Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

EDITORIAL

The 100 people most inuencing the specialty


of orthodontics, 1915-2014
Rolf G. Behrents, Editor-in-Chief
St Louis, Mo

T
he single most important ingredient that has Of course, we cannot have true progress unless some
affected the success and progress of orthodontics people assume leadership roles. Through their inspira-
over the last 100 years is people. The success of tion, courage, and charisma, leaders chart directions
the specialty cannot be explained by the tools and trin- often with a focused mind and a strong hand. They
kets associated with orthodontics, but it can be ex- guide us where they think we need to go, and as the
plained by the actions and accomplishments of the future unfolds, they are judged to be correct in that
people who have helped to advance it. guidance. Some become icons.
Some people, as innovative clinicians, brought inert Finally, there are a few who, although not orthodon-
blobs of plastic and wire to life, fabricating appliances tists, have inuenced orthodontics by the nature of their
and applying them in patients. They enjoyed their advancements in related clinical care, their prowess in
successes and reected on their shortcomings through teaching and presentation, their accomplishments in
critical evaluations, always with a goal of improving or- research that is relevant to orthodontics, and their lead-
thodontic ministrations, so that at the end of treatment ership.
there would be a corrected malocclusion, enhanced To choose the people to honor, a list of nominees was
facial esthetics, and a bright smile of appreciation. compiled from many sources: a listing of all the authors
They were the pioneers, the adventurers, and the brave who published in the AJO-DO over the past 100 years,
in their actions and results. Best of all, they shared numerous journal articles written about the history of
through textbooks, articles, and presentations. orthodontics (notably those by Bernhard Weinberger,
Other people, as teachers, passed along what was Norman Wahl, and Milton Asbell), names suggested by
known, what was not known, and what was dreamed. the judges, and several source books.1-4 This process
They sought out the tall timber from the dental schools resulted in approximately 250 nominations.
and invited them to learn orthodontics. They taught, they Subsequently, 16 judges participated by casting 100
trained, they molded, and they encouraged, and by doing votes each. The following served as judges: James L.
so they helped direct the professional lives of their grad- Ackerman, Sheldon Baumrind, Rolf G. Behrents, Charles
uates. By their nature, teachers share, and their inuence J. Burstone, G. Frans Currier, Robert J. Isaacson, Lysle E.
remains long after they are gone. Johnston, Jr, James A. McNamara, Jr, Sheldon Peck,
Still others, as thinkers, inventors, and scientists, William R. Proft, David L. Turpin, James L. Vaden,
explored areas of concern or those that were uncharted. Robert L. Vanarsdall, Jr, Norman Wahl, Wayne G.
They worked with ideas that could be considered and Watson, and Larry W. White.
tested. Ideas that proved to be good would be written These judges were selected because of their extensive
up and published, considered again, and then used to knowledge of orthodontics and their years of experience
formulate more research. Ideas without merit would be in the specialty (in fact, I was the youngest judge). A few
reported and then discarded, sometimes contrary to restrictions were applied to those nominated and
the inherited and strongly held beliefs of others. selected. First, there was a window of time to be consid-
Through determined inquiry and dissemination, these ered: all nominees had to be living sometime between
people also shared their work and ndings with others; January 1, 1915, and December 31, 2014. They needed
they made us look at orthodontics in new and different to be deceased before January 1, 2015, to prevent the
ways. complication of singling out a living legend, of which
there are many.
Of course, this window of time (January 1, 1915,
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:S145-6 to December 31, 2014) is harsh at its beginning and
0889-5406/$36.00
Copyright 2015 by the American Association of Orthodontists.
its end, since a few notable people who lived before or
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.010 after are not included. Thus, William Gibson Arlington
S145
S146 Editorial

Bonwill, Christophe-Francois Delabarre, John Nutting inuential of all. There can be no serious debate about
Farrar, John Hunter, Pierre Fauchard, Norman Kingsley, this. It can only be Edward Hartley Angle. He was and
Pierre-Joachim Lefoulon, Jean Melchior Alexis Schange, is a symbol of everything that we value and admire.
Robert Bunon, and many others who were inuential His time will be remembered for its denition and begin-
before 1915 were not selected for the nal list. On the nings in organization, education, clinical advancement,
other end of that time, some very inuential people, and appreciation of the value of science. So, for the time
such as Charles J. Burstone (one of the judges), were from January 1, 1915, to December 31, 2014, the rst
not selected for the listing because they were still living century of the AJO-DO, Edward Angle is the Person of
as of December 31, 2014. the Century.
Because of these notable people. once the selection I hope you enjoy our special section honoring some
process was completed, there were a pause and a reec- of the heroes of orthodontics.
tion, and I wished that the original task had been to
Rolf G. Behrents
select the 100 people of all time who most inuenced
the specialty of orthodontics. Well, however imperfect
or incomplete, or argued, the nal list of 100 was con- These men moved the world, and so can we all. Few
structed, along with a list of 60 people who received will have the greatness to bend history itself, but
votes and thus deserved honorable mention. each of us can work to change a small portion of
I must also add that 20 people on the list were chosen events, and in the total of all those acts will be written
the history of this generation.
unanimously by the judges, and there was remarkable
Robert F. Kennedy
consistency across the judges for more than half of the
100 listed. For all persons in either list, it was clear
that inuence is hard to measure, but it is possible REFERENCES
to identify people whose ideas, examples, talents, and 1. Moyers RE, Jay P. Orthodontics in mid-century: transactions of a
discoveries transformed the world of orthodontics over workshop in orthodontics. St Louis: C. V. Mosby; 1959.
the past century. 2. Shankland WM. American Association of Orthodontists: the biogra-
For all the people listed, we hope we have honored phy of a specialty organization. St Louis: American Association of
Orthodontists; 1971.
them appropriately and afforded them the respect that
3. Curtis EK. Orthodontics at 2000. St Louis: American Association of
they deserve. Orthodontists; 2000.
Finally, in compiling such a list, it is expected and 4. Wahl N. Who was who in orthodontics with a selected bibliography
customary to single out one person who was the most of orthodontic history. Sequim, Wash: Norman Wahl; 2002.

May 2015  Vol 147  Issue 5  Supplement 2 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Вам также может понравиться