April 12 2007

Please see attached Lawyer Files #s 1-10 which details the Province of Ontario goverment cover up
of their legal system which is not consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982.

See letter to Armand P. LaBarge,YRP dated April 11 2007 below which details the criminal acts of
Fraud over $100,000 and filing false and misleading information ($43,000) an offense under s. 206
(1) Tenant Protection Act, 1997 which unfolded during the ORHT hearing on June 30 2005 before
the judicator Nancy Fahlgen in a public building mandated to serve justice for the people has refused
to commence proceedings against him.

She and others of the ORHT have tampered with the recording of the first day of the hearing and
removed conversation where she told me she is authorized to forward the case on to Investigations
and Enforcement of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing but she never did.

The second day of the hearing she announced there would be no recording for that session..

For twenty months now I have been sending correspondence and the evidence to a gazillion
government departments to have them deal with this matter and I now have a prodigious amount of
evidence which proves beyond any doubt the whole system is corrupt and they do not have a modus
operandi capable of backing the peoples Rights and Freedoms as guaranteed by the Charter. They
have set the system up for lawyers to feast and after all, who writes the laws, and who administers
them.

The judges even obstruct justice before the cases get to court.

The evidence also proves that the Ombudsman, the ORHT and the Ontario Civilian Police
Commission who are purportedly independent of the government for public show but they are tight
with the conspiracy.
See pages 3-7 for web site download of the many roles of the Attorney general who is responsible to
public.

I have been seeking justice on the matter addressed below for over 20 months now and during my
trek it became apparent that the whole system is corrupt from the bottom right up to the Attorney
General of Ontario Michael Bryant who wears too many hats but never puts on the one for the people
and our constitutional rights.

Of course it goes right on up to the federal level right to the Prime Minister whom I sent these 10
Lawyer Files and other information.
My Mp won’t acknowledge receipt of my documents, neither will many senators I have forwarded
them to.

The ORHT, Investigations and Enforcement of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing , the
Minister Hon. John Gerretsen, the Premier Dalton McGuinty and the Attorney General Michael
Bryant were all sent copies of the 271 page Black Book dated September 1 2006 which you will see
on my web site Black Book below,exposes these matters originating at the ORHT and another
completely different issue which took me to the Law Society of Canada .

I have a prodigious amount of correspondence since which proves beyond any doubt the whole
system is a conspiracy which most definitely involves the Law Society and its members.
It’s to obvious which you will read in the attachment Truth about the Lies-A.doc

There is another serious matter regarding the Surveys Property Management of the City of Toronto
regarding huge wastes of tax funds and harassment which I addressed to the management team in the
19 gallagher papers over a period of a year where I was even suspended for about 2 minutes until the
manager calmed down and read the new letter I had brought to him stating they had backed me into a
corner and I saw no way out but to take the matter public when I was immediately unsuspended and
certain obligations were lifted off me.

Not long after I retired and took the paper’s to the Mayor’s office where a cover up began which you
will read about in my Whistleblower site below.

I would like to mention that I have spent 40 years in the legal survey field beginning with the DHO,
now MTO back in 1964 then spent 16 years in the private sector where I left to join the City of
Toronto where I took a field Party Chief position for less money than I was paid to manage a survey
office of the same size at the City which required 4 supervisors to run it with same amount of staff I
had and their out put was at least 5 times less than that which I put out.

It didn’t take long to see why because ignorance runs rampant throughout and most of the staff were
there to pick up a cheque and count the days to retirement.

They don’t know the laws and they don’t have any standardization of policies which I addressed and
gave them a couple of tests in mathematical computations where ½ the staff refused to cooperate
because they could not do it and the other half missed the proper solution by 5 –20 centimeters(2-8
inches) which was absolutely pathetic.

The other test was on legal matters as to how to reestablish the original subdivision framework which
they all failed miserably and I went on to prove legally I was right.

This involved the Ontario Land Surveyors Association from behind the scenes but the supervisor who
was ordered to review my papers after months of refusal finally came to me to say they the land
surveyors would be easier to get along with if I included in my writings one statement regarding the
right of presumption in a matter about identifying original evidence in the field but after some
thought I declined and wrote a two page letter in support of my decision to negate the presumption
ideology.

Bottom line is the whole City of Toronto City street lines are scrambled and this along with a control
network established throughout the city for quality control of measurement is not comprehended by
staff.

I designed a whole new modern day system to regain control of the street lines which would
eventually lead to very high efficiency which would decrease human resources and in fact it would
immediately eliminate the whole control section staff which could be transferred to the legal section
while we got my new system up to speed and nobody would lose jobs but on retirement they would
not be needed to be replaced.

That is the problem with the whole damn system. They are not there to deal with the problems to get
them done, they are their to build an empire dealing with the symptoms and allowing them to
flourish.
For example the evidence I have provided shows the legal system is not designed to deter crime for
that would put them out of business so the lawyers designed it for immorality to flourish with a
system that is not feasible to bring the majority of criminals to justice for many reasons which is
demonstrated by how long and expensive it is to take a simple clear cut case to court to get justice for
the people.

It simply is too much trouble to most people and the drop it as a write off.

Lawyers are only interested in big money cases where they can financially support their lavish life
styles and that is the catalyst behind the woes of the world along with of course the politicians who
only make an attempt to show they are doing something when election time rolls around.

Like the environment and the accountability show they are putting on but the fact is the problems are
behind the scenes and always will be to they are exposed, due punishment issued and true honest to
goodness watch dogs to watch every move they make.

The problem at the moment is there is no moral people with insider experience which comprehends
the true purpose of their jobs which in legal matters is to give priority to the people’s Charter Rights
and protection with the purpose of creating a moral society by eradicating immorality.

I have documented their modus operandi is applied in such a manner as to result in an immoral
society to the astronomical detriment of the moral society which finances the whole system to the
benefit of the legal profession and the influential which obviously is precisely opposite that which is
intended in the spirit of the Charter.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.

I bring your attention to without discrimination based on mental and physical disability where
we people who do not deal with matters of law as a vocation are at a huge disadvantage
mentally and individually in quest of our Constitutional Rights face a huge physical disadvantage
in as much as one individual gets to fight their whole damn army which is financed by the whole
of us individuals for purported good purpose and when we discover diffierently we can express
our rights by hiring a lawyer and fighting them all until we the individual goes broke or they do
with them having clear and better odds and while we struggle on our own time with our own
money they carry on their day laughing , relaxed knowing there isn’t a damn thing we can do.

They will all state publicly that they understand they are there to represent the people but the
evidence shows without the slightest bit of doubt that they take great satisfaction in supporting
their decline to deal with criminals by citing sections and acts which they feel quite content they
have done their job diligently which leaves me a victim, the criminal free out doing somebody
else and spreading the word to their friends that the establishment is on their side.

As I state I have a prodigious amount of evidence gathered over 20 months and I remind you I am
well experienced in the value of documents regarding law having spent 40 years in that endeavor in
legal surveying, however it is useless unless I can get it out to the public.
The stage is set which you will read about in the 10 Lawyer Files where charges need to be laid
where I do not have the wherewithal to do so at this particular point in time.

Once this starts the whole thing will break wide open and the people will bring them to the ground.

It is so simple on paper but as you know simplicity has nothing to do with Reality in matters of
government where the books and laws are so complicated due the necessity to make it appear they are
dealing with law in a manner so as to benefit society while in fact their purpose is definitely to benefit
themselves while having their way with us.

To get their obvious character and nature all you need do is listen to them rat on each other openly on
the Legislature channels with such arrogance and confidence that they can do such things and get
away with them simply because they can and do.

If the OPP Anti-Rackets and the RCMP were coherent to the spirit of the Constitution and were
cognizant to the fact that the provincial laws were not consistent with the Constitution and therefore
not enforceable they would understand the necessity to confront the legislature on these matters.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no
force or effect.

The problem is which you will see on the sketch on page 2 of the “Truth about the Lies-A.doc” in
such matters as mine they must consult with the Crown Attorney’s who are under the Attorney
General who just take the laws verbatim without analysis for meeting their intended purpose which of
course is to eradicate and deter immorality from society and they have proven their ignorance in this
matter when they all feel they have applied themselves precisely to policy and have done their duty
with the criminal still on the loose owing me and my friends a considerable amount of money relative
to our financial status.

They feel it is quite okay to commit criminal acts right in their courtrooms before their judicators in
buildings financed by the people to administer justice.

Hell, if they can’t do it when they got the guy right in court with the smoking gun how can we expect
them to hear evidence and comprehend it to the proper conclusion.

Man this is frustrating so I will close off for now but I will follow these documents with the 73 page
letter to the Sun dated October 8 2006 drawing your attention to the significance of it for it provides
the detailed facts that proves beyond any doubt that the crimes were committed

It is important that you have this most significant fact in you mind so that you will see the absurdity
of the government correspondence regarding the issues addressed to them.

Well I am available at your convenience any time, anywhere or if you would be be wanting any more
evidence or you should have any questions please do not hesitate to e-mail me.

Meanwhile I’ll get a little rest and then keep on plugging until I get justice.

This is not about me recovering my losses for the money has long gone.
It’s simply about the fact that due my particular circumstances having been fortunate enough to have
knowledge and experience with government people and knowing the difference between goofing off
and making a profit and by perchance the facts were all just thrown at me it would be highly
irresponsible of me not to follow through to fruition.

I myself am 64 and often wondered what I worked so hard for all my life to know my job well when
government employees were retiring 10 years younger than me and in terms of promotion with
government they define experience in how many years you have put in towards retirement with no
desire to find someone who can get the job done for that is not their objective.

Man it’s all too frustrating………

That’s it for now

Thank you for reading me out

Frank gallagher

.
http://groups.google.ca/group/black-book
http://groups.google.ca/group/whistle-blowers

http://groups.google.ca/group/united-spirits-of-canada

April 11, 2007

To: Armand P. LaBarge, Chief

York Regional Police
info@police.york.on.ca

From: Frank Gallagher

franklyone@hotmail.com

Re: Province of Ontario

Administration Non Compliance
Constitution Act, 1982
Obstruction of Justice under the Act
Tenant Protection Act, 1997
Inconsistent with Constitution
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing & Staff Bruce Herridge has files
Obstruction of Justice
Etc.

Dear Chief LaBarge

I have attached Lawyer Files #s 1-10 for your personal review which prove there are serious issues
to be dealt with in the matter of administering and enforcement of the law in the province of Ontario
consistent with the Constitution, Act 1982.

On June 30 2005 during an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing at 375 D’Arcy Street,
Newmarket I presented evidence to prove the dispute submitted to the ORHT by Don Wilson signed
and dated June 10 2005 by Don Wilson to dispute my application to evict him for being in arrears of
rent and failing to vacate my premises on May 31 2005 as agreed, was false and misleading
information which is an offense under s. 206(2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997.

I had attached a copy of a 4 page document dated May 6 2005 to support my application filed with
the ORHT June 6 2005 as evidence to support the eviction on the grounds Don Wilson had agreed to
vacate my premises on May 31 2005 because he was in arrears of rent.
Don Wilson had signed each of the 4 pages of this document which dealt with matters regarding
money he owed me for personal loans, arrears in rent, agreement to vacate and other matters to do
with shares of his company called Bio Safe which I had invested in along with some of my friends.
My mother witnessed Don Wilson sign this document which was a revision of the April 13 2005
agreement which he and I had signed and a friend of mine Dave Kirby had signed as witness.

When Don Wilson spoke to the reason he was disputing my application to evict him he reitterated
that which he had written on the dispute which he had filed with the ORHT where he claimed he had
prepaid rent up to February 2009 through some kind of verbal agreement to do with my purchase of
stock in his company.

So I stated to the judicator that the agreement I had attached to my application which Don Wilson had
signed proves that not to be true and the fact was Don had signed both his dispute and the agreement
which were two completely different stories so all we need do is prove which was true.

I must add that the judicator Nancy Fahlgren had difficulty grasping this at first but then she asked
me to show Don a copy of the May 6 2005 agreement which he denied having ever seen or signed.

I gave Nancy that copy and then showed Don a copy of the April 13 2005 agreement which was
superseded by the May 6 2005 and he stated that he had never seen or signed this agreement.

I handed it to Nancy and pointed the witness signature and said that reads Dave Kirby. Then I
introduced Dave Kirby who testified that Don Wilson did indeed sign all 4 pages of the agreement.

Nancy had questioned Don about these documents and asked Don. are you saying these signatures
have been forged and he said no he was stating they were not his signatures nor his initials..

All signatures on both these agreements were identical but indeed they were not the signature he has
used on all other documents he has signed with me. The signature on his dispute is the one he
normally uses.

The signatures used on the agreements were quite legibly similar for his first name Don where he
uses a very large D but his last name Wilson is just a scrawl on the pertinent agreements but clearly
legible on his proper signature.
These 2 agreements were drawn up to clear legal problems regarding the original purchase of stock
agreements and certificates which a lawyer told me were not the proper certificates for issuing stock
and he had not signed them.
Their were other matters dealing with the stock issues which by these agreements he agreed to reissue
proper agreements and certificates to not only me and my friends but all other people who had
invested with Bio Safe before me.

The fact that he had denied having ever seen these two agreements and stating that these were not his
signatures and my witness who attested that Don Wilson did indeed sign them proves he had done so
for the purpose of defrauding all of us which if it had not been for this eviction hearing we would
have never known until we tried to cash them in years down the road which would have taken years
to straighten out if I was not available with my records to back every investors investment.

Bottom line he is a Fraud and presented that fact right in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren in a
building funded by the province to administer justice to the people for the people who actually
finance the system.

We are still waiting for justice, and with all the evidence I have provided which includes bank
transfer slip and cancelled cheque which confirm the purchase of stock agreement, it proves that we
people individually are not likely to ever receive justice if we ever manage to get the case heard in a
court of the land.

The whole system does everything it can to obstruct justice which is the backbone of the Constitution
Justice and punishment is meant to deter crime in support of the Charter guarantee which provides for
our equality in all matters of law and our protection.

The consistency of the provisions in the Charter is dependent on the consistency of justice and the
evidence proves we people are not being protected nor is the guarantee being backed by those who
have been mandated to do so.

The evidence shows that every effort is made to ensure that we are left out on the line to dry why the
lawyers have their way with us.

The evidence shows they do everything to hinder us from even getting to court as your detectives F.
Kerr and G. Rorke state that the judges frustrate them when they bring such evidence before them to
get a warrant and then they inform me that if I get a lawyer he would be negligent if he didn’t inform
me that I was not likely to get justice anyway especially if Don Wilson didn’t have the money to pay
or in fact if he had the money he could pay for a good defense and get off anyway.

Tell me about it, we all know these things.

Then the law says upon arresting a person, even when they are caught in the act they must be read
their rights that any thing they say will be used against them.

So rather than just letting them speak and tell the truth when it’s clear and present without being
coached by their lawyer and given plenty of time to organize a story contrary to the facts we get a
long drawn out case where everyone in the system pretends to be seeking the truth so that justice can
be served.
Justice is being obstructed every inch of the way and who are you going to report this to?
The judge who tries his damdest not to let the case get to court, the lawyer who tells his client not to
tell the truth and wait until they can prepare a story that works with the facts.

The only people who benefit under these circumstances are the lawyers and the criminals who get to
argue out points of law which are intended for moral purpose to use them for immoral purpose to
protect the immoral individual from the justice that supports the rights of the people of a moral
society.

Yes we moral people have good reason to be frustrated when they see it all unfold when they become
a victim due to the incompetence and deliberate efforts of the administrators of the law to have us
believe as a whole our rights are being protected and ensured to the level of a guarantee which in fact
is not which we don’t find out until we become victims.

Oh we have a damned good idea that is how it is but unless the issue is brought forth to the people
where they can jump on the band wagon nothing changes and given the fact the individual can’t get
the facts out to the people the system just goes on and on picking each individual off one at a time
with most individual victim ceding their losses.
Those who know things just aren’t right who can find their way financially to argue it out in court
who must have a lawyer to do so will discuss his case with their lawyer who will just confirm that the
system is how it is for after all they are part of the whole conspiracy which allows for their fine
lifestyle at the expense of the people who finance the whole system at outrageous costs due to the
web of deceit meant to look to benefit society but benefits the lawyers society.

THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA where the lawyers, judges and Attorney General are a
part of, all in cahoots together against the people for their personal benefit.

In the documents you will find information which I downloaded from the web site of the Attorney
General which documents the conspiracy as plain as the nose on your face if one is competent to read
it as the evidence proves.

If one were to read this with the FAITH and BELIEF that religious sects have in their leaders trusting
them such as trusting that the Attorney General with all the hats he wears in positions of trust, then
you will believe everything is prim and proper.

If you Believe that our elected representatives care for the welfare of the people as they state they do
and are trusted to do and considering that all the people dealing with matters of law all are given the
same trust inherent to these matters and considering there are so many of them watching out for the
people it supports FAITHFUL BELIEVERS Trust in them.

Then when you consider there are other offices set up like the Ombudsman, the ORHT and the
Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services purportedly set up to oversee these people who are
TRUSTED to administer the law in the Spirit of the intended Spirit of the Constitution then the
BELIEVERS have good reason to TRUST in their BELIEF.

That’s evidence enough for them that the system is in place and they can go to all these buildings and
see the people do exist in these ROLES and if ever some question arises to shed some doubt they are
satisfied when all them confirm that each other is right.
They go away satisfied having confirmed their FAITH in their original BELIEF is justified.

But what happens if a person is a Non BELIEVER having no FAITH in things they can not prove to
be TRUE which is the purported to be goal of the court system where they ask liars to place their
hand on a bible in the Spirit of God and raise their right hand as they swear to tell the whole truth
nothing but the truth in matters which regard punishment more serious than the lie.
Considering all the effort to ensure the criminal didn’t have to come to court in the first place to face
justice in the name of a moral society and the law helps the criminal by advising them not to tell the
TRUTH when they are arrested and they know the criminal will be coached to address the evidence
against them and knowing every criminal’s obvious concern is to look out for themselves they are
obviously going to lie.

So the whole charade or act is for the naïve people of society to BELIEVE they are in a sanctuary of
TRUTHS connected to God by the bible and the robes the judge’s throw on give it the finishing
touch.

The whole purpose of the whole system is to bring forth evidence with which to prove the TRUTH so
as to serve justice and the people who have no experience as an insider in matters of THE LAW
having careers in other fields of endeavor who understand how TRUST works outside the
environment of the establishment knowing if they do not do their jobs as TRUSTED to do they will
soon be discovered so with that ideology transferred to their reasoning about the Establishment they
strengthen their BELIEFS.

When one has a grasp of all these realities other than the reality inherent to their own environment
they have the opportunity to reason things out coincidental to reality.

When you reason that people are capable of extraordinary things good and evil which is why the legal
system is established to sort the good and the evil and when you consider the personnel of the
establishment are people capable of extraordinary things good and evil we must consider the extra
effort that must be made to ensure the establishment personnel are good.

The independent departments at arms length to the government is a nice touch in this endeavor.

But what if they were all evil of the same mind then the whole ideology would be gone with the
wind.

But then of course who would BELIEVE that such a condition could happen in reality.

I mean all these people have friends and can vouch that they are not evil.

But what if most of them are just ignorant to the TRUE purpose of their positions and they BELIEVE
that they fit quite well within their department and know for fact they are following the policies set
out by the department heads and they are quite confident they are right because their department
heads confirm they are right and others with more experience agree because they have always done it
that way and have done well and been successful in promotion and financial gain.

So obviously when the poor innocent naïve individual comes looking for help not satisfied that the
information they got from one is coincidental to logic and others confirm the irrational logic of one to
be consistent right up to management if nothing else they know they don’t have a hope in hell to fight
for sanity there and with no where else to go they resign themselves to submission.

So, anyway these people will rate themselves on their competence to administer the policy of the
department quite smug and arrogant and so proud of how much smarter they are about the policy of
the department than those people from the public that come to see them from the real world who
seem so much dumber to them.

The people from the public who have good reason to be unfamiliar with the ways of administering
law walk away BELIEVING they are more ignorant of the administration of law than they originally
BELIEVED and the people who are administering the law end up BELIEVING they are even more
smarter of the law than they originally BELIEVED which gives them even more confidence the next
time they meet the public.

The people just keep getting dumber and dumber with one the public BELIEVING they are dumber
and the establishment personnel BELIEVING they are getting smarter making it much more difficult
for the TRUTH to be known.

If a person speaks the TRUTH to people who are in the woods will it be recognized?

Like when I talk to Phil Moreau and explain the common sense version of the TRUTH which I wrote,
how the purpose of the Constitution was to eradicate immorality from society so that we end up with
a moral society and that if the establishment understood that concept which they will all admit is the
purpose which they must endeavor to demonstrate and after application of their policy then morality
should be served.
And since I have been fleeced and remained fleeced while their policy is to let the immoral free of
facing justice to that endeavor with the victim seeing no evidence the establishment has a modus
operandi in place to demonstrate effort to benefit a moral society argues don’t I understand that all
these people who are well experienced in law enforcement, who are all intelligent and HONORABLE
people have consistently told me that I alone was wrong for they are all HONORABLE people.

It is difficult to decide the reason for one who argues with inane argument against the evidence, for
the evidence never changes unless of course someone messes with it for deceptive purpose
undetected, remaining to be seen today as it would be seen years from now which is impervious to
perception however reality is influenced by perception which one’s perception can influence
another’s not receptive or coherent to reality.

Within the realities of present knowledge to me I have insufficient evidence to prove whether Phil is
as ignorant as hell or is as evil as hell but by association to hell neither is beneficial to the Spirit of
THE LAW where the Spirit of God is supreme.

I know enough TRUTH to know that whatever the TRUTH be about Phil the one fact about this
indefinite TRUTH is the definite TRUTH he has no right serving the public and in fact does not so
the question remains WHY are we, the public paying him to stand in our way?

Damn good question where we could use it over and over again.

For those who read my writings, unwillingly I am sure, they must wonder how ignorant I am to go on
and on trying in so many different ways to get my point across which surely I must know if I have
any sense that I am wasting my time presenting it to arrogant ignorant people or brilliant arrogant
immoral people.

To be sure I know this to be fact long before I began this trek for I have spent 10 years in the employ
of the province of Ontario and 14 years with the City of Toronto and 16 years in the real world in the
private sector, 40 years in the same field of endeavor and I know the difference between evil and
good purpose and all sorts of stuff like that.

I know reality and I know every person lives in their own reality and I know that if there is to be any
hope for a moral peaceful society it must be a fair and equal society and everyone must have grasp of
that fact and something that they can have FAITH in common with all their perceptions and with
FAITH there must be TRUST and I TRUST you know what I mean.

In that endeavor we all know of God and we know we can TRUST in the SPIRIT of God’s ways for
He is not ONE for the MONEY nor TWO for the SHOW for we have never seen Him nor has He
ever requested money.

We all know His ways to be TRUE in the endeavor of peace and Heaven on Earth and these in fact
are the only TRUTHS that we know to be TRUE about God which remain TRUE even if there is no
God

We know the Constitution is the supreme law of Canada and we know of God’s way for Canada is
founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God.

We know that it matters not if God exists in matters of Heaven on Earth it matters only that we
BELIEVE in the Spirit of God’s ways and the fact is by reason we can prove His ways to be TRUE to
the purpose of Heaven on Earth.

So it simply does not matter one way or the other if God exists for us to have Heaven on Earth where
there are so many who do not BELIEVE God exists, for good reason I might add with no proof, and
so many who BELIEVE He does exist without proof.

We all have very good reason to BELIEVE in God’s way though because it is TRUE.

So, in that respect we can all accept the Spirit of God (His ways) must be in the Spirit of each and
everyone one of us under the Constitution if we are to live in Heaven on Earth in Canada where God
is recognized as supreme by THE LAW.

If we are to be all equal in all matters of THE LAW we must have a benchmark to relate all matters
of law to, for in matters of disagreement between two people if ones religious BELIEFS or cultural
BELIEFS were different than an other one may have advantage over an other which is not permitted
by THE LAW where we must be all equal before and under the LAW.

Perhaps a good example is there are some religions or cultures where the men are of the BELIEF they
can treat their women like some inferior animal and of course that is not permitted nor is it
comprehensible which is rather scary to know such thoughts exist but then on the other hand it is the
very thought that we know such thoughts and even worse do exist in man that the law was enacted to
stop such ludicrous behavior.
So we of sane mind know that even with THE LAW written and signed with authority it will not
change things for many obvious reasons and since THE LAW was written for good and sound reason
with good and sound reason any reasoning that would leave the matter unattended to would not be
good and sound reason if it were not attended to.

If you can reason something will happen it will happen if you do not address the factor of reason
which will leave one in harm’s way.

The number one method of changing such gross ignorance of mind is to enforce the law of course
and of course we know we can’t stand out side of each one of their houses waiting for screams to
address the problem because it would simply be too costly yet we know it happens.

That is of course is the reality of THE LAW that somebody must become a victim first and then the
person can be punished if we had people in place in the Spirit of THE LAW who were cognizant to
the fact due punishment must be consistently served for the purpose of the ideology of the Spirit of
THE LAW where Canada is founded upon principles (morals) that recognize (understand) the
supremacy of God and the rule of law

They are a team each needing each other for without the rule of law God does not exist in the minds
of many and those who have God in their minds and hearts would be at a definite disadvantage.

The same goes without the supremacy of God to provide a benchmark of consistency as to what is
meant by and the purpose of THE LAW you would have a rather chaotic presence in society hardly
conducive to the Spirit of THE LAW and the Spirit of God.

Nothing can be more certain that if the Constitution (Document) is to be consistent with the Spirit of
the Document which is clearly stated to be of the Spirit of God and we all know that the Spirit of God
is the Spirit of God’s ways then the Constitution (Establishment personnel) must be consistent with
the Spirit of God’s ways.
Without consistency we can not possibly expect to be treated equally in all matters before and under
the law.

Also it is clear that although how horrendously often the Spirit of THE LAW and GOD are lost and
people suffer because these immoral are not caught, each time they are immoral many people suffer
victim to them which addresses the necessity of emphasis of consistent due punishment when they
are caught with clear and swift application of the law with no obstructions set in place by the
Establishment personnel for that is definitely inconsistent with the Sprit of THE LAW and GOD and
considering the absurdity that assuredly would exist when those people put in trust to eradicate
immorality from society are immoral themselves these immoral are deserving of greater punishment
for obvious reason that they assuredly earned it and assuredly deserve it but the most important factor
to be addressed is the purpose of THE LAW is to eradicate immorality as quickly and efficiently as
possible to prevent any individual of society from becoming a victim who by THE LAW has equal
right to protection.

Money simply has no place in matters of THE LAW if we are all to be protected equally in all
matters of THE LAW in the Spirit of THE LAW and the Spirit of God and the Spirit of all people
who must be of the same Spirit in all matters of THE LAW.

Consistency, consistency is the only possible way to address all matters under THE LAW and that is
fact and any one who has the slightest semblance to reason can understand that and there can be no
tolerance for any inconsistencies with THE LAW by the personnel of the Establishment who are
assigned to this endeavor of eradicating immorality from society.

When they are caught inconsistent with the Spirit of THE LAW which we all know is the Spirit
which keeps us all from harm for assuredly it is the ideology and reason for THE LAW if it were not
consistently enforced havoc would rain upon society and assuredly people would be harmed so with
that thought in mind and one were identified to be purposely inconsistent for monetary or other
personal benefit they are no better than a goon hired to do harm upon another and they must be duly
punished because they deserve it and to make it known what will happen if anyone else should mess
with the lives of the people whom they have been ENTRUSTED to serve and protect.

The personnel are paid well with excellent benefits and provided with the best of equipment and the
benefit of an army of help at their disposal to do one thing and that is to protect and ensure the
welfare of every person who has every right they have and even more for they have been paid and
handed the responsibility to deal with the eradication of immorality not encourage it and allow it to
flourish anywhere.

Responsibility is assumed the moment they take on the position of TRUST and obviously writing into
law while in such a position of TRUST a law which purports to relieve them of any responsibility
that comes with the territory is proof of their Spirit which is not consistent with the Spirit of THE
LAW which is a good example of why the Spirit of THE LAW must take precedence over words
which are written under the authority of the Spirit of THE LAW.

Obviously we TRUST the people elected to abide by the Constitution and the Spirit of democracy
otherwise once elected they could just enact laws to change the Spirit to Despotism.

Having said all that and with due consideration to

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.

with emphasis on mental disability where we all know the obviousness unfairness to those born
incapacitated with illness at birth and how much their lives are dependent on help from others.

That scenario is obvious and just as obvious is the fact if such a person inherited a wealth of money
there would be no end to the line of people willing to offer their service to look after them and their
money and just as obvious how short the line if left penniless where the person them self remains the
same with the significance difference being the money which brought forth so many friends.

With mental disability not being a matter of concern as to ones equality in all matters before and
under the law and considering in reality we are all different in matters of mentality and in particular
in matters of THE LAW those people who spend their lives in careers of other fields of endeavor
outside the environment of the Establishment personnel have a most certain and definite mental
disability and though it could be well argued that in fact it is the personnel of the Establishment that
TRULY has the mental disability in matters of common sense relative to the Spirit of THE LAW
which grants the equal rights under 15. (1) the argument is not a factor in matters of THE LAW for it
clearly states we are all equal in all maters of THE LAW without the disastrous influential affects
money would have upon ones well being.

As obvious as that and considering the unfair advantage the mentality factor could have and does
have considering those administering THE LAW are taught that common sense has nothing to do
with THE LAW and the fact these people are willing to toss their sanity aside so they may administer
THE LAW it presents a very serious factor which must be dealt with and given the significance of the
fact all our lives are at stake it is absurd to let those people who have abandoned common sense to
make these very, very important decisions.

Given the fact that they all have equality under THE LAW we must treat them as equals under THE
LAW just the same as those who were born with a mental disability and when you take into
consideration that given the choice a person of mental deficiency would opt for a brain more helpful
and beneficial to themselves it just seems particularly eerie that one blessed with common sense
would choose insanity.

However, like so many mysteries that exist in reality it matters not that we understand the mystery
which can not be solved by reasonable means it only matters that we know these mysteries exist and
how they affect reality as a whole.

So as obvious is the fact that you can’t go east by stepping west even though you can end up in the
same place by going west as one would get to by going east it would be absolutely idiotic if the
purpose of my trek was to advance 100 feet eastward and I about faced and set out on a trek
westward to traverse the world to get there.

Seems to me I could accomplish a whole lot more with straight consistent forward motion with
fortitude and conviction on due course of due east if that were my destination of purpose.

If someone was watching me and noticed that I was off course I would be appreciative of the fact and
thank the person but if I had some doubt I would communicate in hopes that clear and good reason
would set my mind at ease so I could proceed confidently knowing I have reasoned as well as I could
with all that was available to reason with which would take into consideration the character from
whence the new information came from.

It’s A TRUST sort of thing.

Do I TRUST me or 1 scorpion who has 499,999 fellow scorpion friends who avidly back and vouch
for the character of the scorpion?

It is obvious there is only one thing to do.

Walk east while appearing to walk west.

Please read my writings attached and soon to follow consistently with attentiveness to your intended
purpose coincidental to the SPIRIT OF THE LAW, THE SPIRIT OF GOD AND THE SPIRIT OF
THE PEOPLE AS MANDATORY BY LAW

It’s not like it isn’t fair to anyone.

Thank you

Frank Gallagher