Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 58

Ilana Taub 0455496

UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH

Analysis of the growth and development of digital


signage and in-store TV networks
By

Ilana Taub

Dissertation presented for Honours Degree in Business Studies


2007/2008

Dissertation Advisor: Ashley Lloyd

1
Ilana Taub 0455496

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank Miriam Taub and Jean-Charles Figoni for sparking my interest in this new
medium and for providing a continuous source of information and encouragement throughout
this process.

2
Ilana Taub 0455496

ABSTRACT

The advertising industry is one that has changed considerably in the past few decades. At
the root of this evolution lies a changing environment which has witnessed transformations in
demographics, lifestyles, consumer needs and consumer buying habits. These recent changes
have considerably altered the ways through which companies communicate with their
consumers. Marketers and advertisers have had to develop new efficient ways of reaching
increasingly less responsive consumers by adopting more targeted approaches. The last fifty
years have also seen incredible developments in the media, the technology that consumers use
daily, and in the way that they interact with them. This combination has led to advertisers and
marketers to use innovative ways in advertising products and services.

As a relatively young industry generating large profits, the digital signage industry
provides marketers and advertisers the ability to tailor specific messages to reach consumers at a
specific time in a specific location. This technology can fulfil many purposes from promoting
products and services, enhancing customer experience, presenting information and producing an
increase in sales. To examine whether this medium can efficiently meet its objectives, a review
of past research is undertaken. Studies on out of home advertising and point of purchase
advertising demonstrate that the potential of these two channels in raising brand awareness and
producing an increase in sales. An examination of examples of where digital signage networks
have been deployed is then provided to contextualise this new communication channel. The
research finds that there remain some unresolved issues for digital signage, mainly in
demonstrating how consumers interact with the medium and in providing concrete evidence of
its return on investment. Past literature and the evidence provided in the cases demonstrate the
medium’s efficiency as an advertising medium and its potential to develop into a significant
industry.

3
Ilana Taub 0455496

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 5
CHAPTER 2: DIGITAL SIGNAGE – A NEW COMMUNICATION CHANNEL 7
2.0 Definition 7
2.1 Key Market Segments 7
2.3 Technology Requirements 7
2.4 Digital Signage Applications 8
CHAPTER 3: LITERATURE REVIEW 11
3.0 Out of Home Advertising 11
3.1 Point of Purchase Advertising 12
3.2 Growth and Development of Digital Signage 15
3.2.0 The decline of television advertising 16
3.2.1 Sophisticated and empowered consumers 20
3.2.2 Technology and media proliferation 22
3.3 Literature Review Conclusion 23
CHAPTER 4: DIGITAL SIGNAGE IN PRACTICE 24
4.0 “The Onspot Digital Advertising Concept in Simon Malls” 24
4.1 Tesco and in-store TVs 27
4.2 Pinnington and Edlerfield’ study (2005) 29
CHAPTER 5: CASE STUDY – IDKLIC 31
5.0 Company Overview 31
5.0.0 Business model 31
5.0.1 Content 32
5.1 Industry Overview 34
5.1.0 Pharmaceutical industry 34
5.2.0 Belgian advertising industry 35
5.2 iDklic’s digital signage solutions 35
5.3 Consumer Response to In-Store TV Networks in a Belgian Pharmacy 36
5.4 Pharmaceutical Companies’ Response to iDklic’s Digital Signage Networks 37
5.5 Conclusion 40
CHAPTER 6: EVALUATION OF DIGITAL SIGNAGE AND IN-STORE TV NETWORKS 41
REFERENCES 44
BIBLIOGRAPHY 47
APPENDICES 49
1. Digital Signage Business Models 49
2. Additional iDklic information 49
a. Company information 49
b. Interview with Jean-Charles Figoni 49
3. Consumers response to in-store TV networks in a Belgian pharmacy 53
4. Pharmaceutical companies’ response to iDklic’s digital signage networks 56

4
Ilana Taub 0455496

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

The advertising industry is one that has changed considerably in the past few decades. At
the root of this evolution lies a changing environment which has witnessed transformations in
demographics, lifestyles, consumer needs and consumer buying habits. This had led to marketers
having to deal with more fragmented consumers and markets, and to be increasingly precise in
targeting specific groups. The development of mass media which occurred in the past fifty years
have enabled advertising to become widespread, coming in any form and present almost
anywhere. Global advertising expenditures are expected to reach $653.8 billion in 2008,
representing a worldwide growth of 4.6% from 2007 (Coen 2007). While it is expected that the
global advertising expenditure will continue to increase with a general growing economy, the
share of investment for different media is predicted to change significantly. Today, marketers
and advertisers need to constantly adapt and develop new efficient ways of reaching increasingly
less responsive consumers. Recent figures on advertising spending demonstrate that while
television advertising remains the medium with the largest investment, marketers are
increasingly turning to other media to reach consumers (Initiative Special Report 2006;
ZenithOptimedia 2007).
Digital signage, a branch of advertising whereby digital content is displayed on in-store
TV networks, is becoming recognised as a valuable channel for marketers. As identified by the
North American Commercial Digital Display Market Study (Hayes 2004), one of the earliest
developments of digital signage present in research was seen in American airports. The CNN
airport network was created twelve years ago as a network broadcasting a “customized blend
from standard CNN programming with emphasis on breaking news, travel, sports, weather and
personal fashion.” (Hayes 2004: 30) At this day, the successful network contains around 3000
screens at 1800 gates in 39 U.S.A airports. It is has been predicted that the digital signage
industry and the point of purchase advertising industry will continue to grow and to gain
importance within marketing campaigns. Frost and Sullivan (2005) estimated that the size of the
North American Digital Signage Advertising Market based on advertising revenues from digital
signage networks reached $102.5 million in 2004 and would grow to reach $3.7 billion in 2011,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 67.12%.
This dissertation will fully assess the potential of digital signage as an advertising
medium. In order to do so, chapters two and three will examine its objectives and the factors that
encouraged its development, as well as reviewing literature out of home advertising and point of
purchase advertising. Chapter four will contextualize the growth of this industry by analyzing

5
Ilana Taub 0455496

cases where digital signage networks have been deployed, accompanied by a study assessing
whether in-store TV networks can improve customer loyalty. An in-depth examination of iDklic,
a small Belgian company delivering digital signage solutions to pharmacies, will be carried out
in chapter five. The concluding chapter will evaluate the effectiveness of this new
communication channel by contrasting its aims with the evidence discussed in the previous
chapters.

6
Ilana Taub 0455496

CHAPTER 2: DIGITAL SIGNAGE – A NEW COMMUNICATION CHANNEL

2.0 Definition
Digital signage is the “digital delivery of visual content through a network of displays in an out-of-home
setting that is centrally managed and controlled” (Hayes 2004: 8).
Digital signage can be used for a variety of purposes from promoting products and services, enhancing
customer experience, providing information, brand building and increasing customer loyalty.

2.1 Key Market Segments


Digital signage is present in the following market segments:

- Retail: digital signage networks have been deployed in supermarkets, shopping malls, car
dealerships, pharmacies, specialty stores – these are mostly for promotional purposes.
- Hospitality: networks have also been deployed in hotels, restaurants, cinemas to entertain
customers and provide establishment information.
- Services: financial services, health services such as doctors and nurseries – to inform
consumers.
- Other public spaces: airports, train stations, shopping malls where customers are
informed of opening times, travel times, promotions or entertained with programmes
such as weather and news channels.

2.3 Technology Requirements


Due to its extensive technology requirements, digital signage is a communication channel that
requires high initial investments. Digital signage could not have been developed without the
recent technological advances and media developments. All digital signage solutions differ as do
the business models1 used by the various players in the industry. Below are outlined the key
technology requirements for digital signage (may differ with different examples/cases):

• LCD or Plasma screen


- The amount of screens required will depend on the scale of the project. In some
establishments, one screen may prove to be sufficient whereas in more public
areas, such as supermarkets or shopping malls, a larger number of screens will be
used.

1
See appendix 1 for further explanations on the different business models in use.

7
Ilana Taub 0455496

- Screens need to be placed strategically to attract the consumer’s attention.


• Display management computer/site
- Content will be broadcasted to the various screens from this display management
computer or site.
• Broadcasting software
• Decoder (depending on type of screen)
- Some screens may have an integrated decoder which will enable content to be
broadcasted; other screens will require a separate decoder (resembling a TV
decoder)
• Manager/designer computer/site
- At this station, the content is created using software such as photoshop, illustrator
and flash.
• High speed internet/ADSL internet connection
- To send content from the display management site to the screens

2.4 Digital Signage Applications

Advertising can be defined as “any paid form of non-personal presentation and


promotion ideas, goods or services by an identified sponsor. It can be a cost-effective way to
disseminate messages, whether to build brand preference or to educate people” (Kotler and
Keller 2006: 568) Falling under the promotional part of the marketing mix, advertising can have
many purposes from promoting special offers, introducing a new brand or product, to presenting
a product’s new features. Kotler and Keller (2006) identify four types of advertising. The first
type is information advertising which promotes brands, products service and strives at increasing
consumers’ knowledge of these elements. Persuasive advertising pushes to stimulate the act of
purchase by creating a preference and convincing the consumer that he/she must buy that
product or service. Reminder advertising acts as a simple reminder to the customer to trigger
purchase while reinforcement advertising aims at convincing consumers that they have made the
right decision in purchasing a particular brand. In recent years, advertising has become less
efficient at reaching consumers due to increasing amount of advertising clutter, the introduction
of new medium such as Interactive Digital TV which can enable viewers to skip commercials as
they please, and consumer’s increasing power in interacting with advertising messages. Digital
signage has the potential to accomplish all of the advertising objectives mentioned above and as
an alternative new medium, it has the potential to reach an audience in a cost efficient dynamic

8
Ilana Taub 0455496

manner. There are many objectives that both advertisers and retailers/sellers aim to achieve when
investing in digital signage networks. Both for advertisers and retailers, the most prominent
objective will be to increase sales. This section will review digital signage’s various objectives
and the value this media channel can bring to marketers, retailers and consumers.
With the increasing use of internet shopping (Lawrence and Clark 2007), the
fragmentation of consumer needs and the increasing number of outlets where consumers can
obtain the products they are looking for, it is important for retailers to create a shopping
environment which stands out from competitors and which will make the consumer loyal to that
brand or establishment. In-store communications have traditionally relied on promotional and
advertising tactics but an increasing importance is being place on the brand and the experience
consumers perceive. Creating an ‘experience’ for the consumer will transmit not just information
about a product or service but will aim at portraying the brand as a whole and what is stands for.
In their paper on “Managing Media and Advertising Change with Integrated Marketing”, Calder
and Malthouse (2005) suggest that integrated marketing should “define how the consumer
experiences the product” and that an advertisement should not “merely tell consumers about the
brand” but should “vicariously let the consumer experience the brand” (2005: 357). Calder and
Malthouse see media not just “as a passing vehicle” but as a “media context” (2005: 358) which
can engage the consumer and create an experience. In-store TV networks aim to create an
experience by engaging consumers, keeping them up to date with relevant information, and
creating a particular atmosphere in the store. Nike’s deployment of in-store TV networks in
Niketown stores has produced a store atmosphere where consumers are shown how the brand is
to be worn - the content fashions the clothes and efficiently creates a story behind the brand.
Information and persuasive advertising, two of the four types of advertising identified by Kotler
and Keller (2006), strive to promote brands, products or services and to create a preference
which will lead to particular purchase. Marketers and advertisers have long recognised the power
of advertising at the point of purchase, having done so with extensive advertising displays. The
deployment of in-store TV networks will aim to produce an increase in sales by advertising
promotions in stores or by encouraging consumers to choose a particular product or brand.
Despite digital signage being predominantly used to produce an increase in sales in retail,
it can also fulfil different purposes in non-retail environments. For instance, in public spaces or
in hospitality settings, digital signage can provide establishment information or entertain
consumers when they are waiting for something. For example, in a doctor’s waiting room, a
screen can provide health information as well as promoting certain products. Although this
cannot be considered point of purchase advertising, the screen can encourage the patient to

9
Ilana Taub 0455496

discuss products with his/her doctor and ultimately influence him in future purchasing decisions.
Installing screens in train stations or airports where consumers have to wait can improve their
customers’ waiting experience by providing them relevant information and by entertaining them
with unrelated information or programmes. While these objectives are not directly linked to
producing an increase in sales, they will aim to strengthen customer loyalty thereby encouraging
customers to return to that establishment or location.
As will be discussed extensively in the literature review, consumer fragmentation has
contributed to the development of digital signage. In our increasingly fragmented consumerist
society, it is important for marketers and advertisers to efficiently target their consumers. Digital
signage aims to attain that objective by delivering specific messages in a quantifiable manner.
The technology’s components enable advertisers to target specific customers in specific locations
at specific times. The content displayed on the screen can be changed from a distant location as
often as required. For advertisers, this offers flexibility in targeting messages according to factors
relevant to the purchasing decisions. For example, in advertising medications in pharmacies, the
messages will be changed flexibly according to the time of year. The technology also allows
local targeting whereby advertising messages can be customised and adjusted for different sites.
For instance, in a post office in-store TV network, the content will be adjusted according to the
location of the post office presenting different location-specific information. As consumers are
diversifying and harder to reach, digital signage and particularly in-store TV networks allow
advertisers to target consumers at the point of purchase - thus influencing them directly at the
place where it could have the largest impact. Digital signage combines the “emotional benefits of
TV advertising while engaging consumers at a time when they are often actively seeking
inspiration and are the most pre-disposed to act on impulse” (Anstey 2006: 53). The
effectiveness of point of purchase advertising will be further discussed in the following chapters.

10
Ilana Taub 0455496

CHAPTER 3: LITERATURE REVIEW

3.0 Out of Home Advertising

While out of home advertising is not a new medium - advertising that reaches consumers
out of their homes has been around for a long time - the avenues through which it is being
delivered are constantly diversifying themselves. Often called the “15 second sell” (Kotler and
Keller 2006: 23), out of home advertising can come in many shapes and forms, and can be seen
in supermarkets, on street corners, on public transportation, in doctor’s waiting rooms, in post
offices, in pharmacies and so on. As it can target consumers everywhere while they are outside
their homes, outdoor advertising offers marketers many opportunities. The out of home
advertising industry is growing: the worldwide outdoor expenditure was estimated at $25.5
billion in 2007 (ZenithOptimedia 2007). In the UK in 1998, outdoor advertising was used by
83% of the top 100 advertising agencies – this number increased to 95% by 2006. Moreover,
since 1998, the revenue generated in the UK from this type of advertising grew by 66% reaching
£932.5 million (Outdoor Advertising Association of Great Britain 2007). As the use of this
medium continues to grow, it is necessary to assess its effectiveness: does out of home
advertising work? Does it increase brand awareness or product awareness and what impact does
it have on sales? A number of studies have investigated the effectiveness of outdoor advertising
but it remains difficult to evaluate. The variety of different uses this medium has and its nature
whereby consumers experience the advertising message while they are ‘on the go’ make it hard
to measure. A billboard on the side of the road is likely to have a different impact than
advertisement displayed on a small screen in a taxi – in the latter, consumers will be much more
exposed to the media and will be more likely to welcome and notice entertainment as they are
sitting through their journey. The following section will discuss studies that have examined
outdoor advertising.

Wendell Hewett’s study (1972) investigated the effectiveness of billboard advertising by


displaying 100 billboards in a “standard statistical metropolitan area” (1972: 29) on which was
displayed the question “Who was the 23rd President?” Before the billboards were put up, only
.57% of the 340 respondents were able to answer the question. Five weeks after the billboards
were installed, 7.7% of the respondents were able to answer the question. More interestingly,
when respondents were asked how they knew the answer to the question, many said they had
seen the billboard and researched the answer. A last sample was taken two weeks later, the
billboard also having been changed to include the question and the answer – the figure went up

11
Ilana Taub 0455496

to 35.6%. While this study suggests that people’s awareness of a product or service would go up
by 35% after being exposed to billboard advertising, Hewett points out limitations in the study.
Amongst other limitations, he discusses the “curiosity-creating” aspect of the question – not all
advertisements for products and services would be as intriguing thus reducing the impact they
have. Bhargava and Donthu’s study on “Sales Response to Outdoor Advertising” (1999)
presented similar results to Hewett’s study by investigating different aspects of sales response to
out of home advertising. Bhargava and Donthu used thirty billboards across a medium-size city
in North America to attract visitors to a botanical garden which had recently complained of a
decline in the number of visitors and thus of sales. The billboards were present for four weeks in
different locations in the city, some including a promotional message offering free coffee.
Bhargava and Donthu monitored the botanical garden’s sales and asked visitors to point out on a
map where they lived – doing this instead of asking if they had seen the billboard prevented any
biased recall2. The findings indicated “an average daily attendance increase of 58% from the
previous year’s level during the advertising period” (1999: 11) and a monthly average attendance
increase of 64%. Furthermore, by examining the zip codes of the customers before and after the
campaign, the study found that up to 70% of the customers came from locations where the
billboards had been put up. The advertising campaign was successful in increasing sales. Both
Hewett and Bhargava and Donthu’s studies demonstrated that outdoor advertising can increase
consumer awareness and can produce an increase in sales. Nevertheless, it is important to note
that due to the nature of both campaigns and any out of home advertising campaign, results can
be influenced by the difficult to control external factors such as word-of-mouth or multiple
exposures to the medium. Outdoor advertising provides advertisers with an opportunity to create
awareness of a certain product or service by targeting consumers as soon they leave their homes.
Point of purchase advertising is a particular type of outdoor advertising which can target the
consumer where he is most likely to purchase a product or service.

3.1 Point of Purchase Advertising

Point of Purchase advertising falls under the out of home umbrella and has recently also
regained importance within the marketing mix. Like out of home advertising, the point of
purchase industry is growing – it is a $30 billion worldwide business and is growing at a 7% rate
2
Biased recall represents the idea that some individuals may recall seeing an advertisement on a certain media
despite seeing it on another. In media recall surveys, individuals will be more likely to credit television advertising,
followed by newspapers in second place – this usually being tied to time spent per media. (Bucci, 1983 as cited in
Bhargava and Donthu, 1999)

12
Ilana Taub 0455496

annually (Liljenwall 2004). In the late nineties, Point-of-Purchase Advertising international


(POPAI) conducted a global investigation where they researched the “effectiveness of retail-
level point of purchase advertising by analyzing customer behaviour” (Liljenwall 2004: 184).
The 1995 POPAI Consumer Buying Habits Study found that on average, 70% of in-store
decisions are made at the point-of-purchase. This number rose to 75% for Europeans and up to
88% for Brazilians – thus demonstrating the potential impact advertising can have on the
consumer at the point of sale. There are numerous studies investigating point of purchase
advertising delivering mixed findings. This section will review, amongst others, the following
papers: “Sales effects of in-store advertising” by Woodside and Waddle (1975), “Consumer
behaviour at the point-of-purchase” by Ogden and Ogden (2004) and “Making in-store
advertising a measured medium” by Adams (2004).
Woodside and Waddle’s study of “Sales effects of in-store advertising” (1975) examined
whether point of purchase advertising or price specials would have a greater impact on sales. The
study was carried out in four supermarkets over four consecutive weeks and studied the effects
of advertising and price reductions on the sales of instant coffee. Woodside and Waddle used a
simple hand-written sign which was attached to the shelf of the product – this simple format was
used as they felt that “it was the least effective type which could possibly be used” (1975: 30) in
order to make the hypothesis indicating that point of purchase was more effective harder to
attain. A 20% price reduction was also imposed on the product; this was deemed significant
enough by consumers and retailers. Woodside and Waddle tested three hypotheses: the first one
examined whether point of purchase advertising would be more effective than a price reduction
in increasing sales of instant coffee; the second hypothesis checked whether consumers would
“buy more of a product at a reduced price than at the normal price with point of purchase
advertising present or absent in both instances” (1975: 30); while the third hypothesis examined
whether consumers would buy more of a product at a normal price with or without the presence
of point of purchase advertising. The findings indicated that consumers were more sensitive to
point of purchase advertising than to a price fluctuation. Consumers were more likely to
purchase instant coffee when its price was reduced when no point of purchase advertising was
used to catch their attention, this figure increased when a price reduction was used alongside the
advertisement. When the price remained normal, the sales increased more when point of
purchase advertising was also used. The findings suggested that point of purchase advertising
was a greater incentive to purchase the product than a price special alone. Woodside and
Waddle’s study concluded that “when the effectiveness of a crude point of purchase advertising
device was compared to a price special, the results indicated the superiority of the point of

13
Ilana Taub 0455496

purchase advertising device in producing increased product sales” (1975: 33). While Woodside
and Waddle’s study was carried out in 1975, long before the use of different digital media, it
successfully demonstrates the effect of even the simplest point of purchase advertising display in
creating an increase in sales.

As studies have demonstrated that up to 70% of purchasing decisions are made once
customers enter the store (POPAI 1995), understanding consumers’ needs, wants and habits at
the point-of-purchase is essential to efficiently create tools to influence their behaviour. While
most consumers will have certain brands preferences for particular products or service, many of
them do not always remain loyal to their preferred brands – letting other factors influence their
purchase decisions. In examining consumer behaviour at the point of sale, Ogden and Ogden
(2004) investigated one of the key elements in understanding point of purchase advertising.
Odgen and Odgen’s paper discusses marketing research which has shown that consumers’
decisions are influenced by factors such as “anxiety level, physical surroundings, and whether or
not the shopper is alone” (2004: 23). Marketers need to understand why a purchase is being
made and what decision process happens from a consumer’s perspective. As stimulating
purchase and influencing the consumer is one of point of purchase advertising’s main objectives,
it is necessary to consider what influences a consumer’s purchasing decisions – this should be
done by investigating the consumer behaviour of the target market. “The effectiveness of point
of purchase advertising depends on understanding of the customer and the customer’s in-store
behaviour. With their understanding of retailing, point of purchase specialists can motivate and
provide meaningful cues to customers, resulting in increased sales” (2004:36).
Gerwin’s “Sales Promotion Planning” paper (2004) discusses point-of-purchase
advertising in relation to sales promotion planning and how they both relate to the marketing
mix. Advertising’s objectives can be summarized into building brand awareness, product or
service awareness, stimulating purchase, and creating customer loyalty or preference. Sales
promotions aim to directly stimulate purchase, its effects are or should be instantaneous.
Although advertising’s and sales promotions’ objectives may differ, it is interesting to link the
two and understand how they can work together. One of the most valuable points Gerwin makes
in his paper presents the idea of “push” and “pull” strategies. Gerwin argues that all types of
promotions fall “under two broad classifications—trade promotions and consumer promotions”
(Gerwin 2004: 58). Trade promotions are aimed at those responsible for deciding which products
or services a retail establishment will offer. They are directed at “pushing” a product or service
into a store or to be put on display. Consumer promotions are aimed at consumers and strive to

14
Ilana Taub 0455496

convince the consumer to “pull” the product from the store – to make a purchase. Gerwin claims
that point of sale advertising connects both types of promotions where the consumer makes
purchasing decisions. “The trade incentives ensure that the right products are at the right place at
the right time and the consumer incentives deliver motivated buyers to purchase the products”
(Gerwin 2004: 59). This suggests that by displaying products and services in this efficient
manner, point-of-purchase advertising can deliver an increase in sales.
Recency theory represents the idea that “advertisements are more effective the closer the
consumer is to a decision” (Adams 2004: 208). While this may seem to be self-evident, it is
crucial in understanding point of purchase advertising. Erwin Ephron’s paper on “Recency
Planning” (1997) discusses “recency” and the way in which it has challenged traditional
advertising models. Advertising was previously thought to work by repetition – “frequency
generated awareness, created interest and aroused desire, and triggered action.” (1997: 61) This
view was challenged in the early 1990s when John Philip Jones (1995, as cited in Ephron 1997)
demonstrated that in fact, a single exposure to an advertisement could be strong enough to
influence which brand is purchased. Additionally, Jones suggested that the first exposure was far
more persuading than subsequent exposures. Jones also found that the impact of a certain
advertisement will decrease rapidly after the viewer has been exposed to it. Recency theory does
not suggest that frequency is irrelevant or that one exposure is enough. Instead, it argues that “in
the short term, additional exposures are often wasteful because the recipient is not likely to be in
the market” (Ephron 1997: 63). Targeting consumers at the right time has become crucial as they
enjoy greater control in filtering which messages are relevant to them and which are not. If
Recency theory is taken to be true, point of purchase advertising will be one of the most effective
types of advertising as the consumer’s exposure to a product or service will be directly in
conjunction to the purchase.

3.2 Growth and Development of Digital signage

Frost and Sullivan (2005) estimate that the size of the North American Digital Signage
Advertising Market based on advertising revenues from digital signage networks reached $102.5
million in 2004 and would grow to reach $3.7 billion in 2011, presenting an annual compound
growth of 67.12%. As a relatively young industry generating large revenues and with a potential
to generate even larger ones, it is important to understand the key drivers responsible for the
growth of the digital signage industry. Frost and Sullivan (2005) identify a number of reasons
leading to the development of digital signage. While the factors identified focus on the North

15
Ilana Taub 0455496

American market, it is fair to say that most of them also apply to other parts of the world.
Amongst others, Frost and Sullivan (2005) discuss the decline of the impact of television
advertising; technological advances and a decrease in their costs; a growing interest in improving
the consumers’ shopping experiences as they become increasingly sophisticated and fragmented;
and increasing research demonstrating that point of purchase advertising can impact consumers
and boost sales.
The advertising industry as a whole has undergone a number of changes which have
considerably altered the way in which companies communicate with their consumers. Kiely
(1993 as cited in Kim, Han, Schutz 2004: 32) identified four main changes the advertising had
come across:

• “A decrease in the effect of advertising through the mass media due to more diversified
and fragmented social change”, also decreasing the effect of television advertising.

• The proliferation of communication channels due to technological advances, seen, for


instance in “the introduction of digital communication and other diversified multimedia”.

• The increase in the number of and types of advertising agencies “due to the
diversification and specialisation of the entire area of marketing communications.”

• The increasing expectations and demands of clients to receive concrete evidence on the
return of their advertising investments.

In the context of the overall changes the industry has experienced, a number of specific factors
are believed to have significantly contributed to the digital signage industry’s development.

3.2.0 The decline of television advertising

For a long time and to some extent still today, television advertising has been considered
the most powerful advertising medium “to reach the broadest spectrum of consumers” (Kotler
and Keller 2006: 570). Reaching consumers at home, while they are concentrating on the screen,
has been thought to be one of the most efficient ways to increase product and brand awareness.
As a number of factors are leading to a decline in its impact, it is inevitable that television
advertising will lose its rank as the top medium in the marketing mix. A number of researchers
have identified Interactive Digital TV (IDTV) as one of the key factors leading to the decline to
traditional television advertising. This section will discuss the changes that television advertising
is undergoing and will evaluate how it is contributing to the growth of other less traditional

16
Ilana Taub 0455496

media and more particularly digital signage. The section will focus closely on two studies:
“Opportunities and Thresholds for Advertising on Interactive Digital TV: A View from
Advertising Professionals” by Cauberghe and Pelsmacker (2006) and “Adoption of Digital
Video Recorders and Advertising: Threats or Opportunities” by Fortunato and Windels (2005).
Cauberghe and Perlsmacker’s paper (2006), which sets out to investigate the attitudes and
expectations of advertisers in respect to the introduction of IDTV in Belgium, first explores the
various aspects of IDTV and then discusses its threats and opportunities. The paper identifies
IDTV “as a group of technologies that gives users the possibility to take control over their TV
experience, enabling interactivity with the content” (2006: 23). IDTV is composed of various
technologies such as Video on Demand, a Personal Video Recorder and an Electronic Program
guide – all of which provide users with extensive control over their TV experience and the
possibility to choose what they are watching – ultimately “threatening the traditional advertising
business model”(2006: 31). Cauberghe and Perlsmacker’s study was carried out in two separate
times: first before the launch of IDTV in Belgium and then a year later. Conducting the study in
this manner enabled the authors to investigate advertisers’ perceptions of IDTV and its impact
both before and after its implementation. The research method consisted of sending out web
surveys to marketing professionals and other staff of marketing and advertising agencies. The
findings demonstrated that not many respondents were aware of this technology or of its threats
to the advertising industry. Furthermore, the study showed that most respondents’ attitudes did
not significantly change before and after IDTV’s launch. Cauberghe and Perlsmacker also
identify a number of threats and opportunities brought by the introduction of IDTV. One of the
most important threats introduced by the authors is seen in the digitalization of TV giving
viewers a much wider range of TV channels, consequently leading to “a decrease in terms of
reach per channel” (O’Connor and Galvin 2001, as cited in Cauberghe and Perlsmacker 2006:
23). Viewers are also given the ability to pause programmes, record them, and thus watch them
whenever is most convenient. This trend is dangerous for advertisers as studies have shown that
viewers do enjoy skipping commercials. Forrester’s study (2005, as cited in Cauberghe and
Perlsmacker 2006) found that viewers, who owned a device with the ability to record a
programme and watch it at another time, skipped 88% of all advertisements. Furthermore, the
study found that over 50% of all IDTV users claimed that their favourite feature was the ability
to skip commercials. Considering the amounts that are invested into television advertising, it is
inevitable that marketers will continue to search for alternatives in reaching consumers.
Fortunato and Windels’ paper (2005) is similar to Caudeberghe and Perlsmacker’s study
as it focuses on understanding the reasons behind the increasing trend to use IDTV technologies

17
Ilana Taub 0455496

and sets out to discuss the threats and opportunities IDTV introduces. While it does not carry out
primary research, the paper does offer some valuable points. The challenges IDTV introduces to
advertisers are further developed by the fact that TV rates are declining anyway and that
television advertising costs are reaching peak levels. A key step in using advertising to influence
consumer behaviour is for the consumer to notice the message – without being noticed, it is
impossible for the consumer to be influenced. The main threat of IDTV is its “potential to hinder
the advertised message being noticed” (2005: 140). It is crucial for advertisers to find efficient
ways to communicate their messages to reach consumers. The development of IDTV
technologies appears to have significantly influenced the traditional advertising models and
continues to do so. As the amount of users of such technologies is set to grow and continue to
grow in the future, it is advisable that advertisers adapt to this changing environment. A survey
of the advertising industry’s leaders found that 75% of them strongly believed that IDTV
technologies would have a “significant, even dramatic effect” on the importance of television
advertising and would continue to lead to a “growth of non-traditional ad formats, if not the
outright death of the 30 second spot” (AAF Survey of Industry Leaders on Advertising Trends
2004: 2). Figure 1 illustrates the differences in the share of total advertising spending by medium
between 2005 and 2009 while figure 2 illustrates similar findings for the UK between 2000 and
2007.

Share of global advertising spending by medium 2005-2009

45

40

35

30 2005
2006
25
2007
&

20
2008
15 2009
10

0
on

et
s

io

or
es
er

em
ad

rn
do
si
in
ap

te
vi

in
az

ut
sp

le

In
C

O
ag

Te
ew

M
N

Medium

Figure 1 – Source: ZenithOptimedia Press Release 2008

18
Ilana Taub 0455496

Share of advertising spending by medium 2000-2007 (UK)

45

40

35

30

25 2000
%

20 2007

15

10

0
Radio Newspaper Magazine Cinema Outdoor Internet TV
Medium

Figure 2 – Source: Elms 2007

Figure 1 demonstrates the global changes in advertising spending that have occurred
since 2005 and the expected changes until 2009. Newspaper, magazine and radio advertising are
seen declining while television, outdoor and internet advertising are growing. Cinema
advertising remains relatively the same. As has been discussed above, television advertising is
facing many threats and the amounts invested in it are expected to further decline – it has been
estimated that television’s share of advertising expenditure will decrease by 0.3% in North
America and 0.5% in Europe in 2008. However, figure 1 portrays television’s share of
advertising spending to increase up until 2009 – this is due to advertising trends in other parts of
the world where television advertising remains the preferred medium as those markets “are more
dependent on fast market consumer goods advertisers” (ZenithOptimedia 2006: 2). Furthermore,
TV’s global share of advertising expenditures is predicted to be positively affected by the 2008
Beijing Olympics (ZenithOptimedia 2006: 2). Figure 2 demonstrates that in the UK, outdoor
and internet advertising are experiencing the highest growth while television advertising is
clearly declining. The changes that are occurring in the allocation by marketers of their
investments per year by medium are small but portray the trends that the advertising industry is
experiencing.
While many studies suggest that IDTV and similar technologies will lead to a significant
decrease in television advertising, it is important to note that some studies also identify a key

19
Ilana Taub 0455496

number of opportunities. Cauberghe and Perlsmacker (2006) argue that as IDTV provides more
channels, consumers will segment themselves enabling advertisers to target advertisements in a
more efficient manner. Additionally, they propose the introduction of new advertising formats
such as the Dedicated Advertising Location (DAL) whereby consumers watch a short
advertisement followed by the option of accessing another page with more information regarding
the particular product or service advertised in the 30 second spot. Fortunato and Windels (2005)
suggest that IDTV might, in fact, improve the TV experience and act as a “wake-up call and lead
to advertisers looking more closely on how to communicate creatively” (2005: 142). With the
steady decline of prime time viewers, the increasing costs of advertisements to reaching a
shrinking audience with the introduction of new ad-skipping technologies all leading to a decline
in the effectiveness of traditional advertising medium, out-of-home advertising and specifically
digital signage offer advertisers and marketers alternative channels to target specific consumers.

3.2.1 Sophisticated and empowered consumers

In his article on “The concept of the marketing mix”, Neil Borden (1964) identifies a
number of market forces which “govern the mixing of marketing elements” (1964: 10). The first
force Borden recognizes is consumers’ buying behaviour, which he argues, is determined by
consumers’ buying and living habits, buying power and motivations behind purchasing. All these
factors can be seen to have influenced and changed consumer behaviour. With more disposable
income and a tendency to spend it on “leisure and luxuries” (Gritten 2007: 16), consumers have
become increasingly fickle, sophisticated and more demanding in the choices they make.
Purchasing decisions are based on a number of different factors including price, value,
knowledge, trends, societal influences and convenience. This has led to businesses to target both
their products and marketing campaigns in a more efficient way. Customer orientation “underlies
all good marketing all facets of good marketing planning from the design of products and
services to pricing, distribution and communication” (Murlhen 2004). Knowing your consumer
involves understanding what consumers desire, how they consume what they desire and more
importantly how they acquire these products and services. As consumers have become
fragmented and require individual needs, growing importance has been placed on targeting
consumers with timely information and advertising being tailored to their buying patterns and
preferences. While customizing content to specific customers at specific times in specific
locations is one of they key aspects digital signage, it has also acted as one of its enablers.
Modern consumers are given an array of possibilities in which they can choose what suits them

20
Ilana Taub 0455496

best. They want products and services that are personalized to their individual needs. It is thus
essential for companies to market their products and services specifically to enable consumers to
have the most accurate and suited information. Digital signage has provided businesses the
opportunity to target and tailor messages accordingly, and to change these as often as required
when consumer habits or preferences change.
In the consumerist society we live in, individuals constantly are bombarded with
advertisements and marketing campaigns. This increasing amount of advertising has left many
consumers having a negative attitude toward advertising and the marketing industry (Ogden and
Odgen 2004). Advertising clutter has been a serious issue for many years within the industry
with increasing worries that consumers will reach a saturation point whereby they completely
dismiss advertisements. Boyee and Arens’ study (1995, as cited in Ogden and Ogden 2004)
found that on a daily basis, Americans are exposed up to an average of 500 commercial
messages, while in the UK, it has been suggested that this figure could go up to as far as 4000
messages a day (McDonald, 2003). Such figures evidently illustrate why consumers may feel
invaded by marketing techniques. Elliot and Speck’s (1998) paper on consumer perceptions of
advertising clutter set out to investigate consumers’ perceptions in various medium including
television, radio, magazine and yellow pages. The article defined advertising clutter as “one’s
belief that the amount of advertising in a medium is excessive” (Elliot and Speck 1997, as cited
Elliot and Speck 1998: 30). While perceptions may be erroneous, they are extremely significant
as they can reduce the impact of individual advertisements or increase advertisement avoidance3
(Elliot and Speck 1998). As it has become imperative for marketers to devise ways to reduce
advertising clutter perceived by consumers, digital signage has offered an efficient platform to
do so. Consumers perceive clutter when they see a media as intrusive. For instance, consumers
often identify TV advertising as the one with the highest clutter – placing it higher than yellow
pages which are, in fact, 100% advertising. This perception may be due to media differences
whereby advertising in yellow pages is the desired effect whereas in TV, it may seem unjustified.
Searching for information in catalogs, consumers will voluntarily expose themselves to the
advertising thus not feeling as invaded. Furthermore, consumers may feel less harassed if the
information provided to them is pertinent to their habits and needs. One of the main objectives of
digital signage is its ability to target consumers specifically – thus potentially reducing the
perception of advertising clutter. On the other hand, it is possible that consumers will see digital
signage as yet another media adding to the commercial clutter that they face on a daily basis. It is

3
Advertisement avoidance is “defined as all actions made by media users that differentially reduce their exposure to
advertisement content” (Speck and Elliot 1997, as cited in Ogden and Ogden 2004: 31).

21
Ilana Taub 0455496

thus necessary that the content displayed on digital signage networks enhance consumers’
experience and benefit them in one way or another.

3.2.2 Technology and media proliferation

The last fifty years have seen incredible developments in the media and the technology
that consumers use daily and in the way they use them. Technology and media is used regularly
for entertainment, communication, a platform for self-expression, at work and to obtain
information. Televisions are present in almost every household and perform numerous tasks
from providing entertainment through video, music and radio, to interacting with individuals
with the use of the internet. The number of mobile phone users worldwide has increased from a
mere 200 million in the late 1990s to 1.6 billion in 2007 (Gitten 2007). Whether using television,
phones, computers or blackberries, the modern consumer is constantly exposed to media giving
marketers various options to reach consumers. Advertisers have to follow the increasing trends
and relationships consumers have created with media use, and exploit the opportunities they
offer.
Digital signage is one of the many alternatives adopted by advertisers and has been made
possible by the development of more efficient technologies and the reduction in costs of these
technologies. Despite this evolution, digital signage remains an expensive channel due to its
many technical components, as deploying such a network can be up to five times more expensive
than traditional static displays – thus potentially hindering some marketers from adopting this
technology and the industry from developing to its full potential. While the investment costs
remain high, the cost reductions and technological advances have nonetheless played a role in
enabling the industry to grow. Without these developments, creating a digital signage solution
would not be possible. The price of computers has steadily declined and computers become more
powerful thus enabling advertisers to control large networks from as little as one central hub
(Hayes 2004). The improvements in high-speed Internet connections and wireless connections
are also another important enabler of digital signage as they allow messages to be broadcasted on
the various screens from one central computer. Additionally, improvements have been made
with large LCD and plasma displays. The cost of a plasma screen dropped by 50% in a single
year (Hayes 2004) while their quality and the quality at which they broadcast has improved too.

22
Ilana Taub 0455496

3. 3 Literature Review Conclusion

In order to fully understand the impact of out of home advertising and point of purchase
advertising, the literature review evaluated the effectiveness of these two media by examining
previous studies. The findings reveal that both advertising channels can produce an increase in
sales by raising consumers’ awareness of products and services. While these may have positive
implications for the further use of these channels for advertisers, it cannot be ignored that an
increase in sales or brand awareness can also and usually be attributed to other influencing
factors. Consumers are fickle and enjoy a growing amount of power in how they interact not
only with brands but with advertising as well, making “their media consumption patterns and
behaviour […] more difficult to read from a market research perspective” (Gritten 2007: 16)
This explosion of media consumption, together with technological advances, have enabled the
digital signage industry to develop and is expected to further encourage its growth.

23
Ilana Taub 0455496

CHAPTER 4: DIGITAL SIGNAGE IN PRACTICE

To examine the effectiveness of digital signage, it is necessary to consider examples of


where in-store TV networks have been deployed and to evaluate the results these networks have
delivered.

4.0 “The Onspot Digital Advertising Concept in Simon Malls” (Rose, B. and Williams, D,
2006)

With the decreasing impact of traditional media and the constant consumer
fragmentation, advertisers and marketers have to find innovative ways of reaching individual
consumers. The retail setting plays an important role for marketers as it often is the only place
where the two are able to meet and where the consumer is fully exposed to a brand’s own
environment. It has been estimated that the retail industry generates $3.6 trillion dollars in sales
per year in the USA alone (National Retail Federation in Liljenwall 2004) and that the industry
employs more than 20 million people. With such figures, it is not surprising that many marketers
are looking to advertise in retail settings and more particularly in shopping malls. The following
case will discuss the implementation of digital signage networks in Simon Malls4 in the USA.
Marketing and advertising in shopping malls can be very effective and provide advertisers with
an opportunity to reach billions of consumers each year. As identified in the Simon Shopper
Profile Study (2004), advertising at the mall can have surprisingly a “high effective reach”: an
estimated 2 billion consumers visit Simon malls each year. Each shopper will be exposed to the
advertisement in the mall at least three times per visit thus amounting to 6 billion (or more)
opportunities to reach consumers. Moreover, individuals who visit shopping malls do not
necessarily only go there to shop, many of them will also look to enjoy an exciting afternoon
with friends or family – shopping malls are where consumers purchase but also where consumers
socialize thus providing marketers with a different setting to reach consumers.
The digital signage network was deployed by Onspot Digital Networks – a “50/50
venture between Publicis Groupe, the world’s fourth largest communications agency and the
Simon Property Group, the largest publicly traded retail real-estate company in North America”
(2006: 3). The first screens were installed in November 2004 in Roosevelt Field Mall (Long
Island, New York) where it is estimated that an average of 17 million consumers visit each year.

4
Simon malls, which belong to the Simon Property Group (www.simon.com), comprise of 247 establishments in 37
states and account for two billion shoppers annually (Rose 2004).

24
Ilana Taub 0455496

A total of 58 screens were installed in strategic locations including the entrances, food courts,
corridors and near escalators. The content displayed on the screens combined entertainment,
information and advertising content – strategically created to “build relationships with mall
visitors by providing localized, useful and entertaining content” (2006: 5). A loop lasting ten
minutes in total was split into the following percentages:

Loop Content (10 minutes)

Advertising (local/national)

35% 35%
Movie Trailers

Mall Announcements

Fashion Show
Footage/Other
10% entertainment Content
20%

Source: Rose and Williams 2006

The study was conducted through interviews on three different occasions. On the first
two occasions, in December 2004 and in February 2005, on-site interviews were carried out at
the Roosevelt Field Mall. In December, Arbitron Inc., a media and marketing research firm,
examined 188 respondents to evaluate consumers’ awareness of and attitudes to the newly added
screens. In February, 400 respondents were interviewed to study consumers’ awareness of
specific advertising and their ability to recall what they saw on the screens. On the third and last
occasion, phone interviews were conducted in February and March of the same year to compare
the results obtained from the on-site interviews. The 148 respondents who participated in this
part of the study had all watched a “specific television program” at a particular time which
contained advertisements that had also appeared in the mall. This allowed the study to effectively
contrast the impact of television advertising and digital signage advertising – providing
interesting insight into the comparison of both channels.

25
Ilana Taub 0455496

The research which was conducted by Arbitron, an international media and marketing
research firm5, examined the response and attitudes of consumers who visit the Malls by
investigating “consumer awareness and acceptance of video programming in shopping malls and
its potential as an advertising medium.” (2006: 1) The first and second set of interviews which
investigated consumers’ awareness and perceptions of the new screens found up to 80% of
shoppers watched the content displays on the screens, 62% of frequent shoppers (who visited the
mall more than 10 times in the past 3 months) believed the network of screens improved the
shopping environment and 71% of them “were glad the screens were installed in the mall”
(2006: 9). By and large, consumers seemed to respond quite positively to the installation of the
new technology and perceived it as a genuine improvement to their experiences at the mall.
Furthermore, the findings indicate that 51% of shoppers who watched the content recalled seeing
a commercial on the screen and 47% of them could at least name one advertiser on an unaided
basis. Overall, six out of seven advertised brands were remembered by 40% or more of the
shoppers. These findings also depict a positive response rate to the content displayed on the
screens. When comparing consumer recall of advertising on television and at the mall, the study
found that 47% of shoppers remembered seeing any products advertised on the screens compared
to 32% of consumers who watched the television program at home. Additionally, 35% of
respondents remembered seeing a diet soda advertisement at the mall while only 14% of viewers
at home were able to recall the same advertisement. The comparison suggests that consumers
were more likely to remember advertisements when they had seen them on screens at the
Roosevelt Field Mall than at home.
The findings provide valuable insight into consumers’ attitudes of this non-traditional
advertising medium. The respondents’ perceptions of the network suggest that the screens
enhance consumers’ experience in the shopping mall – a factor that has become recognized as
largely significant in influencing consumer behaviour. In comparing television advertising and
digital signage advertising, the study suggests that the latter can produce greater brand recall and
brand awareness. These findings are valuable in understanding consumers’ opinions but do not
provide insight into purchasing behaviour or whether digital signage can, in fact, produce an
increase in sales. It is important to make a distinction between digital signage networks in
shopping malls and in-store TV networks as both will have different objectives and results.
Installing screens in the malls aim to enhance the mall’s environment but also to generate

5
Arbitron Inc. is “an international media and marketing research firm serving radio broadcasters, cable companies,
advertisers, advertising agencies and outdoor advertising companies in the US, Mexico in Europe” (Rose and
Williams 2006: 18).

26
Ilana Taub 0455496

advertising revenue from companies wishing to promote their products or services. Installing
screens at the point of purchase in a particular store will ultimately aim to increase that specific
establishment’s sales, whether it is by promoting products and/or improving the shopping
experience. It is also necessary to point that consumers’ shopping behaviours are likely to differ
between shopping malls and smaller retail establishments. Consumers visit malls for far more
reasons than when entering a store to conduct a purchase – in the former, they will “shop,
socialize, seek entertainment, have a meal, catch a movie and spend money” (Rose 2004: 2). In
this leisurely environment and state-of-mind, they are more inclined to pay attention to the
content displayed on the screens, consequently influencing the study’s results.

4.1 Tesco and in-store TVs

In 2003, Tesco, the UK’s biggest retailer, announced it would launch Tesco TV, a digital
signage network advertising products in its stores. Tesco attracts an average of 15 million
shoppers a week and accounts for £1 in every £8 pounds spent in the UK (Rigby 2006), thus
having immense potential to reach a large number of consumers at the point of purchase. By
installing a digital signage network, Tesco has the opportunity to benefit from various
advantages. As well as attracting advertising revenue from advertisers, the screens provide Tesco
the ability to advertise its own products and services and to keep customers informed of
promotions and entertained during their shopping trips. Additionally, the Tesco Clubcard, the
UK’s “most popular loyalty scheme with over 11 million active cardholders”6 provides Tesco
with a large amount of information available in creating targeted and precise content for the
screens.
Installed and designed by JCDecaux, one of the world’s leading outdoor advertising
agencies, Tesco TV initially consisted of 5000 screens in 100 of Tesco’s largest stores. The
number was set to increase to 300 stores had it been successful. Similarly to other digital signage
networks, Tesco TV was a combination of Tesco’s own promotions, advertising and customer
information. At its launch, JCDecaux declared that with 100 stores, Tesco TV would have the
ability to reach 4 million shoppers per week (Ray 2004). It was reported that research
investigating the impact of Tesco TV on sales found positive results - indicating that 47 of the 62
brands advertised on Tesco TV were able to demonstrate a 10% increase on sales. Furthermore,
10 of the 62 brands were able to show a 25% increase (Ray 2004). Despite revealing positive
results, the Tesco TV project was nearly abandoned – this was mainly due to Tesco’s inability to

6
http://www.tescocorporate.com/publiclibs/tesco/CoreUK.pdf

27
Ilana Taub 0455496

convince advertisers to invest in the media. The concept was relaunched when Tesco asked
Dunnhumby, a small British customer-marketing-consultancy to take care of the network’s
management. Dunnhumby and Tesco previously worked together as the consultancy is
responsible for Tesco’s incredibly successful Clubcard loyalty scheme.
The new network, renamed Tesco Screens, also comprises of 5000 screens in 100 Tesco
stores. The main differences between the two projects are in the management of the networks
and in the information displayed on the screens. The content of the new network aims to match
consumer’s needs and wants, most of the information being based on information obtained for its
loyalty scheme. Tesco TV’s content had mostly included television advertising and had not been
adapted to fit the new environment. Tesco Screens is said to be more tailored-made, displaying
product promotions, new product launches and seasonal themes. The content displayed on the
screens has been adapted to the supermarket setting where consumers do not have the time to
watch a thirty second TV advertising – the messages displayed are kept simple and straight to the
point (Joy 2007). Dunnhumby has also reduced advertising rates (Joy 2007) thus potentially
attracting more companies to promote their products on the network.
Dunnhumby has estimated that the new content produced an increase in sales ranging
from 5% to 18% (Joy 2007). While further investigation of the network’s impact on sales will
need to be carried out when the networks have been established for a longer period of time, it is
fair to say that this network has the potential to reach millions of customers. A very successful
deployment on in-store TV networks can be seen in Walmart. The American retailing giant
effectively launched Walmart TV (WMTV) with PRN, a network provider which has assisted
many of the world’s biggest retailers in deploying digital signage networks. WMTV which
initially started as a single channel now comprises of six different channels individually targeting
different departments and customer segments. The content is a combination of advertising,
entertainment, weather reports and even cooking tips7.
Tesco’s first deployment of in-store TV networks with Tesco TV portrays how easily
digital signage solutions can fail despite its large customer base and vast access to customer
information. The case illustrates the importance of targeting consumers efficiently and tailoring
messages that will be of interest and relevance to them. Tesco TV displayed television
commercials which are significantly too long for consumers who enter the supermarket to shop
and not necessarily adapted to the environment. Dunnhumby identified that shoppers desired
“information on money-saving deals and new products” as well as “assistance in choosing what

7
http://www.prn.com/networks/index.html

28
Ilana Taub 0455496

to buy” and “ideas on how to use their purchases” (Joy 2007: 1). Displaying television
commercials does not present that kind of pertinent information. The case also illustrates how
many advertisers are still reluctant to invest in this type of advertising as they demand concrete
evidence of how consumers interact with the screens and the actual impact this has on sales.
Much research has investigated consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards this medium but
fewer have actually explored its direct impact on sales.

4.2 Pinnington and Elderfield’s study (2005)

In their paper offering a “new perspective on the in-store new media debate”, Pinnington
and Elderfield (2005) set out to research whether digital signage’s objectives were, in fact,
attainable. Pinnington and Elderfield’s research tested whether in-store digital networks have the
ability to develop customer loyalty through the creation of a better in-store experience. Divided
into three sub-hypotheses, they investigated whether a consumer’s shopping experience is
enhanced by in-store TVs (hypothesis 1), whether in-store TVs ease the shopping process
(hypothesis 2), and lastly whether it communicates effectively at the point-of-purchase
subsequently generating an increase in sales (hypothesis 3). The research, which took place from
October to December 2004, consisted of three different approaches. In the first method, they
conducted 24 two hour interviews with pre-recruited respondents from the shopping population.
Prior to the interviews, the respondents had been taken to two separate establishments – one of
which had in-store TVs. The second approach consisted of interviewing senior managers in
businesses which were all involved with digital signage – this included network providers,
content providers or design agencies. The third approach involved visiting thirty sites in which
digital signage was installed and making observations on the network systems.
In the first hypothesis, the study examined two main factors: if the installation of digital
signage led to a reduction in point-of-purchase clutter and if the network engaged customers.
Neither of these seemed to deliver positive outcomes. The findings did not suggest a reduction in
clutter as traditional static displays remained present, nor did the findings suggest that customers
felt engaged by the in-store TVs. Pinnington and Elderfield propose a number of reasons as to
why the first hypothesis was not supported. Similarly to Tesco TV, the content displayed on the
screens lacked the sophistication required for digital networks and was not adapted to this media.
Many messages displayed were not relevant to the customer at the time consequently conflicting
with one digital signage’s attributes whereby messages are specifically targeted at the right
consumers at the right time. The second hypothesis examined whether in-store digital networks

29
Ilana Taub 0455496

eased the shopping process. The study found that up to half of the respondents had not even
noticed the screens which had been installed in the stores for over six months. Pinnington and
Elderfield also largely attributed this to the lack of relevance of messages displayed on the
screens. Consumers will be less inclined to be attracted to the screens if the information
displayed is of no relevance to them. Despite not finding evidence supporting the idea that in-
store TVs ease the shopping process, the study recommends a different approach whereby
consumers’ needs are researched in order to create content which can fit their preferences,
leading consumers to use the screens as references during their shopping experience. This is
comparable to Dunnhumby’s approach in creating Tesco Screens. The third hypothesis, which
tested whether in-store TVs communicated effectively at the point-of-purchase and produced an
increase in sales, was partially supported. Nonetheless, Pinnigton and Elderfield emphasize that
they did not carry out a comparative study to examine whether traditional static displays would
have the same effect.
The study efficiently examines the main two digital signage’s objectives: enhancing the
customer’s shopping experience and producing an increase in sales. As growing emphasis is put
on consumers’ experience, the results do not deliver promising results. If digital signage fails to
improve the shopping environment and to ease the shopping process, it is unlikely that it will
lead to an increase in sales. Similarly to Tesco TV, this study illustrates the need to tailor content
to the targeted consumers in order to achieve positive significant results. “In-store TV is most
effective when it has a clear role within the purchase process, and the message is relevant to the
shopper” (Pinnington and Elderfield 2005: 5).

30
Ilana Taub 0455496

CHAPTER 5: CASE STUDY – IDKLIC

5.0 Company Overview8

Created in 2006, iDklic is a small Belgian advertising agency delivering complete digital
signage solutions including:

- The installation and deployment of the equipment needed,


- The creation of the content broadcasted on screens,
- The sale of advertising space to advertisers, and
- The network’s management, supervision and maintenance.

iDklic specialises in pharmaceutical advertising, a niche market identified by the


founders as exceptionally lucrative due to the relatively high expenditures of pharmaceutical
companies on advertising and the low competition levels within the pharmaceutical digital
signage advertising industry. The company deployed its first network in November 2006,
initially installing five LCD screens in five pharmacies and quickly expanding to fourty-five
screens in fourty pharmacies. iDklic works on two fronts: selling advertising space to
pharmaceutical companies and deploying digital networks in pharmacies – thus acting as a
middleman between the two industries. iDklic’s largest pharmacy client is the EPC familia
group, a chain of pharmacies predominantly located in Wallonia, the French-speaking part of
Belgium. It is the second largest chain of pharmacies in Belgium owning 104 pharmacies. iDklic
signed a four year contract with EPC familia and plans to deploy in-store TV networks in sixty to
eighty of their pharmacies. iDklic generates most of its revenues from selling advertising space
to pharmaceutical companies who want to promote their products at the point of the purchase. It
currently holds contracts with companies such as Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and
Boerhinger-Ingelheim. In the second year since its creation, iDKlic generated a profit of !
890000 to be reinvested in the company.

5.0.0 Business Model

8
See appendix 2 for further information on the company and how it was obtained.

31
Ilana Taub 0455496

The figure below illustrates the relationship between the EPC familia group and iDKlic
but is also representative of how other networks function. The pharmaceutical laboratories are
located at one end while the EPC familia group is located at the other. The content displayed on
the screens is created or edited by iDklic and broadcasted on the screens through high-speed
internet connections.

This figure is confidential and should not be reproduced or disclosed to any person without the written permission of
iDklic.

Currently, iDklic sells advertising space to all its the pharmaceutical customers at the same rate.
Advertisers pay iDklic a fixed fee per month and per number of establishments where screens are
installed. The founders preferred to start with this approach as a starting point as smaller
laboratories cannot afford to pay the bigger sums large laboratories can afford and hence ask for
short-term commitments.. In the future, iDklic hopes to offer advertisers more flexibility in the
solutions they purchase – perhaps offering fees per week as some laboratories may wish to
advertise for even shorter durations while other larger ones would prefer to sign six month to one
year agreements.

5.0.1 Content

32
Ilana Taub 0455496

To create the content that is displayed on the screens, iDklic works with laboratories, doctors and
charities – for instance, it recently collaborated with an association raising the awareness of
AIDS and has also worked with other associations to promote public health. The content
displayed on the screens runs on a seven minutes loop, a duration chosen to match precisely the
average time a consumer spends in the pharmacy. The content includes a mix of advertisement,
government health campaigns, pharmacy information and general health information. It is
divided into the following percentages:

• 45% pharmaceutical advertisement provided by pharmaceutical laboratories/companies


and edited by iDklic to ensure it is properly integrated within the medium (in terms of
size resolution, length and subtitles).

Example: pharmaceutical advertisement “Colludol Spray” against sore throats.

• 15% pharmacy information providing pharmacists with a chance to display information


about the pharmacy (e.g.: opening hours); the content is entirely created by iDklic.

Example: pharmacy opening hours Example: promoting loyalty scheme

• 30% seasonal thematic information (e.g.: flu information in the winter; sun-protection
information in the summer); created by iDklic with the help of governmental
organisations.

33
Ilana Taub 0455496

Example: information on how to prevent back pains.

• 10% public health information (e.g.: AIDS day campaign); created by iDklic with the
help of governmental organisations and non-profit associations.

5.1 Industry Overview

5.1.0 Pharmaceutical Industry

The worldwide consumption of medicines is increasing, global pharmaceutical spending


increased by 9% in 2004, reaching nearly $500 billion (IMS Health as cited in Encyclopaedia of
Global Industries 2006). As one of the world’s most lucrative industries in terms of sales volume
(Encyclopaedia of Global Industries 2006), the pharmaceutical industry owns large budgets for
marketing and advertising expenditures. With the increasing trend of self-diagnosis and self-
medication, pharmaceutical advertisers have a large opportunity to influence many consumers’
brand or product preference. Nonetheless, pharmaceutical advertising is highly regulated and
many drugs cannot be advertised directly to the general public. In Belgium, only over-the-
counter (OTC) drugs can be advertised under strict directives. The limitation on pharmaceutical
advertising tied with the increasing trend of consumers to self-diagnose has left a gap whereby
consumers are sometimes left unaware of the products available and the laboratories they came
from.

The Belgian pharmaceutical market grew by 5.4% in 2007 reaching a value of $5.3
billion. In the past five years, the market has grown steadily and is expected to continue doing so
in the next few years. In 2003, Belgium counted a total of 5269 pharmacies, 2719 in Flanders,
644 in Brussels and 1906 in Wallonia – this number having not recently increased due to a
moratorium on the opening of new pharmacies until 2009. Pharmacies remain important in

34
Ilana Taub 0455496

Belgium as they dominate the distribution of OTC drugs. Consumers “are loyal to their
pharmacists and still need them for advice” (Euromonitor International, 2006).

5.1.1 Belgian advertising industry

The Belgian advertising industry grew by 9% in 2006 to reach a value of $609.5 million
and is forecasted to reach a value of $907.4 million by 2011 representing an increase of 48.9%
since 2006 (Datamonitor 2007). Similarly to advertisers and marketers around the world, players
in the Belgian advertising industry are “constantly adapting their approaches and methods in
order to reach fragment mass audiences, who become increasingly difficult to target due to
technological advances, and evolving consumer habits” (Datamonitor 2007: 13).

5.2 iDklic’s Digital Signage Solutions

iDklic has targeted a niche market where most of their revenues are generated from
selling advertising space to profitable pharmaceutical companies. As pharmaceutical companies
are limited in the amount and type of advertising they can create, it is necessary that they target it
efficiently - consequently making advertising directly at the pharmacy a great opportunity.
Pharmaceutical companies recognised the power of advertising at the point of purchase for a
long time – having advertised in pharmacies through static displays, posters and panels. Digital
signage offers pharmaceutical companies the opportunity to advertise their products at the point
of purchase with a new dynamic communication channel. More interestingly, digital signage
presents pharmaceutical companies broadcasting statistics allowing them to know exactly how
often their advertisements are being displayed, whereas with traditional displays, they were
unable to quantify how often their advertisements were seen by consumers. The technology
allows them to change advertising messages more frequently than before as traditional displays
remained unchanged for months at a time. This particular characteristic of the technology allows
pharmaceutical companies to target their advertising efficiently – for instance by changing which
products are advertised according to the month or time of year. Furthermore, digital signage
offers the possibility of explaining products extensively and to present consumers with pertinent
health information. Consumers require advice to understand how a product is to be used, for
example in how often a product is to be used or if to be taken regularly after the first symptom.
Between November 2006 and April 2007, iDklic investigated the impact of their digital signage
solutions in producing an increase in sales in five pharmacies. The study revealed that the largest

35
Ilana Taub 0455496

increase was obtained when combining an advertising campaign both on national television and
on the in-store TV networks. The study also revealed that when a product was only advertised on
in-store TV networks, it produced an average increase of 25%.

5.3 Consumer Response to In-Store TV Networks in a Belgian Pharmacy

To fully assess the effectiveness of a new communication channel, it is necessary to


understand how consumers respond to it and how they are affected by it. The present survey was
conducted to investigate consumers’ response to this type of non-traditional advertising in the
iDklic context. Thirty consumer interviews were carried out outside one pharmacy in a
residential neighbourhood of Brussels. Customers were interviewed as they came out of the
pharmacy, after having finished their purchases. Out of the thirty customers interviewed only
two had not noticed the screen in the pharmacy and were consequently not asked the following
questions. With the exception of the first question, the percentages were calculated on the basis
of consumers who had noticed the screen. Similarly, the two sub-questions of question three
were calculated on the basis of the number of customers that had looked at the content displayed
on the screen. Table 1 below presents the findings.

Consumer response to in-store TV networks %


Yes No
Did you notice that a screen was installed in the pharmacy? 93.33 6.67
Do you think the screen improves the pharmacy’s environment? 82.14 17.86
Did you look at the content displayed on the screen?
If they answered yes, they were asked the 2 questions below. If not, they continued 85.71 14.29
to question 4.
Can you name a brand, a product or a theme that appeared on the
screen? 58.33 41.67

Do you have a positive or negative opinion on this concept/approach?


70.83 29.17

Do you believe this communication channel can incite you to purchase? 42.86 57.14
Do you believe this communication channel can influence your choice of a
brand or product? 21.43 78.58

Table 1 (See appendix 3 for complete figures and results)

36
Ilana Taub 0455496

The findings indicate a positive response to the new screens as 93.33% of respondents noticed it
and 82.14% believed it improved and modernised the pharmacy’s environment. 70% of
respondents who paid attention to the content had a positive opinion on the technology while
58.33% of them were able to recall a specific brand, product or theme advertised on the screen.
The last two questions looked at respondents’ attitudes towards advertising and whether they
believed it could have an impact on them. Not surprisingly, the survey found that 57.14% of
respondents did not believe digital signage could stimulate them to purchase and 78.58% of them
did not believe that digital signage could influence their choice of a brand or product.

Can you name a brand, a product or a Do you believe this communication


theme that appeared on the screen? channel can incite you to purchase?

42%
43%
Yes Yes
No No
58% 57%

Do you believe this communication


channel can influence your choice of a
brand or product?

21%

Yes
No

79%

37
Ilana Taub 0455496

The findings for the last two questions are not surprising as past research has demonstrated that
individuals are often reluctant to admit that they can be influenced by advertising. O’Donohoe’s
review of research in “Attitudes to Advertising” (1995) indicates that “consumers have both
personalised and generalised attitudes toward advertising and believing themselves to be less
gullible than other” (Reid and Soley 1982, as cited in O’Donohoe 1995: 5). A similar study by
Barnes (1982) found that 78% of individuals surveyed believed that advertising is able to make
“consumers buy goods which they do not really need” but only 15% of them admitted that it
could have the same effect on them (Barnes 1982 as cited in O’Donohoe, 1995: 5).
It is important to review the limitations of the survey in order to understand the implications
which can be made from it. The sample size being quite small and restricted to one pharmacy,
the results may not accurately portray the views of Belgian customers in pharmacies.
Furthermore, located in a quiet residential area of Brussels, the pharmacy is more likely to attract
elderly people or customers that frequently visit the pharmacy thus being acquainted with the
technology and possibly its content. The number of exposures respondents may have had prior to
the survey was not accounted for thus possibly influencing the recall of the brand, product or
theme.

5.4 Pharmaceutical Companies’ Response to iDklic’s Digital Signage Networks

Two interviews9 were conducted separately with marketing managers from two
pharmaceutical companies that advertise on the iDklic network. The first interview was carried
out with Ronny Heymans, a KAM and BOS manager at Bayer while the second interview was
carried out with Marie-Caroline Sasserath, a brand manager at Boerhinger-Ingelheim. The
purpose of the interviews was to get an insight into their perceptions and opinions of this new
channel. The interviews indicated that both had quite different views of digital signage and its
potential as an advertising medium.
Bayer initially decided to invest into this technology when iDklic was the first company
to offer them the opportunity. Having not considered it before, they saw it as an opportunity to
remind customers of television advertising at the point of purchase. On the iDklic network,
Bayer mainly advertises “big brands” and products that have been advertised on television.
Boehringer-Ingelheim invested in the technology as they noticed digital signage was being
increasingly used in various establishments and was pleased with the benefits the technology

9
See appendix 4 for complete interviews

38
Ilana Taub 0455496

could bring. Sasserath described digital signage as “an efficient alternative to the many and
sometimes excessive visual displays that are already present in pharmacies.” Furthermore, she
perceived digital signage as differentiating itself from other media and being efficient in
attracting consumers’ attention. Boehringer-Ingelheim advertises generic medicine and nutrients
on the screens with the objective of increasing awareness and stimulating impulsive purchases of
these products.
Both companies claim to have witnessed satisfying results since advertising on the iDklic
networks but these do not come without limitations. Heymans pointed out that while they
definitely witnessed an evolution, the impact of the advertising was not comparable to television
campaigns. On the other hand, Sasserath recognised that sales had improved when advertised on
digital signage networks and that a distinction between pharmacies with and without screens
could clearly be made. However, she stressed that the pharmacist’s advice to customers remained
crucial in influencing which products were purchased.
In terms of comparing digital signage to traditional media such as static displays,
Heymans admitted that it did not present many added opportunities. Instead, he identified digital
signage as an incredible support channel, providing reminders of television advertising. He also
identified that a better way of promoting a product at the point of purchase was by providing a
display at the counter where the customer can get a “feel” of the product, by touching it, seeing it
and discussing it with the pharmacists. On the other hand, Sasserath saw digital signage as
beneficial in that it presented the opportunity to explain the product to its customers, whether by
supplying extra information or displaying a demonstration of the product. Additionally, she
argued digital signage enabled them to diversify “their presence at the point of purchase” thus
advertising more products. However, she also held a similar opinion to Heymans in stressing that
advice from the pharmacist remained the best way of promoting products at the point of
purchase.
Both Heymans and Sasserath strongly agreed that digital signage would increasingly by
used by marketers to advertise at the point of purchase. Nevertheless, Heymans emphasized that
the technology would need “to go through a democratisation” whereby the initial deployment
costs and other costs associated with the complete solution would need to decrease. The
interviews suggest that both advertisers were satisfied with the changes digital signage has
brought about and the benefits it offered. However, both suggested that pharmacists play a key
role in the promotion of pharmaceutical products.

39
Ilana Taub 0455496

5.5 Conclusion

The case study presents iDklic and its implementation of in-store TV networks in Belgian
pharmacies, providing significant insight in assessing the growth of digital signage and its
potential as an advertising medium. Targeting pharmaceutical advertising in pharmacies
presented iDklic with the opportunity to enter the digital signage industry in Belgium. While this
approach has proved to be strategically efficient in the short-term, iDklic needs to target other
markets for future expansion – whether it is by deploying digital signage in pharmacies in other
countries, expanding to other healthcare sectors (doctors and dentists’ waiting rooms,
hospitals…) or by targeting other industries within Belgium. The founders revealed that they are
currently negotiating a merger with Digiscreen, one of the company’s main competitors which
has deployed digital signage networks in 400 pharmacies and is expected to expand to another
500. Additionally, the company has recently signed a contract with Mercedes to deploy a
network of sixty screens in various car dealerships throughout Belgium.
The particular healthcare niche that iDklic has targeted is interesting to examine when
assessing the impact of in-store TV networks as it represents a small market where consumers
require greater advice than when they purchase retail goods. As identified in the interview with
Boerhinger- Ingelheim, in-store TVs provide the ability to extensively present a product to
consumers and to present more information than a traditional static display would. While the
survey carried out in Belgian pharmacies reveal mixed results as consumers are reluctant to
admit that this medium can influence them, it contrasts with the increase in sales that the
networks have produced. The case illustrates the potential use of digital signage in many
different markets and provides insight into consumers’ and advertisers’ perceptions of the
medium.

40
Ilana Taub 0455496

CHAPTER 6: EVALUATION OF DIGITAL SIGNAGE AND IN-STORE TV NETWORKS

The dissertation has examined digital signage’s objectives, reviewed relevant literature
and presented examples of the deployment of in-store TV networks. As a relatively young
industry generating large revenues, digital signage has the potential to further mature and to
attract an increasing number of advertisers. This section will evaluate the potential of digital
signage as an advertising medium by assessing its effectiveness and by contrasting its objectives
with the evidence discussed in the previous chapters.

Digital signage’s main objectives have been identified as the following:

- Promotion of products and/or services (leading to a purchase),


- Enhancement of the customer experience (by entertaining, providing information and
improving consumers’ waiting times),
- Producing an increase in sales (by improving customer loyalty and inciting impulse
purchases)

To examine whether digital signage can efficiently meet its objectives, a review of past
research was undertaken. This included investigations into whether this and other media can
achieve the desired effect. Studies on out of home advertising and point of purchase advertising
demonstrated that these two channels have the potential to raise brand and product awareness as
well as producing an increase in sales (Hewett 1972; Bhargava and Donthu 1999; Woodside and
Waddle 1975). While these conclusions may imply that digital signage, a type of point of
purchase advertising, has the same effect on consumers, it cannot be ignored that many factors
influence consumer behaviour and that all communication channels affect consumers in a
different way. The impact of an advertisement will differ according to many factors including
the target market, the product or service promoted, the consumer, the content of the
advertisement and its location – consequently making it very difficult to make implications from
one medium’s research to another. In-store TVs in supermarkets produce a very different impact
than in-store TVs in pharmacies – these differences originating from the actual products sold and
consumers’ purchasing behaviours in these establishments.
It is also important to consider the many limitations of advertising research. When
studies investigate consumer behaviour by surveying consumers, it is difficult to assess the
extent to which these findings are reliable. Consumers’ perceptions and opinions do not always

41
Ilana Taub 0455496

represent their actual behaviour. For instance, if a study investigates consumer’s response to in-
store TV networks by inquiring whether they have paid attention to the screen, whether it may
incite them to purchase or whether they believe it can have an impact on them, it does not
suggest that their actual behaviour is the same as what they answered in a survey. If a
respondent claims to have looked at the content displayed on a screen, does it mean she/he will
have paid close attention to the advertisement and that this will have an impact on his/her
purchasing behaviour? Similarly, when a respondent asserts that he/she plans to purchase a
product that he/she has seen advertised on the screen, it may indicate intent but not actual future
behaviour. Furthermore, studies that have investigated and successfully demonstrated that an
advertising campaign has resulted in an increase in sales have limitations as “a rise in sales or
brand awareness can always be attributed to other non-advertising causes such as seasonability,
changes in income, or random fluctuations in demand. Direct causative relationships between
advertising and other variables can never be proven beyond doubt” (Hackley 2005: 99).
In our fragmented consumerist society, growing importance is placed on the different
consumer experiences associated with each brand, product or service. Studies evaluating this
technology's ability to achieve such an objective are therefore valuable. The Onspot Digital
Networks study and the survey carried out in Belgian pharmacies indicated that consumers are
generally tolerant of the screens and often seem to think that they can improve the
establishment’s environment. Nevertheless, these fail to indicate how consumers’ perceptions
will relate to their behaviours. Improving the shopping environment may be beneficial in
improving customer loyalty of a brand, product, or establishment, but for advertisers and
retailers to further invest in this technology, a concrete link between the two is to be established.
The digital signage industry is still in development and studies examining its direct
impact on consumers and on sales are limited. As a result, many establishments and advertisers
remain reluctant to invest in this relatively expensive medium. In order for this technology to be
increasingly accepted and adopted, further research needs to investigate how consumers interact
with the screens, how they are affected by it and the ways through which this technology can
produce the largest behavioural changes. Recent developments in digital signage technologies
have created the ability to measure its impact more efficiently. Webcams, which are inserted into
the screens, record and analyse “the stream of images provided by the camera and estimates the
number of people passing in front of the media, counts how many people are actually looking at
the media and provides their dwell time, attention time and demographics.”10 This innovative

10
http://www.quividi.com/vidireports.html

42
Ilana Taub 0455496

technology is capable of quantifying the amount of individuals that have looked at the screen;
distinguishing between individual’s presence in front of the screen and actually paying attention
it; determining the duration individuals pay attention to a screen and its content; and as a result,
determining which advertisements have the biggest audiences and which have the potential to
create the largest impact. If these technologies are increasingly used and are able to precisely
demonstrate how consumers are influenced by advertisements, it is likely that digital signage
will become adopted by more advertisers.
Due to the relative youth of the industry many issues are yet to be resolved. Concrete
evidence is needed to demonstrate the medium's return on investment. Despite preliminary
studies delivering promising results, the industry has also witnessed failures. The evidence
presented in the Tesco TV case illustrates the need to carefully plan digital signage solutions and
to meticulously study what consumers desire from such networks as ultimately, it is their
behaviour which will determine whether or not a network is successful. While there remain
some unresolved issues for digital signage and in-store TV networks, the evidence provided in
the literature showing that out of home advertising and point of purchase advertising can
produce an increase in sales and the evidence presented in the case studies demonstrate the
medium’s potential as an advertising tool and its ability to develop into a significant industry.

43
Ilana Taub 0455496

REFERENCES

Books

• Adam, D, 2004. Special Report: Making In-Store Advertising a Measured Medium. In


Liljenwall, R. (ed.), The Power of Point-of-Purchase Advertising: Marketing at Retail.
Washington: Point of Purchase Advertising International, 207- 227
• Gerwin, A.S, 2004. Sales Promotion Planning. In Liljenwall, R. (ed.), The Power of
Point-of-Purchase Advertising: Marketing at Retail. Washington: Point of Purchase
Advertising International, 57-70
• Hackley, C, 2005. Advertising and Promotion: Communicating Brands. London: Sage
Publications
• Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. 2006. Marketing Management 12th edition. New Jersey:
Pearson Education
• Liljenwall, R, 2004. The Power of Point-of-Purchase Advertising: Marketing at Retail.
Washington: Point of Purchase Advertising International
• Mulhern, F.J, 2004. Marketing at Retail and Marketing Management Today. In
Liljenwall, R. (ed.), The Power of Point-of-Purchase Advertising: Marketing at Retail.
Washington: Point of Purchase Advertising International, 15-22
• Ogden, D.T., and Ogden, J.R, 2004. Consumer Behavior at the Point of Purchase. In
Liljenwall, R. (ed.), The Power of Point-of-Purchase Advertising: Marketing at Retail.
Washington: Point of Purchase Advertising International, 21-36

Journals Articles

• Bhargava, M. and Naveen, D, 1999. Sales Response to Outdoor Advertising. Journal of


Advertising Research, 39(4), 7-18
• Borden, N.H, 1964. The Concept of the Marketing Mix. Journal of Advertising Research,
24(4), 7-12
• Calder, B.J. and Malthouse, E.C., 2005. Managing Media and Advertising Change with
Integrated Marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(4), 356-361
• Cauberghe, V. and De Pelsmacker, P, 2006. Opportunities and Thresholds for
Advertising on Interactive Digital TV: A View from Advertising Professionals. Journal
of Interactive Advertising, 7(1), 25-40
• Elliot, M.T. and Speck, P. S, 1998. Consumer Perceptions on Advertising Clutter and its
Impact across Media. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 29-41.
• Ewrin, Ephron, 1997. Recency Planning. Journal of Advertising Research, 37(4), 61-65
• Fortunato, J. and Windels, D.M, 2005. Adoption of Digital Video Recorders and
Advertising: Threats or Opportunities. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(1), 137-148 .
• Gritten, A, 2007. Media proliferation and the demand of new forms of research.
International Journal of Market Research, 49(1), 15-23
• Hewett, W.C, 1972. What one little showing can do. Journal of Advertising Research,
12(5), 29-30
• Kim, I., Han, D. and Schultz, D.E, 2004. Understanding the Diffusion of Integrated
Marketing Communications. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(1), 31-45
• O’Donohoe, S, 1995. Attitudes to advertising: a review of British and American reseach.
International Journal of Advertising, 14(3), 245-261
• Woodside, A.G. and Waddle, G.L, 1975. Sales effects of in-store advertising. Journal of
Advertising Research, 15(3), 29-33

44
Ilana Taub 0455496

Websites

• Outdoor Advertising Association of Great Britain, 1998. www.oaa.org.uk, 23/06/07


• Tesco Everything Little Helps, 02/10/07. www.tescocorporate.com, 25/11/07
• PRN- Media where it matters, 08/01/08. www.prn.com, 19/01/08
• The Automated Audience Measurement Solution, 2007. www.quividi.com, 02/02/2008
• iDklic – Alternative & Interactive Network Agency, 2007. www.idklic.com, 22/02/2007

Others

• American Advertising Federation, 2004. Survey of Industry Leaders on Advertising


Trends. Atlantic Media Company. Available at: www.aaf.org
• Advertising in Belgium – Industry Profile. Datamonitor, 2007. Available at: Business
Source Premier
• Anstey, M, 2006. Digital networks versus digital signage. Admap Magazine, issue 476,
53-54
• Coen, R, 2007. Insider’s Report: Robert Coen Presentation on Advertising Expenditures.
Universal McCann. Available at: WARC.com
• Elms, S. The long media tail: are you wagging it or is it wagging you? In Worldwide
Multi Media Measurement; June 2007; Dublin, Ireland. Available at: WARC.com
• Frost, and Sullivan, 2005. Digital Signage Executive Summary – Summary of major
findings. Available at:
http://www.popai.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Research2&Template=/TaggedPage/
TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=13&ContentID=1106
• Encyclopaedia of Global Industries, 2006. Global Industry Overview: Pharmaceuticals.
The Gale Group. Available at: Business Source Premier
• Hayes, J. et al, 2004. The North American Commercial Digital Display Market.
InfoTrends/CAP Ventures
• Joy, A, 2007. Changing styles. Available at:
www.avinteractive.co.uk/Assets/Files/0909/avsept07_signage.pdf
• Lawrence, G. and Clark, H. Is the web killing the high street? In Retail Conference; Feb
2007; Valencia, Spain. ESOMAR. Available at: WARC.com
• McDonald, C, 2003. Changing Consumers: Rethinking Your Strategy. Admap Magazine,
issues 439
• Euromonitor International, 2006. OTC Healthcare in Belgium – Executive summary.
Available at: http://www.euromonitor.com/OTC_Healthcare_in_Belgium#exec
• Pinnington, D. and Elderfield, E. Through the shopper's eyes - A New Perspective on the
In-Store New Media Debate. In Retail Conference, April 2005; Budapest, Hungary.
ESOMAR. Available at: WARC.com
• Ray, A, 2004. In-store TV ads next on Tesco’s list. Financial Times, published 15/03/04.
Available at:
http://search.ft.com/ftArticle?queryText=tesco+tv&aje=true&id=040315006650&ct=0
• Rigby, E, 2006. Companies UK: Another milestone on Tesco journey. Financial times,
published 10/08/06. Available at:
http://search.ft.com/ftArticle?queryText=tesco+milestone&aje=false&id=060810000340
&ct=0
• Rose, B, 2004. Simon Malls Shopper Profile. Arbitron Inc. Available at:
www.simon.com/arbitron
• Rose, B. and Williams, D, 2006. The Onspot Digital Advertising Concept in Simon Malls
– Case Study: Roosevelt Field Mall. Arbitron Inc. Available at: www.simon.com/arbitron

45
Ilana Taub 0455496

• The Initiative Special Report - Spheres on influence: Global Advertising Expenditure


2006. Available at: WARC.com
• ZenithOptimedia Press Release – 2008 Olympics to boost TV to its highest ever share of
world adpsend. ZenithOptimedia Group Limited. Available at: WARC.com

46
Ilana Taub 0455496

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books

• Belch, G. and Belch, M.A, 2001. Advertising and promotion: an integrated marketing
communications perspective – 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education
• Goatly, A, 2000. Chapter 7: Advertising and Consurism. In Critical reading and writing:
an introductory coursebook. London: Routledge

Journal Articles

• Dahlen, M. and Edenius, M, 2007. When is Advertising Advertising? Comparing


Responses to Non-Traditional and Traditional Advertising Media. Journal of Current
Issues and Research in Advertising, 29(1), 33-42
• Gibson, L.D, 1996. What one TV exposure can do. Journal of Advertising Research,
36(2), 9-18
• Gritten, A, 2007. Forum – Media proliferation and demand for new forms of research.
International Journal of Market Research, 49(1), 15-23
• Smit, E.G. and Neijens. P.C, 2000. Segmentation Based on Affinity for Advertising.
Journal of Advertising Research, 40(4), 35-43
• Vakratsas, D. and Ambler, T, 1999. How Advertising Works: What Do We Really
Know? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 26-43

Websites

• Dynamic digital signage news and information, 2007. www.digitalsignagetoday.com,


14/03/2007
• Digital signage - Captive Audience Network news and intelligence, 2002-2007.
www.aka.tv, 15/03/2007
• iDklic – Alternative Out of Home Media, 2007. www.idklic.be/fr/indexfr.html,
22/02/2007

Others

• Bell, N, 2006. Digital screen Advertising. Admap Magazine, issue 446, 27-29
• Berman, S.J., Battino, B., Shipnuck, L. and Neus, A, 2007. The end of advertising as we
know it. IMB Institute for Business Value. Available at: www-
03.ibm.com/industries/media/doc/content/resource/business/2898468111.html
• Cronwall, E.D. Digital Signage in the retail environment. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=19
• Dey, C. and Schultz, D.E, 2005. Time to Kill Off the Four Ps? Market Leader, issue 29,
18-22
• Dowell, J. Sorting Out Digital Signage: Advice for professional AV integrators wanting
to design and install digital signage systems. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=17
• Fisher, J. The Road Ahead. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=36
• Grossman, L, 2006. How to Avoid the Big DRTV Mistakes. Admap Magazine, issue 468,
44-45

47
Ilana Taub 0455496

• Johnson, D. Signs of the Times. Available at:


www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=4
• Kathri, S. New Technologies Drive Market Growth Digital Signage Market Expected to
Reach $2.4 billion in 2009. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=
• Litwin, J. and Johnson, W.C, 1998. P-O-P Metrics: Quantifying P-O-P Effectiveness.
Advertising Research Foundation. Available at: WARC.com
• McLeod, N. Narrowcasting Market Poised for Rapid Growth. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=1
• O’Regan, R, 2007. Ooh la la – digital technology transforms out-of-home. The
Advertiser, 24-34
• Perchinsky, T, Digital Signage: Return on investment. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=46
• Porter, J. In Search of the Captive Audience – Changes in the Advertising World Drive
Digital Signage. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=29
• Say, M. and Oldfield, S, 2003. The Importance Of The Customer Experience. Admap
Magazine, issue 440
• Sheldon, N, 2007. Consumers’ changing relationship with new technologies. Admap
Magazine, issue 482
• Solomon, D, 2003. Does Out-Of-Home Advertising Work? In Online and OOH Audience
Measurement; June 2003; LA, USA. Available at WARC.com
• Temmerman, W, 2007. Le narrowcasting aux portes de la grande distribution. Media
Marketing, issue 233.
• Vrettas, P.T. Content is King in Narrowcasting. Available at:
www.digitalsignagedirectory.com/articles/article_details.asp?ID=20

48
Ilana Taub 0455496

APPENDICES

1. Digital Signage Business Models

Business models are “driven by the target market, core competency of the provider and
desire to capture market share” (Hayes 2004: 13) The North American Commercial Digital
Display Market Study identifies four key business models (Hayes 2004: 13):
a. “Advertising Revenue Only”: The digital signage operator pays for the installation,
maintenance costs, interacts with advertisers and creates the content. The return on
total costs is generated through advertising revenues.
b. “Adverting Revenue and Recurring Site Fee”: The operator pays for the installation,
interacts with advertisers and creates content. The site where the network is deployed
is responsible for maintenance costs. The return on installation costs is generated
through advertising revenues.
c. “Shared Installation and Operations Costs and Revenue”: The operator and the site
share installation costs. The operator creates the content with the site’s considerable
input. The site pays the operator a regular maintenance fee. Both the site and the
operator interact with advertisers.
d. “Customized/Outsourced Network”: The site pays for both the installation and
maintenance costs, as well as paying the operator a regular fee for content
management. The operator simply provides the content. They both interact with
advertisers.

2. Additional iDklic information

a. Company information
iDklic (www.idklic.com) is a small advertising agency located in Brussels, Belgium.
It was founded in 2005 by Miriam Taub, Jean-Charles Figoni and Nathaniel Van
Parijs. To obtain information on the company, I interviewed Jean-Charles
individually (see interview below) and spent many hours with the founders studying
the company and what it does. Miriam Taub, my sister, is the Communication and
Design Director. She is responsible for creating the content and working with
advertisers to adapt the animations they wish display. Nathaniel Van Parijs is the
Sales and Technology Director. Jean-Charles Figoni is the New Business and
Development Director. They are responsible for deploying the technology, and
interacting with both pharmacies (or other clients) and advertisers.

Address and contact number:


iDklic
106-108 rue Berthelot
1190 Brussels
Belgium
+ 32 (0) 2 375 01 91

b. Interview with Jean-Charles Figoni (14/08/2007)

IT: How many pharmacies do you advertise in?


JCF: 40.

49
Ilana Taub 0455496

IT: How many advertisers do you have contracts with at the moment?
JCF: 7.

IT: What goals did you set yourself and have you met them?
JCF: We’d set a breakeven point in year 3 but actually reached in year 2 so it’s quite
good!

IT: Profit?
JCF: 89 000 euro.

IT: When did you install your first screen?


JCF: November 2006.

IT: Why did you decide to target pharmacies specifically (It is quite a narrow target
market…)?
JCF: We did a lot of research into point of purchase advertising and realized that a lot of
money is spent on advertising pharmaceuticals at the POP because pharmaceutical
companies have such large budgets and they don’t advertise much on TV (relatively). I’m
sure they could advertise products as much as yogurts or cars, they would. We also
recognized that pop advertising give these companies a huge advantages in reaching
consumers. After all that research, we also recognized that it was best to target a niche
market at first with less competition – it’s very precise, it’s worth more. In the short term,
I think this was a good strategy but if we want to grow, we’ll have to expand the markets
we advertise in.

IT: What products are advertised on your network?


JCF: Like many other countries, Belgium has strict regulations on which products can
and cannot be advertised. Here, you can only advertise OTC products, not prescription
ones. We’re also obligated to put a “pharmasmile” on commercials and to include all
legal mentions, such as if products are forbidden for certain ages groups or how many
can be taken per day.

IT: Before the introduction of digital signage, how often were traditional displays
changed?
JCF traditional displays were changed on average quarterly, every semester. The
possibility of changing static displays is much more expensive than changing content on
digital displays. Also, pharmacists often throw out the displays so the laboratories don’t
actually know if their products are being advertised or not.

IT: How often do you change the content on your screens?


JCF: We change the content every month. This might not be the most adapted solution
for this type of media, it should probably be done every two weeks but we cannot afford
to do that at the moment. It would cost us too much to hire someone to do it full time
which is what we would need. Advertising is specific to pharmacies and locations so
changing those every two weeks while having different content for different pharmacies
would be too time-consuming for us. We hope to do that in the future though and we
hope to hire people who will handle a number of a networks – so one person would be in
charge of 3/4 networks.

50
Ilana Taub 0455496

IT: Did advertisers communicate directly with pharmacies before? Or how did the
pharmaceutical advertising model work?
JCF: In general, pharmacies would buy products from laboratories in bulk and when
doing that, laboratories would send them displays. In exchange, they would offer them a
number of free products. However, this doesn’t mean that pharmacists would put the
displays up, they often just let them rot at the back of the store. It wasn’t a very efficient
approach.
With digital signage, advertisers can be sure that the media is communicated efficiently.
We offer pharmaceutical manufacturers broadcasting statistics so they know exactly how
often their ads are being displayed and from that they can target consumers properly. I
think this is one of the reasons that make digital signage worth it, it might be more
expensive but at least it is efficient, everything is quantifiable.

IT: Do you decide what content goes on the screen yourself or do the laboratories or
pharmacies do this?
JCF: We work with laboratories, doctors and charities. For specific product advertising, it
is obviously the laboratories who provide the content but our creative team has to edit it
to make sure it fits properly (in terms of size but also content). For seasonal advice and
information, we create most of the content but work with other governmental
organizations to help us. For example, now, we’ll be working with a non-profit
association which fights against AIDS to have a campaign displayed on the screen in
December for World’s AIDS day.

IT: Let’s talk about costs. How do you deal with installation and management costs?
Who pays what?
JCF: First of all, compared to static displays costs, digital signage is obviously a lot more
expensive. The materials and the installation obviously require a much bigger investment.
Many laboratories are still reluctant to invest in digital signage as they think television
advertising is the most profitable. But advertising on TV is actually a lot more expensive
than digital signage and digital signage impacts the consumer when he is about to
purchase a product – it’s more efficient.
For the first pharmacies we worked with, we paid for the screens but not for the
installation costs. Working with EPC pharma, where we’ve installed 30 pharmacies, they
have paid for the installation and the screens.
For management costs, we usually deal with them as we take care of problems and of
changing content. If we have to intervene in a pharmacy because there is a problem with
a screen, it’s time-consuming. We need time to develop our business instead of running
from one pharmacy to another. We have to make sure we invest in the right technology
so we don’t have to intervene often! We’ve arranged a deal with EPC to make them pay
for management costs after the first year of our contract.

IT: Can you tell me more about the technology itself?


JCF: the first 5 screens that we bought were LCD screens with integrated computers.
Plug & Play is a marketing approach we use to convince people to use this technology.
Commercially, it’s easier to sell that option because it takes less space in the shop. But
after installing them, we found that the maintenance was too expensive. If a problem
arises, you need two people to come and get the screen which weighs around 30kg. It’s
hard to always have to need two people. Also these screens were more expensive than the
second solution we found.

51
Ilana Taub 0455496

We decided to buy LCD screens and decoder like a digibox for a TV. We install the
decoder at the back of the pharmacy and the information is transmitted through that. If
there’s a problem, you simply need to take the box and not the whole screen so it’s a lot
easier.
The information with both solutions is stored on the hard-drive so if the connection is
ever cut, the animations will continue to be displayed.
We’ve also installed a special program which allows us to control the decoder
(essentially computer) from a distance.
The computers use Windows XP Embedded which is specifically made for digital
signage. It protects the computer and the networks as digital signage is the only thing it’s
able to do.

IT: What problems did you encounter with the implementation?


JCF: We had a series of problems as with any technology. With fixing the screens in the
pharmacies, we had problems when deciding whether to install them on the wall or to
hang them from the ceiling. What we found is that many ceiling aren’t proper so you
can’t hang a 30kg screen, it’ll fall down after a few months. Luckily, we found that out
early enough to not make that mistake or it could have cost us a lot.
We had problems when connecting computers through the internet with the 30
pharmacies belonging to EPC because they already have an internet network which is
very protected. We had to create a mini-network within their network and had to find a
solution that allowed us to use their network. They had to open a special port in their
central server which allowed us to connect directly to idecoder in the pharmacies.
We also realized that when ordering technology equipment, there is about 10% of them
that have some manufacturing problems and at 3500euro per screen, that’s expensive.
They would freeze for no reason so we had to change them, basically just manufacturing
problems. This allowed to realize that you always need expect this and be prepared.

IT: What improvements do you hope to make? Changes in the future?


JCF: We hope to change the content more often when we’re able to anyway. I hope we’ll
be able to use Apple computers instead of the decoder as they have less problems, cost
the same, don’t freeze and are even less prone to viruses than Windows XP Embedded.
We also hope to install a program that makes advertising appear on the screen when a
product is scanned so the advertising matches the product sold. Unfortunately this
technology is not up to date yet.

IT: Do you perceive any problems with digital signage in pharmacies?


JCF: If I compare it to retail, then yes. First of all, there are much fewer pharmaceutical
companies than retailers. Secondly, there are many more opportunities to advertise in
retail than in pharmaceuticals so really, there is a bigger potential to make money in
retail. But like I said before, healthcare is a niche market and a good starting point for us.

IT: How do you hope to expand in the future?


JCF: We’re currently discussing merging with Digiscreen which is one of our biggest
competitors. If that happens, we’ll be covering up to 1000 screens in Belgium. Another
possibility is to further expand in the healthcare sector by targeting doctors, vets,
hospitals, dentists…. Eventually we’d like to expand to other countries. We’re also
deploying 60 screens in Mercedes dealerships so we’re expanding into other
markets/industries.

52
Ilana Taub 0455496

3. Consumers response to in-store TV networks in a Belgian pharmacy (19/12/2007)

1. Did you notice that a screen was installed in the pharmacy?

Client Yes No
1 x
2 x
3 x
4 x
5 x
6 x
7 x
8 x
9 x
10 x
11 x
12 x
13 x
14 x
15 x
16 x
17 x
18 x
19 x
20 x
21 x
22 x
23 x
24 x
25 x
26 x
27 x
28 x
29 x
30 x
Total (30) 28 2

2. Do you think the screen improves the pharmacy environment?

Client Yes No
1 x
2 x
3 x
4 x
5 x
6 x
7 x
8 x
9 x

53
Ilana Taub 0455496

10 x
11 x
12 x
13 x
14 x
15 x
16 x
17 x
18 x
19 x
20
21 x
22 x
23 x
24
25 x
26 x
27 x
28 x
29 x
30 x
Total (28) 23 5

3. Did you look at the content displayed on the screen?


If answered yes, ask the following:
a. Can you name a brand, a product or a theme that appeared on the screen?
b. Do you have a positive or negative opinion on this concept/approach?
(Yes being positive, No being negative)

Client Yes No
1 Xab
2 x
3 Xb a
4 Xab
5 X
6 x ab
7 Xab
8 x
9 Xab
10 x Ab
11 Xab
12 Xb A
13 Xb a
14 Xab
15 Xab
16 x Ab
17 Xb A
18 Xab
19 Xab

54
Ilana Taub 0455496

20
21 xa b
22 Xab
23 X Ab
24
25 Xb a
26 x
27 Xab
28 Xa b
29 X Ab
30 Xab
Total Q3 (28) 24 4
Total a (24) 14 10
Total b (24) 17 7

4. Do you believe this communication channel can incite you to purchase?

Client Yes No
1 x
2 x
3 x
4 x
5 x
6 x
7 x
8 x
9 x
10 x
11 x
12 x
13 x
14 x
15 x
16 x
17 x
18 x
19 x
20
21 x
22 x
23 x
24
25 x
26 x
27 x
28 x
29 x
30 x

55
Ilana Taub 0455496

Total (28) 12 16

5. Do you believe this communication channel can influence your choice of a brand or
product?

Client Yes No
1 x
2 x
3 x
4 x
5 x
6 x
7 x
8 x
9 x
10 x
11 x
12 x
13 x
14 x
15 x
16 x
17
18 x
19 x
20
21 x
22 x
23 x
24
25 x
26 x
27 x
28 x
29 x
30 x
Total (28) 6 22

4. Pharmaceutical companies’ response to iDklic’s digital signage networks

a. Ronny Heymans - KAM and BOS Manager


Bayer Healthcare, Consumer Care

b. Marie-Caroline Sasserath
Brand Manager
SCS Boehringer Ingelheim Comm.V

1. Why did you decide to invest in this type of technology and to communicate with
consumers through this channel?

56
Ilana Taub 0455496

a. It was the first time that this type of technology was proposed to us and it was
simply a pilot project including only 5 screens to start off with. But we
decided to invest in this technology because it acts as a good reminder of
television campaigns. We’re hoping more and more pharmacies will be part of
this project so the reach will be larger.

b. L’officine increasingly uses this type of support. Digital signage is an efficient


alternative to the many and sometime excessive visual displays that are
already present in pharmacies. Digital signage differentiates itself from other
materials because it is “dynamic” and I think, attracts consumers’ attention
more than a simple display…

2. What type of products have you advertised through the iDklic network and why?

a. Mainly big brands which are advertised on TV and then we use similar
material for the pharmacy. We can’t advertise anything on those screens, it’s
better to advertise products that are advertised on TV and use it as a support
channel.

b. Generic medicine and nutriments. The main goal is to generate awareness and
to stimulate impulsive purchases by repeating a simple and clear message that
is easily accepted by a mass audience.

3. Have you noticed positive/satisfying results since your products have been advertised
on the iDklic network?

a. We’ve definitely seen an evolution but it’s only been a pilot ‘study’ so only
broadcasting on 5 screens can only present limited results. There has been an
evolution at the point of purchase but it’s not comparable to television
advertising which has the potential to have a much larger impact. We invest
more in television advertising because the results are much more impressing.

b. We’ve been able to make a distinction between pharmacies with a dynamic


screen and with the ones that don’t. Sales have improved in establishments
with digital signage but I have to stress that the pharmacist’s advice and
opinion remains crucial!

4. What does digital signage bring you that a more traditional channel does not?

a. I don’t mean to sound negative but not much really, not more than a
traditional display. It’s an incredible reminder of television advertising – a
support channel like I said earlier. It’s easier to affect consumers through
television advertising; digital signage is an excellent complement.

b. I think digital signage offers the opportunity to “explain” the product in


greater detail, you can even include a demo of how to use the product – it’s a
huge advantage compared to static displays. It also allows us to diversify our
presence on the point of sale – by advertising a variety of products.

57
Ilana Taub 0455496

5. Do you believe that this technology will be increasingly used by marketers?

a. Yes, for sure. However, I think it needs to go through a democratisation: the


client base is too limited in pharmacies, clients who make their purchases are
often the same like 35/40 year old wives. I also think the content needs to be
more pertinent because it’s not always appropriate. The amount of people
impacted by this channel is not large enough yet and the costs are still very
high. With those changes, it will be much better. Again, it’s a great support
for TV and I think if it’s used as a complement for other types of advertising it
will be used more and more.

b. Yes definitely.

6. Do you think there is a better way of advertising at the point of purchase?

a. Yes definitely. When a product is advertised with a display at the counter and
the consumer is able to see it, touch it and discuss it with the pharmacist, he
can compare the product to other products – essentially he can get a feel for it.
That’s the best type of promotion.

b. Advice from the pharmacist remains critical and is still the best way to
communicate at the point of purchase. An actual host or hostess at the point of
purchase demonstrating the products would probably have the largest effect
but it’s not feasible, you’re not talking about the same budgets there…

58

Вам также может понравиться