NOLD: Feminism Hurts Modern-Day Relationships - Daily Nebraskan: Opinion

NOLD: Feminism hurts modern-day relationships - Daily Nebraskan: Opinion 2/22/13 4:35 PM
21
Clear
Advanced Search
GO
Home News Sports A&E Opinion Visuals Advertising About Classifieds Contests Fashion
Welcome back,
jpaxonreyes
Login | My Dashboard | Register
Home Opinion
View Today's
Paper
NOLD: Feminism hurts modern-
day relationships
SStor
toryy Comme
Commen t s ( 4
44 ) Print Font Size:
Recommend 938 Tweet 78 0 11
Posted: Friday, February 22, 2013 12:00 am
Zach Nold | 44 comments
Feminism has met its goals and women are now

equal with men as they should be. We are truly
beginning to see feminism change our economy,
college campuses and relationships. However,
an overreaching has begun to happen through
feminism whether or not they realize it.
Feminism has achieved what it was set out to

do, and now that women are considered equal,
feminists want more. The movement is ruining Social
modern relationships, and its bringing about
the downfall of men. This can easily be seen by Media
the numbers on a college campus and in the
modern economy. Facebook
The fact of the matter is: the rules of survival Twitter

have changed. No longer do people need to
be risk takers, strong and resilient to survive in Instagram
the world. So, in an economy that relies on
communication and thinking over physical
strength, women are excelling, according to
the Institutions and Development Database.
This is because the job market is better suited Events

for women, and the idea that men are more
competitive than women has all but February 2013
disappeared. Business-women have started to Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

eclipse men in many companies for pay and 1 2
position. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
For the first time in 2010, women made up a majority of the workforce, and in 2011 women held 51.4 24 25 26 27 28
percent of all jobs in management or professional positions, while holding 46.6 percent of all jobs in the
labor force. The argument that women simply cant make it in todays economy is a fallacy as the today's events
statistics show; its the women who are on top now and increasing their numbers as Fortune 500 CEOs in browse
the past years.
submit
College and relationships, however, have a greater impact on the immediate student body. According to
http://www.dailynebraskan.com/opinion/article_1b6e3d68-7c8e-11e2-a370-001a4bcf6878.html#user-comment-area Page 1 of 12
Hanna Rosin and her article The End of Men, women earn 60 percent of all masters degrees, 42
percent of all MBAs and 60 percent of all bachelors degrees. Women have become equal in both the Opinion
realms of education and economics, but feminists fail to acknowledge both of these statistics. So, they
continue to push against the evil man until they can push no further.
However, men also may not be adapting to an ever changing environment that we are now a part of.
Markets that require typical male attributes were the greatest areas affected by the decrease of blue
collar jobs during the recession. This has hurt men and the male egos. Still guys, we need to adapt, pull
ourselves up by our bootstraps and claim our place on the pedestal next to women as equals.
The advancement of feminism past the point were at now poses dire consequences for women. Men
have begun to adopt a habit where they are no longer being held to a higher standard, so they can BOETTNER:
slum it in college receiving Cs, while women would kill for an A. Dont get me wrong; the blame Feminism means
shouldnt be placed on women, as it isnt their fault that men chose to only half-ass it in school. The more than
grade difference may come from women wanting to prove themselves in a mens world, whereas men
womens equality
may become complacent.
posted: February 22
Comments (2)
The gender gap favoring females has gotten so bad that many colleges are trying to bring more men in
than women to keep enrollment equal. The rolls have flipped. Men are now the minority in certain
schools, and affirmative action may be swinging the other way.
Men have fallen behind by their own doing as well as overreaching feminism. Yet, women are the ones
who are hurt the most when it comes to relationships. Feminism has disturbed the modern relationship
and thrown equal relationships off balance. An equal relationship should be when two people work
together to achieve a common outcome based on mutual desires. However, relationships today are
based on who can get the last word in, who can outdo the other, essentially who comes out on top.
Suzanne Venker the author of The War on Men, stated, Feminism didnt result in equality between
NOLD: Feminism
the sexes it resulted in mass confusion. Today, men and women have no idea whos supposed to do
what.
hurts modern-day
relationships
This statement is best reflected in modern-day relationships, specifically between those of us who are in posted: February 22
college, or leaving it for the real world. Instead of the ideal marriage feminists told you marriage would Comments (44)
become, it has become nothing more than a last resort for many women who want to have kids but find
themselves running out of time on their biological clock.
The fact is women have become so independent and focused on their work many have forgotten how to
have a relationship based on mutual understanding and cooperation. Instead, it has become a
competition, and feminism has turned relationships into a competition of equality as well.
According Suzanne Venker, men have it so easy when it comes to relationships. No longer are men
required to buckle down and court a woman to receive some satisfaction for their needs. Women, like
men, are willing to have quick, easy relationships with little strings attached, or one night stands to
satisfy them. In regards to equality, there is nothing wrong with this. However, this plays into the
stereotypical male mentality one which I disagree with and dont think feminists should strive for. It is a
mentality of promiscuity and conquests verses nurturing a relationship and respecting a woman for who
she is.
The idea of equality can take on two forms. It can either be interchangeable, as when one perfect
replica takes the place of the former. Or it can take the shape of equality of value, as in a relationship.
In our case, valuing the other sex as equals because they can provide traits you cant, and vice versa.
This doesnt mean that women need to do gender-specific activities or men need to do their gender-
specific set as well in their lives or a relationship. All it means, is men and women in a relationship need
to value one another equally and agree to their responsibilities to the relationship, together in mutual
partnership.
In the end, women and men should be equal. Yet, being equal doesnt mean pushing men off the
platform. It means working together to create better relationships, a more lucrative economy for all, and
encouraging stronger moral principles in our youths lives.
The notion that women should be protected, and have the door held open for them will always be
something this writer places value on, which is not anti-feminist. It is in fact the opposite. A man who
places value on a woman in a way such as this is anything but a pig, for we are not equal because we
are interchangeable. We are equal because we value each others joys, sorrows and talents in a
manner completely original to us, yet completely definitive of what a man and woman look for in each
other.
Zach Nold is a Senior English major. Reach him at opinion@dailynebraskan.com
More about Opinion

ART ICL
ICLEE: BOETTNER: Feminism means more than womens equality
ART ICL
ICLEE: CALLAHAN: Strong preschool education begins foundation for successful life
ART ICL
ICLEE: UNL announces addition of 36 new agriculture faculty members by 2014
ART ICL
ICLEE: Letter to the editor, Feb. 21
More about Feminism

ART ICL
ICLEE: BOETTNER: Feminism means more than womens equality
ART ICL
ICLEE: BOETTNER: Female celebrity shaming distorts young girls opinions
ART ICL
ICLEE: CROGHAN: Stereotypical gender roles have no place in modern society
ART ICL
ICLEE: BUCKLEY: Halloween costumes should not be subjected to gender stereotypes
Recommend 938 Tweet 78 0 11
Discuss Print
Posted in Opinion on Friday, February 22, 2013 12:00 am. | Tags: Opinion, Feminism, Modern
Relationships
Similar Stories Most Read

BOETTNER: Feminism means more than womens UNL student, Matt Dutton, dies in parking
equality garage
WELCH: Many American universities policies on JONES: ASUN fails in student education,
diversity squelch free speech involvement
CALLAHAN: Strong preschool education begins 10 Below grand opening promises new
foundation for successful life nightclub experience
UNL announces addition of 36 new agriculture JONES: ASUN fails in student education,
faculty members by 2014 involvement
UNL student, Matt Dutton, dies in parking
garage
From The Web by Taboola
Billionaire Tells Controversial Video Sneak Peek: Designing World Cup 2010 Top
Americans to Prepare Spreads Virally After B McLaren's New $1M S 10 Hottest Soccer/Foot
F
(Moneynews) (Moneynews) (Bloomberg) (The Digital Camera
Experts)
Rules of Conduct
Keep it Clean. Be Nice.

1 Please avoid obscene, 4 No racism, sexism or any
vulgar, lewd, racist or sort of -ism that is
sexually-oriented degrading to another
language. person.
Don't Threaten or Be Proactive.

2 Abuse. 5 Use the 'Report' link on
Threats of harming each comment to let us
another person will not be know of abusive posts.

tolerated. AND PLEASE
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Share with Us.
6 We'd love to hear
Be Truthful. eyewitness accounts, the
3 Don't knowingly lie about history behind an article.
anyone or anything.
Welcome to the discussion.

Screen Name or Email Or, use your linked account:
facebook
Password google
Forgot?
yahoo
Login
Need an account? Create one now.
44 comments:
Luke Miller po st e d at 4 :2 11 pm o n FFri,

ri, FFe bb 2
22 ,, 2 0
01 3
3..
A few things:
Posts: 1 1. You aren't really talking about feminism here. You are talking about
dysfunctional relationships. Just because a woman will now call you on your
BS, doesn't mean you're any less full of it than you would have been 50 years
ago. (This also means that women will, from time to time, spout their own BS.
You're allowed to call them on that too.)
2. Don't pull that "feminism is antithetical to holding the door for a woman"
card. My wife is a feminist. She enjoys when I get the door for her. Some
women don't enjoy that. It's a personal preference.
3. Really an offshoot of number two - every woman is an individual person,
which is something else you seem to be failing to grasp. Lumping them all
together as either "feminist/evil" and "not feminist/one-of-the-good-ones" is
probably a HUGE factor in (if I'm reading between the lines correctly) your
inability to find and maintain a successful, healthy relationship. If you actually
make an effort to get to know them as such, rather than as cookie-cutter puzzle
pieces to fill the voids in your life, I'm sure your courting efforts will go more
smoothly.
4. You are not Don Draper. You will neverLog
be In
Don Draper. Even
to report. Linkif this Reply
was
1960's Manhattan, and not 2010's Lincoln, you would never have been Don
Draper. You are, at best, Pete Campbell. (Truthfully, you shouldn't WANT to be
read more (about 5 more lines)
either one, but you seem to long for the glory days of the white male, so in an
Kitty po
post e d at 4 :1 5 pm o n F ri, F e b 2 2 , 2 0 1 3 .
I hope your dick shrivels up and falls off.

Posts: 1
If you even have one.
Log In to report. Link Reply
zapfizzle po
post e d at 4
4:1 4 pm
pm o nn F ri,
ri, F eebb 2
22 ,, 2
2001 3
3.
Dear DN- please employ a copy editor. You are trolling too many people at
Posts: 1 once!
funkathustra po st
steed at
at 4 :1
:133 pm o
onn F ri,
ri, FFe b 2 2
2,, 2
20 1
133.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJtMNSZ5ZfY
Posts: 2
funkathustra po st
steed at
at 4 :1
:100 pm o
onn F ri,
ri, FFe b 2 2
2,, 2
20 1
133.
Lemme put on my editor hat and help you out, as you've totally embarrassed
Posts: 2 yourself with this piece.
I'll go over your hollow, baseless claims in a moment, but there's a broader
problem here: you have a short-sighted, sophomoric understanding of gender
issues. As men, we will never fully understand the challenges that women go
through, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't give it our best effort. What you've
written is extremely offensive to the people who work every day to eliminate
gender inequality.
Onto the editing:
Your first two grafs are identical. Start by deleting either of them.
Third graf:
"So, in an economy that relies on communication and thinking over physical
strength, women are excelling, according to the Institutions and Development
Database."
I have no idea what the "Institutions and Development Database" are, but if
you're referring to the OECD Gender, Institutions
Log In toand Development
report. Link Database
Reply
(GID-DB), the database states that although women make up 55% of the
professional
read more (aboutand
24technical workforce, women have an earned income ratio of
more lines)
0.64. In other words, women are highly skilled and talented; we just don't pay
them very much.
shinkokami08 po st
steed at 4 :2 1
1 pm
pm o
on FFri, FFeeb 2 2
2,, 2
20 1 3 .
How does that support your point?
I also think one of the biggest flaws is that is completely America-centric.

Posts: 3
Fourth graf:
There are other countries in the world with the same disparities that existed
"Business-women
in America 60have
yearsstarted
ago ortomore.
eclipse men in many companies for pay and
position"
Yet women still earn 77 cents on the male dollar, and
Log In to that drops
report. Linkto 68 cents
Replyfor
African American women and 58 cents for Latinas. (US Census, "Income,
Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011",
jmarieslagle po st e d at 4 :0 5 pm o n FFri,
ri, F eebb 2
22 ,, 2 0
01 3
3..
I suppose one could say that feminism has achieved its goals, if those goals
Posts: 1 include 1 in 3 women worldwide being raped or beaten in her lifetime, a
woman earning significantly less money than a man with the same
qualifications and position, or women still being expected to take on the
majority of childcare and household duties even if she and her partner work
the same amount of hours at a "real job." The argument in terms of differences
between college attendance and degree between the sexes is an important one
that needs looked at critically, but instead of looking at the construction of
masculinity and the pillars of hegemonic masculinity, women are blamed for
succeeding in an environment which was not created by or for them.This article
is insulting, and completely ignores any differences by race, class, sexual
orientation, or otherwise. The author's cis-gendered, white, heterosexual, male
privilege definitely shows. And in the future, it may be best to avoid using a
Fox "News" opinion piece as your source
westopher po st
steed at
at 4 :1 8
8 pm o
on F ri,
ri, FFe b 2 2
2,, 2
20 1
133..
I was just about to comment, asking if I was the only one who was very
Posts: 1 bothered by the fact that the author is assuming every woman is straight.
Well said!
shinkokami08 po
post
ste d at 4
4:0
:05 pm
pm o
onn FFri,
ri, FFe bb 2
22 ,, 2
2001 3
3.
literally idiocy. I could edit every single sentence in this article. I wouldn't
Posts: 3 pursue a career in journalism if you're looking to be successful.
Kid po
post eedd at 4 :0 1 pm
pm o nn F ri, F eeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Honestly I think everyone is over-reacting. I'm 90% positive this is a satirical

Posts: 2 piece. I could be wrong but just look at the way it's written. It definitely lends
itself to satire more than definitive opinion.
shinkokami08 po st
steed at 4 :0 8
8 pm
pm o
on FFri, FFeeb 2 2
2,, 2
20 1 3 .
I think if this was satire there would be 32 laughing people and 1 offended
Posts: 3 person, rather than the opposite.
boris po
post e d at 4
4:2 0 pm
pm o nn F ri,
ri, F eebb 2
22 ,, 2
2001 3
3.
You should check out some of the previous junk he's "published". It's not
Posts: 2 satire.
Kid po
post eedd at 4 :0 0 pm
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Honestly I think everyone is over-reacting. I'm 90% possitive this is a a satirical

Posts: 2 piece. I, of course, could be wrong. Seriously though, look at the way it's
written, it definitely lends itself to satire more than to an actual opinion.
teacher_miss po st e dd at 3 :5 3 pm
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
I could go on about how the facts and statistics referenced in this article are
Posts: 1 poorly applied. I could also go on about how this kid has absolutely no
credibility. But I will simply say this: misguided, chauvinistic tirades like this one
are the very reason women will have to work extra hard to be equal to men
(which we're not, despite what the author may have you believe). I bet he
thinks racism is dead, too.
psychstudent47 po
post e d at 3 :4 8 pm
pm o
on FFri,
ri, F e bb 2
22 ,, 2 0
01 3
3..
Women are now equal to men? From the beginning of the article, I can't grasp
Posts: 1 this argument. I agree with Keaton, and equality between men and women has
not yet been achieved simply because of a difference in the workforce. Look at
the pay rates between men and women for the same job. This article is
ridiculous, although it is well-written, it's a weak argument and an insulting
inference. As a male and a feminist, I think this author needs a little more
research.
QueryingKiwi po
post e dd at 3 :3 6 pm
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeebb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Dear Mr. Nold,

Posts: 1
I am a female majoring in chemical engineering, a field that was comprised of
nearly entirely men as recently as 50 years ago, and is still dominated by
them. I've had to work hard to be successful in my classes so that when I
graduate I can get support myself without having to depend on my parents or
a husband. At the same time, I have been in the most wonderful well balanced
relationship for over a year now. Deal with it.
Keaton Soto-Olson po st
ste d at
at 3 :3
:333 pm
pm o nn F ri,
ri, FFe b 2
22 ,, 2 0
0113
3..
A poorly constructed argument and a poorly written article. Speculation and

Posts: 1 conjecture abound with very weak evidence. I mean read the part about men
and women and their respective grades, come on! In the end you push for
equality which is the end goal but you provide little in the way of means to that
end. I didn't expect much from a Nold article so I cannot say that I'm
disappointed, but I am surprised he still writes.
mls312 po st e d at
at 3 :2
:23 pm o
on F ri, FFeeb 2
22 ,, 2
20 1
133.
Thoughts:
Posts: 1
1. I find it ironic that rule #4 for commenting says no sexism, and yet that is
exactly what this article is.
2. You need to talk to a feminist, because you have an incredibly skewed
definition of what feminism is.
3. There is solid research to counter pretty much every point made here.
4. This: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/27/men-dont-recognize-
benevolent-sexism_n_885430.html
ddtx po st e dd at 33:2 0 pm
pm o n F ri,
ri, F e bb 2
222,, 2 0
01 3
3.
PROTIP: Before attempting to write an article about feminism, make sure you
Posts: 2 actually know something about feminism. Or else you'll look like this guy.
Abbie po st e d at
at 3 :1
:15 pm o n F ri, FFeeb 2
222,, 2
2001
133.
It's so incredibly frustrating to see straight white males deny the presence of
Posts: 1 undeserved privilege in their life. Open your eyes.
orangeclouds7 po
post e dd at 3
3:0 7 pm
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeebb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 .
My god, Nord, you're a senior English major? I weep for my alma mater. Your
Posts: 1 ridiculously glib and ignorant opinions aside, this piece reads like a middle
school topical essay. Ouch.
taylorpbrooks po st e d at
at 3 :0
:03 pm o
onn F ri, F eebb 2
222, 2 0
0113 ..
Does the Daily Nebraskan have such a juvenile conception of its role as a
Posts: 1 newspaper and of its First Amendment rights that it continues to publish this
writer's ridiculous trash in some manic effort to prove that they know that they
can? Congratulations, DN, you've stirred up some conversation. Now please,
post something worthy of the University of Nebraska.
Whatonearth po
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Also, you might consider sending this to The Onion! Seriously, it will get the
Posts: 2 attention it deserves.
Whatonearth po
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Perhaps the author should have chosen a different major.

Posts: 2
laur po
post
ste d at 2 :5
:52 pm
2,, 2
20 1
13 ..
I am a feminist because of men like you.

Posts: 1
dpkeller po st
steed at 2 :4 6
6 pm o n F ri,
ri, FFe bb 2
222, 2 0
01 3
3..
thanks for giving me something to laugh at today! I couldn't contain my
Posts: 1 laughter past the first sentence. Then I started feeling sad when I realized you
actually think this way....
FlyFlyPizzaPie2 po
post
ste d at 2 :4
:43 pm
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFe b 2
22 ,, 2
2001 3
3..
I love the basis for this opinion's bombastic statements - other people's books
Posts: 3 and articles that support the presupposed view - failing to acknowledge how
those writers came to their conclusions.
Cool DN. Keep sharing sensational claims that bring in the page views. Fuck
self-respect.
kbb po
post eed at
at 2 :4 2
2 pm o
on F ri,
ri, F e bb 2
22 , 2
2001
13 ..
I'm choosing to believe that this is a piece written to purposely rile its audience
Posts: 1 and see how people respond, perhaps for some sort of ridiculous class project.
If i believed anything other than that, it would mean that UNL is now admitting
some of the most ill-informed, backwoods, insecure idiots known to man, and
that would depress me as an alum. Good luck with that project!
RightsforAll po st
steed at
at 2 :3
:399 pm o
on F ri,
ri, FFe b 2
222,, 2
20 1
133.
Perhaps before voicing opinions about gender equality you should do a little
Posts: 1 research beyond what you come up with when typing up a stream of
consciousness. Last I checked, women still make an average of $12,000 less
per year than our male-counterparts. This is the first of many errors in an article
filled with obtuse, misinformed statements.
http://www.pay-equity.org/
memorialred po
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Let me begin with a comment on how this is edited. As an English major, the
Posts: 1 author should know not to switch between the passive voice and speaking in
the third person. I'm a music major, and even I know that.
Secondly, this is an opportunity for the author to look at his point of view from
his privilege point. Society has granted him the privilege of being an upper
middle class, educated, white male. Yet he is acting like he's the victim of the
oppression of feminists? I would like to see his sources of information for the
data he presents in this article. Because according to National Committee on
Pay Equity, women only make 77 cents to a man's dollar. So a woman makes
77% of what a man does. And we're only speaking about WHITE women. How
does that make it seem that women are "on top"?
The author makes sweeping general statements about the quality of a modern
woman's relationship and sexuality. Again, let's reinforce the patriarchal
standards of what is acceptable in a woman. Or in anyone! The author is
clearly slut-shaming both men and women for being promiscuous. I don't know
the author, but he still has no right to comment on the promiscuity, or lack there
of, of any person male or female. Log In to report. Link Reply
read more (about 3 more lines)
kat685 po
post e d at 2 :2 9 pm o n FFri, FFe b 2
222,, 2
20 1
13 ..
Holy wow, I can't even begin to explain how ridiculous and ill-informed this is.
Posts: 1 The author can't get through the first twelve words without making it obvious he
has no idea what he's talking about.
JackntheBeanStalk po st e d at 2 :2 55 pm
pm o
onn F ri,
ri, FFe bb 2
22 ,, 2 0
0113
3..
So if I'm interpreting this right, men are testicles with legs, and women are uteri
Posts: 1 with legs?
c po
post e d at
at 2 :1
:19 pm o n F ri, F e bb 2 2 , 2 0 1
13 ..
This article makes me sick and I think so much less of the DN now. This is so
Posts: 1 incredibly offensive to women and should have never been published. The DN
should be ashamed. As an alum of UNL, I am incredibly disappointed and am
embarrassed that this is the sort of article that is approved by superiors and
published. Shame on you.
cohagen po st
ste d at
at 2 :1
:14 pm
pm o n F ri,
ri, FFeebb 2 2
2, 2 0
0113 ..
Dude, I think you posted on the wrong site. The DerN is over here ->
Posts: 1 http://dailyernebraskan.com/
taylorh po
post
ste d at
at 2 :1
:13 pm
pm o n F ri, FFeebb 2 2
2, 2
2001
13 ..
Thank you for sharing your opinion. I agree with a lot of what you said and it's
Posts: 1 awesome that you have the courage to be honest and share in a respectful
manner. I am a woman who is not a huge fan of feminism and how it's
changing our society. I am not saying that we should be oppressed or have less
opportunities but we are made differently than men to do a different job.
m po st
ste d at 2 :3 5 pm o n FFri, F eeb 2 2 ,, 2
20 1
13 ..
Uhh, you're a woman? Really? Because I cannot imagine how any rational
Posts: 27 woman would support this the way you are.
You're made to do a specific job? It's 2013, you're not made to do

anything.
Ayn Rand po
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
As a strong, politically involved woman, writer, and philosopher, I would

Posts: 5 have to disagree with you entirely.
To be honest, I'm having a hard time believing you are actually a woman. I
suspect that you are one of the following:
Zach Nold
Zach Nold's mom (still not a woman)
Zach Nold's drinking buddy
Please respond asap so I can better understand your debilitating stupidity.
husker98027 po st e d at
at 4 :0
:00 pm o
onn FFri,
ri, F eebb 2
222, 2 0
0113
3..
"how it's changing our society" do you enjoy the right to vote? Jesus, please
Posts: 3 educate yourself
NoldHater po st eed at
at 2 :0
:00 pm o
on F ri,
ri, FFeeb 2
222,, 2
20 1
133.
I can't begin to express my distaste for this piece. It doesn't matter that this is
Posts: 1 supposedly an opinion -- publishing it makes the DN look like a shit rag. Zach
Nold is an embarrassment to the paper and should've been terminated long
ago. Spreading ideas such as these perpetuates discriminatory ideologies.
Nold is a goddamn blemish on the face of the state of Nebraska. His
antiquated, small-minded excuse for an opinion is a complete fucking joke, and
to give him a platform on which to dispense that opinion to the general public
is an outrage. His superior at the DN should be ashamed for allowing this
drivel to hit the page.
husker98027 po
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Also, I would like to add that Zach Nold is the one who wrote this wonderful
Posts: 3 piece that completely objectified women:
http://admin.collegepublisher.com/preview/mobile/2.3308/2.3912/1.2433629
How am I supposed to take him seriously when he is obviously a misogynist?
husker98027 po
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
This makes me sick. Women are STILL making less money than men are - The
Posts: 3 most recent data shows that women working full time, year round are paid 77
cents for every dollar paid to their male counterparts. It's much worse for the
typical African-American woman paid 64 cents and the typical Latina woman
paid 55 cents for every dollar paid to a white, non-Hispanic man. Just because
women have jobs doesn't mean they're being treated fairly. Zach Nold
CLEARLY does not understand what it means to be disenfranchised. His
ignorance is astounding and, frankly, his columns make me think lower of the
DN as a whole.
Morgananan po st e dd at 1 :3 4 pm
pm o nn FFri,
ri, FFeeb 2 2
2, 2
20 1
13 ..
Jeez, read this http://www.dailynebraskan.com/opinion/article_91dd504c-

Posts: 1 7c8e-11e2-9688-001a4bcf6878.html
troyandabed po st
steed at
at 1 0 :5
:51 am o n F ri,
ri, FFe b 2 2
2,, 2
20 1
133..
If this article were written with the same language, but changed "feminism" to
Posts: 1 "civil rights", "men" to "whites" and women to "blacks" it could have been
written in 1968. This is the most shallow and myopic take on "feminism" I have
read yet. I would expect this article from a High School newspaper, not from a
supposed college senior.
m po st e d at
at 1 0
0:3
:32 am
am o n F ri, FFe b 2 2
2,, 2
20 1 3
3.
I have no idea if this column is being serious or trolling...

Posts: 27
Sections Services Contact us Search

Home About Us dailynebraskan.com
News Contact Us
Sports Rack Locations Search
Daily Nebraskan
A&E Advertise Search in:
P h o n e n u m b e r : 402-472-2588
Classifieds Submission Forms
Opinion Site Index
E - m a i l : dn@unl.edu All A&E Video
Obituaries Add Search Toolbar A d d r e s s : P.O. Box 880448 News Opinion
Photos Lincoln, NE 68588 Sports Photos
Videos
Online Features
Weather
Copyright 2013, Daily Nebraskan

Nebraskan,, Lincoln, NE
NE. Powered by BLOX Content Management System from TownNews.com. [Terms of Use | Privacy Policy]

NOLD: Feminism Hurts Modern-Day Relationships - Daily Nebraskan: Opinion

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

NOLD: Feminism Hurts Modern-Day Relationships - Daily Nebraskan: Opinion

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

NOLD: Feminism hurts modern-day relationships - Daily Nebraskan: Opinion 2/22/13 4:35 PM

Login | My Dashboard | Register

Recommend 938 Tweet 78 0 11

Posted: Friday, February 22, 2013 12:00 am

Zach Nold | 44 comments

Feminism has met its goals and women are now

Feminism has achieved what it was set out to

The fact of the matter is: the rules of survival Twitter

This is because the job market is better suited Events

disappeared. Business-women have started to Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

Zach Nold is a Senior English major. Reach him at opinion@dailynebraskan.com

More about Opinion

More about Feminism

Recommend 938 Tweet 78 0 11

Similar Stories Most Read

From The Web by Taboola

Keep it Clean. Be Nice.

Don't Threaten or Be Proactive.

another person will not be know of abusive posts.

Welcome to the discussion.

Need an account? Create one now.

Luke Miller po st e d at 4 :2 11 pm o n FFri,

I hope your dick shrivels up and falls off.

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Onto the editing:

I also think one of the biggest flaws is that is completely America-centric.

Fox "News" opinion piece as your source

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Honestly I think everyone is over-reacting. I'm 90% positive this is a satirical

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Honestly I think everyone is over-reacting. I'm 90% possitive this is a a satirical

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Dear Mr. Nold,

Log In to report. Link Reply

A poorly constructed argument and a poorly written article. Speculation and

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Perhaps the author should have chosen a different major.

I am a feminist because of men like you.

thanks for giving me something to laugh at today! I couldn't contain my

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

read more (about 3 more lines)

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

Log In to report. Link Reply

You're made to do a specific job? It's 2013, you're not made to do