Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
Division of Rizal
District of Pililla
NIOGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: GRACE B. ROCERO Name of Rater: DOROTEA C. ENCIO

Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Review Period: MAY , 2016 TO APRIL,2017 Date of Review: DECEMBER , 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Elementary

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

PERFORMANCE
Weight INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCOR
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, RESULT E
Timeliness) Q E T Ave
Delivery of Teaching Prepared daily logs June, 2016 20 % Outstanding ( 5 ) 90%
Basic Learning activities in E.S.P, to April, 2017 and above of the daily logs
Educational Process English, FILIPINO, A.P, of activities was prepared in
Services EPP, and MAPEH with all learning areas indicating
45% objective, references, the objectives, references,
instructional materials instructional materials and
and procedures including procedures including
appropriate, adequate appropriate adequate and
and updated instructional updated Ims within the
materials within the rating period.
rating period. Very Satisfactory ( 4 ) -
75% to 89% of the
teachers were monitored
and supervised in their
teaching learning activities
as well as provided with
technical assistance.
Satisfactory ( 3 ) - At least
60% to 74% daily logs of
activities was prepared in
all learning areas indicating
the objectives, references,
instructional materials and
procedures including
appropriate adequate and
updated Ims within the
rating period.
Unsatisfactory ( 2 ) - At
least 40 % to 59% daily
logs of activities was
prepared in all learning
areas indicating the
objectives, references,
instructional materials and
procedures including
appropriate adequate and
updated Ims within the
rating period.
Poor ( 1 ) - 39% and
below of daily logs of
activities was prepared in
all learning areas indicating
the objectives, references,
instructional materials and
 procedures including
appropriate adequate and
updated Ims within the
rating period.

Outstanding (5)-
Cooperative and innovative
learning strategies
were90% and above
effective when used.
Very Satisfactory (4)-
Cooperative and innovative
Facilitated effective learning strategies were
learning in 75% of the 75% to 89% effective when
grade IV Guava pupils used.
through functional daily Satisfactory (3)-
June , 2016 10%
logs activities and Cooperative and innovative
to April, 2017
innovative teaching learning strategies were
strategies within the 60% to 74% effective when
rating period. used.
Unsatisfactory (2)-
Cooperative and innovative
learning strategies were
40% to 59% effective when
used
Poor (1)- Cooperative and
innovative learning
June, 2016 15% OUTSTANDING (5) NO
to April, 2017 drop- out rate in IV-Guava
within the School Year
 2016-2017.
VERY SATISFACTORY
(4)Had 1-2 drop-out rate in
Grade IV-Guava within the
School Year 2016 2017.
Ensured zero drop- SATISFACTORY (3) Had 3-
out rate in Grade VI- 4drop-out rate in Grade IV-
Virgo by providing of Guava within the School
FLOs to learners at Year 2016 2017.
risk within the school UNSATISFACTORY (2)Had
year 2016-2017. 4-5 drop-out rate in Grade
IV-Guava within the School
Year 2016 2017.
POOR (1) Had 6 and
abovedrop-out rate in
Grade IV-Guava within the
School Year 2016 2017
Delivery of Pupils/ Monitored, June, 2016 7% Outstanding (5)- 90% and
Basic Students evaluated and to April, 2017 above were maintained the
Educational Outcome maintained the achievement performance
Services progress of grade level of Grade III Mahogany
25% IV Guava pupils pupils in all learning areas
within the rating to 75%.
period. Very Satisfactory (4)-
75% to 89% were
maintained the
achievement performance
level of Grade IV and AP 3
pupils in all learning areas
to 75%.
Satisfactory (3)- 60% to
74% were maintained the
 achievement performance
level of Grade IV and Ap 3
pupils in all learning areas
to 75%.
Unsatisfactory(2)- 40% to
59% were maintained the
achievement performance
level of Grade IV and Grade
III pupils in EPP, AP,
MAPEH and AP 3 areas to
75%.
Poor(1)-39% and below
were not maintained the
achievement performance
level of Grade IV and III
pupils in all learning areas
to 75%.
Maintained updated, June, 2016 10% OUTSTANDING (5) -
accurate and clean April, 2017 Pupils records were 90 %
school records of and above maintained
Grade IV Guava updated, accurate and
pupils within the clean within the School
rating period. Year 2016 2017.
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
- Pupils records were at
least 70 % to 89
%maintained updated,
accurate and clean within
the School Year 2016
2017.
SATISFACTORY (3) -
Pupils records were at least
 60 % to 74% maintained
updated, accurate and
clean within the School
Year 2016 2017.
UNSATISFACTORY (2) -
Pupils records were at least
40 % to 59 % maintained
updated, accurate and
clean within the School
Year 2016 2017.
POOR (1) - Pupils records
were at least 39% and
below maintained updated,
accurate and clean within
the School Year 2016
2017.

Conducted remediation July 8% Outstanding ( 5 )-

enrichment program to 3 December Remediation /Enrichment
slow readers to improve 2016 Program is offered to 90%
performance indicator and above of students who
from July-December need it.
2016. Very Satisfactory ( 4 )
Remediation / Enrichment
Program is offered to70 %
to 89 %of students who
need it
Satisfactory ( 3 )-
Remediation / Enrichment
Program is offered to 60 %
to 74% of students who
 need it
Unsatisfactory ( 2 )-
Remediation / Enrichment
Program is offered to 40 %
to 59 % of students who
need it.
Poor ( 1 )- Remediation /
Enrichment Program is
offered to 39% and below of
students who need it.
Outstanding ( 5 ) 90%
and above accomplishment
with set agreements met.
Very Satisfactory ( 4 )
75% to 89% of planned
meeting conducted
Conducted 3 producing only set
regular / periodic agreements are partial
Delivery of HRPTA accomplishment of these.
Basic Meetings/Conference June, 2016 Satisfactory ( 3 ) 60% to
Community 7%
Educational s with 75 % to April, 2017 74% of planned meetings
Involvement
Services. attendance of the conducted producing set of
parents within the arguments.
15%
School Year 2016 Unsatisfactory ( 2 ) 40%
2017. to 59% of planned meetings
conducted with minimal
results.
Poor ( 1 ) 39% and below
of planned meeting
conducted with result.
June, 2016 4% Outstanding (5)- 5 home
to April, 2017 visitations conducted
 Visited parents of
5 grade IV-
Very Satisfactory (4)- 3 -4
Guava pupils
home visitations conducted.
needing
Satisfactory (3)-2 home
academic
visitations conducted.
monitoring /
Unsatisfactory (2)- 1
follow-up within
home visitation conducted.
the School year
Poor (1)-no home visitation
2016 2017.

Outstanding (5)- Attended

3 community allied services
with documented result.
Very Satisfactory (4)-
Attended and
Attended 2 community
participated
allied services with
actively in 3
documented result.
community /
June, 2016 Satisfactory (3)- Attended
allied services 4%
to April, 2017 1 community allied services
before the end of
with documented result.
the School year
Unsatisfactory (2)-.
2016 2017
Attended 1 to 2 community
allied services without
documented result.
Poor (1)- no attendance in
community allied services.
Delivery of Served as Outstanding ( 5 ) Served
Basic demonstration June, 2016 at least 5 times as
Educational Professional teacher training 1 to April, 2017 demonstration tweacher
Services Growth and time before the 4% coach/facilitator/mentor in
Development end of the School school competition with
year 2016-2017 documented result.
 Very Satisfactory ( 4 )
Served at least 3 times as
demonstration teacher
coach/facilitator/mentor in
school competition with
documented result.
Satisfactory ( 3 )Served at
least 2 times as
demonstration teacher
coach/facilitator/mentor in
15% most school competition
with documental results.
Unsatisfactory ( 2 )
Served 1 time as
demonstration teacher
/coach/facilitator/mentor in
school competition without
documental result.
Poor ( 1 ) Not served as
demonstration
teacher/coach/facilitator/me
ntor in school activities.
July, 2016 to 4% Outstanding ( 5 )
April, 2017 Initiated at least 2 co-
Initiated and curricular/school activities
participated in co- with documents result.
curricular and Very Satisfactory ( 4 )
school activities Initiated and participate in
within the rating co-curricular/school
period. activities with documented
result.
Satisfactory ( 3 )
 Participated in most of co-
curricular/school activities
with documented results.
Unsatisfactory ( 2 )
Participation only without
documental result.
Poor ( 1 ) no participation
in school activities.
Outstanding ( 5 ) 90%
Performed duties June, 2016 7% and above of duties as
as grade IV to April, 2017 Grade IV teacher were
teacher performed effectively and
effectively within efficiently within the School
the School Year Year 2016-2017.
2016-2017. Very Satisfactory ( 4 )
75% to 89% of duties as
Grade IV teacher were
performed effectively and
efficiently within the School
Year 2016-2017.
Satisfactory ( 3 ) 60% to
74% of duties as Grade IV
teacher were performed
effectively and efficiently
within the School Year
2016-2017.
Unsatisfactory ( 2 ) 40%
to 59% of duties as Grade
IV teacher were performed
effectively and efficiently
within the School Year
2016-2017.
 Poor ( 1 ) 39% and below
of duties as Grade IV
teacher were performed
effectively and efficiently
within the School Year
2016-2017.
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISH-
MENTS

DOROTEA C. ENCIO GRACE B. ROCERO MARY ANN A. RUBIO, Ed.D.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority