Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Meaning:
Bentham used the word utility as a synonym for the word good/value.
Everything that bring happiness is good. The desire of every individual is to be
happy and pleasant. He likes happiness.
It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do as well to determine what
we shall do. The principle of utility recognizes this subjection and assumes it for
the foundation of that system. According to Bentham everything was to be
valued, adjusted, and measured only in terms of pleasure and happiness.
Bentham says the principle of utility consists in taking as our starting point in
every process of reasoning the calculus of comparative estimates of pains and
pleasure and not allowing any other idea to intervene.
2. Pain and pleasure also occurs due to moral sanctions. For e.g. there are
pleasure and pain which we experience/expect at the hands of fellow
human beings prompted by a feeling of hatred or goodwill.
3. Political sanctions pleasure and pain are received from the magistrate
or legislator.
The action of the State is good which increases the pleasure of the largest
number. Everything has to be judged from this point of view. The principle of
utility is held to be the rationale guide both to private morals and public policy.
The end of any legislation should be for the happiness of man.
Criticisms:
His theory shook the foundations of many age old institutions. His theory
helped to face day to day problems and hold good even today. It made the
legislators to think before approving any law. He offered practical solutions to
reform the English society. He applied the principle of utility to the question of
property.
He said property was an institution which brought happiness to the owner. For
greatest happiness of the greatest number property be equally distributed
among the people. He only wanted to remove the disparity by imposing
limitations on the issue of property.
Conclusion:
Bentham unlike other ideal thinkers emphasized the view that State is for man
and not man for the State. This is the correct view of relations between the
individual(man) and the State. The interests of the individual are primary, for
whose protection the State ushers (comes) into existence.