PARAMETRIC CYCLE ANALYSIS OF TURBOFAN ENGINES

PROPULSI PESAWAT TERBANG

AE 3212

AGUSTINUS DIMAS 13608039

FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA

JURUSAN AERONOTIKA & ASTRONOTIKA
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
2011
INPUTS : M0, T0, , CP, hPR, Tt4, c, f,

OUTPUTS : F/0, f, S, T, P, O, FR

EQUATIONS :

( )
( )
( )
( )

{ [ ( )] }

( )

Specific Thrust

[ ( )]

Fuel/air Ratio

( )

Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption

( )(
)

Thermal Efficiency
Propulsive Efficiency

( )

( )

Overall Efficiency

Thrust Ratio
 specific thrust
700

600
0.5

500 1
F/0 [N/(kg/sec)]

1.5
400 2
3
300 4
5
200
8
12
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 1 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for f =2 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

thrust specific fuel consumption

28

26
0.5
24
1
22
S[mg/(N.sec)]

1.5
20 2
3
18
4
16 5
14 8
12
12
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 2 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for f =2 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption
 fuel/air ratio
0.032

0.030

0.028

f
0.026 f

0.024

0.022
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 3 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for f =2 and M0=0.9: fuel/air ratio

thermal efficiency
70

60

50
T

40 T

30

20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 4 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for f =2 and M0=0.9: thermal efficiency
 propulsive and overall efficiencies
80
P
0.5
70
1
60 1.5
(%) 50 2
3
40
4
0 30 5
20 8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
12
c

Gambar 5 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for f =2 and M0=0.9: propulsive and overall efficiencies

specific thrust
6

5
0.5

4 1
1.5
FR 3 2
3
2 4
5
1
8
12
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 6 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for f =2 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio
 specific thrust
300.00

280.00

260.00
1.2
F/0 [N/(kg/sec)]

240.00 1.5
2
220.00 3
3.5
200.00
4
180.00 4.5

160.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 7 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for =5 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

thrust specific fuel consumption

28

26

24
1.2
22
S[mg/(N.sec)]

1.5
20 2
3
18
3.5
16 4
14 4.5

12
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 8 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for =5 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption
 propulsive efficiency
75

70

65 1.5

P 2
60
(%) 3
3.5
55
4

50 4.5

45
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 9 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for =5 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

overall efficiency
45

40

35 1.2
1.5
0
30 2
(%)
3
25 3.5
4
20
4.5

15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 10 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for =5 and M0=0.9: overall efficiency
 thrust ratio
10

1.2
6 1.5
FR 2

4 3
3.5

2 4
4.5

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
c

Gambar 11 Ideal turbofan performance versus c, for =5 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio
 specific thrust
400

350

300 3
F/0 [N/(kg/sec)]

4
250 5
6
200
7
150 8
10
100
12
50
1 2 3 4 5 6
c

Gambar 12 Ideal turbofan performance versus f, for c =24 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

thrust specific fuel consumption

26

24

22 3

20 4
S[mg/(N.sec)]

5
18
6
16 7

14 8
10
12
12
10
1 2 3 4 5 6
c

Gambar 13 Ideal turbofan performance versus f, for c =24 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption
 propulsive efficiency
80

75

70 3

65 4

P 5
60
(%) 6
55 7

50 8
10
45
12
40
1 2 3 4 5 6
c

Gambar 14 Ideal turbofan performance versus f, for c =24 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

thrust ratio
5

4
3
4
3
5
FR
6
2
7
8
1 10
12
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
c

Gambar 15 Ideal turbofan performance versus f, for c =24 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio
 specific thrust
600.00

500.00

1.5
F/0 [N/(kg/sec)]

400.00 2
2.5

300.00 3
3.5

200.00 4
4.5

100.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
c

Gambar 16 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for c =24 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

thrust specific fuel consumption

22.00

20.00

1.5
S[mg/(N.sec)]

18.00 2
2.5

16.00 3
3.5

14.00 4
4.5

12.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
c

Gambar 17 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for c =24 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption
 propulsive efficiency
80

70

1.5
60 2
P
2.5
(%)
50 3
3.5

40 4
4.5

30
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
c

Gambar 18 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for c =24 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

thrust ratio
5

1.5
3 2
FR 2.5

2 3
3.5

1 4
4.5

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
c

Gambar 19 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for c =24 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio
 specific thrust
800.00

700.00

600.00
F/0 [N/(kg/sec)]

500.00 0.5
1
400.00
2
300.00 5

200.00 8
10
100.00

0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 20 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =2: specific thrust

thrust specific fuel consumption

30.00

25.00

0.5
S[mg/(N.sec)]

20.00
1
2
15.00
5
8
10.00 10

5.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 21 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =2: thrust specific fuel consumption
 propulsive efficiencies
100

80

0.5
60 1
P
2
(%)
40 5
8

20 10
T

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 22 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =2: propulsive efficiency

overall efficiency
80

70

60

50 0.5

0 1
40
(%) 2
30 5

20 8
10
10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 23 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =2: overall efficiency
 thrust ratio
6

4 0.5
1
FR 3
2
5
2
8

1 10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 24 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =2: thrust ratio
 specific thrust
1200.00

1000.00

800.00
F/0 [N/(kg/sec)]

0
0.2
600.00
0.5
1
400.00
2

200.00 5

0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 25 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =3: specific thrust

thrust specific fuel consumption

30.00

25.00

0
S[mg/(N.sec)]

20.00
0.2
0.5
15.00
1
2
10.00 5

5.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 26 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =3: thrust specific fuel consumption
 propulsive efficiencies
100

80

0
60 0.2
P
0.5
(%)
40 1
2

20 5
T

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 27 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =3: propulsive efficiency

overall efficiency
80

70

60

50 0

0 0.2
40
(%) 0.5
30 1

20 2
5
10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 28 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =3: overall efficiency
 thrust ratio
3.5

2.5
0
2 0.2
FR
0.5
1.5
1
1 2
5
0.5

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
M0

Gambar 29 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for c =24 and f =3: thrust ratio