Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
1.1 Power System
2
1.2 History of Power Sector in Pakistan
The demand exceeded supply capability by about 15-25% in the early 1990s,
requiring about 1,500 to 2,000 MW of load shedding during peak hours. There was
a weak link between the electricity price and demand, resulting in high demand.
While on the supply side, the capacity shortage was the inability of the public
budget to meet the high investment required by the power sector for development
of projects. The GOP, in line with its strategic plan of 1992 decided restructuring
the entire power sector in the country [6] [7].
In order to eliminate power shortage in minimum time, an Energy Task Force in
1993 was constituted by GOP to devise a comprehensive policy to revive the
energy sector [8]. On the recommendations of the Energy Task Force, the GOP in
March 1994 announced a "Package of Incentives for Private Sector Power
Generation Projects and Policy Framework" to introduce a large scale private
sector investment in power development [8] [9].
On December 16, 1997, issue of the Gazette of Pakistan proclaimed the enactment
of the Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power
Act, 1997, which had be-come effective on 13 December 1997, known as NEPRA
act [10]. Thus National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) has been
created to regulate the electric power sector of Pakistan, introduce sound
commercial principals and ensure transparency in the power sector.
The WAPDA act was amended in December 1998, which allowed the creation of
Pakistan Electric Power Company (PEPCO), and unbundling of WAPDAs Power
Wing into: eight distribution companies (formed from existing area boards);
four generating companies (comprising 11 of WAPDAs thermal generating
plants); and National Transmission and Dispatch Company Limited (NTDCL) [2].
More recently out of eight distribution companies Hyderabad electric supply
company (HESCO) is divided to from two companies Sukkur Electric Power
Company (SEPCO) and HESCO, while PESCO is under process of bifurcation to
form Tribal Electric Supply Company (TESCO).
Now Pakistan's power system is divided into three main categories which includes
power generation, WAPDA (Hydro generation), GENCOs (Thermal generation),
and IPPs (Independent Power Producers consisting of thermal and nuclear
generation). Transmission is controlled by NTDCL & KESC, whereas distribution
is controlled by power distribution companies i.e. 10 DISCOs and KESC.
Distribution companies (DISCOs) and KESC are supplied with electricity to meet
their demand by two transmissions companies (NTDCL and KESC).
The study will focus possibilities of construction of transmission lines over 500
kV in Pakistan by looking at the available experience of construction of power
transmission lines above 500 kV in both HVAC and HVDC technologies
throughout the world. The other focus area of this study is to relate the construction
of these EHV transmission lines above 500 kV to the major power projects in
Pakistan and future grid interconnections desired by the government of Pakistan as
per its international commitments. Since these EHV transmission lines are always
constructed to transfer huge amount of power over considerably large distances.
Already power dispersal feasibilities of mega projects in field of power and energy
are conducted by many international consulting companies specialized in this field
on behalf of government agencies related to this work. So the scope of this study
will also focus on these feasibilities about their merits and demerits if any.
Another aspect to be focused in this study will be economic feasibility of
construction of lines above 500 kV along with considerations for future
expansions, as more and more land congestions will strongly be felt for
constructing new transmission lines in same corridors due to the clearances
required by these EHV lines.
10
2.1.2 Under Ground Transmission
11
2.2.1 HVDC Transmission
HVDC is also used for submarine cables because over about 50 miles lengths AC
cannot be supplied. In these cases special high-voltage cables for DC are used.
Submarine HVDC systems are often used to connect the electricity grids of islands,
for example, between Great Britain and mainland Europe, between Great Britain
and Ireland, between Tasmania and the Australian mainland, and between the
North and South Islands of New Zealand. Submarine connections up to 600
kilometers (370 mi) in length are presently in use.
NTDC operates and maintains thirteen 500 KV and thirty six 220 KV Grid
Stations, over 5000 km of 500 KV transmission line and 7500 km of 220 KV
transmissions line in Pakistan. Transmission system of Pakistan is one of the few
largest synchronized systems in the world, expanding from Karachi in South to
Peshawar in north.
Highest operating voltage in the country for transmission system is 500 kV.
NTDCL operates and maintains primary transmission system of Pakistan at 500 kV
and 220 kV. While the secondary transmission system operated at 132 kV and 66
kV is owned and maintained by different distribution companies in the country.
Secondary transmission system consists of more than 900 132 kV grid stations and
24000 km of transmission lines.
15
Chapter 3
16
High voltage, extra high voltage or ultra high voltage transmission lines are
constructed for power dispersal over very long distances. The source of power may
be generating stations that are located far from load centers or from other utilities
willing to export power. Whatever the case may be if distance is large enough high
voltage to ultra high voltage AC or DC transmission lines are considered as means
for transfer of this power. For choosing the best option suitable and its
implementation for power dispersal there are few stages:
Power Resource potential identification
Planning
Implementation / Construction
In Pakistan power resource identification are provided via different forums, but
most prominent of them are Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA),
Private Power & Infrastructure Board (PPIB) and Alternate Energy Development
Board (AEDB). WAPDA in its report of Hydro Power Potential in Pakistan dated
may 2010 [15] has identified the potential sites for hydro power generation in
Pakistan. PPIB in its report on Pakistan Coal Power Generation Potential issued in
June 2004 [16] had identified various sites in detail for power generation from
coal; similarly AEDB in collaboration with PPIB identifies the renewable energy
resource potential for development of these sites.
3.2 Planning
In Pakistan power planning and power system expansion plans based on least cost
generation plans are studied and prepared by the Power Planning NTDCL once the
power generation sites are identified and their feasibilities are prepared.
3.2.1 Feasibility
NTDCL based on its least cost generation expansion plans prepares studies and
feasibilities for power dispersal of these new generating sites. Most suitable
options are selected during these transmission studies keeping in view, the
geographical location, availability of land for construction of transmission lines,
environmental impacts, power system reliability and compatibility with existing
infrastructure, future expansions, local or international commitments, socio-
economic impacts, impacts on national interest and economy. After passing
through detailed studies the best option is selected for further detailed design work.
3.2.2 Design
3.2.2.1.1 Towers
Transmission towers are the most visible component of the bulk power
transmission system. Their function is to keep the high-voltage conductors
separated from their surroundings and from each other. Higher voltage lines
require greater separation. The unintended transfer of power between a conductor
and its surroundings, known as a fault to ground, will occur if an energized line
comes into direct contact with the surroundings or comes close enough that an arc
can jump the remaining separation. A fault can also occur between conductors.
Such a fault is known as a phase-to-phase fault. The first design consideration for
transmission towers is to separate the conductors from each other, from the tower,
and from other structures in the environment in order to prevent faults. This
requirement and the electrical potential (voltage) define the basic physical
dimensions of a tower, including its height, conductor spacing, and length of
insulator required to mount the conductor. Given these basic dimensions, the next
design requirement is to provide the structural strength necessary to maintain these
distances under loading from the weight of the conductors, wind loads, ice loading,
seismic loads, and possible impacts. Of course, the structure must meet these
requirements in the most economical possible manner. This has lead to the
extensive use of variants on a space frame or truss design, which can provide high
strength with minimal material requirements. The result is the ubiquitous lattice
work towers seen in all regions of the country. The last design requirement is to
provide a foundation adequate to support the needed tower under the design loads.
Some of the environmental implications of a transmission line result directly from
these transmission tower design requirements. First, the physical dimensions of the
towers and the resulting line arrangements and line spacing establish the necessary
minimum dimensions of the ROW, including clearances to natural and man-made
structures. To create and maintain these clearances, it is often necessary to remove
or trim vegetation during construction and operation. In addition, excavation,
concrete pouring, and pile driving are required to establish foundations.
All of these tasks require access roads and service facilities with dimensions and
strength sufficient to handle large, heavy tower components, earthmoving
equipment, and maintenance equipment.
19
Fig-3.1 Transmission Line Components
Figure 3.4 shows a lattice-type tower with a single-circuit 765-kV line. A close
look at the figure reveals twelve conductors strung from insulators suspended on
the crossbar, but this is a single-circuit line. Thus, there are three isolated
conductors for a single AC transmission circuit. The lattice tower in Figure 3.4
uses groups of four conductors to carry each of the three phases. Above 220 kV,
bundled conductors are normally used to reduce corona discharge.
There are several other features to note in Figure 3.4. The conductors are supported
in a horizontal configuration. This configuration requires broad towers to achieve
adequate line separation, which is about 45 feet between conductors for 765 kV.
The horizontal configuration requires a correspondingly greater cleared width for
the ROW than a vertical configuration.
Figure 3.4 shows a 765-kV deviation tower located less than 50 yards from a new
two-story home. The illustration provides a good indication of the size of these
towers. The footprint for towers along straight segments is smaller because the
balanced conductor load reduces the bending moment that must be supported at the
foundations.
The minimum set of specifications for towers are the material of construction, type
or geometry, span between towers, weight, number of circuits, and circuit
configuration. At 500 kV, the material of construction is generally steel, though
aluminum and hybrid construction, which uses both steel and aluminum, have also
been used. The type of tower refers to basic tower geometry (Annexure-1,
Showing tower specifications used by NTDCL in Pakistan on 500 KV T/Lines).
The weight of the tower varies substantially with height, duty (straight run or
corner, river crossing, etc.), material, number of circuits, and geometry. The
average weight of 670 towers for 500-kV lines included in the EPRI survey (EPRI
1982) is 28,000 lb. The range of reported tower weights is 8,500 to 235,000 lb
[17]. The type of tower (specific tower geometry) is very site-dependent, and, for
any given conditions, multiple options are likely to exist. The next section provides
some illustrations of specific tower types and describes their relative impacts. The
number of circuits is generally either one or two. The circuit configuration refers to
the relative positioning of conductors for each of the phases. Generally the options
are horizontal, vertical, or triangular. The vertical orientation allows for a more
compact ROW, but it requires a taller tower.
The basic function of the tower is to isolate conductors from their surroundings,
including other conductors and the tower structure. Clearances are specified for
phase-to-tower, phase-to-ground, and phase-to-phase. Phase-to-tower clearance for
500 kV ranges from about 10 to 17 feet, with 13 feet being the most common [17]
specification. These distances are maintained by insulator strings and must take
into account possible swaying of the conductors. The typical phase-to-ground
clearance is 30 to 40 feet. This clearance is maintained by setting the tower height,
controlling the line temperature to limit sag, and controlling vegetation and
structures in the ROW. Typical phase-to-phase separation is also 30 to 40 feet
[17] and is controlled by tower geometry and line motion suppression.
Since the towers are tall, well-grounded metallic structures, they are an easy target
for lightning. This puts the conductors, other energized equipment, and even
customer equipment at high risk. To control the effects of lightning, an extra set of
wires is generally strung along the extreme top points of the towers. These wires
are attached directly to the towers (no insulation), providing a path for the
lightning directly to and through the towers to the ground straps at the base of the
towers. The extra wires are called shield wires and are either steel or aluminum-
clad steel with a diameter of approximately inch.
3.2.2.1.2 Conductors
.
3.2.2.2 Right of Ways (ROWs)
After final designs and detailed financial expenses government approval is sought
to arrange financing. When finance is arranged, contract is awarded via bidding to
successful contractor for construction of transmission lines in collaboration with
EHV department of NTDCL. Following few steps are followed during construction
in field:
Fig-3.12 Anchor Bolt Cage and Reinforcing for Tower Foundation Construction
Fig-3.13 Crane Being Used to Lower a Tower Section onto a Tower Base
EHV and UHV transmission is not a new idea, and a number of UHVAC circuits
have already been constructed in different parts of the world. For example, 495 km
of 1,150 kV circuits were built in the Former USSR in 1985 (Ekibastuz-
Kokcehtav) and then operating voltage changed to 500 kV after few years, and
427 km of 1,000 kV AC circuits have been developed in Japan (Kita-Iwaki power
line). Experimental lines of various scales are also found many
countries.[19] However, most of these lines are currently operating at lower
voltage due to insufficient power demand or other reasons.[20][21] There are
fewer examples of UHVDC. Although there are plenty of 500 kV (or below)
circuits around the world, the operative circuit above this threshold is
the Itaipu 600 kV project in Brazil. In Russia, construction work on a 2400 km
long bipolar 750 kV DC line, the HVDC EkibastuzCentre started in 1978 but it
was never finished. In USA at the beginning of the 1970s a 1333 kV powerline
was planned from Celilo Converter Station to Hoover Dam. For this purpose a
short experimental power line near Celilo Converter Station was built, but the line
to Hoover Dam was never built.
Jinping Sunan (JS): A 2095 km, 800 kV UHVDC 12-pulse bipole circuit
with 7200 MW capacity. Construction started in 2009, completed in
December, 2012.[25]
While voltage levels of 765 kV have been introduced in many countries which
include Canada, Brazil, Russia, USA, South Africa, South Korea, Venezuela
and India [33][34] [35].
The key objective of the transmission expansion plan [36] is to ensure that the
planned generation can be delivered to the load centers throughout the country. To
achieve this task following items are considered.
To check the transient and dynamic stability of 500 kV HVAC or above, and
HVDC systems catering for the bulk transmission of power from major power
plants to the major load centers to verify the adequacy of network for normal
and disturbed conditions.
Planning criteria is to study system in Steady State, Dynamic/Transient
Conditions, Grid Frequency Variations, Grid Voltage Variations and Short
Circuit (Fault Levels).
The power dispersal feasibility of the following mega power projects is discussed:
This feasibility study identifies the available corridors for the transmission lines
and transmission scheme to evacuate almost 36,000MW of power to load centers
from future hydropower projects.
Bunji 5400 MW
Palas Valley 580 MW
Tungas 2000 MW
Yulbo 2400 MW
System Study Services and Options for 26 HPPs
Most of the available and suitably accessible corridors in the north have some very
narrow sections with limited space. Therefore based on available corridors new
connection schemes were developed and the groups selected by the Consultants to
include the additional HPPs.
Aliot near the Murree- Muzaffarabad Road to collect power from Kunhar
Valley and also additional HPPs in the Jhelum Valley;
Mansehra to collect power from Chor Nullah and Ogi Valley; and
For each corridor the voltage levels as defined in the Contract of 500 kV HVAC,
765 kV HVAC and 500 kV HVDC were considered for study and analysis. The
initial corridors proposed included one from Chilas to the south up Thak Nala to
the Babusar Pass through the Kaghan Valley and down the Kunhar River to the
Jhelum River. There was no alternative found to the selected routes through the
passes at Babusar and Batugah where sections of the corridor reach altitudes of
more than 4000 masl. This altitude is more than the peaks of the highest
mountains in Europe. The new corridors for the additional HPPs also included
sections at high altitudes to connect Yulbo to Bunji and Basha to Gabral Kalam
resulting in significant corona problems particularly at higher voltages. Systems
and transmission line specialists worked together to consider feasible solutions.
voltage level to transmit power is also limited to the available rating of equipment
such as circuit breakers. This will remain a problem until commercially available
proven equipment becomes available. The cost of substation equipment for 765 kV
at the time of this study was found to be between 2 and 3 times more expensive
than the equipment for 500 kV. The Consultants concluded that the use of 765 kV
in a proposed transmission system could only be considered with the current
international knowledge and experience using single circuits and limited to
corridors with adequate width along the full length of the corridor. Such corridors
with adequate space are only found to the south of the mountainous regions where
there are also no proposed corridors reaching very high elevations. The
Consultants specialists also concluded that proven available design data for 500
kV double circuit transmission lines at lower elevations could be extrapolated for
elevations above 4000 masl.
As part of the initial phases to develop transmission system options a detailed Load
Flow Study was prepared by PPI for all the different options of corridors and
voltage levels for HVAC and HVDC. In these study all the planning criteria issues
included in the Grid Code were complied with. This detailed report was submitted
to NTDC in January 2011. The Options studied were as follows:
Option-2: A mix of 500 kV and 765 kV HVAC (500 kV at high altitude and
765 kV at low altitudes);
Option-A: Utilizing a corridor close to the border line which divides land
controlled by Pakistan and India (LoC);
Option-C: Without utilizing the corridor along LoC but with the alternative
reduced (rationalized) outputs of Bunji, Yulbo, Tungas and Palas Valley
HPPs.
All the results were compared and Options 1-A and 1-C were technically the most
feasible options. NTDC did not want to consider the corridor with sections close
to the LoC therefore Option A as unacceptable leaving Option-1C as the selected
proposal. The NTDC Power Planning department accepted this Option-1C with
detailed comments on the Consultants Systems Study Report of April 2011.
Detailed load flow simulations for normal and N-1 contingency conditions were
carried out for the options as identified in the initial system studies.
For the transmission scheme Option-1B the system would require a huge amount
of reactive power compensation to facilitate the power flow on 500 kV circuits to
the load centres, whereas for Option-1C the system remains relaxed all the way
from North to South.
Option-3 only considers an alternative for the evacuation of power from the Bunji,
Yulbo and Tungas HPPs, however power from the Yulbo and Tungas HPPs would
use the same 500 kV HVAC D/C transmission lines to Bunji as for Options 1 and
2. This collected power from these together with the Bunji HPP would be a total of
42
12,300 MW. This Option 3 considers the evacuation of all this power from Bunji
directly to Lahore using HVDC. However it is not technically possible as there is
not enough space due to many narrow valley sections of the corridor to the south
from Chilas for the 4 lines that would be required, which would comprise 3
Bipoles HVDC together with one 500 kV HVAC line for the Basha HPP. This
Option would also require a vast land area near Bunji for a converter station of
12,300 MW and this space is unlikely to be available. This option would also be
very expensive and therefore it has been considered as neither technically nor
economically feasible.
All the substations of HPPs and intermediate stations have been proposed to be
designed with 1 breaker configuration and to maintain fault levels reasonably
below the current factory standard equipment maximum limit of 63 kA. The short
circuit analysis found that the fault levels are more reasonable in Option 1C.
In all the Options the switchgear rating for the substations at the HPPs and for
intermediate substations should be set at 63 kA for the transmission system to
connect all the identified HPPs up to the year 2030.
These were prepared for the 2,400 km of transmission lines which were surveyed
in more detail with the SUPARCO data provided by NTDC.
Constructability
The steep valleys in the mountainous terrain in the north of Pakistan with many
hazards and corridors with some sections at very high elevations and severe winter
conditions will make installation and maintenance of some sections of the
transmission lines difficult, although considered physically feasible by the
Consultants. Essential challenge will be the lack of any access road and the non
feasibility of their construction as this may increase the already high capital costs
to the unsustainable level and prolong the construction period by years. The
Consultants advised NTDC that they believe that helicopters and other resources
available from the Pakistan military or other party will be needed not only for
construction but also for essential maintenance.
47
Fig-4.4 Geological Map of Project Area Fig-4.5 Dasu-Islamabad 500 kV T/L Altiutude
48
Fig-4.6 Option 1-A 26 Hydro Power Project Power Dispersal Feasibility
49
Fig-4.7 Option 1-C 26 Hydro Power Project Power Dispersal Feasibility
50
4.2.2 CASA-1000 [38],[39]
The proposed CASA-1000 project would build a cross-border power trade facility,
comprising 477km of 500kV HVAC transmission lines from Kyrgyzstan to a 1,300
MW HVDC converter in Tajikistan and thereafter 750km 500kV HVDC
transmission, via a 300 MW HVDC converter in Kabul, to a 1,300 MW terminal
with HVDC converter facilities in Pakistan. It can be viewed as a combination of
the following elements:
The concept of the CASA 1000 project was developed after a comprehensive
Phase-I pre-feasibility study (2007) of the viability of extending 500kV networks
from Tajikistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan. By the time of the Phase II study
(2009), that option was rejected in favor of a combined HVAC/HVDC
configuration. The final feasibility study was updated in December 2011.
The use of dedicated HVDC transmission for long distance power transit
interconnections is generally the optimum techno-economic option for the parties
involved in the various proposed power trading operation.
51
HVDC transmission is normally used to achieve efficient power transfers from a
single point to another, using an AC/DC converter at each end. DC transmission is
preferred over long distances as it does not require any intermediate substations or
compensation as AC transmission does. In this case, DC transmission is also
preferred as it allows the networks of Pakistan, Tajikistan and Afghanistan to
exchange power while remaining asynchronous and shielded from faults or
disasters occurring on the other side of the line.
The major obstacle to regional power trading, that is peculiar to the Afghanistan
situation, is the inability of the various neighboring grids in the CAR countries,
Iran and Pakistan to be synchronized with each other. The need for islanding is
also exacerbated because some of the CAR exporters do not permit Afghanistan
to synchronize its domestic generation to their grids without first meeting the
obligations of their respective Grid Codes.
In the foreseeable future it will not be possible for the three large regional power
systems blocks (Iran/Turkmenistan, CAR and Pakistan/India) to be synchronized
with each other, directly or indirectly through Afghanistan. If this option was to be
seriously considered, its implementation would cause a great deal of disruption to
the power systems in the many interconnected countries that are not involved with
cross border trading. On the other hand Afghanistan could be more easily
synchronized with one of the major blocks, and can feasibly be interconnected with
other blocks using interfaces such as HVDC converters facilities.
Based on load flow studies carried out during the initial assessment of the HVDC
interconnection, the Pakistan network at Peshawar can absorb all the power to be
delivered by the CASA DC interconnection project without incurring significant
costs in the upgrade of their AC power systems up to an import level of 1,000
MW. If the import level into Pakistan were increased to 1,300 MW or 2,000 MW,
then some additional 500 kV transmission out of the Peshawar area would
probably be required.
Access restrictions to the Peshawar substation site due to existing 500 kV and 220
kV lines would mean that the HVDC converter station would need to be located at
a site remote from Peshawar and tied into the Peshawar substation via some short
500 kV circuits. This has been included in the cost estimate by allowing for two 10
km 500 kV circuit to integrate the converter station into the existing network.
Under the project, Iran will build a powerhouse in its Zahedan province bordering
Pakistan, to generate electricity for export. A 700-kilometre transmission line of
500 kV HVDC Bipole for 1000 MW import of power from Iran will also be laid
from the Pakistan-Iran border to Quetta. Tehran has provided 50 million for
laying of 170 Km transmission line on its side for the import of 1000MW of
electricity from Iran in 2009.
Following are the reasons for considering HVDC over conventional HVAC system
as more feasible option:
Asynchronous system - Power control is easier and faults across border will
not travel due to DC interlink.
High voltage problems during energization of HVAC and voltage drop over
long distance during loaded conditions are not encountered in case of
HVDC.
The addition of transmission network necessary for the evacuation of power from
the Thar Power plants identified in the NPSEP [36] by 2016-17 would be as
follows:
The transmission additions necessary for the evacuation of power from the Thar
power plants in the NPSEP between 2016-17 and 2020-21 would be as follows:
500 kV lines to be double circuit quad bundled using Martin conductor (ACSR) in
North and mid country; and Araucaria (AAAC) in South. The following table
shows the total additional reinforcements required for the NTDC network till the
year 2030 over and above the ongoing, committed and planned till 2016-17.
58
Chapter 5
Conclusion
59
The study of feasibility of construction of transmission lines above 500 kV in
Pakistan can be concluded in light of following points:
During the study it was also noticed that due to reservations of NTDCL over
transmission lines passing near the LoC, alternatives of transmission lines
route were finally proposed which resulted in downward revision of Bunji
HPP from 7100 MW to 5400 MW, Pallas Valley HPP from 621MW to 580
MW, Tungus HPP from 2200 MW to 2000 MW and Yulbo HPP from 3000
MW to 2400 MW.
It is also concluded that smaller hydro projects and their transmission
system development in the same corridor could lead to further congestion of
already limited spaces for construction of these proposed transmission lines.
So care full planning and good co-ordination between different stake holders
is required to implement these projects, so maximum hydropower potential
in this corridor could be exploited.
Since the power transfer in CASA-1000 is limited to 1300 MW and only 750
Km transmission line is to be built +/- 500 kV bipole is considered as a
feasible option.
Similar is the case with Iran-Pakistan Power project. The power transfer in
this project is limited to 1000 MW and about 700 Km transmission line is to
be built +/- 500 kV bipole is considered as a feasible option. Though
constructability of 500 kV or 765 kV HVAC transmission line would not be
had been huge issue due to easy availability of vast open lands. But its
consequences of connecting synchronously another foreign system to
Pakistan transmission system could have been disastrous in case of faults
across the border. Besides the losses will be far lower in HVDC than 500 kV
or 765 kV HVAC transmission line. Substations in between or reactive
power compensation issues in HVAC system would had further escalated
the cost of transmission system.
Thar Coal power project is the only project where lines above 500 kV are
considered in Pakistan as NPSEP issued by NTDCL in 2011, as four
( 600 kV HVDC 2x2000 MW bipole each) from Thar to Lahore, three
( 600 kV HVDC 2x2000 MW bipole each) from Thar to Faisalabad and
one ( 600 kV HVDC 2x2000 MW bipole each) from Thar to Mulatn are
proposed for power dispersal from Thar Coal Power Project. Since the
number of HVDC transmission lines and 500 kV HVAC transmission lines
for reinforcement of AC transmission system are proposed, constructability
of HVAC above 500 kV would definitely be issue as the amount of power to
be transferred would require far greater number of lines and space. Further
500 kV HVAC system is already existent, replacement or up gradation to
765 kV would require huge amounts, which will not be economically
feasible as well.
Since the length of these proposed lines is easily over 1000 Km, 1000 kV
UHVAC system (recently re-developed by china and its successful operation
since commissioning) will not be even feasible due economic reasons as
losses will be far greater as compared to HVDC, besides higher construction
cost for transmission lines of UHVAC system.
Since there are only two terminals proposed in each HVDC line, it will be
economically feasible unlike 26 Hydro power cases and the smaller amount
of generation in route can be connected to existing or proposed 500 kV
HVAC system.
Since the feasibility of Thar Coal Power Project in 2011, higher HVDC
voltage levels had been successfully commissioned and are operating. 800
kV UHVDC transmission lines are operating in China at various sites for
more than three years now.
So the voltage levels for these proposed HVDC bipoles can be raised from
600 kV to 800 kV after careful study keeping in view reliability of system,
economy, and constructability, environmental and other important factors in
consideration.
So it can be concluded from this study that construction of high voltage lines
in Pakistan is suitable. HVDC lines are the most suitable option of both
technologies due to its superiority of proven technology, lesser lines losses,
and cost efficiency over large distances. HVAC lines are limited in Pakistan
due to the smaller system in terms of loading of system and spacing required
in different cases. Further different transmission lines constructions options
are suited for different projects. So far, for the identified power projects
HVDC is better option to go beyond 500 kV in Pakistan.
THE END
References
[5] A. Malik, " Power crisis in Pakistan: A crisis in governance," Pakistan Institute of
Development Economics, Islamabad, 2012
[6] http://www.pmic.gov.pk/index.php?
option=com_content&view=article&id=1706&Itemi d=612 (Accessed in Nov,
2014)
[9] "Package of Incentives for Private Sector Power Generation Projects in Pakistan", Power
Policy 1994, Government of Pakistan, March 1994.
[10] "Policy for New Private Independent Power Projects ", Power Policy 1998, Government
of Pakistan, July 1998.
[11] http://electrical4u.com/electrical-power-transmission-system-and-network/
[18] Electrical Power System basics, Steven W Blume, IEEE Press, Wiley Inter science Inc.
Publications, 2007
[19] Du Z (2008), Study on Strategic Planning of Ultra High Voltage Grid Development in
China, Ph.D Thesis, Shangdong University (In Chinese)
[21] Zhao J, Niu L (2007b), Research and Application of UHVAC Transmission Technologies
in Japan Part II, Proceedings of CSU-EPSA, Vol. 19, No. 4, P. 16 (In Chinese)
[23] http://www.cec.org.cn/zhuanti/2012nianzhuantihuigu/zhongguodianlizhutiri/huihuangche
ngjiu/2012-08-03/88527.html (Accessed in Nov, 2014)
[24] "World's Longest UHV Power Line Operational in China". Transmission & Distribution
World. January 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
[25] http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2013-09/25/c_117508544.htm
66
[29] http://www.sgcc.com.cn/ztzl/tgyzl/zxbd/293860.shtml (Accessed in Nov, 2014)
[32] http://www.power-technology.com/features/featurethe-worlds-longest-power-
transmission-lines-4167964/ (Accessed in Nov, 2014)
[34] Power Transmission and distribution, UHV 1200 KV Transmission, Grid Tech, 2007,
Siemens by
[37] Feasibility of Evacuation of Power from 26 Hydropower Projects in the North, NTDCL
[38] Central Asia - South Asia Electricity Transmission and Trade (CASA-1000) Project
Feasibility Study Update, SNC Lavalin Int. Inc. Feburary 2011.
[39] Technical and Economic Options for Power Transit Operations through Afghanistan ,
John Irving, Peter Meier & Vijay Prash, August 2013
[40] Socio-economic profile and Impact Screeing, 500 kV Dasu-Islamabad Transmission Line
Project, Vol-I, NTDCL, Feburary 2013.
Appendices
Annexure i Tower Specifications Used By NTDCL on 500 kV T/Lines
Annexure ii Load Flow 2030 South, High Water Peak
69
Annexure iii Load Flow 2030 North, High Water Peak
70
Annexure iv Dynamic Study Sample
71
Annexure v Parameters for Lines Above 700 kV
72
73
74