Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rachel Spendlove
Ms. Moser
Period 2
20 April 2017
Mock Trial
For the case of Dale Reynolds v. The State of Washington, the jury decided that Dale was
not guilty of the murder of his stepfather Thomas Simpson. The jury determined that Dale was
simply defending himself when he shot his stepfather. Although there is no evidence to prove
that Simpson was after him, Dales perception of reality was altered by many different factors.
Dale had battered child syndrome, and he also happened to be drunk at the time of the murder.
First, Thomas Simpson had abused Dale Reynolds almost daily for the past 12 years,
since he was 6 years old. The affidavit says, Dale states that Simpson was subject to
unpredictable bursts of anger, when he would beat them, smash their toys, and threaten to kill
them for failing to do chores around the house. This caused Dale to have battered child
syndrome which makes the victim feel as if they are in imminent danger at any time. The
feeling of danger was even more amplified when, the previous night, Simpson told Reynolds that
he would, get rid of him once and for all. This clearly made Dale especially nervous, and he
Another reason Dales perception was off is because he had been drinking some of his
stepfathers alcohol in order to make him mad, and was drunk the night of the murder. Detective
Nickie Loo said that when she arrived at the house, she could smell the alcohol in his breath.
Drinking alcohol can affect parts of the brain that control movement, judgement, and memory.
Spendlove 2
This can lead to impulsive behavior and memory lapses. The consequences of alcohol are
Some may say that because Dale purposefully drank the alcohol to try to provoke his
stepfather, that he is responsible for any outburst that Simpson may have had when he returned
home just before the murder. However, Dale is not responsible for the actions of his stepfather.
Again, because of Dales battered child syndrome, he was not thinking clearly, and acted
irrationally.
If the decision was up to me, I would have exonerated Dale. In my opinion, the facts that
Dale had battered child syndrome and that he was drunk reasonably explain why Dale was not
able to think clearly, and acted in self defense, even if he was not in imminent danger. Dales
perception of reality was altered, and he was only trying to defend himself when he murdered his