INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT FORM (IPCRF) Name of Employee: VICTOR D. DUMAGUIT Name of Rater: CHRISTOPHER D. KUIZON Position: TEACHER I-III Position: Principal Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Maasin City Division Date of Review: March 2017 WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL TIME- RATING SCORE MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS LINESS KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE. I. BASIC Prepared 5 All Daily lesson 4 Had four of the five 3 Had 3 of the five 2 Had 2 of the five 1 Had 1 of the five EDUCA- plans had the following parts of lesson plan parts without evidence parts without evidence parts without evidence of functional daily TION objective, subject with evidence of of localizing the of localizing the localizing the curriculum SERVICES lesson plans matter, procedures, localizing the curriculum and had curriculum and had and had not provided any and daily log of June evaluation and curriculum and had seldom provided very seldom provided of the above conditions activities and 2016- assignmentwith sometimes provided individual and group individual and group to 100% of the classes March evidence of localizing individual and group activities utilizing activities utilizing handled. facilitated 20% TEACHING learning through 2017 the curriculum and had activities utilizing teaching strategies teaching strategies that frequently provided teaching strategies that that develop the 21st develop the 121st - innovative individual and group develop the 21st century century skills with century skills with LEARNING teaching activities utilizing the skills with emphasis on emphasis on the use emphasis on the use of PROCESS teaching strategies that the use of 4As, of 4As, cooperative 4As, cooperative strategies Q develop the 21st century cooperative learning learning and the use learning and the sue of (60%) skills with emphasis on and the use of ICT in of ICT in 60% of the ICT in 40% of the the use of 4As, 80% of the classes classes handled for classes handled for the cooperative learning handled for the rating the rating period as rating period as and the use of ICT in period as evidence in evidenced in the evidenced in the lesson 100% of the classes the lesson plan, actual lesson plan, actual plan, actual delivery of handled for the rating delivery of the students delivery of the lesson the lesson and period as evidenced in outputs or portfolios and students outputs students outputs or the lesson plan, actual or portfolios. portfolios. delivery of the lesson and students outputs or portfolios. Delivered the 5 Attained 100% of 4 At least 80% of the 3 At least 70% of 2 At least 60% of the 1 At least 50% of the the desired learning desired learning the desired learning desired learning desired learning desired learning competencies with the competencies with the competencies with competencies without competencies without competencies help of a help of a incomplete budget budget of lessons and budget of lessons and as reflected in a complete budget of complete budget of of lesson and very without utilization of without utilization of budget of lesson June lessons with lessons and seldom seldom utilized instructional materials instructional materials in 2016- 30% E appropriate, adequate utilized instructional instructional materials in teaching learning teaching learning with appropriate, March and updated materials in teaching in teaching learning process process adequate and 2017 instructional materials learning process process updated instructional materials Initiated 5 All students were 4 At least 80% were 3 At least 70% of 2 At least 60% of 1 At least 50% of guided in the guided in the students were guided students were guided in students were guided in discipline of observation of observation of in the observation of the observation of the observation of students classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and including Guidelines with guidelines with the use guidelines with the guidelines without any guidelines without any classroom rules, June the use of agreed of agreed existing use of teacher classroom policies as classroom policies as 2016- 5% existing classroom or classroom or school imposed classroom evidence by descriptive evidenced by descriptive guidelines T March school policies as policies as evidenced policies as evidenced rating in the report rating in the report through 2017 evidenced by by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in card/journals card/journals individual and descriptive rating in the the report card and the report/journals group tasks report card and journals journals within the rating period WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL TIME- RATING SCORE MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS LINESS KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE. I. BASIC Maintained a 4 Sometimes safe, 3 Seldom safe, 2 Unsafe, topsy-turvy, 1 Unsafe, topsy-turvy, EDUCA- 5- Always safe, order, order, clean classroom order, clean dirty classroom and dirty classroom and TEACHING safe, motivating TION clean classroom and and toilet with evidence classroom and toilet toilet without evidence of toilet without evidence SERVICES - classroom June toilet with evidence of of proper waste with evidence of proper of proper LEARNING environment 2016- proper waste disposal or proper waste waste disposal or waste disposal or and conducted March 5% Disposal or management where disposal or management where management where PROCESS 2017 E management where students and teachers management where there seldom proof of there NO proof of systematic (60%) checking of students and teachers respect each other with students and teachers respect from among respect from among respect each other with 80% systematic respect each other the teachers and the teachers and learners 100% systematic checking of attendance with 70% systematic students with 60% students and no attendance checking of attendance of learners checking of systematic checking of systematic process of of learners attendance of learners attendance of learners checking of attendance of learners 5 Teacher has FULLY 4 Teacher has 3 Teacher has 2 Teacher has VERY 1 Has not provided utilized his/her SOMETIMES utilized SELDOM utilized SELDOM utilized his/her any of the above exceptional art of his/her exceptional art his/her exceptional art exceptional art of conditions to 100% of questioning in the of questioning in the of questioning in the questioning in the the classes handled and delivery of lessons delivery of lessons delivery of lessons delivery of lessons using remediation/enrichment Monitored, using VARIED types of using varied types of using few types of few types of assessment activities are offered evaluated and assessment tools to assessment tools to assessment tools to tools to assess student 50% and below of maintained Quarterly 15% assess student assess student assess student performance WITHOUT students who need it performance with the performance with the performance with the the utilization of table of students utilization of table of utilization of table of utilization of table of specification in the progress specification in the specification in the specification in the crafting of and conducted crafting of crafting of crafting of quarterly assessment quarterly assessment quarterly assessment quarterly assessment tool (traditional, non- remediation/ T tool (traditional, non- tool (traditional, non- tool (traditional, non- traditional assessment enrichment traditional assessment traditional assessment traditional assessment tools; rubrics, programs to tools; rubrics, tools; rubrics, tools; rubrics, authentic outputs) as improve authentic outputs) as authentic outputs) as authentic outputs) as evidenced in the existing evidenced in the evidenced in the evidenced in the classroom assessment performance existing classroom existing classroom existing classroom tools STUDENTS indicators within assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools and students portfolio LEARNING the rating period and students portfolio and students portfolio and students portfolio and OUTCOMES and and remediation/ and remediation/enrichment (25%) remediation/enrichment enrichment activities remediation/enrichme activities are offered activities are offered are offered 80% of nt activities are 60% of students who 100% of students who students who need it. offered 70% of need it need it. students who need it. 4 80% adherence to 3 70% adherence to 2 60% adherence to 1 Non-adherence to 5 100% adherence to the new grading system the new grading the new grading system the new grading system the new grading system in the rating and system in the rating in the rating and in the rating and computing of and computing of computing of computing of Adhered to the students performance students performance students performance students performance existing as evidenced in the as evidenced in the as evidenced in the as evidenced in the Quarterly 5% teachers class record teachers class record teachers class record assessment teachers class record T with the with the with the principles for with the conduct of pre and conduct of pre and conduct of pre and post conduct of pre and post learner post test to see the post test to see the test to see the baseline test to see the baseline performance as well as the gain after baseline as well as the baseline as well as as well as the gain after gain after the gain after particular term in all particular term in all particular term in all particular term in all classes/subject areas classes/subject areas classes/subject areas classes/subject areas handled handled handled handled WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL TIME- RATING SCORE MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS LINESS KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE. I. BASIC 5 80% and above 4 75 79% 3 70-74% 2 65 69% 1 64% and below EDUCA- STUDENTS Attained the MPS/GSA MPS/GSA MPS/GSA MPS/GSA MPS/GSA TION SERVICES LEARNING required GSA OUTCOMES for grade Quarterly Q (25%) 5% level and learning areas
Conducted 5 100% 4 80% of 3 70% of 2 60% of 1 50% and below
periodic PTA accomplishment planned meetings planned meetings planned meetings of planned meetings meetings/ with set conducted conducted conducted with conducted with no conferences Quarterly 1% agreements met producing only set producing set of minimal results results T agreements agreements and partial accomplishment of these Conducted home 5 100% 4 80% 3 70% 2 60% 1 50% and below COMMU- visitation/met June 3% accomplishment of accomplishments accomplishment accomplishment of accomplishment parents of 2016- NITY March set visits and with partial of visits with visits with planned with no INVOLVE- students needing suggested interventions interventions 2017 T academic accomplished success in MENT planned monitoring/follow- targeted objectives implementation of (5%) up within the interventions for intervention interventions rating period Undertook/ 5 100% 4 80% project 3 70% project 2 60% project 1 No June initiated 1% accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment initiative only with project/event/activity 2016- projects/events/ March with full with partial with no no completion initiated activities with 2017 E completion completion report report documentation external funding/sponsors report on hip within completion PROFESSIO Conducted June Conducted 4 2 Action 3 1 Action 2 Identified 1 Only 2016- -NAL problem/classro problem/classroom Research Research classroom/learning classroom/learning/ March GROWTH om-based 2017 -based Action conducted with conducted with problems with problems/issues AND Action research 3% Q research documentation on documentation on research proposals identified DEVELOP- completion of completion of MENT interventions interventions (5%) 5 Initiated and 4 Initiated and 3 Participated 2 Participation 1 No participation June Initiated/Participa participated at least participated in co- in most of co- only without in school activities 2016- ted in co- March 2 co- curricular/school curricular/school documented curricular/school 2017 1% E curricular/school activities with activities with results activities within activities documented documented the rating period with documented results results result WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL TIME- RATING SCORE MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS LINESS KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE. OTHER Winning 5 At least 1 of the listed activities was accomplished RELATED coach ACTIVITI Resource ES Speaker/Train June er/Facilitator 2016- (PLUS March FACTOR) Member of 2017 Technical 5% E Working (5%) Group(TWG) Awardee Demonstration Teacher Coordinator Chairman OVER - ALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT: ADJECTIVAL RATING: 4.09 VERY SATISFACTORY
GERALDIN Y. EGIDO CHRISTOPHER D. KUIZON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
Ratee Rater
ELENA S. DE LUNA, Ph.D.
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING APPROVED:
4.500 5.000 OUTSTANDING 3.500 4.499 VERY SATISFACTORY 2.500 3.499 SATISFACTORY 1.500 2.499 UNSATISFACTORY MARIZA S. MAGAN, Ed. D., CESO V BELOW 1.499 POOR Schools Division Superintendent