Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
30
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER
SIMON BUILDING, 4.3
Oxford Rd./Brunswick Str. M13 9PS
IMPACT AND ITS DISCONTENTS: Ethnography,
Accountability and Activism
Simon Building 4.38, University of Manchester
Programme:
9:30 10:00 Registration
10:00 11:00 Keynote Lecture: What Are the Social Sciences If Not Extractive Industries?
Gillian Evans (University of Manchester)
16:15 18:15 Panel 3: Anthropologists and/or Activists: Doing things with Ethnography
Laura Harris (University of Liverpool): Impacts and the Arts: Notes from the Field
Andreas Streinzer (University of Vienna): Myriad consultations. Anthropology and impact in austerity
Greece.
Anglica Cabezas Pino (University of Manchester): Please Exit the Academic Comfort Zone: Can
Anthropology Smell Like Dead Practice?
Joshua Blamire (University of Liverpool): Rethinking Impact: Politically-Engaged Ethnography with
the Liverpool Anti-Austerity Movement
Chair: Jos Fajardo (University of Manchester)
16:15 18:15: Panel 3: Anthropologists and/or Activists: Doing things with Ethnography
Laura Harris: Impacts and the Arts: Notes from the Field
For ethnographers engaging with arts organisations (such as myself), Impact is an inescapable concern. Not only is
Impact a growing concern within the ethnographic method, as this conference demonstrates, it is also an orienting
principle within the arts and culture industry. This is partly due to a policy atmosphere which instrumentalises the
arts and culture as a means to effect social change, distributing financial support accordingly. Bound up with
attempts to justify state-funded arts and culture, this has resulted in arts organisations skewing their practice
towards projects which evidence Impact (which may not be the same as achieving it). This trend is clear in Arts
Council literature (see Arts Impact Fund, How to Evidence your Impact, How we Make an Impact). As such,
Impact is increasingly shaping the relationship between ethnographer (or researcher more widely) and arts
organisation; a researcher is invited in, with the implicit assumption that their findings can be used by the
organisation to evidence Impact.
This paper will briefly introduce the role of Impact on arts and culture organisations, with an emphasis on
contemporary policy. It will then propose that just as ethnographers build forms of engagement and outcomes into
the design of their research, so do to arts organisations predicate their actions on the Impact imperative. Finally, it
will introduce the dilemma facing ethnographers of arts institutions: how does the institutions vested interest in
hosting research which evidences Impact impact, in turn, on the shape and nature of ones project?
Laura Harris is a first year PhD student in the Sociology and Philosophy department at the University of Liverpool.
Her research is based at Bluecoat, Liverpools centre for contemporary art. Her PhD looks at the role of Bluecoat and
will entail an ethnography of the exhibition making process. Laura has an MA in Aesthetics and also works as an arts
writer and editor.
Andreas Streinzer: Myriad consultations. Anthropology and impact in austerity Greece.
My paper will be both analysis and reflection of my doctoral fieldwork with anti-austerity activists organising a local
currency in Volos, Greece (between 2014-17). The activists shared the observation that they were not achieving a
prosperous alternative local economy and their aims of more solidarity and mutuality. They gave different reasons
why they thought so, what exactly was going wrong, and why and what should be done about it. This theme was of
constant concern during the following years, with several local currency consultants, social science scholars, and
other activists coming to Volos to consult the currency activists on their challenges and failures. These consultations
led to a myriad of advices on how to achieve more solidarity, more turnover, more embedding of the economy, in
short: more impact.
In my paper, I want to reflect on these social lives of knowledge production between friendly observers, experts,
supporters, colleagues and others on how to achieve what, how to know about it and why to do so. The aim of my
paper is to present "thinking through impact" as a fruitful strategic entry point into studying the way social actors
orient their action using ambigous, anticipated potentialities as justifications. My paper ends with an argument for
acknowledging and reflecting the impact of our knowledge on such anticipated futures and their justifications.
Andreas Streinzer is a PhD candidate in Anthropology at the University of Vienna and Fellow of the Austrian
Academy of Sciences (DOC team). His current work is on household provisioning, and notions of resistance and
complicity among urban households in Volos, Greece. In his MA he worked on value creation in NGO - business
relations in Ethiopia and Austria. In May, he is/ was visiting researcher at the sociology department in Lancaster.
Anglica Cabezas Pino: Please Exit the Academic Comfort Zone: Can Anthropology Smell Like Dead
Practice?
In this paper, I argue that We as anthropologists, must go beyond our comfort zone and well known practices, to
engage with ethnographies of shared knowledge production, with a work that does not operate from within the
same well-known paths of knowledge articulation.
Relying on concepts that anthropology has standardized, our discipline usually takes off from similar epistemological,
theoretical and political terms, articulated mostly White, Male and Western. By proposing an accountable
anthropology, one that welcomes others epistemologies, I argue that knowledge can be created in the relation
(between collaborators), rather than in the collection (of data), following a horizontal and multi-vectorial logic.
We create knowledge.
We. As in you and me.
Together.
We as in collaborators, not as in anthropologist and subject, separated
Activism plays a key role here, as this is a project entangled with an ethical and political practice that does not step
away from our social accountability.
By criticising my own work, as an attempt of an Anthropology from the South, I will rely on texts by Boaventura de
Sousa Santos, and Orlando Fals-Borda among others, to address how other epistemologies can inspire and inform
our anthropological and/or ethnographic work. By radicalizing our critical practices, I intend to convey a
conceptualization of an anthropology that brings politics to the front, at the same time balancing the particularities
and beauty of our discipline.
(Biography: please see above)
Joshua Blamire: Rethinking Impact: Politically-Engaged Ethnography with the Liverpool Anti-Austerity
Movement
The problematic of combining academic research with political activism has plagued radical scholars in the academy
over the past few decades (Fuller, 1999). Amidst this broader participatory turn within human geography, and the
pursuit of social justice, scholars have wondered how to appropriately navigate the dual positionalities of activist and
academic (Halvorsen, 2015), where ethnographic methods have played a critical role. Routledges (1996: 400)
seminal text suggested creating a thirdspace between academia and activism, whereby neither site [] holds
sway, where one continually subverts the meaning of the other. Juris (2007: 165), instead, has advocated militant
ethnography, whereby the researcher deploys collaboratively produced ethnographic methods, which aim to
dissolve the chasm between research and practice by co-producing knowledge as an active participant within the
movement milieu and by facilitating ongoing activist (self-)reflection regarding movement goals, tactics, strategies
and organisational forms. Militant ethnography, therefore, represents the identification of some problematic or
contradiction inherent within a social movement, and then striving to understand and contribute to the collective
surpassing of this paradox (Russell, 2014: 225). This research constituted eighteen-months of politically-engaged
ethnographic research, and could be characterised as existing in-between these third-space and militant
ethnographic approaches. Reflecting upon my experience as a doctoral student and activist within the anti-austerity
movement in Liverpool, I critically consider issues concerning engagement, accountability, ethics and impact in
relation to conducting ethnographic research with campaigns for social justice. The paper, in turn, explores the
possibilities and contradictions posed by politically-engaged ethnographies to assist and contribute towards
movement struggles.
Josh Blamire is a postgraduate researcher in the Department of Geography & Planning at the University of Liverpool.
He completed his BA(Hons) in Geography in June 2012, and received his MA in Geographies of Globalisation &
Development (Research Methodology) in September 2013, both from the same institution. His research examines
anti-austerity resistance within Liverpool, and explores whether alternatives to austerity and capitalism are
emerging from this resistance. Can Liverpool be the hotbed of anti-austerity dissent, the site where radical
alternatives can emerge (a la the socialist Liverpool council of 1983-87), or are the protests, as one senior Labour
Party city councillor described, just simply not credible? The research therefore examines the transformative
political potential of the different (and competing) anti-austerity discourses that are being (re)produced by both
Liverpool City Council and grassroots campaigns for social justice.
18:15-18:30: Closing Remarks
Stef Jansen is a Senior Lecturer in Social Anthropology at the University of Manchester (UK). Based on long term
ethnographic research in the post-Yugoslav states, his work is primarily concerned with hope, the state, home-
making, borders, identitarianism and postsocialist transformations.
See http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/stef.jansen
Other information
Lunch and coffee will be provided for presenters and those registered.
All events will take place in Room 4.38 of Simon Building at the University of Manchester.
https://www.facebook.com/events/1686337031669152/?ref=br_rs
http://manchesterimpact2017.weebly.com/
To reduce our negative impact on the environment: Please download this programme to your electronic device or
print out if needed.
By Bus:
If you are coming from Piccadilly Train Station or the National Express Terminal, it is a short walk to the main bus
station Piccadilly Gardens. Take bus 42, 43, 142 or 143 from Piccadilly Gardens to University Shopping Ctr. (see
walking route below). Single tickets are 1.50.
By taxi:
Taxis from Piccadilly Train Station or the National Express Terminal to the University cost around 5-6.