Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I. INTRODUCTION
Money supply and inflation, and their mutual relationships are the most
prominent indicators of strength, potential and the prosperity of a country.
TABLE 1
Money Supply in Pakistan (Rupees in millions)
Narrow Monetary Broad
End year Percentage Percentage Percentage
Money Assets Money
stock change Change Change
M1 M2 M3
FIGURE 1
Monetary Aggregates of Pakistan
(M2). Money supply (M2), during 2006-07, expanded by Rs. 47.8 billion or
14 percent higher than the corresponding period the previous year. The main
reason of this high monetary growth, during this period, was sharp rise in the
net foreign assets (NFA) of the banking system and the growth in the net
domestic assets (NDA) of the banking system accelerated at a lesser pace.
The overall money supply (M2) increased by 14 percent as against 12.1
percent in the same period last year. The monetary expansion was kept
marginally below the projected nominal GDP growth over 14 percent in view
of monetary overhang that had built up from excessive yearly monetary
expansion since 2002-03.
Figure 2 presents the upward increasing trend in money supply (M3)
during 1990 to 2011. During the 1990s, money supply increased at large
level not only in public sector but also in private sector.
FIGURE 2
Trends in Monetary Aggregates
reasons for this double-digit inflation rate are observed in 1990s which
include supply shocks, monetary policy, tax policy, external shocks, pricing
policy (i.e. procurement prices for agriculture products). While, expectations
of people are the main factors that explain the inflationary pressures. The
inflationary trends are explained with the help of Figure 3.
FIGURE 3
Trends in Inflation Rate
DATA
The data for this study are taken from Pakistan Economic Survey (Various
Issues), Ministry of Finance, Fifty Year Economy of Pakistan (SBP) and
World Bank (World Development Indicators). The data ranges from 1972-73
to 2011-13 is used for the analysis. Study uses inflation rate (IR) as
dependent variable while Money supply (M2), interest rate (i), Gross
CHAUDHRY et al.: Monetary Policy and Its Inflationary Pressure in Pakistan 259
MODEL SPECIFICATION
The following model is formulated for the estimations of the results of
money supply and inflation. This model finds the short-run and long-run
impacts of money supply on inflation in Pakistan as follows:
IRt = 1+ 2 (M2) + 3(GDP) + 4(i) + t
WALD-TEST (F-STATISTIC)
After regressing ARDL equation, we apply the Wald test (F-Statistic). The
Wald test (F-Statistic) is used to establish the long-run relationship between
dependent and independent variables.
The Null Hypothesis is given as follows:
260 Pakistan Economic and Social Review
TABLE 2
Descriptive Statistics
Variables GDP I IR M2 RM
Mean 3006686 8.642564 10.64679 1351264. 135586.3
Median 1077943 8.800000 9.094895 544732.0 43910.17
Jarque-Bera 35.01189 1.434803 9.699595 16.91541 81.88817
Probability 0.000000 0.488019 0.007830 0.000212 0.000000
Observations 40 40 40 40 40
STATIONARITY OF DATA
The stationary can be checked with the help of ADF test. Table 3 shows the
calculation for ADF Test at the critical level of five percent. The results of
the data show mixed order of integration.
TABLE 3
ADF Unit Root Test
Variable At level At 1st Difference Conclusion
GDP 0.914946 5.9399 I (1)
IR 7.712870 8.9422 I (0)
M2 1.011641 4.9399 I (1)
I 3.097144 4.9422 I (0)
Source: Authors calculations based on E-Views 7.0.
TABLE 6
Short-Run Impact of Monetary Policy on Inflation Rate
Dependent variable is INF
Regressor Coefficient Standard Error T-Ratio
di 0.033239 0.25455 0.13058
dM2 1.7542 4.0498 0.43316
dGDP 19.6047 8.2844 2.3664
dC 1.5451 6.4694 0.23883
ecm(1) 0.29565 0.18399 1.6069
STABILITY TEST
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2012
The straight lines represent critical bounds at 5% significance level
VI. CONCLUSION
The present study is designed to investigate the short-run and long-run
impact of monetary policy on inflation rate in Pakistan by using the time
series data and employs ARDL techniques for the estimation of the results.
The study figures out important policy variables that would be helpful in
prudent policy formulation for controlling inflation in Pakistan. Results of
CHAUDHRY et al.: Monetary Policy and Its Inflationary Pressure in Pakistan 265
the study go in favour of monetarist approach that money supply is the main
cause of inflation while any increase in interest rate is responsible for
reducing inflationary pressure in Pakistan. While increase in national income
fulfills peoples demand for the commodities and slows down the inflationary
pressure, the results reveal. This leaves a clear message for economic
planners that inflation targeting policies may be helpful through controlling
the interest rate, money supply and country output level.
266 Pakistan Economic and Social Review
REFERENCES
Abulrazag, B. and M. M. Shotar and A. Al-Quran (2003), Money supply in Qatar:
An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences,
Volume 19(1), pp. 118-126.
Ahmed, N. and F. Ahmed (2006), The long-run and short-run endogeneity of money
supply in Pakistan: An empirical investigation. SBP-Research Bulletin,
Volume 2(1), pp. 267-278.
Bakare, A. S. (2011), An empirical study of the determinants of money supply
growth and its effects on inflation rate in Nigeria. Journal of Research in
International Business and Management, Volume 1(5), pp. 124-129.
Brumm, H. J. (2005), Money growth, output growth, and inflation: A reexamination
of the modern quantity theorys Linchpin Prediction. Southern Economic
Journal, Volume 71(3), pp. 661-667.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20062067
Chaudhary, M. A. and N. Ahmed (1995), Money supply, deficit and inflation in
Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, Volume 34(4), pp. 945-956.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41259914
Chaudhry, I. S., Y. Qamber and F. Farooq (2012), Monetary policy, inflation and
economic growth in Pakistan: Exploring the cointegration and causality
relationships. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, Volume
6(2), pp. 332-347.
Christensen, M. (2001), Real Supply Shocks and The Money Growth-Inflation
Relationship. The Aarhus School of Business, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210
Aarhus V. Denmark.
Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller (1979), Distribution of estimators for autoregressive
time series with unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
Volume 74(366a), pp. 427-431.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller (1981), Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive
time series with a unit root. Econometrica, Volume 49(4), pp. 1057-1072.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912517
Dwyer, G. P. and R. W. Hafer (1999), Are money growth and inflation still related?
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, Volume 84(2), pp. 32-43.
Fitzgerald, T. J. (1991), Money Growth and Inflation: How Long is the Long-Run?
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
Friedman, M. (1968), The role of monetary policy. The American Economic
Review, Volume 58(1), pp. 1-17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831652
CHAUDHRY et al.: Monetary Policy and Its Inflationary Pressure in Pakistan 267