
lZ.3
= - 052
. 23.7~
0 0 ~T.r
""'lfl5;/t1i
-- i -
-
LOfl'>rO/.
I oj cUr
I \
~ \
B ! '\
-.
.. !
,,-
~
IJ
!borr.""
t
0 0 ~
~
~
- ,. 4 /~pIj
~ 70" . 4- I",'l-Ib5 + dl;t'r"rQ- 4 + [ %~lIrri?f*'l ~ gfQ~ ";I.,,. s I~~,",ec; = ~ 1,8.5
,,,,c,f.H'
r
\bS
5/3.2 - IN.
~.1677
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\I-g-q$
~U$S, 'Rvc.-I,....,S~(
I II
s1" fLE:; SS) /0 F I '" I...e-r
'3D <0 u..S/,,., ,
(" 707')( 1-z..?:N) '::' .3 J.f g 8 pSI O. "' '
a.. ". S /1
b ::: I. 'Z. ~ ,
:,)
:: -:r::.
Me