PROHIBITION:

1. Matuguina Integrated Wood Products, Inc. v. CA, 263 SCRA

490(1996)
2. Aurillo v. Rabi, 392 SCRA 595 (2002)
3. Versoza v. CA (299 SCRA 100, 113-114[1998]), the Supreme Court
stated:
4. Vergara v. Rugue, 78 SCRA 312 (1977) (^^^^)
5. Nacionalista Party v. Bautista, 85 Phil 101 (1949)
6. Enriquez v. Macadaeg, 84 Phil. 674 (1949)
7. Asinas v. CFI Romblon, 51 Phil 665 (1928)

MANDAMUS:

1. Lamb v. Phipps, 22 Phil 456 (1921)

2. Big Five Products v. CIR, 31 July 1963, G.R. No. L-17600
3. University of San Agustin v. CA, 230 SCRA 761, G.R. No. 100588
March 7, 1994
4. Uy Kiao Eng v. Nixon Lee GR No. 176831, 15 Jan 2010
5. Manalo v. PAIC Savings Bank, G.R. No. 146531, March 18, 2005,
453 SCRA 747, 754-755
6. Mantrade/FMMC Division Employees and Workers Union v.
Bacungan, No. L-48437, September 30, 1986, 144 SCRA 510
7. Rural Bank of Salinas, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 96674,
June 26, 1992, 210 SCRA 510, 515-516
8. Angchangco, Jr. v. Ombudsman, 268 SCRA 301 (1997)
9. Carbungco v. Amparo, 83 Phil 638 (1949)
10.University of San Carlos v. CA, 166 SCRA 570 (1988)
11.Peralta v. Salcedo, 101 Phil 452 (1957)

Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus; Common matters

1. Mid Islands Power Generation Corp. v. CA, GR No. 189191, 29 Feb.

2012 (citing Domdom v. Sandiganbayan, 613 SCRA 528 [2010])
2. Santiago v. Vasquez, 217 SCRA 633 (1993)
3. Eternal Gardens Memorial Park v Court of Appeals, 164 SCRA 421
(1998)
4. Joy Mart Consolidated Corp. v Court of Appeals, 209 SCRA 738
(1992)
5. Go v. Judge Abrogar, 398 SCRA 166 (2003)

RULE 66 QUO WARRANTO

1. Abaya v. Alvear, 82 Phil. 103(1948)
2. Potot v. Bagano, 82 Phil 679(1949)
3. Serafin v. Cruz, 58 Phil 611 (1933)
4. Lacson v. Romero, 84 Phil. 740 (1949)
5. Acosta v. Flor, 5 Phil 18 (1905)
6. Garcia v. Perez, 99 SCRA 628 (1980)
7. Cruz v. Ramos, 84 Phil. 226 (1949)

RULE 67 EXPROPRIATION

1. Barangay San Roque v. Heirs of Pastor, G.R. No. 138896, 20 June

2000
2. National Power Corporation v. Jocson, 206 SCRA 520 (1992)
3. Visayan Refining Co. V. Camus, 40 Phil. 550 (1919)
4. Municipality of Binan v. Garcia, 180 SCRA 576 (1989)
5. Provincial Government of Rizal v. Caro de Araullo, 58 Phil. 308
(1933)
6. Republic v. Vda de Castellvi, 58 SCRA 336 (1974)
7. Export Processing Zone Authority v. Dulay, 149 SCRA 305 (1987)
8. Benguet Consolidated, Inc. V. Republic, 143 SCRA 466 (1986)
9. Coscolluela v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 77765 August 15, 1988)
10. Republic v. Lim, G.R. No. 161656. June 29, 2005
11. Vda De Ouano v. Republic, G.R. No. 168770, February 09, 2011

RULE 68 - FORECLOSURE

1. Seno v. Pestolante, 103 Phil. 414 (1958)

2. Limpin v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 166 SCRA 87 (1988)
3. Quimson v. PNB, 36 SCRA 26 (1970)
4. Ramos v. Manalac and Lopez, 89 Phil. 270 (1951)
5. Grimalt v. Velasquez, 36 Phil. 936 (1917)
6. Sy v. Court of Appeals, 172 SCRA 725 (1989)
7. Tolentino v. Court of Appeals, 106 SCRA 513 (1981)
8. Gravina v. Court of Appeals, 220 SCRA 178 (1993)
9. Ouano v. Court of Appeals, 398 SCRA 425 (2003)
10. Yulienco v. Court of Appeals, 393 SCRA 143 (2002)

+ General Banking Act of 2000, Sec. 47

+ Act No. 3135

RULE 69 PARTITION

1. Russel v. Vestil, 304 SCRA 738 (1999)

2. Ruguian v. Ruguian, 9 Phil. 527 (1908)
3. Miranda v. Court of Appeals, 71 SCRA 295 (1976)
4. Municipality of Binan v. Garcia, 180 SCRA 576 (1989)
5. Quimpo, vs. Abad Vda. de Beltran, G.R. No. 160956, February
13, 2008
6. De Guia v. CA, 413 SCRA 114

RULE 70- FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL DETAINER

1. Reyes v. Sta. Maria, 91 SCRA 164 (1979)

2. Hilario v. Court of Appeals, 260 SCRA 420 (1996)
3. Wilson Auto Supply Corp. v. Court of Appeals, 208 SCRA 108
(1992)
4. Munoz v. Court of Appeals, 214 SCRA 216 (1992)
5. Sumulong v. CA, 232 SCRA 372 (1994)
6. Ong v. Parel, 355 SCRA 691 (2001)
7. Co Tiamco v. Diaz, 75 Phil. 672 (1946)
8. Penas, Jr. v. Court of Appeals, 233 SCRA 744 (1994)
9. Caniza v. Court of Appeals, 268 SCRA 640 (1997)
10. Cetus Development, Inc. v. CA, 176 SCRA 72 (1989)
11. Heirs of Suico v. CA, 266 SCRA 444 (1997)
12. Mara, Inc. v. Estrella, 65 SCRA 471(1975)
13. Balagtas Realty Corp. V. Romillo, Jr., 114 SCRA 28 (1982)
14. Chua v. Court of Appeals, 286 SCRA 437 (1998)
15. De Laureano v. Adil, 72 SCRA 148 (1976)

RULE 71 CONTEMPT

1. Halili v. Court of Industrial Relations. 136 SCRA 112 (1982)

2. Ang v. Castro, 136 SCRA 453, (1985)
3. In re: Kelly, 35 Phil. 944 (1916)
4. In re: Lozano and Quevedo, 54 Phil. 801, 805 (1930)
5. People v. Godoy, 243 SCRA 64 (1995)
6. In re: Sotto, 82 Phil. 595 (1949)
7. Zaldivar v. Sandiganbayan, 166 SCRA 316 (1988)