Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia.
http://www.jstor.org
AnwarIbrahim
Introduction
Seenfrom theeconomic pointofview,development theoriesfalllargely
intotwocategories. The firstgroupoftheories propounded mainlyby
conservative scholarstendto see thelackofdevelopment inthe"New
States"as theresultof somelag or lack,whether thisbe in termsof
resources,technology andmanpower orinstitutions.
Thesecondgroup
oftheoriespropounded mainly byradicalscholars
secsuchinternational
dependence relations
as exploitative.
Development andunderdevelop-
mentareseenas partofthesameglobalcapitalist system ina waythat
corresponds withMarx'slaw of unevendevelopment and pauperiza-
tioninsociety.Thesetwosetsof theories areessentially
basedon the
economic aspectsofdevelopment. Withsuchan emphasis oneconomics
indevelopment theories,littleattention
has beenpaidto otherfunda-
mentalissues.
Here,however, liesourdilemma.Whileitistruethatourknowledge
aboutnatural sciences andtherationalworldhasgrowntremendously,
our knowledge of humanity has notprogressed likewise.Despitethe
stunningadvancesmadeinthefieldsofpsychology andsociology,for
example,theresults achievedhavebeensterile.In simpleterms,man
cannotreallyknow"how"unlesshe knows"why".Thoughit is im-
possibleto agreeon a precisedefinition of manor humanity because
ofdifferencesinscientificperspectives, ideology orreligious doctrines,
wecan,nevertheless, agreeon theirmostessential, sharedbasisofex-
istence.Without delineating theelements pertaining to theconception
of manaccording- to themajorcurrent ideologicalschools(thatis,
secularwesternliberalism,secularmarxism, secularexistentialism,and
therearesomefundamental
religion), issueswhichmaybesaidto form
sucha sharedbasis.Man is a primary beingin thenaturalworld.He
possessesthewilltointervene withnatureandalsothepowerofchoice.
Thisis articulated withreference to a systemof values.
Thusanyprogramme fordevelopment thatfollowsfroma recogni-
tionof theseissuescannotbutbe consistent withhumannature.It
would, therefore, have to include the commitment to eradicatemass
the
poverty, respect forhuman dignity and freedom, theencourage-
mentofpeople'sparticipation at all levelstowards andna-
self-reliance
tionalresilience.
Theeradication ofpoverty andnationalreconstruction wouldrequire
will
political and the commitment to the principle ofjustice.Structural
reforms wouldbe neededto eradicateexploitation and monopolistic
practicesby individuals, conglomerates or local partnersof multi-
nationalcorporations.
Development wouldbe meaningful if it is morecomprehensive,
including moral,spiritual and material dimensions. Withethicalax-
ioms as its basis, the economicsystemwould,by its verynature,
disciplineman'sinsatiabledesireandgreed.A meaningful development
mustliberatethemassesfromtheclutches of a dehumanizing system
intoa humanesocialorder.
IslamizationProcess in Malaysia
Islam has been in our regionfor not less than fivecenturies.Before
that, the entire Malay Archipelago - which formsfour-fifths of
modern-dayASEAN (the Associationof SoutheastAsian Nations) -
was our equivalentof the European Dark Ages beforeChristianity.
Islam broughtus light,vision, a betterway of lifeand a civilization
- in the same way as Christiansbelieve Christianitybroughtthe
Westernworld lightand salvation.
In a momentof weakness,we wereconqueredat theturnof thesix-
teenthcentury.Our land plunderedand our richesdispersed,we were
subjectedto humiliationand degradation.We were,inshort,dehuman-
ized. But throughoutthosebitteryearsuntil31 August1957,whenwe
gainedindependence,Islam has alwayspreservedour dignityand self-
respect.
Whenwe talk about Islamizationin Malaysia, it is not a hysterical
reactiontowardstheWest. Afterall, we have been independentfor28
years now. It is also not the "us" versus "them"situation.So our
Islamizationpolicyis primarilymeantforthe Muslimsthemselves.It
is a processto renewand reaffirm our faithin themoraland spiritual
principles that have been our main source of strength.
As partof a process,the developmentprogrammesupon whichwe
have embarkedcall fortime. We musthold back theurgeto see im-
mediateresults.We understandand recognizethe factthatelements
in thebureaucracy,thepoliticians,intellectualsand thegeneralpublic
are notentirelyreadyfortheIslamizationeffort.Some of thoseMuslim
bankers, economists and bureaucratsassignedthetaskof preparingfor
thesettingup of our Islamic banks, forexample,havenotbeen known