Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2, FEBRUARY 2015
AbstractThis paper presents application and control of scale sustainable electric energy resources [2]. Recently, the
the gate-controlled series capacitor (GCSC) for series com- doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) has gained significant
pensation and subsynchronous resonance (SSR) damping attention from the electric power industry in offshore wind
in doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG)-based wind farms.
The GCSC is a new series FACTS device composed of a farms and renewable energy sources [1], [3].
xed capacitor in parallel with a pair of antiparallel gate- However, in offshore wind farms, the distance between the
commuted switches. The study considers a DFIG-based wind turbines and the shore is much longer [4] than that
wind farm, which is connected to a series-compensated in onshore wind farms. Therefore, unlike the onshore wind
transmission line whose parameters are derived from the farmswhere the voltage level of the wind farm is usually the
IEEE rst benchmark model for computer simulation of the
SSR. The small-signal stability analysis of the system is same as the voltage level of the distribution systemhigher
presented, and the eigenvalues of the system are obtained. voltage levels with reliable and efficient transmission lines are
Using both modal analysis and time-domain simulation, it required for the offshore wind farms to minimize the power
is shown that the system is potentially unstable due to the losses [2].
SSR mode. Therefore, the wind farm is equipped with a Currently, there are numerous large offshore wind farms
GCSC to solve the instability of the wind farm resulting from
the SSR mode, and an SSR damping controller (SSRDC) operating throughout the world [2], [5]. Future projects in
is designed for this device using residue-based analysis offshore wind farms will be larger in size and further away from
and root locus diagrams. Using residue-based analysis, the shore [2]. This requires defining new concepts for the trans-
the optimal input control signal to the SSRDC is identied, mission system, including transmission lines from the offshore
which can damp the SSR mode without destabilizing other wind farm to the shore and network integration to the onshore
modes, and using root-locus analysis, the required gain for
the SSRDC is determined. MATLAB/Simulink is used as a power system. The transmission system options to transmit the
tool for modeling, design, and time-domain simulations. wind power to the shore are high-voltage ac (HVAC) [2] or
high-voltage dc (HVDC) [5], [6]. The HVAC solutions are vi-
Index TermsDoubly fed induction generator (DFIG),
exible ac transmission systems (FACTS), gate-controlled able for distances up to 250 km, and with series compensation,
series capacitor (GCSC), root-locus diagram, subsyn- they may be viable for distances longer than 250 km [2].
chronous resonance (SSR). Reactive power injection, either shunt or series, into power
transmission lines has been used for many years to increase the
I. I NTRODUCTION transmittable power of transmission lines [7]. For the purpose
of increasing the power transfer capability of a transmission
D UE to the recent rapid penetration of wind power into the
power systems [1], some countries in central Europe, e.g.,
Germany, have run out of suitable sites for onshore wind power
line, series compensation is preferred compared with shunt
compensation. One of the main reasons is that, unlike shunt
compensation, series compensation is less sensitive to system
projects, due to the high population density in these countries.
load characteristics and equipment location along a transmis-
Moreover, it has been found that the offshore wind power
sion line. However, it was found at an early date that using se-
resources are much larger than onshore wind power sources [2].
ries compensation can cause instability in power systems due to
Therefore, offshore wind farms have a great potential as large-
a phenomenon known as subsynchronous resonance (SSR) [7].
Properly designed flexible ac transmission systems (FACTS)
could be used to take advantage of series compensation ben-
Manuscript received September 13, 2013; revised December 29, efits without causing the SSR problem in power systems [7].
2013, May 23, 2014, and July 10, 2014; accepted July 29, 2014. Date
of publication August 12, 2014; date of current version January 7, Nowadays, FACTS devices are required in order to support
2015. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation massive integration of renewable energy resources into the
Industry/University Cooperative Research Center for Grid-Connected power networks [8]. The advantages of using FACTS devices
Advanced Power Electronic Systems under Grant 0934378.
The authors are with the Department of Electrical Engineering, such as static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) [7], static
University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA (e-mail: VAR compensator (SVC) [9], synchronous series compensator
Mohammah@email.sc.edu; Santi@cec.sc.edu). (SSSC) [7], unified power flow controller (UPFC) [10], and
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available
online at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. thyristor-controlled series compensator (TCSC) [9] in power
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TIE.2014.2347007 systems are well known.
0278-0046 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
MOHAMMADPOUR AND SANTI: GCSC INTERFACED WITH A DFIG-BASED WIND FARM 1023
e e
Rs b XSS 0 0 b XM 0
eb XSS Rs 0 eb XM 0 0
0 0 Rs 0 0 0
F =
(e r ) (e r ) (8)
0 XM 0 Rr 0 X rr
b b
(e r ) X 0 0 (e r)
Xrr Rr 0
b M b
0 0 0 0 0 Rr
MOHAMMADPOUR AND SANTI: GCSC INTERFACED WITH A DFIG-BASED WIND FARM 1025
Then,
AIG = b G1 F (10)
BIG = b G1 . (11)
In (8) and (9): Xlr is the rotor leakage reactance (p.u.), Xls
is the stator leakage reactance (p.u.), XM is the magnetizing
reactance (p.u.), Xss = Xls + XM (p.u.), Xrr is equal to
Fig. 5. Equivalent circuit of the system under subsynchronous fre-
Xlr + XM (p.u.), Rr is the rotor resistance (p.u.), Rs is the quency [16].
stator resistance (p.u.), b is the base radian frequency (rad/s),
r is the generator rotor speed (rad/s), and e is the rotating The ATline and BTline matrices are defined as follows:
synchronous frame frequency (rad/s). RL 1
XL e X L
0
RL 1
E. Modeling of the Shaft System ATline = e
XC
XL 0 XL (20)
0 e 0
The shaft of the wind turbine system can be represented as a 0 XC
e 0
two-mass system. The first mass represents the low-speed tur- b 0 0 0
bine, and the second mass represents the high-speed generator, 0 b 0 0
BTline = (21)
and the two mass connections are modeled as a spring and a 0 0 1 0
damper. The motion equations then can be expressed as a third- 0 0 0 1
order linear system in per unit as follows [17]:
where iql and idl are the transmission line qd-axis currents
X shaft = Ashaft Xshaft + Bshaft Ushaft (12) (p.u.), vqc and vdc are the series capacitors qd-axis voltages
(p.u.), RL is the transmission line resistance (p.u.), XL is the
where transmission line reactance (p.u.), XC is the fixed-series capac-
Xshaft = [ r Ttg ]T
m (13) itor (p.u.), EBq and EBd are the infinite bus qd-axis voltages
(p.u.), and e is the rotating synchronous frame frequency (p.u.)
Ushaft = [T Te 0]T . (14) Considering the modeling of the system shown in Fig. 1
given in this section, the entire DFIG system is a 22nd-order
The Ashaft and Bshaft matrices are defined as follows:
model and can be expressed as
(D D )
t tgD tg 1
2Ht 2Ht 2Ht
X = f (X, U, t) (22)
= (Dt Dtg )
Ashaft Dtg
2Hg 2Hg
1
2Hg
(15)
Ktg b Ktg b 0 where
1 T
T
2Ht 0 0 T T T
X = XIG Xshaft XTline vdc XRG . (23)
Bshaft = 0 1
0. (16)
2Hg
0 0 1 The nonlinear system equations developed in Section III are
linearized around an operating point to calculate the linearized
In the shaft equations, Te is the electric torque and is given state space matrices A, B, C, and D [18]. This can be performed
by 0.5XM (iqs idr ids iqr ) (p.u.),
m is the turbine shaft speed using MATLAB/Simulink. Equation (22) was assembled in
r is the generator rotor speed (p.u.), T is the wind
(p.u.), MATLAB/Simulink, and eigenvalues were obtained using the
torque (p.u.), Dg and Dt are the damping coefficient of the linmod function. In the next section, the DFIG performance
generator and turbine (p.u.), Dtg is the damping coefficient is briefly analyzed using modal analysis and time-domain
between the two masses (p.u.), Ktg is the inertia constant of the simulation.
turbine and generator (p.u./rad), and Hg and Ht are the inertia
constants of the generator and turbine (s).
IV. SSR IN F IXED -S ERIES -C OMPENSATED DFIG
Considering the line current and the voltage across the ca- A series-compensated power system with a compensation
pacitor as the state variables, the transmission line equations in level defined as K = XC /Xe excites subsynchronous currents
the qd-frame can be expressed in matrix form as follows [20]: at frequency given by [15]
X Tline = ATline XTline + BTline UTline (17) KXe
fn = fs (24)
X
where
XTline = [iql idl vqc vdc ]T (18) where Xe is equal to XL + XT , X is the entire inductive
T reactance seen from infinite bus, fn is the natural frequency of
(vqs EBq ) (vds EBd ) the electric system, and fs is the fundamental frequency of the
UTline = 00 . (19)
XL XL system.
1026 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 62, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2015
TABLE I
S YSTEM M ODES AND PARTICIPATION FACTORS AT 75% S ERIES C OMPENSATION AND 7-m/s W IND S PEED (PART I)
TABLE II
S YSTEM M ODES AND PARTICIPATION FACTORS AT 75% S ERIES C OMPENSATION AND 7-m/s W IND S PEED (PART II)
At this frequency, the slip given by (25) becomes negative B. System Modes and Participation Factors
since the natural resonance frequency, i.e., fn , is less than the
The participation factor is a measure of the relative partici-
electrical frequency corresponding to the generator rotor speed,
pation of the jth state variable in the ith mode of the system.
i.e., fr . Thus,
The magnitude of the normalized participation factors for an
fn fr eigenvalue, i.e., i , is defined as [21]
S= . (25)
fn
The steady-state equivalent circuit of the system under sub- |ji ||ij |
Pji =
n (26)
synchronous frequency is shown in Fig. 5. If the magnitude |ji ||ij |
of the equivalent rotor resistance, i.e., Rr /S < 0, exceeds the i=1
sum of the resistances of the armature and the network, there
will be a negative resistance at the subsynchronous frequency, where Pji is the participation factor, n is the number of modes
and the subsynchronous current would increase with time. This or state variables, and and are right and left eigenvectors,
phenomenon is called the induction generator effect (IGE). respectively.
MOHAMMADPOUR AND SANTI: GCSC INTERFACED WITH A DFIG-BASED WIND FARM 1027
TABLE III
5,6 AT D IFFERENT W IND S PEEDS AND C OMPENSATION L EVELS
Fig. 9. Single line configuration of the GCSC. vcg = voltage across the
GCSC, iL = transmission lines current, icg = GCSC capacitor current,
Xcg = fixed capacitance of the GCSC.
Fig. 7. (a) Electric torque, (b) generator rotor speed, and (c) DFIG
terminal voltage at 75% compensation level and 7-m/s wind speed.
Fig. 10. Line current iL (t), capacitor voltage vcg (t), and switching
function of the GCSC. = GCSCs turn-off angle = the angle of the
advance(/2 ), = hold-off angle ( 2 = 2).
Fig. 8. (a) Electric torque, (b) generator rotor speed, and (c) DFIG peak value of the line current. Fig. 10 shows the line current,
terminal voltage at 90% compensation level and 9-m/s wind speed. capacitor voltage, and the GTO pulse waveform. As seen in this
figure, the GTO switch is closed, when vcg (t) is equal to zero.
the oscillating frequency is about 21.27 Hz, which coincides The effective capacitance of the GCSC is given by [13]
with what is calculated in Table I using modal analysis.
In order to study the SSR in a wind farm at higher wind Xcg Xcg
XG = (2 sin 2) = ( sin ) (27)
speeds, Fig. 8 shows the wind farm response at 9-m/s wind
speed and 90% series compensation. As we expected in Fig. 6,
where is the the angle of the advance, is the hold-off angle,
the system is stable at this operating condition, even for a very
and XCf g is the fixed capacitance of the GCSC. As changes
high series compensation level, i.e., 90%.
from 0 to 180 , XG varies from 0 to Xcg .
The voltage across the GCSC contains odd harmonics, in ad-
V. GCSC: S TRUCTURE AND C ONTROL dition to the fundamental components. The harmonic analysis
FACTS are defined as a high-power electronic-based system of the GCSC and some methods to reduce the harmonic levels
and other static equipment controlling one or several trans- have already been studied in the literature [22], [23]. It has been
mission systems to improve their controllability and power shown that the maximum total harmonic distortion (THD) of
transfer capability. Generally, high-power electronic devices the GCSC voltage, when a single GCSC module is used, is
include a variety of diodes, transistors, silicon-controlled rec- about 4.5%. However, in practice, multimodule GCSCs, which
tifiers (SCRs), and gate turn-off thyristors (GTOs). Unlike the use smaller GCSC modules in series so that each module com-
conventional thyristors or SCRs, GTOs are fully controllable, pensates part of the total required series compensation level, are
and they can be turned on and off by their gate. Nowadays, used in order to obtain the required power rating for the GCSC.
SCRs and high-power GTOs are widely used for FACTS con- Using this configuration, the THD generated by the GCSC can
trollers. GCSC is a family of series FACTS devices that uses be reduced down to 1.5%. In this method, the voltage of each
GTO switches that can be turned on and off by its gate [7]. GCSC module still contains all the harmonic components of the
single GCSC module, but with lower magnitude [22].
Another method for reducing harmonic levels in the GCSC
A. Principle of Operation and Generated Harmonics
voltage is using multipulse arrangements [22]. In this method,
A GCSC (one per phase), as shown in Fig. 9, is composed transformers are used to inject the GCSC voltage into the
of a fixed capacitor in parallel with a pair of GTOs. The switch transmission line, and the transformer windings are connected
in the GCSC is turned off at the angle , measured from the in such a way that some lower order harmonics of the GCSC
MOHAMMADPOUR AND SANTI: GCSC INTERFACED WITH A DFIG-BASED WIND FARM 1029
Fig. 13. Real part of Modes 1 and 2 when wind speed is (a) 7 m/s or
Fig. 12. Block diagram of the GCSC PSC. (b) 9 m/s with GCSC and fixed capacitor in line.
voltage are canceled out. Using this method, the THD of the A modal analysis at different operating points of the wind
GCSC voltage could be reduced to less than 0.34%, which is farm is performed when the GCSC model with PSC is added
an acceptable level of the THD level in high-voltage power to the system. Fig. 13 compares the real part of Modes 1 and 2
systems and FACTS applications [22]. More details of the at different compensation levels and different wind speeds for
harmonic analysis of the GCSC can be found in [22] and [23]. two cases: 1) when the DFIG wind farm is compensated only
with a series fixed capacitor; 2) when the DFIG wind farm is
compensated with a GCSC without SSRDC and only with a
B. GCSC Modeling and Control
PSC. As seen in this figure, using only the PSC in GCSC not
The operation of the GCSC is modeled as a variable capaci- only does not enable this device to stabilize Mode 1 but also
tor. It is assumed that the desired value of the GCSC reactance decreases the damping of Mode 1. This shows that an auxiliary
is implemented within a well-defined time frame, i.e., a delay. SSRDC is needed to enable the GCSC to damp the SSR.
The delay can be modeled by a first-order lag as shown in 2) SSRDC: In order to enhance the SSR damping, an aux-
Fig. 11, which will add one more order to the system. In Fig. 11, iliary controller is added to the GCSC control system with an
XPSC is determined by the PSC. In [12] and [13], a power appropriate ICS, as shown in Fig. 11. The question is how an
controller has been used for the GCSC to damp SSR and power appropriate ICS should be selected. This question is answered
oscillation; however, as shown later, this power controller may in the following sections.
not be adequate to damp the SSR. Therefore, an auxiliary
SSRDC, as shown in Fig. 11, should be added to the GCSC
VI. ICS S ELECTION AND SSRDC D ESIGN
controller to enable it to damp the SSR.
1) PSC: The block diagram of the GCSCs PSC control is A. ICS Selection Using Residues
shown in Fig. 12. In this figure, Tm is the time constant of a
The residues corresponding to SSR and SupSR modes for
first-order lowpass filter associated with the measurement of
different ICSs are computed. If the state-space model and
the line current. In this controller, the measured line current Im
transfer function of the single-input single-output are defined
is compared with a reference current IL , and the error I is
as [21]
passed through a lead controller and a PI regulator.
The MPPT curve and the chosen reactive power control strat- X = AX + BU (29)
egy for the transmission line, i.e., fixed Var flow or fixed power
factor, are used to obtain IL . If the power losses are ignored, the Y = CX (30)
optimum input wind power P , which can be obtained using the
n
Y (s) Ri
MPPT curve for different wind speeds, is equal to the desired G(s) = = (31)
delivered real power to the transmission line, i.e., PL (p.u.). U (s) i=1
s i
Furthermore, depending on the chosen reactive power control
strategy for the transmission line, i.e., fixed Var flow or fixed then for a complex root i , the residue Ri is a complex number,
power factor, the desired reactive power of the transmission which can be considered as a vector having a certain direction,
line, i.e., QL (p.u.), can be determined. Then, the transmission and can be expressed as [21]
line reference line current can be calculated as follows:
Ri = Ci i B. (32)
PL 2 + QL 2 In a root-locus diagram, Ri is a representation of the direc-
IL = . (28)
Vs tion and speed of the closed-loop eigenvalue ci , which leaves
1030 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 62, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2015
the pole i . The effect of the residues in selecting ICS can be Fig. 17. Root-locus diagram of the SSR mode with IL as ICS. The
described as follows. Suppose that dynamics of all eigenvalues + sign indicates the locations of the roots corresponding to the indicated
gain, i.e., Kgc .
are ignored, except one specific eigenvalue a . This means that
the open-loop transfer function of the system has only one pole, the controller design. The reason is that a simple proportional
which can be represented as controller chosen to increase damping of the SSR mode will
Ra decrease the damping of the SupSR mode, verifying that r is
Ga (s) = . (33)
s a not an optimum choice for ICS. Therefore, this signal will not
be further considered.
Using (33), the closed-loop system with a gain controller, i.e., Fig. 15 shows that when IL is selected as ICS, the residue
Kgc , is represented as follows: magnitude of the SSR mode is rather large, and therefore, a
Ra smaller feedback gain is needed to stabilize the SSR mode.
Gca (s) = . (34) However, since the residues of the SSR and SupSR modes in
s a + Kgc Ra
this case point in opposite directions, stabilizing the SSR mode
Finally, using (34), the root of the closed loop and the shift in via a feedback gain will decrease the SupSR mode damping.
the eigenvalues, i.e., sh , can be represented using (35) and This shows that the line current may not be an optimum
(36), as follows: parameter as ICS. This signal as ICS will be further analyzed in
the next section.
ca = a Kgc Ra (35) Finally, Fig. 16 shows the residue of the SSR and SupSR
sh = Kgc Ra . (36) modes, when Vcg is selected as an ICS. This figure exhibits two
facts: First, it shows that the SSR and SupSR modes are in the
Equation (36) shows that the residue influences the closed- same direction; second, the magnitude of the residues is large
loop system root, by determining the direction and speed of it. enough. These properties will make the design of the feedback
If the magnitude of the residue is large enough, then a smaller control simple so that a small gain will be enough to force both
gain is needed for the feedback control system. the SSR and SupSR modes to move to the left and make the
Figs. 1416 show the residues of the SSR and SupSR modes system stable. In the next sections, both IL and Vcg are studied
at different operating conditions of the wind farm, when r , in more detail as two potential ICSs.
IL , and Vcg are used as ICS. Fig. 14 shows that when r is
selected as ICS, the residue magnitude of the SSR mode is
B. Root-Locus Analysis
small. Therefore, if this signal is being used as ICS, a larger
gain will be needed for the feedback control. In addition, as The analysis presented in Section VI-A is verified using root-
Fig. 14 shows, the residues of the SSR and SupSR modes are locus analysis. As represented in Fig. 17 for IL as ICS, when
in an opposite direction, which will increase the difficulty of the gain increases, the SSR and SupSR modes will move in
MOHAMMADPOUR AND SANTI: GCSC INTERFACED WITH A DFIG-BASED WIND FARM 1031
Fig. 18. Root-locus diagram of the SSR mode with Vcg as ICS. The
+ sign indicates the locations of the roots corresponding to the indicated
gain, i.e., Kgc .
Fig. 19. Comparing dynamic response of the electric torque without
opposite directions, as we expected from residues analysis. In SSRDC and with SSRDC (IL and Vcg as ICS). (a) Simulation time from
addition, the maximum damping ratio for SSR mode is obtained t = 0 s to t = 4 s. (b) Simulation time from t = 0.9 s to t = 1.9 s.
at 3%, and the corresponding gain in this case is about 0.282,
as indicated in Fig. 17. For this gain, the corresponding SupSR
mode will move toward the right-hand side of the root-locus
diagram but will not pass the imaginary axis, and the system is
still stable.
Fig. 18 represents the root-locus diagram of the system when
Vcg is an ICS. This figure shows that when the gain increases,
both the SSR and SupSR modes move to the left-hand side of
the root-locus plane. In this case, in order to have 5% damping
ratio for SSR mode, the gain is computed as 0.598, as indicated
in Fig. 18. For this gain, the corresponding SupSR mode will
move toward the left-hand side of the root-locus diagram and
become more stable.
In conclusion, the root-locus diagram results presented in this
section and residues analysis presented in Section VI-A show
that both IL and Vcg could be used as ICS; however, using
Fig. 20. Comparing dynamic response of the terminal voltage without
the latter, a larger damping ratio can be obtained, and also, both SSRDC and with SSRDC (IL and Vcg as ICS). (a) Simulation time from
the SSR and SupSR modes can be simultaneously stabilized t = 0 s to t = 20 s. (b) Simulation time from t = 0.9 s to t = 1.9 s.
by the use of the proposed procedure.
TABLE IV
PARAMETERS OF THE S INGLE 2-MW AND 100-MW AGGREGATED DFIG.
VALUES A RE IN (p.u.), U NLESS IT I S M ENTIONED
TABLE V
PARAMETERS OF THE N ETWORK AND S HAFT S YSTEM . VALUES
A RE IN (p.u.), U NLESS IT I S M ENTIONED
Fig. 22. Power factor of the DFIG wind farm. (a) Simulation time from
t = 1 s to t = 2 s. (b) Simulation time from t = 1 s to t = 25 s.
TABLE VI
confirms the analysis presented in Section VI that using IL as PARAMETERS OF THE C ONTROLLERS
ICS decreases the damping of the SupSR mode and that the
maximum damping ratio for the SSR mode is limited to less
than 3%. A similar behavior can be observed using Figs. 20
and 21, where the terminal voltage Vs and dc-link voltage Vdc
are plotted, respectively.
Finally, in order to show that the control system guarantees
the unity power factor, Fig. 22 compares the power factor of the
system when IL or Vcg is used as ICS. As seen in this figure,
damp the SSR mode, the SupSR modes stability is decreased in
the control system is able to maintain the unity power factor
this case, indicating that this signal may not be an optimum ICS.
for the wind farm using both ISCs. Once again, using Vcg as
The residue-based analysis for the voltage across the GCSC,
ICS provides better SSR and SupSR damping for the system
however, predicts that this signal can increase the stability of
compared with when IL is used as ICS.
both the SSR ans SupSR modes, simultaneously.
In addition, using root-locus diagrams, the required gain to
VIII. C ONCLUSION damp the SSR mode is computed for both line current and
voltage across the GCSC as ICSs. The results show that, unlike
This paper has proposed application, modeling, and con-
the line current as ICS, using voltage across the series capacitor
trol of the GCSC, a series FACTS device, for transmission
as ICS can guarantee the damping of the SSR mode, without
line compensation and SSR mitigation in DFIG-based wind
sacrificing the SupSR modes stability, verifying what was
farms using modal analysis. First, the studied fixed-series-
expected from the residue-based analysis. Moreover, the maxi-
compensated DFIG-based wind farm is modeled for small-
mum SSR damping ratio, when the voltage across the GCSC is
signal stability analysis. The eigenvalues of the 22nd-order
used as ICS, is 67% more compared with that of the line current.
model of the system are obtained. Moreover, using participation
Finally, time-domain simulation is used to verify the design
factors, the participation of each state to the each system mode
process using residue-based analysis and root-locus diagrams.
is identified. The main modes of the DFIG-based wind farm
The work presented in this paper was completely simulation
including SSR, SupSR, electromechanical, and shaft modes are
based. A thorough discussion of technology feasibility issues
identified. The results show that the fixed-series-compensated
for a practical implementation of the proposed control scheme
DFIG-based wind farm is highly unstable due to the SSR mode.
is left as future work.
Therefore, in order to stabilize the SSR mode, a series
FACTS device, i.e., GCSC, replaces with the fixed-series ca-
A PPENDIX
pacitor. Using residue-based analysis, three different signals,
namely, generator rotor speed r , line current IL , and voltage The parameters used are given in Tables IVVI.
across the GCSC Vcg are examined in order to find the optimal
ICS to the GCSCs SSRDC. R EFERENCES
The residue-based analysis shows that the rotor speed is not [1] R. Cardenas, R. Pena, S. Alepuz, and G. Asher, Overview of control
systems for the operation of DFIGs in wind energy applications, IEEE
an optimum ICS for the SSRDC for two reasons: First, a very Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 27762798, Jul. 2013.
large gain is needed in this case, and second, it is not possible to [2] T. Ackermann, Wind Power in Power Systems. London, U.K.: Wiley,
simultaneously increase the damping of both SSR and SupSR 2005.
[3] G. D. Marques and M. F. Iacchetti, Stator frequency regulation in a
modes. Moreover, although the residue-based analysis for the field-oriented controlled DFIG connected to a DC link, IEEE Trans. Ind.
line current as ICS predicts that a smaller gain is needed to Electron., vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 59305939, Nov. 2014.
MOHAMMADPOUR AND SANTI: GCSC INTERFACED WITH A DFIG-BASED WIND FARM 1033
[4] S. Chuangpishit, A. Tabesh, Z. Moradi-Shahrbabak, and M. Saeedifard, [19] Z. Lubonsy, Wind Turbine Operation in Electric Power Systems.
Topology design for collector systems of offshore wind farms with pure New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
DC power systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 320 [20] P. C. Krause, O. Wasynczuk, and S. D. Sudhoff, Analysis of Electric
328, Jan. 2014. Machinery. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 1995.
[5] N. Holtsmark, H. J. Bahirat, M. Molinas, B. A. Mork, and H. K. Hidalen, [21] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control. New York, NY, USA:
An all-DC offshore wind farm with series-connected turbines: An alter- McGraw-Hill, 1994.
native to the classical parallel AC model? IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., [22] L. F. W. de Souza, E. H. Watanabe, and M. Andres, GTO controlled series
vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 18771886, Jun. 2013. capacitors: Multi-module and multi-pulse arrangements, IEEE Trans.
[6] R. Teixeira Pinto et al., A novel distributed direct-voltage control strategy Power Del., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 725731, Apr. 2000.
for grid integration of offshore wind energy systems through MTDC [23] H. A. Mohammadpour, M. R. Alizadeh Pahlavani, and A. Shoulaie,
network, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 24292441, On harmonic analysis of multi-module gate-controlled series capacitor
Jun. 2013. (MGCSC) considering SSR phenomenon, Int. Rev. Elect. Eng., vol. 4,
[7] N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugi, Understanding FACTS. Piscataway, NJ, no. 4, pp. 627634, Aug. 2009.
USA: IEEE Press, 2000.
[8] J. C. Zabalza, M. A. R. Vidal, P. Izurza-Moreno, G. Calvo, and
D. Madariaga, A large-power voltage source converter for FACTS ap-
plications combining three-level neutral-point-clamped power electronic
building blocks, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 4759
4779, Nov. 2013. Hossein Ali Mohammadpour (S10) received
[9] L. Wang and D. N. Truong, Stability enhancement of a power system the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in electrical engi-
with a PMSG-based and a DFIG-based offshore wind farm using a SVC neering and power systems from Iran Univer-
with an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Trans. sity of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran,
Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 27992807, Jul. 2013. in 2006 and 2009, respectively. He is currently
[10] U. Malhotra and R. Gokaraju, An add-on self-tuning control system for a working toward the Ph.D. degree in electrical
UPFC application, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2378 engineering at the University of South Carolina,
2388, May 2014. Columbia, SC, USA.
[11] M. Aredes and R. Dias, FACTS for tapping and power flow control in His primary research interests include power
half-wavelength transmission lines, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, systems stability, power electronics, renewable
no. 10, pp. 36693679, Oct. 2012. energy, flexible ac transmission system tech-
[12] H. A. Mohammadpour, S. M. H. Mirhoseini, and A. Shoulaie, Com- nologies, and electric ship system modeling and analysis.
parative study of proportional and TS fuzzy controlled GCSC for SSR
mitigation, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Power Eng., Energy, Elect. Drives,
Mar. 2009, pp. 564569.
[13] M. Pahlavani and H. A. Mohammadpour, Damping of sub-synchronous
resonance and low-frequency power oscillation in a series-compensated
transmission line using gate-controlled series capacitor, Elec. Power Syst. Enrico Santi (S90M94SM02) received the
Res., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 308317, Feb. 2011. Dr. Ing. degree in electrical engineering from the
[14] M. Jafar and M. Molinas, A transformerless series reactive/harmonic University of Padua, Padova, Italy, in 1988 and
compensator for line-commutated HVDC for grid integration of offshore the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the California
wind power, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 24102419, Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, in
Jun. 2013. 1989 and 1994, respectively.
[15] First benchmark model for computer simulation of subsynchronous reso- From 1993 to 1998, he was a Senior Design
nance, IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-96, no. 5, pp. 15651572, Engineer with TESLAco, where he was respon-
Sep./Oct. 1977. sible for the development of various switch-
[16] L. Fan and Z. Miao, Mitigating SSR using DFIG-based wind genera- ing power supplies for commercial applications.
tion, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 349358, Jul. 2012. Since 1998, he has been with the University of
[17] M. J. Hossain, T. K. Saha, N. Mithulananthan, and H. R. Pota, Control South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA, where he is currently an Associate
strategies for augmenting LVRT capability of DFIGs in interconnected Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering. He has published
power systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2510 over 100 papers on power electronics and modeling and simulation
2522, Jun. 2013. in international journals and conference proceedings and holds two
[18] L. Wang and M. Sa-Nguyen Thi, Stability analysis of four PMSG-based patents. His research interests include switched-mode power convert-
offshore wind farms fed to an SG-based power system through an LCC- ers, advanced modeling and simulation of power systems, modeling
HVDC link, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 23922400, and simulation of semiconductor power devices, and control of power
Jun. 2013. electronics systems.