Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.3 Subject Weighting Indicated below is the weighting of this subject and the total course points.
4 BBus (Accg) 96
1.4 Student Workload Indicated below is the expected student workload per week for this subject
Co-requisite ACC300 Auditing and Assurance Services (may be done before or at the
same time as ACC302)
Kings Own Institutes key generic graduate attributes for a Bachelors level degree are summarised below:
Across the course, these skills are developed across 3 levels. These are:
Level 1 Foundation Students learn the basic skills, theories and techniques of the subject and
apply them in basic, stand-alone contexts.
Level 2 Intermediate Students further develop skills, theories and techniques of the subject and
apply them in more complex contexts, beginning to integrate the application with other subjects.
Level 3 Advanced Students have a demonstrated ability to plan, research and apply the skills,
theories and techniques of the subject in complex situations, integrating the subject content with a
range of other subject disciplines within the context of the course.
Listed below, are key knowledge and skills students are expected to attain by successfully completing this
subject:
13
Study Review Week
13 Feb
14 Please see Exam Timetable for exam date,
Final Exam Week
20 - 25 Feb time and location
15 Student Vacation begins
27 Feb Enrolments for T117 open
16 Results Released Tuesday 07 Mar
07 Mar Certification of Grades Friday 10 Feb
T117 begins 13 Mar 2017
Week 1 of classes for T117
1
Friday 17 March Review of Grade Day for T316 see Sections 2.4 and 3.5.2 below
13 Mar
for more information
T316 has one (1) public holiday (Australia Day) that occurs during classes this trimester. Classes
scheduled for this public holiday (Calendar Class Dates) will be rescheduled as per the table below. All
other public holidays fall within the mid-trimester break period.
Please see the table below and adjust your class timing as required. Please make sure you have
arrangements in place to attend the rescheduled classes if applicable to your T316 enrolment.
Classes will be conducted at the same time and in the same location as your normally scheduled
class except these classes will be held on the date shown below.
There may be instances when you believe that your final grade in a unit does not accurately reflect your
performance against the subject criteria. Section 8 of the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy
(www.koi.edu.au) describes the grounds on which you may apply for a review of grade.
If this happens and you are unable to resolve it with the Academic staff concerned then you can apply for a
formal Review of Grade within the timeframes indicated in Sections 2.4.4 and 3.5 below and the
Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy.
Please ensure you read the Review of Grade information before submitting an application.
KOI will hold the Review of Grade Day for all subjects studied in T316 on:
Only final exams will be discussed as all other assessments should have been reviewed during the
trimester.
If you fail one or more subjects and you wish to consider applying for a Review of Grade you MUST attend
the Review of Grade Day. You will have the chance to discuss your final exam with your lecturer, and will
be advised if you have valid reasons for applying for a Review of Grade (see Section 3.5 below and the
Assessment and Assessment Appeals.
If you do not attend the Review of Grade Day you are considered to have accepted your results for
T316.
The information in this section applies to both mid-trimester and final exams.
If you miss you mid-trimester or final exam there is NO GUARANTEE you will be offered a
deferred exam.
You must apply within the stated timeframe and satisfy the conditions for approval to be
offered a deferred exam (see Section 8.1 of the Assessment and Assessment Appeals
Policy and the Application for Assignment Extension or Deferred Exam Forms).
You will not normally be granted a deferred exam on the grounds that you mistook the
time, date or place of an examination, or that you have made arrangements to be
elsewhere at that time; for example, have booked plane tickets.
If you:
are not offered a deferred exam, or
are offered a deferred exam, but do not attend
you will be awarded 0 marks for the assessment. This may mean it becomes very difficult
for you to pass the subject.
If you apply for a deferred exam within the required timeframe and satisfy the conditions you will be
advised by email to your KOI student email address of the time and date for the deferred exam.
Marks awarded for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that assessment.
If you are offered a supplementary assessment, you will be advised by email to your KOI student email
address of the time and due date for the supplementary assessment supplementary exams will normally
be held at the same time as deferred final exams.
You must pass the supplementary assessment to pass the subject. The maximum grade you can achieve
in a subject based on a supplementary assessment is a PASS grade.
If you:
are offered a supplementary assessment, but fail it;
are offered a supplementary exam, but do not attend; or
are offered a supplementary assessment but do not submit by the due date;
you will receive a FAIL grade for the subject.
Briefly described below are the teaching methods/strategies used in this subject:
Face-to-face lectures (2 hours/week) are conducted in seminar style and address the subject content,
provide motivation and context and draw on the students experience and preparatory reading.
Tutorials (2 hours/week) include class discussion of case studies and research papers, practice sets and
problem-solving and syndicate work on group projects. Tutorial participation is an essential component of
the subject and contributes to the development of graduate attributes (see section 2.2 and 2.2.1 above). It
is intended that specific tutorial material such as case studies, recommended readings, review questions
etc. will be made available each week in Moodle.
Online teaching resources include class materials, readings, model answers to assignments and
exercises and discussion boards. All online materials for this subject as provided by KOI will be found in
the Moodle page for this subject. Students should access Moodle regularly as material may be updated at
any time during the trimester.
Other contact - academic staff may also contact students either via Moodle messaging, or via email to the
email address provided to KOI on enrolment.
Finalise groups
Week 4 Group Report 10%
Group Report and
Report Week 10 Presentation 20% a, b, c, d
Presentation
Presentations Week Total 30%
11
Provided below, in formal reference format, is a list of the prescribed and recommended readings.
Recommended readings:
http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/ACCED264_06-15.pdf
http://www.ifrs.org/current-projects/iasb-projects/conceptual-framework/Pages/Conceptual-
Framework-Summary.aspx
http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/Industry-Topics/Reporting/Current-issues/Conceptual-
framework.aspx
Satish Joshi and Yue Li (2016) What Is Corporate Sustainability and How Do Firms Practice It? A
Periodicals Available:
Abacus
Accounting and Finance
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Accounting Research Journal
Acuity
Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
Australian Accounting Review
Australian GST Journal
Australian Journal of Accounting Education
Australian Journal of Management
Contemporary Accounting Research
In The Black
International Journal of Finance and Accounting Studies
Journal of Accounting and Economics
Useful Websites:
The following websites are useful sources covering a range of information useful for this subject..
However, most are not considered to be sources of Academic Peer Reviewed theory and research. If
your assessments require academic peer reviewed journal articles as sources, you need to access
such sources using the Library database, Ebscohost, or Google Scholar. Please ask in the Library if you
are unsure how to access Ebscohost. Instructions can also be found in Moodle.
The assessments for this subject are described below. Other assessment information and/or assistance
can be found in Moodle, including the marking rubric.
Marking guides for Assessments follow the assessment descriptions. Students should compare their
assessment final drafts against the marking guide before submission.
Assessment submission is as per the instructions below. Please retain a photocopy and softcopy of all
assessments.
Assessment 1
Value: 20%
Submission: Submissions must be made via Turnitin on the KOI Moodle Subject Home Page by
5.00pm Friday of Week 6.
Topic: Does the current accounting framework meet the needs of the users of financial
reports as prescribed in the objective of the Conceptual Framework of Accounting?
How the conceptual framework revision to include Prudence is likely to address
the disparity in Corporate Reporting is a requirement in your analysis.
Task Details: Download the latest annual report of any two listed companies.
Annual Reports are available on the company website or ASX website.
Analyse the conceptual framework with reference to the annual reports of your chosen companies in light
of the reporting requirements imposed on accountants and those charged with governance of corporations.
Your analysis may include the following:
Are the annual reports in compliance with the conceptual framework and AASB standard requirements?
You need to use extracts from the annual reports to support your analysis.
Provide screen shots of the relevant sections from the reports in your assignment.
If they are not in compliance, explain the reason.
How the conceptual framework revision to include Prudence is likely to address the disparity in
Corporate Reporting
You may find the explanations in the notes to the financial statements or in the Directors Report.
Compare and contrast the two annual reports, identify the differences in disclosures of these
corporations.
Reference to material of the course and a critical analysis of the annual reports is required.
Students are to critically analyse and develop supported recommendations and conclusions, in reference
to the relevant accounting framework (see Topics 1-5).
The analysis and supported recommendations need to be formatted into a professional report as would
be expected in a modern organisation by management and clients.
Research Students need to support their analysis and recommendations with the text and
Requirements: minimum of 10 recent and relevant academic journal articles. Other sources
may also be used but students need to be confident of the academic validity of
such sources.
ACC303 CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING T316 FINAL 12-11-2016 Page 9 of 14
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A
ACC303
Students need to stay within the assigned word limits, and indicate the word count on the cover
page of the assignment. Marks will be reduced for assignments shorter than or greater than the
minimum word count.
The report should be typed double spaced, using Times New Roman font size of either 10 point or 12
point.
Every page should be clearly numbered.
The assignment should include the following parts:
(a) A title / cover page, which indicates basic information such as Subject title, Subject code, Trimester
number, Assignment title, group members full names and KOI student numbers, word count and
name of the tutor;
(b) Executive Summary;
(c) Table of Contents;
(d) Main contents Introduction, analysis using suitable headings and subheadings, Conclusions and
Recommendations, Appendices (if any);
(e) References (using Harvard Anglia style); and/or
(f) Attachments.
Assessment 2
Assessment Type: Group report and presentation combined group and individual assessment task.
Please note: This is a group assessment and presentations are delivered by the
group but individual presentation efforts are be marked
Purpose: This assessment is designed to allow students to research and analyse current
social issues in accounting and evaluate their impact on various stakeholders. As
a group assessment, it further develops students team working skills. This
assessment relates to Learning Outcomes a, b, c and d.
Value: Total value is 30% made up of 10% Group marks for report plus 20% individual
marks for presentation. This assignment marks will be scaled to a mark out of 30
total subject marks.
Due Date: 5.00pm Monday of Week 10 ONE COPY OF THE GROUP REPORT ONLY PER
GROUP uploaded to Moodle Link and Turnitin.
Presentations will be in tutorial classes Weeks 10 11 as allocated by Week 5.
You need to book your presentation times with your tutors. Make sure you book in
early to avoid disappointment.
Submission: ONLY ONE student from each group must upload the group report
Report submission to the Turnitin Assignment Link on the KOI Moodle Subject Home
Page no later than 5.00 pm Monday of Week 10. A printed copy should also be
handed to the Tutor during that Weeks tutorial to assist with marking.
Video Presentation One student from each group must upload copy of the group presentation
materials to computer storage as directed by the Lecturer at the time of
presentation in Week 10 and 11. A retrievable and reusable electronic copy of the
presentation material must be provided in a format to allow for the Tutor and
Lecturer to review the presentation at a later date.
Task Details: Groups are to research the current state of Sustainability Reporting. As a result of
their research groups need to develop a video presentation detailing the current
state of sustainability reporting including the issues, practices, etc using higher
order analysis and explaining the implications for various stakeholders in relation
to financial decision making. The video presentation should conclude with
supported specific recommendations as to how organisations and their accounting
advisors should proceed in light of the analysis.
Research Students need to support their analysis with reference from the text and
requirements: minimum of ten (10) suitable, reliable, current and academically acceptable
sources check with your tutor if unsure of the validity of sources.
Groups seeking Credit or above grades should support their analysis with
increased number of reference sources comparable to the grade they are
seeking.
Presentation: 5 minutes video presentation per group. Using the course material with reference
to group report content, groups are to present their analysis and findings/
conclusions in a professional 5 (five) minute video presentation. All group
members must participate in the preparation of the video.
Videos may be prepared using any available platform such as iMovie, MoveMaker,
Prezi and others
Group Report 1500 + 10% word report format Word .doc or .docx.
Title page, executive summary, table of contents, appropriate headings and sub-
headings, recommendations/findings/conclusions, in-text referencing and
reference list (Harvard Anglia style), attachments if relevant. Single spaced, font
Times New Roman 12pt, Calibri 11pt or Arial 10pt.
Video Presentation 5 minute video presentation in class supported by appropriate visual aids.
Presentations will be timed groups going over 5 minutes will be asked to stop -
this will effect marks, as will presentations that are too short (under 4 minutes) or
too long (over 6 minutes). All group members must participate.
The presentation will carry an individual mark that will be scaled to a mark out of
20 subject marks.
Assessment 3
Purpose: The purpose of the final examination is to test your understanding of course
concepts and your ability to apply these concepts. The examination may cover
materials used in tutorials, class discussions and/or from the readings
This assessment contributes specifically to Learning Outcomes a, b and c.
Value: 50%
Due Date: The final exam will be held in the official KOI exam period in Week 14 of the
trimester. The specific date and time will be posted towards the end of the
trimester.
Topic: The examination may cover content from any part of the entire subject.
Task Details: The exam will require students to critically evaluate financial accounting
information and standards, demonstrating technical accounting skills to prepare
comprehensive accounts for given sets of real world circumstances.
An important part of business life and key to achieving KOIs graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the
ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as in-class
quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty (see below).
Students who miss mid-trimester tests and final exams without a valid and accepted reason (see below)
may not be granted a deferred exam and will be awarded 0 marks for assessment item. These penalties
are designed to encourage students to develop good time management practices, and create equity for all
students.
Any penalties applied will only be up to the maximum marks available for the specific piece of assessment
attracting the penalty.
Late penalties, granting of extensions and deferred exams are based on the following:
o In Class Tests (excluding Mid-Trimester Tests)
o No extensions permitted or granted a make-up test may only be permitted under very special
circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence is provided. The procedures and timing to
apply for a make-up test (only if available) are as shown in Section 3.2.1 Applying for an
Extension (below).
o Missing a class test will result in 0 marks for that assessment element unless the above
applies.
o Written Assessments
o - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is approved (see Section
3.2.1 below)
o Presentations
o No extensions permitted or granted no presentation = 0 marks. The rules for make-up
presentations are the same as for missing in-class tests (described above).
o Mid-Trimester Tests and Final Exams
o If students are unable to attend mid-trimester tests or final exams due to illness or some other
event (acceptable to KOI), they must:
1. Advise KOI in writing (email: extensions@koi.edu.au) as soon as possible, but no later than
three (3) working days after the exam date, that they will be / were absent and the reasons.
They will be advised in writing (return email) as to whether the circumstances are acceptable.
2. Complete the appropriate Application for Extension or Deferred Exam Form available from the
Student Information Centre in Moodle, on the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the
Reception Desk (Market St), as soon as possible and email with attachments to
extensions@koi.edu.au.
3. Provide acceptable documentary evidence in the form of a satisfactorily detailed medical
certificate, police report or some other evidence that will be accepted by KOI.
4. Agree to attend the deferred exam as set by KOI.
If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they
must apply by completing the appropriate Application for Extension form available from the Student
Information Centre in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Market St),
as soon as possible but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date.
The completed form must be emailed with supporting documentation to extensions@koi.edu.au.
Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as
practicable.
Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an extension must be supplied. Please
remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a
satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.
Please remember that all sources used in assessment tasks MUST be suitably referenced.
Failure to acknowledge sources is plagiarism, and as such is a very serious academic issue. Students
plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for a first offence
for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serious repeat cases. Exclusion has
serious visa implications. The easiest way to avoid plagiarising is to reference all sources.
Harvard referencing is the required method in-text referencing using Authors Surname (family name)
and year of publication. While there are many versions of Harvard referencing, KOI prefers the Anglia
version of Harvard referencing.
A Referencing Guide, Harvard Referencing, and a Referencing Tutorial can be found in the right hand
menu strip in Moodle on all subject pages.
An effective way to reference correctly is to use Microsoft Words referencing function (please note that
other versions and programs are likely to be different). To use the referencing function, click on the
References Tab in the menu ribbon students should choose Harvard Anglia 2008 as the style. A guide
to this method can be found in Moodle.
Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism KOI expects students to submit their own original work in
both assessment and exams. All students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting
assessments online via Moodle, stating that the work submitted is their own original work. Authorship
becomes as issue under the following circumstances:
Handing in work created by someone else, whether copied from another student, written by
someone else, or from any published or electronic source, is fraud, and falls under the general
Plagiarism guidelines.
Copying / cheating in tests and exams also fall under these guidelines. Such incidents will be
treated just as seriously as other forms of plagiarism.
Students who willingly allow another student to copy their work in any assessment situation may be
considered to collude to the copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied.
The Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (1992) makes it unlawful to treat people with a disability
less fairly than people without a disability. In the context of this unit, the principle of Reasonable
Adjustment is applied to ensure that participants with a disability have equitable access to all aspects of the
learning situation. For assessment, this means that artificial barriers to their demonstrating competence
are removed.
The focus of the adjusted assessment should be on enabling the participants to demonstrate that they
have achieved the unit purpose, rather than on the method used.
Full details of the KOI Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy may be obtained in hard copy from the
Library, and on the KOI website www.koi.edu.au under Policies and Forms.
Where students are not satisfied with the results of an assessment, including mid-trimester exams, they
have the right to appeal. The process is as follows:
1. Discuss the assessment with their tutor or lecturer students should identify where they feel
more marks should have been awarded students should provide valid reasons based on the
marking guide provided for the assessment. Reasons such as I worked really hard are not
considered valid.
2. If still not satisfied, students should complete an Application for Review of Assessment Marks
form, detailing the reason for review. This form can be found on the KOI website and is also
available at KOI Reception (Market St).
3. Application for Review of Assessment Marks forms must be submitted as explained on the
form within ten (10) working days of the return of the marked assessment, or within five (5)
working days after the return of the assessment if the assessment is returned after the end
of the trimester.
Where students are not satisfied with the results of the whole subject or with their final exam results, they
have the right to request a Review of Grade see the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy for
more information.
An Application for Review of Grade form (available from the KOI Website under Policies and Forms and
from KOI Reception, Market St) should be completed clearly explaining the grounds for the application.
The completed application should be submitted as explained on the form, with supporting evidence
attached, to the Academic Manager.