Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Insureds of FM Global should contact the local FM Global office before beginning any roofing work.
Table of Contents
Page
List of Figures
Fig. 1. Typical re-cover of existing standing seam roof. ................................................................................ 4
Fig. 2. Standing seam roof in re-cover construction. ..................................................................................... 5
Fig. 3. Standing seam roof applied to OSB/composite insulation. ................................................................ 7
Fig. 4. Attachment utilizing bar secured to existing metal panel. Courtesy of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. . 10
Fig. 5. Clip secured to purlinCourtesy of Vic-West Steel Co. .................................................................. 10
Fig. 6. Standing seam clipCourtesy of Vic-West Steel Co. ..................................................................... 12
List of Tables
Table 1. Recommended Rating of Field, Perimeter, and Corner Areas (Zones 1, 2, and 3)
for Enclosed Buildings3 .................................................................................................................... 9
2008 Factory Mutual Insurance Company. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of Factory Mutual Insurance Company.
1-31 Metal Roof Systems
Page 2 FM Global Property Loss Prevention Data Sheets
1.0 SCOPE
This data sheet provides recommendations for the installation and maintenance of metal roof systems.
Information is included on new construction, re-cover of existing metal roof systems, and use of metal roof
systems in re-covering existing low-sloped roofs. The generic term metal roof system is used throughout this
data sheet when discussing all three types of systems (standing seam and lap seam roof systems and
insulated roof deck panel systems), except where noted. Guidance is also given for those situations where
FM Approved (see Appendix A for definition) products are unavailable.
Information and recommendations are applicable to all three types of metal roof systems unless noted
otherwise. Refer to the Approval Guide (a publication of FM Approvals) and RoofNav (web-based software
by FM Approvals) for additional details and ratings on these systems.
1.1 Changes
July 2008. Table 1 was made consistent with revisions in Data Sheet 1-28, Wind Design, and Data Sheet
1-29, Roof Deck Securement and Above-Deck Roofing Components. This change raised the safety factor in
the perimeter and corner areas to 2.0. Prescriptive perimeter and corner enhancements remain unchanged.
Recommendation 2.2.4 relating to gravity loads was added.
2.1 Introduction
The recommendations in this data sheet are not intended to supersede the requirements of any prior
FM Approval. They should be used to supplement the RoofNav listings. For all applications, follow the general
recommendations (Section 2.2.1). If applicable, follow the specific recommendations (Sections 2.2 and 2.3).
2.2.1 General
2.2.1.1 Install appropriate wind uplift rated, FM Approved metal roof systems, where available. Secure the
system in the roof field in accordance with RoofNav and the Approval Guide, a publication of FM Approvals.
Use components that are FM Approved for use together. Use of FM Approved components and systems
is universally recommended and is implied for all applicable assemblies whether or not specifically stated.
2.2.1.2 Do not accept materials without proper FM Approval labeling. All FM Approved materials are required
to have the FM Approval mark on the packaging or the material itself.
2.2.1.3 Determine design and factored (rated to include safety factor) field of roof wind uplift pressure in
accordance with Data Sheet 1-28.
2.2.1.4 Use Table 1 to determine the FM Approved wind uplift rating for the roof system, including the perimeter
and corner areas, as higher uplift forces on these areas result in the need for additional securement over
that FM Approved for the field of the roof. Alternatively, use prescriptive perimeter and corner enhancements
per Section 3.1.5. Refer to Data Sheet 1-28, Wind Design, for corner/perimeter definitions, dimensions, and
examples.
Provide increased deck securement to the next purlin support and/or deck seam where the perimeter/corner
width falls between purlin supports or deck rib seams.
2.2.1.5 Ensure metal roof systems are designed for snow and rain loading and drainage in accordance with
Data Sheet 1-54, Roof Loads for New Construction.
2.2.1.6 Ensure metal roof systems have a minimum slope of 14 in./ft (21 mm/m). Steeper minimum slopes
may be recommended by the roof system manufacturer, particularly for lap seam roofs.
2.2.1.7 For lap seam and standing seam metal panel roofs installed over oriented strand board/foam plastic
composite (OSB/composite) insulation, use only FM Approved standing or lap seam roof systems. Currently,
there are no FM Approved combinations of metal roofs over OSB/composite; however, such installations
may be acceptable if installed in accordance with Recommendations 2.2.1.7, 2.2.1.8, and 2.2.1.9.
2.2.1.8 Use only FM Approved OSB/composite insulation with lap seam and standing seam metal roof. Ensure
it secured to the supporting roof deck per the Approval Guide. Ensure the OSB layer is a minimum of 58
in. (16 mm) thick. Determine the spacing of the FM Approved metal roof system fasteners applied over the
OSB/composite from pull-out tests as outlined in Section 3.1.2.
2.2.1.9 For lap seam and standing seam roofs, when the supporting roof deck for OSB/composite insulation
is steel, ensure it is FM Approved, 18-22 ga (0.0474-0.0295 in. [1.204-0.749 mm]), installed per the Approval
Guide and Data Sheet 1-28, Wind Design.
2.2.1.10 For protection of new or re-cover construction of metal roof systems installed adjacent to Maximum
Foreseeable Loss (MFL) fire walls, refer to Data Sheet 1-22, Criteria for Maximum Foreseeable Loss Fire
Walls and Space Separation.
2.2.1.11 Do not use perforated liner panels in metal roof systems where the occupancy uses or produces
a considerable amount of dust, oil, or oil mist. There have been cases where the dust or oil has collected inside
the panels, greatly increasing the fire spread potential.
2.2.1.12 Provide roof-top walkways in areas subject to frequent foot traffic to avoid damage to the roof system.
2.2.1.13 Provide thorough supervision by the building owners qualified representative during all roof
construction to ensure quality of workmanship and adherence to FM Global data sheets and project
specifications.
d. Have the insulation(s) pre-secured in the field of the roof with FM Approved insulation fasteners (through
both layers, if applicable) at 1.5 times the rate recommended for 22 ga (0.0295 in., 0.749 mm) steel deck
(i.e., the rate is three fasteners per board for boards up to 4 4 ft [1.2 1.2 m], and six fasteners per
board for boards up to 4 8 ft [1.2 2.4 m]).
e. Have the rows of roof cover fasteners run over and driven directly into the purlins. Use a self-drilling
type, adequate for the thickness of the purlin flange. Apply the fasteners in the field of the roof at the
spacing FM Approved for 22 ga (0.0295 in., 0.749 mm) steel deck.
2.2.2.4 For all re-roofing applications, the new roof will add additional weight to the structure. Have the
structure analyzed to ensure that it can support the anticipated loads without reducing the live load capacity
below acceptable limits.
2.2.2.5 For liquid-applied coating re-cover systems, complete surface preparation of the existing metal roof
with strict adherence to the coating manufacturers specifications. To meet FM Approval requirements,
minimum/maximum slope requirements and coating application rates must be observed.
2.2.2.6 Do not apply spray-applied polyurethane foam directly to the top of metal roof systems unless a
Class 2 deck can be tolerated. Ensure the following are true before accepting a Class 2 deck:
a. The building is sprinklered.
b. There are no Class 2 roof deck MFL considerations.
c. Batt insulation below the deck is removed or held in place (tight to the deck underside, with no air
space) with steel liner panels (expanded metal or wire mesh is not acceptable).
Refer to Data Sheet 1-29, Above Deck Roof Components, for additional information on Class 2 roof decks.
Refer to Data Sheet 1-57, Plastics in Construction, for details on the installation of polyurethane foam.
2.2.2.7 Provide roof areas that have increased uplift pressures with increased fastening as outlined in Section
3.1.5.
a. If the existing BUR has an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 108 Class A-rated
mineral surfaced cap sheet or is gravel surfaced and the gravel will remain, no other protection is needed.
If the existing roof is Class 1 insulated steel deck, add no more than 1 in. (25 mm) of additional
noncombustible insulation (glass fiber, mineral wool, FM Approved noncombustible board stock) over the
existing graveled BUR; otherwise, the Class 1 rating may be compromised.
b. Remove the existing BUR, insulation, and adhesive down to the bare steel deck. Note: if the existing
deck is wood, have it covered with minimum 12 in. (13 mm) thick gypsum board (ordinary gypsum board
is acceptable) prior to installation of the framing system.
c. If the existing BUR is smooth surfaced and the deck is Class 2 insulated steel deck or concrete, protect
the roof cover with a minimum of 6 in. (152 mm) of unfaced glass or mineral fiber batts. Do not use this
option if the existing deck is Class 1 insulated steel deck, as the additional insulation would probably
cause the deck to be Class 2.
d. Provide dry-pipe, automatic sprinklers can in the space. Consider this option only if there will be
sufficient access (e.g., hatchways in the existing roof) to the sprinkler system. Also, the new and existing
framing must be capable of supporting the additional weight. Ensure the new framing does not obstruct
the flow of sprinkler water to the existing roof drains. Combustible framing can be used.
2.2.3.2 Fill the expansion joints in the existing roof with ceramic or mineral fiber and cover with minimum
22 ga (0.0295 in., 0.749 mm) sheet steel fastened in place. Ensure the steel is designed to allow for
movement.
2.2.3.3 Ensure framing for the metal roof system is adequately supported by the existing bar joists. That is,
it is not supported by the steel deck at midspan.
2.2.3.4 Remove all wet insulation in the existing roof system. For details on wet insulation see Data Sheet
1-29, Above Deck Roof Components.
2.2.3.5 The new roof system and framing will add additional weight to the structure. The increase may be
offset by removing any existing gravel surfacing or above-deck components (see recommendation 2.2.3.1
above). In all cases, analyze the structure to ensure it can support the anticipated loads.
2.2.4 For new construction of standing seam metal roof systems on cold-formed steel C or Z purlins, ensure
the design is in accordance with the 2007 version of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) standard,
North American Specification for the Design of Cold-formed Steel Structural Members. For locations outside
the United States, comparable local specifications may be followed, provided the design of purlins consideres
their lateral support using one of the following methods:
1. The purlin capacity used in the design accounts for unbraced length between purlin braces.
2. The purlin capacity used in the design is based on testing that similates the lateral resistance provided
by the actual deck and clip assembly.
would most likely be less than that of steel purlins for which the FM Approved metal roof system was designed.
Once the pull-out resistance is known, field-of-roof fastening density can be determined as outlined below.
In no case should the metal roof fastener spacing be less than the FM Approved spacing for direct securement
to purlins. By limiting these constructions to FM Approved metal roof systems, failure modes other than
fastener pull-out are already accounted for. Hence, fastener spacing can be based on fastener pull-out
resistance. As an option, pull-out tests can be run in the laboratory on representative samples. The procedure
for determining the roof clip fastening density for this construction using FM Approved metal roof systems
is as follows:
1. Factored wind uplift pressure is determined from Data Sheet 1-28 or applicable design guideline,
whichever is more stringent.
2. Fastener pull-out resistance from the OSB board is obtained. A minimum of three tests are run with the
average value taken as the resistance.
3. Allowable area/fastener is calculated by dividing pull-out strength by the factored uplift pressure per Data
Sheet 1-28 as follows:maximum area per fastener = (pull-out strength)/(factored uplift pressure).In no case
should the spacing be less than that FM Approved for roof securement direct to purlins.
4. The roof corner/perimeter/peak fastener density is increased over the field density per Section 3.1.5.
The fastening density for securing insulation to these thinner decks with mechanically-secured, single-ply
roof covers should be 50% greater than that recommended for 22 ga (0.0295 in., 0.749 mm) steel deck. The
reason for the higher density is that fastener pull-out resistance in the thinner metal panels is less than that
obtained with 22 ga (0.0295 in., 0.749 mm) steel deck. Fastener fatigue is not considered a major concern
for insulation fasteners because the insulation is not subject to the same cyclic loading as the mechanically
secured roof cover.
FM Approved liquid-applied coatings and polyurethane foam systems FM Approved for spray-applied,
direct-to-steel deck may be used to re-cover existing metal roof systems. For coatings, re-tightening the
fasteners, reinforcing the joints with fabric, wire brushing rusted areas, and power washing the roof are usually
needed (and required by the coating manufacturer) prior to coating application. Some coatings have minimum
and maximum slopes for which they are FM Approved. The minimum slope requirement is needed as some
coatings are not tolerant of ponded water. The maximum slope requirement is needed to limit exterior flame
spread.
Non-Approved polyurethane foam spray-applied directly to existing metal roof systems could constitute a
Class 2 roof deck. If a Class 2 deck is tolerable, this may be acceptable. Refer to Data Sheet 1-29 for
information on Class 2 roof decks.
Use one of the following three methods for increasing the securement of the roof system in the roof perimeter
and corners:
1. Use a roof system with the appropriate FM Global wind uplift rating in each area per Table 1, or
Table 1. Recommended Rating of Field, Perimeter, and Corner Areas (Zones 1, 2, and 3) for Enclosed Buildings3
Minimum Wind Rating for FM Approved Deck/Above-Deck/Entire1 Assembly
Roof Field Area Design Roof Field Area Enclosed Roof Perimeter Area Roof Corner Area Enclosed
Pressure, p, (psf)2 Bldg. Enclosed Bldg. Bldg.
P 30 60 105 150
30 < p 37.5 75 120 180
37.5 < p 45 90 150 225
45 < p 52.5 105 180 270
52.5 < p 60 120 195 300
60 < p 67.5 135 225 330
67.5 < p 75 150 255 360
75 < p 82.5 165 270 405
82.5 < p 90 180 300 435
90 < p 97.5 195 315 480
97.5 < p 105 210 345 510
105 < p 112.5 225 360 540
112.5 < p 120 240 390 585
120 < p 127.5 255 420 615
127.5 < p 135 270 435 660
1
Base the minimum wind rating on the roof field area rating when perimeter/corner areas are enhanced per this data sheet and other pertinent
FM Global data sheets (1-29, 1-31, etc.). Base the minimum wind rating on the respective area rating (field, perimeter, corners) when
perimeter/corner area enhancements in this document are not proposed, or are not acceptable.
2
For roofs with higher field area design pressures, or to interpolate needed perimeter and corner ratings when the field requirements are
between levels, multiply the needed field area design pressure from Table 3, 4 or 5 (of DS 1-28) by a safety factor of 2.0 and the respective
pressure coefficient for perimeter and corner areas (see Table 6), and round up to the next highest 15 psf rating interval.
3
Ratings above apply to roof slopes 7 and roof heights 60 ft (19 m).
2. Use the FM Approved proprietary perimeter and/or corner fastening method, (if one exists), listed for the
manufacturer, or
3. Use the appropriate prescriptive recommendation listed below. Note: The increase in fastening is applied
to the field of roof fastening listing in the Approval Guide.
A. Single-Ply Re-cover System Secured Through Existing Metal Panel Roofs Directly to Purlins
It is not practical to provide additional rows of fasteners for re-cover systems in which the mechanically-
attached, single-ply roof cover is secured directly to the purlins because the existing purlins usually are a
fixed distance of 4 to 6 ft (1.2-1.8 m) on center. For these cases, it would be acceptable to increase the
fastening density of the new single-ply roof cover by decreasing the spacing between fasteners along each
fastener row or batten bar in the noted areas. The fastener spacing is a maximum of 60 percent and 40
percent of the FM Approved spacing (for the field of roof) in the perimeter and corners respectively, but no
closer than 3 in. (76 mm). If there are additional purlins in the areas needing increased fastening, the fastening
of the single-ply membrane can be increased per Data Sheet 1-29. Increase pre-securement of the insulation
(Recommendation 2.2.2.3, item d) by 50% in these areas.
B. Proprietary Single-Ply Re-cover System Attached Directly to Existing Metal Roof System Panels
For FM Approved proprietary re-cover systems in which the new single-ply roof cover is secured to bars
(rails) attached to the metal roof (Fig. 4), decrease the distance between fastener rails per Data Sheet 1-29
in the noted areas. In these systems, the base rails are attached to the metal panels directly over the standing
seams. Hence, where necessary, round spacing down to the next standing seam. Increase pre-securement
of the insulation (Recommendation 2.2.2.3, item d) by 50% in these areas.
C. New Construction Standing Seam Roof Secured to Purlins
For new construction of standing seam roofs secured directly to purlins, the clips are installed at each
purlin/seam intersection (Fig. 5). Therefore, it would not be possible to increase the number of clips without
Fig. 4. Attachment utilizing bar secured to existing metal panel. Courtesy of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
increasing the number of purlins or using narrower panels. Using narrower panels on only the perimeter or
corners of the roof is not practical. Increased fastening can be accomplished by installing additional purlins
in the noted areas. Space these purlins a maximum of 12 and 1/3 times the spacing in the field of the roof in
the perimeter and corners respectively.
Example: Field of roof purlin spacing of 5 ft (1.5 m) would have perimeter spacing of 2.5 ft (0.76 m) and
corner spacing of 1.67 ft (0.5 m).
4.0 REFERENCES
4.1 FM Global
Data Sheet 1-22, Maximum Foreseeable Loss Limiting Factors.
Data Sheet 1-28, Wind Design.
Data Sheet 1-29, Roof Deck Securement and Above-Deck Roof Components.
Data Sheet 1-54, Roof Loads for New Construction.
Data Sheet 1-57, Plastics in Construction.
4.2 Others
American Iron and Steel Institution (AISI)
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). AISI Cold-Formed Steel Design Manual. AISI TS-8-02, Base Test
Method for Purlins Supporting a Standing Seam Roof System. Latest edition.
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel
Structural Members. Latest edition.
January 2000. That revision of the document was reorganized to provide a consistent format and to
consolidate related Engineering Bulletins.
January 1999. Table 1 was completely revised.
June 1996. Editorial changes were made.
June 1992. First edition of Metal Roof Systems.
The standing seam panels can be joined using a proprietary machine or hand tools. These seams are formed
in one of two ways: panel edges can be folded over each other, or a separate strip (batten) can be put over
the two edges and crimped together. A third type of joint does not incorporate crimping. The panels simply
snap together when installed. Currently, there are no snap-together systems FM Approved. The end laps of
all types are usually simple overlaps and are screwed together with a sealant applied between the layers.
Adequately sized and fastened clips can provide the necessary wind uplift resistance while allowing the panels
to move in the longitudinal direction. To accommodate this movement, only one end of the panels is
restrained. Typically, the panels are secured with through-fasteners at the eave line and clip fasteners in the
field of the roof. This allows the roof to expand at the ridge. Ridge caps are designed to accommodate this
movement.
Both roof types are usually insulated on the underside with glass fiber batts and a vapor retarder. A metal
liner panel may also be installed on the underside. The liner is usually of thinner gage than the roof panel.
In most systems, the liner does not add uplift strength to the assembly.