Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

LIBHU NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Libhu, Maasin City, Southern Leyte


INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee: VICTOR D. DUMAGUIT Name of Rater: CHRISTOPHER D. KUIZON
Position: TEACHER I-III Position: Principal
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Maasin City Division Date of Review: March 2017
WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
TIME- RATING SCORE
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS
LINESS
KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE.
I. BASIC Prepared 5 All Daily lesson 4 Had four of the five 3 Had 3 of the five 2 Had 2 of the five 1 Had 1 of the five
EDUCA- plans had the following parts of lesson plan parts without evidence parts without evidence parts without evidence of
functional daily
TION objective, subject with evidence of of localizing the of localizing the localizing the curriculum
SERVICES lesson plans matter, procedures, localizing the curriculum and had curriculum and had and had not provided any
and daily log of June evaluation and curriculum and had seldom provided very seldom provided of the above conditions
activities and 2016- assignmentwith sometimes provided individual and group individual and group to 100% of the classes
March evidence of localizing individual and group activities utilizing activities utilizing handled.
facilitated 20%
TEACHING learning through
2017 the curriculum and had activities utilizing teaching strategies teaching strategies that
frequently provided teaching strategies that that develop the 21st develop the 121st
- innovative individual and group develop the 21st century century skills with century skills with
LEARNING teaching activities utilizing the skills with emphasis on emphasis on the use emphasis on the use of
PROCESS teaching strategies that the use of 4As, of 4As, cooperative 4As, cooperative
strategies Q
develop the 21st century cooperative learning learning and the use learning and the sue of
(60%) skills with emphasis on and the use of ICT in of ICT in 60% of the ICT in 40% of the
the use of 4As, 80% of the classes classes handled for classes handled for the
cooperative learning handled for the rating the rating period as rating period as
and the use of ICT in period as evidence in evidenced in the evidenced in the lesson
100% of the classes the lesson plan, actual lesson plan, actual plan, actual delivery of
handled for the rating delivery of the students delivery of the lesson the lesson and
period as evidenced in outputs or portfolios and students outputs students outputs or
the lesson plan, actual or portfolios. portfolios.
delivery of the lesson
and students outputs or
portfolios.
Delivered the 5 Attained 100% of 4 At least 80% of the 3 At least 70% of 2 At least 60% of the 1 At least 50% of the
the desired learning desired learning the desired learning desired learning desired learning
desired learning
competencies with the competencies with the competencies with competencies without competencies without
competencies help of a help of a incomplete budget budget of lessons and budget of lessons and
as reflected in a complete budget of complete budget of of lesson and very without utilization of without utilization of
budget of lesson June lessons with lessons and seldom seldom utilized instructional materials instructional materials in
2016- 30% E appropriate, adequate utilized instructional instructional materials in teaching learning teaching learning
with appropriate,
March and updated materials in teaching in teaching learning process process
adequate and 2017 instructional materials learning process process
updated
instructional
materials
Initiated 5 All students were 4 At least 80% were 3 At least 70% of 2 At least 60% of 1 At least 50% of
guided in the guided in the students were guided students were guided in students were guided in
discipline of
observation of observation of in the observation of the observation of the observation of
students classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and
including Guidelines with guidelines with the use guidelines with the guidelines without any guidelines without any
classroom rules, June the use of agreed of agreed existing use of teacher classroom policies as classroom policies as
2016- 5% existing classroom or classroom or school imposed classroom evidence by descriptive evidenced by descriptive
guidelines T
March school policies as policies as evidenced policies as evidenced rating in the report rating in the report
through 2017 evidenced by by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in card/journals card/journals
individual and descriptive rating in the the report card and the report/journals
group tasks report card and journals journals
within the rating
period
WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
TIME- RATING SCORE
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS
LINESS
KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE.
I. BASIC Maintained a 4 Sometimes safe, 3 Seldom safe, 2 Unsafe, topsy-turvy, 1 Unsafe, topsy-turvy,
EDUCA- 5- Always safe, order, order, clean classroom order, clean dirty classroom and dirty classroom and
TEACHING safe, motivating
TION clean classroom and and toilet with evidence classroom and toilet toilet without evidence of toilet without evidence
SERVICES - classroom June toilet with evidence of of proper waste with evidence of proper of proper
LEARNING environment 2016- proper waste disposal or proper waste waste disposal or waste disposal or
and conducted March 5% Disposal or management where disposal or management where management where
PROCESS 2017 E management where students and teachers management where there seldom proof of there NO proof of
systematic
(60%) checking of
students and teachers respect each other with students and teachers respect from among respect from among
respect each other with 80% systematic respect each other the teachers and the teachers and
learners 100% systematic checking of attendance with 70% systematic students with 60% students and no
attendance checking of attendance of learners checking of systematic checking of systematic process of
of learners attendance of learners attendance of learners checking of attendance
of learners
5 Teacher has FULLY 4 Teacher has 3 Teacher has 2 Teacher has VERY 1 Has not provided
utilized his/her SOMETIMES utilized SELDOM utilized SELDOM utilized his/her any of the above
exceptional art of his/her exceptional art his/her exceptional art exceptional art of conditions to 100% of
questioning in the of questioning in the of questioning in the questioning in the the classes handled and
delivery of lessons delivery of lessons delivery of lessons delivery of lessons using remediation/enrichment
Monitored, using VARIED types of using varied types of using few types of few types of assessment activities are offered
evaluated and assessment tools to assessment tools to assessment tools to tools to assess student 50% and below of
maintained
Quarterly 15% assess student assess student assess student performance WITHOUT students who need it
performance with the performance with the performance with the the utilization of table of
students utilization of table of utilization of table of utilization of table of specification in the
progress specification in the specification in the specification in the crafting of
and conducted crafting of crafting of crafting of quarterly assessment
quarterly assessment quarterly assessment quarterly assessment tool (traditional, non-
remediation/ T
tool (traditional, non- tool (traditional, non- tool (traditional, non- traditional assessment
enrichment traditional assessment traditional assessment traditional assessment tools; rubrics,
programs to tools; rubrics, tools; rubrics, tools; rubrics, authentic outputs) as
improve authentic outputs) as authentic outputs) as authentic outputs) as evidenced in the existing
evidenced in the evidenced in the evidenced in the classroom assessment
performance existing classroom existing classroom existing classroom tools
STUDENTS indicators within assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools and students portfolio
LEARNING
the rating period and students portfolio and students portfolio and students portfolio and
OUTCOMES and and remediation/ and remediation/enrichment
(25%) remediation/enrichment enrichment activities remediation/enrichme activities are offered
activities are offered are offered 80% of nt activities are 60% of students who
100% of students who students who need it. offered 70% of need it
need it. students who need it.
4 80% adherence to 3 70% adherence to 2 60% adherence to 1 Non-adherence to
5 100% adherence to
the new grading system the new grading the new grading system the new grading system
the new grading system
in the rating and system in the rating in the rating and
in the rating and
computing of and computing of computing of
computing of
Adhered to the students performance students performance students performance
students performance
existing as evidenced in the
as evidenced in the as evidenced in the as evidenced in the
Quarterly 5% teachers class record teachers class record teachers class record
assessment teachers class record
T with the with the with the
principles for with the
conduct of pre and conduct of pre and conduct of pre and post
conduct of pre and post
learner post test to see the post test to see the test to see the baseline
test to see the baseline
performance as well as the gain after
baseline as well as the baseline as well as as well as the gain after
gain after the gain after particular term in all
particular term in all
particular term in all particular term in all classes/subject areas
classes/subject areas
classes/subject areas classes/subject areas handled
handled
handled handled
WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
TIME- RATING SCORE
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS
LINESS
KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE.
I. BASIC 5 80% and above 4 75 79% 3 70-74% 2 65 69% 1 64% and below
EDUCA-
STUDENTS Attained the MPS/GSA MPS/GSA MPS/GSA MPS/GSA MPS/GSA
TION
SERVICES LEARNING required GSA
OUTCOMES for grade Quarterly Q
(25%) 5%
level and
learning areas

Conducted 5 100% 4 80% of 3 70% of 2 60% of 1 50% and below


periodic PTA accomplishment planned meetings planned meetings planned meetings of planned meetings
meetings/ with set conducted conducted conducted with conducted with no
conferences Quarterly 1% agreements met producing only set producing set of minimal results results
T
agreements agreements
and partial
accomplishment of
these
Conducted home 5 100% 4 80% 3 70% 2 60% 1 50% and below
COMMU- visitation/met June
3% accomplishment of accomplishments accomplishment accomplishment of accomplishment
parents of 2016-
NITY March set visits and with partial of visits with visits with planned with no
INVOLVE- students needing suggested interventions interventions
2017 T
academic accomplished success in
MENT planned
monitoring/follow- targeted objectives implementation of
(5%) up within the interventions
for intervention interventions
rating period
Undertook/ 5 100% 4 80% project 3 70% project 2 60% project 1 No
June
initiated 1% accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment initiative only with project/event/activity
2016-
projects/events/ March with full with partial with no no completion initiated
activities with 2017 E completion completion report report
documentation
external
funding/sponsors report on
hip within completion
PROFESSIO Conducted June Conducted 4 2 Action 3 1 Action 2 Identified 1 Only
2016-
-NAL problem/classro problem/classroom Research Research classroom/learning classroom/learning/
March
GROWTH om-based 2017 -based Action conducted with conducted with problems with problems/issues
AND Action research 3% Q
research
documentation on documentation on research proposals identified
DEVELOP- completion of completion of
MENT interventions interventions
(5%)
5 Initiated and 4 Initiated and 3 Participated 2 Participation 1 No participation
June
Initiated/Participa participated at least participated in co- in most of co- only without in school activities
2016-
ted in co- March 2 co- curricular/school curricular/school documented
curricular/school 2017 1% E curricular/school activities with activities with results
activities within activities documented documented
the rating period with documented results results
result
WEIGHT Q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
TIME- RATING SCORE
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES PER E RESULTS
LINESS
KRA T 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T AVE.
OTHER Winning 5 At least 1 of the listed activities was accomplished
RELATED coach
ACTIVITI Resource
ES Speaker/Train June
er/Facilitator 2016-
(PLUS March
FACTOR) Member of 2017
Technical 5% E
Working
(5%) Group(TWG)
Awardee
Demonstration
Teacher
Coordinator
Chairman
OVER - ALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT: ADJECTIVAL RATING: 4.09
VERY SATISFACTORY

GERALDIN Y. EGIDO CHRISTOPHER D. KUIZON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:


Ratee Rater

ELENA S. DE LUNA, Ph.D.


Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING APPROVED:


4.500 5.000 OUTSTANDING
3.500 4.499 VERY SATISFACTORY
2.500 3.499 SATISFACTORY
1.500 2.499 UNSATISFACTORY MARIZA S. MAGAN, Ed. D., CESO V
BELOW 1.499 POOR Schools Division Superintendent

Вам также может понравиться