Individual Guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms

The Federal Government signed sealed and delivered the

Constitution Act, 1982
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize

the supremacy of God and the rule of law

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental
freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief,
opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d)
freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and
security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the
principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected
to any cruel and unusual treatment or
punishment.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.

Credence must be given to that which is least likely to be mistaken by humankind

The evidence I have provided to the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP on
November 8 2007, File No. PC-2007-2316 and ….2317 has been forwarded to the Commissioner of
the RCMP for appropriate action and acknowledged November 16 2007 File 2007-1355445 proves
irrefutably the Constitution (Establishment) administers and enforcers of the Constitution (Document)
are not only incompetent to that endeavor but have deliberately put a modus operandi in place
conducive to the well being and benefit of the immoral of society to the humongous detriment of the
moral majority who not only finance the system but are deliberately estranged from their individual
guaranteed Charter Rights.
Whereas the intent of the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 which recognizes the
supremacy of God is to establish the spirit in which the Constitution (Establishment) is to structure a
system consistent and conducive to a moral society where every individual is guaranteed equality of
protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law
These nincompoops or conspirators, whichever you prefer have in fact structured a team of legal
specialists, members of the Law Society of Upper Canada to implement the Constitution in a manner
profitable to all the members of the Society and in their enthusiasm lost track of their original
legitimate purpose which of course was to put an efficient legal system in place capable of maintaining
the spirit of the Law in the spirit of God in the spirit of the moral majority who finance them to do so
and by their avarice indulgence have created a team of backasswards, highly skilled at scoring on our
own net.
I have presented the evidence for the distinct purpose of getting them the puck out of here and to put
personnel in place coherent to the Constitution intent to consistently score against the immoral until
they “cry uncle” After all that is what they are paid and authorized to do. Right?
1
 Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.

In a free and democratic society every individual is responsible for their own actions and must be
consistently in the spirit and in compliance with the Law and as a whole must decide what is
justifiable. A Public Inquiry is demanded to determine what is justifiable

The government (Establishment) has not demonstrated a modus operandi capable of backing the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and in fact the evidence I have provided has demonstrated their
established modus operandi is precisely contrary to their legitimate purpose to structure a system
consistent with the spirit of the Constitution to protect and benefit the people of a moral society where
each individual is presumed moral and in compliance with the spirit of the Constitution until such time
as evidence is provided to the authority having jurisdiction of ones non compliance whereas every
effort must be made in the spirit of the Law to substantiate the veracity of the accusation and the
preliminary evidence.

Where there exists a victim there most definitely exists a perpetrator and any evidence relative to the
circumstance linking one to the crime must be scrutinized for validity and any interference to the
initiative of discerning the truth is inconsistent with the intent of the spirit of the Law and in fact
obstruction of Justice.

Due consideration must be given to the priority stated or implied by the guarantee itself where due
diligence to the support of the guarantee must be irreproachably applied with fortitude and conviction,
FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith whereas the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms are contingent on the presumption one is in consistent compliance with the Law and where
evidence is presented to the authority of jurisdiction suggesting one has acted to the contrary the
presumption has been compromised and they are called upon to cooperate in the spirit of the Law to
demonstrate they are of the spirit of the Law where any demonstration to the contrary is to the
detriment of the spirit of the Law and the people who finance the entire system.

It is prudent to mention that the Federal Government personnel are representatives of the people who
must be irreproachable to the spirit of the Constitution and the money they spend is the people’s and
they must be able to demonstrate a modus operandi capable of assuring the money is used efficiently
and effectively as per the intent.

A person accused of a crime supported by reasonable evidence is obliged to cooperate in the spirit of
the Law and the people and failure to do so is obstruction of Justice and adds to the expense of
achieving Justice which is inherently passed on to the people depriving them of their money and right
to efficient effective Justice implicating the alleged further distancing them from their pure
uncompromised legitimate guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms.

If logical recourse consistent with the evidence provided against them is to search their premises or any
personal property they must permit it or be charged with obstruction of Justice.

One must ask why they would object if they were of the spirit of the Law which they must be to be in
compliance with the Law and most particularly what would they have to hide other than implicating
evidence.

Any evidence acquired in the investigation implicating them to other crimes must be held against them
to which they must be brought to court to answer for.
2
The Law isn’t a game for the lawyers to play and profit from but an entity financed by the people to
assure their guarantee of protection and benefits are indeed guaranteed as provided by the Constitution.

Anyone who has committed a crime against anyone has committed a crime against the people who
ultimately finance the whole damn system and such a person is a detriment to the whole of society
where due diligence must be applied to rehabilitation and bringing them on side with the spirit of the
Law and the people of the moral society guarantied by the Federal Government being the people.

Persistence must be to nipping immorality in the bud and to that endeavor the Law must be initiated at
home where the parents must be held responsible for their children until they reach the legal age where
the administers and enforcers of the Law take over responsibility.

The Law is the spirit of society as a whole where the government (establishment) has been assigned the
responsibility to act representative of the people and due diligence is demanded to ensure they act
responsibly consistent with and conducive to the spirit of the Constitution and the spirit of the people
whose lives and well being and the state of the nation are dependent on their adeptness to the task being
number one in priority of initiatives mandatory to the government establishment financed and entrusted
to administer and enforce the Law consistently in the spirit of the Law and the people, where every
individual is equal in all matters of Law where the right to vote is irrelevant as a major number of these
individuals are prohibited from voting due to age and these people are wholly dependent on
government personnel doing their jobs in respect of their individual guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms as well as the guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedom of all the people who do vote which
Charter rights are equally the same irrelevant to the opinions of the elected representatives who are
mandated to represent all the people equally in matters of their equal individual guaranteed Charter
rights.

Any government personnel who acts in non compliance with the Law does so on his or her own
personal initiative and are responsible for their own actions and will not be defended by the Federal
Government which is the people and all contracts of entitlements of employment to provide service to
the people and society as a whole are null and void upon conviction and where evidence has been
submitted to a government department having jurisdiction in such matters of a government employees
non compliance with the Law it is incumbent upon such department to commence or cause to
commence appropriate proceedings to determine the truth and upon conviction every effort must be
made to recover all benefits paid to such person from the earliest date of which such person was found
guilty to have committed.

The individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms are a fixed entity attached as an arm or a leg
with no restrictions in continuity commencing at the time of enactment of the Constitution in 1982 to
perpetuity where no government personnel has any legitimate authority to negate at any time without
the support of the people they are obliged to represent in the spirit of the Law they are bound to adhere
to and provide service to the people consistent with and conducive to their guaranteed individual
Charter rights.

I am of the opinion it is the Prime Minister of Canada who has the ultimate responsibility to assure the
government personnel are adept to the responsibility of backing the guarantee to each and every
individual as guaranteed and defined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms whereas he has
been granted the trust and authority by the people of Canada to act consistent with and conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights which are fixed, not to be debated nor a matter of his opinion or
anyone else’s as they are clearly defined and to be observed in the spirit of the Law and the spirit of
God which preceded him.
The individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights are fundamental to the Constitution and the very spirit
which Canada is founded on and it is incumbent upon every government personnel financed in the
service of our Country and the people to ensure due diligence to the guarantee. 3
Where evidence has been provided to the authority of jurisdiction it is incumbent upon them to present the
evidence to the alleged and bring them before the courts immediately to account for his or hers treasonable
actions where the only evidence he or she can present is he or she did initiate appropriate action as required to
maintain the continuity of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The responsibility to back the Federal Government’s Charter guarantee to the individual is ultimately the
responsibility of the people themselves who have entrusted their elected representatives to spend the people’s
money efficiently and effectively consistently in the spirit of the Constitution in the spirit of the people where
each individual’s Charter rights are one and the same with each other of the Constitution of fixed value for
perpetuity. Evidence must be presented to the people: Public Inquiry

I reiterate the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are fixed stable in continued perpetuity no matter which
way the wind blows, no matter who is elected to power and where seemingly interrupted by any authority are not
and can not be and any person or persons artificially interrupting one’s guaranteed Charter rights will be charged
to compensate for damages and costs incurred including time and effort
endured along with mental anguish and other such detriments with the person or person’s responsible
made to pay from their own pockets whereas they acted on their own accord without legal authority
inconsistent with and non conducive to the Law they were obliged and sworn to uphold.

Due the seriousness of such an offense leaving the stability of the Constitution and the sanctity of the people’s
individual guaranteed Charter rights blowing in the wind it is incumbent upon the authorities having jurisdiction
in such matters to attend to the matter FFF where the person or person’s must be immediately relieved from duty
and immediately replaced with a responsible competent person adept to purpose.
To be clear the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights have nothing to do with politics yet where reasonable
evidence is brought forward of a political person being negligent in his or her duties in respect of an individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights it is a crime against all the people and the Constitution itself whereas one individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights are equal to every individual’s rights and every individual pays the consequence
directly or indirectly whether it be due the weakness of the system allowed to continue detrimental to their odds
of protection and unlikely assurance of equal benefit and of course we taxpayers suffer to the inevitable
consequences.

The Constitution (Establishment) is structured in accordance with the Constitution (Document) and the
government personnel know the chain of authority and who ever assigns limited authority to the various
departments and agencies retains all the responsibility obliged by the Federal Government to structure a system
consistent with and conducive to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which does not
preclude them of any responsibility of their assigns for ultimately they are responsible to ensure the right people
are in place competent to the purpose assigned.

RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
will give due regard to this document as they carry out their duties in accordance with the Constitution
(Document) with the same due regard to
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Whereas no one has limited authority to act in support of the Law in the spirit and of the spirit consistent with
and conducive to the moral society guaranteed to each individual under the Charter and it is your sworn duty to
uphold the Constitution and bring the evidence before the people for their decision as to whether the arbitrary
actions of the government personnel employed to administer and enforce the Constitution and back the guarantee
equally to every Canadian individual is demonstrably justifiable.

PUBLIC INQUIRY warranted and demanded.

There are no arbitrary time limits or specific procedures to hinder me in pursuant of my guaranteed
individual Charter rights for they belong to me in perpetuity and any such measures introduced by any
government personnel are indicative of their true intent not supportive of the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights. All delays have been due to them.
4
I highly suspect this presentation of mine exposing the government conspiracy initiated by members of
the Law Society of Upper Canada is not common to usual complaints forwarded to you people to study
and given the extreme significance relative to the well being and benefits of the Canadian Individual’s
and the improbability of an unbiased approach to the review of the evidence and the certain probability
the alleged conspirators will have implemented purportedly legal procedures to appear as if the issues
were dealt with FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith I request in such circumstance you review
such arbitrary laws and policies with respect to their consistency with the Constitution ensuring they
are conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

I remind you the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are fixed in perpetuity, nothing to be debated
and yet the modus operandi of the illegitimate legal system implemented by the government authorities
and practiced by the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada is designed to their benefit where
the odds against Justice being administered are higher than that of winning at the Casino or a Lottery.

This is evidenced in the correspondence between myself and the Law Society of Upper Canada where
if they had been FFF it would have taken them 2 or 3 days at most in sane manner to review the
evidence I presented them to know the particular lawyer I complained about was anything but that
which is required of him to act in a manner consistent with and conducive to my guaranteed Charter
rights in an endeavor to see Justice served.

When you review the Law Society of Upper Canada document which is to be found in 2 Parts by
clicking on the links near the top of the web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms you will
note the efforts I made and length of time it took to have them address the issue effectively and
efficiently due the simplicity of the complaint and how after all the time they wasted the issue remains
unattended to.

The document is clearly indicative of the injustice that can be expected in the courts and throughout the
legal system operated by their members where they made every effort not to address the issue and
evidence tabled attentive to support the integrity of their member and in so doing without effort to my
benefit provided me the irrefutable evidence of their nature not being compatible to administer and
enforce the Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution (Document)

There was no possible way for them to account for the lawyer’s actions and their persistence not to
address the issues is consistent with those of the government personnel I addressed the relative issues
which I have presented to you.

I have written many times in the documents I have provided you the Law Society of Upper Canada
have either stated or implied in the said correspondence that they do not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and their members only obligation is to vigorously advance the
interests of their clients, alias the people who can afford their services.

May I suggest they have a particularly bad attitude as their members set out to administer and enforce
Justice consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s Charter rights?

You will find throughout the Law Society document a simple question regarding the acquisition of a
copy of a contract the lawyer purported to have and since we are on the subject and it is pertinent to the
issues I have raised I request you acquire a copy of the said contract and enter it into evidence.

Is that too much to ask since I have no authority and by no coincidence the RCMP do.

5
I do expect under the auspices of the Constitution (Document) that all retrievable evidence will be
seeked and analyzed in pursuant of the truth where obvious omissions is contra productive to purpose.

Did you know in legal surveying which I spent 40 years at, all evidence found in support of or against
my decisions must be clearly noted on the face of the survey plan.

I will expect you both to respond to all the issues and the WHYs questioned in the Mad Glad mostly
Sad…Why? .doc which is to be found in the vicinity of the 2 Part, Law Society of Upper Canada
document on the aforesaid web site.

For your convenience I am also sending a copy of the Mad along with this document as an attachment.

There is another matter of relative importance which I request you address which government
personnel have refused to respond to.

The term “Threshold” has been used by YRP Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge and Sgt. Randy Craig OPP
Anti-Rackets to define an arbitrary line which purportedly legitimately deprives me of my right to
Justice and I expect you to question them to ascertain their intent as to the use of the word which they
have concluded my evidence didn’t toe the line.

I can guarantee you more assuredly than you can guarantee me my Charter rights are being protected
that a PUBLIC INQUIRY will be held one way or another and it would be prudent of you both to apply
yourselves to this endeavor FFF with attentiveness to due diligence to the most serious nature of this
exercise.

Should either of you have difficulty retrieving the evidence from my web site or require more
information I will be only too happy to accommodate and I request you do not hesitate to ask.

Perchance you are of good intentions I ask you to understand and forgive my attitude which has
acquiesced over the 2 ½ year trek so far to Justice not yet in sight.

I remind you there can be no legitimate arbitrary protocol set out to hinder my guaranteed Charter right
to Justice and there can be no limit to your authority to see that I get it.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

All that stands in the way is you …as Confucius says

“To know what is right, and not do it, is want of courage, or of principle”

Face it now or die a thousand deaths ….something like that and I don’t know who to attribute
it to but I do know who it concerns.

Me too, but I will die but once, one way or another and I prefer a surprise.

We all have our druthers but what will be will be.

Frank Gallagher