Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 20

2013 CA OSPE: ONTARIO SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL

ENGINEERS EMPLOYER COMPENSATION SURVEY


MEMBER MARKET SUMMARY
SURVEY REPORT
Published Date: September 2013
Data Effective Date: June 1, 2013
Mercer is providing this survey information to its clients to permit them to make independent decisions regarding salaries and benefits.
Because the exchange of salary and benefit information among competitors may be construed in certain circumstances as a means to facilitate
an antitrust violation, Mercer has taken appropriate steps in collecting and disseminating this information in order to avoid such perceptions.
Survey materials and the data contained therein are copyrighted works owned exclusively by Mercer and may not be copied, modified, sold,
transformed into any other media, or otherwise transferred in whole or in any part to any party other than the named subscriber, without prior
written consent from Mercer.
For further information, please contact your local Mercer office or visit our web site at: www.imercer.com

Argentina Mexico

Australia Netherlands

Austria New Zealand

Belgium Norway

Brazil Peru

Canada Philippines

Chile Poland

China Portugal

Colombia Saudi Arabia

Czech Republic Singapore

Denmark South Korea

Finland Spain

France Sweden

Germany Switzerland

Hong Kong Taiwan

India Thailand

Indonesia Turkey

Ireland United Arab Emirates

Italy United Kingdom

Japan United States

Malaysia Venezuela

2013 Mercer LLC. All rights reserved. 400 West Market Street, Suite 700, Louisville, KY 40202-3415
OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey

MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR

Paul Acchione, P.Eng.


President and Chair
Ontario Society of Professional Engineers (OSPE)

The OSPE Employer Compensation Survey represents the results of an in-depth market research study
conducted annually amongst employers of engineers. This comprehensive survey has been conducted
with Ontarios engineers for over 50 years and remains the authoritative source on hiring trends and
compensation levels for engineers in Ontario.
In 2013, the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers (OSPE) once again partnered with Mercer to
conduct the survey. As in previous years, the survey implementation was overseen by an advisory
committee comprised of representatives from industry, engineering and human resources tasked with
ensuring the collection of the most comprehensive and relevant data possible.
Data were included from 212 organizations in 2013. This included compensation data for over 15,400
engineers across all major industry groups, in both the private and public sectors.
I personally thank all the organizations that took part in the survey this year, many of which are return
participants from prior years. The support of these organizations remains critical to the success of the
survey.
On behalf of the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers, I sincerely hope that you will find the
results of the 2013 OSPE Employer Compensation Survey a valuable resource for your organizations
continuing success.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers. All rights reserved including the right to reproduce this document or any portion thereof in any
form.
OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey

OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey

The 2013 OSPE Employer Compensation Survey package, including all aspects and modifications thereof (hereafter
referred to as the Survey), contains the proprietary information of Mercer and the Ontario Society of Professional
Engineers. No part of the Survey may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopy, or information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of
Mercer and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers. Redistribution or reproduction of the material is expressly
forbidden.

The information and data contained in this report are for information purposes only and are not intended nor implied
to be a substitute for professional advice. In no event will Mercer or the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers be
liable to you or to any third party for any decision made or action taken in reliance of the results obtained through the
use of the information and/or data contained or provided herein.

The use of the Survey is limited to the original buyer or recipient. The Survey is intended for the internal use of the
buyer only. No management consulting firm, research agency or other comparable organization is authorized to use
the Survey without the express written consent of Mercer and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers.

Mercer
Information Solutions
161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 501
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S5
Telephone: 800 333 3070
Email: info.services@mercer.com

Ontario Society of Professional Engineers


4950 Yonge Street, Suite 502
Toronto, Ontario M2N 6K1
Telephone: 416 223 9961
Email: info@ospe.on.ca

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers. All rights reserved including the right to reproduce this document or any portion thereof in any
form.
OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Table of Contents

Table of Contents
Using the Survey Results
Introduction....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Advisory Committee ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Survey Overview
Confidentiality and Privacy ............................................................................................................................................................... 2
About OSPE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Data in This Report........................................................................................................................................................................... 3
The OSPE Employer Compensation Survey Detailed Report Findings & Mercers
Reporting Tool Premium Access ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Terms and Definitions ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4
OSPE Regions ................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Industry Groupings .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6

Sample Overview
Sample Size by Engineering Responsibility Level ............................................................................................................................ 7
Distribution of Incumbents by Location............................................................................................................................................. 7
Spread of Actual Years from Graduation.......................................................................................................................................... 7
Standard Work Week ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8

Compensation Data
Compensation Data by Engineering Level ....................................................................................................................................... 9
Compensation Data by Primary Industry ........................................................................................................................................ 10
Base Salary by Year of Graduation ................................................................................................................................................ 11
Compensation Data by Location..................................................................................................................................................... 12

Participant List
Click here to open attachments panel

Classification Guide of Engineering Responsibility Levels ................................................................................ 13

Mercer Services
About Mercer .................................................................................................................................................................................. 15

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers i


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Using the Survey Results

USING THE SURVEY RESULTS


Introduction
Mercer and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers (OSPE) are pleased to present the results of the 2013
OSPE Employer Compensation Survey. This survey provides current data with respect to actual compensation
levels for professional engineers in Ontario.

The 2013 OSPE Employer Compensation Survey, conducted under the auspices of OSPE on behalf of its members
and their employers, is designed to:

Establish meaningful criteria for levels of engineering responsibility for the benefit of both engineers and
employers of engineers; and
Provide current data with respect to actual compensation levels for engineering work.

Advisory Committee
OSPE maintains an Employer Compensation Survey Advisory Committee comprised of both human resources
professionals and professional engineers from a variety of industries. We would like to thank the Committee for its
efforts and continuing dedication to this survey. The 2013 Advisory Committee was comprised of the following
members:

Ray Givens
Committee Chair
Givens Engineering Inc.

Carolyn Philps, CHRP


Manager, Human Resources
MMM Group Limited

Adele Argirakis, CHRP


Human Resources Director
Crossey Engineering Ltd.

Dominic Macchia, CHRP


Director, HR
Dragados Canada Inc.

Caroline E. Stewart
Senior Compensation Advisor
Bombardier Aerospace

Joanne Greene
Manager, Compensation & Benefits
City of Toronto

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 1


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Survey Overview

SURVEY OVERVIEW
The 2013 OSPE Employer Compensation Survey results represent salary data submitted by 212 organizations
covering more than 15,400 incumbents, across six engineering responsibility levels. All salary data are based on
rates paid effective June 1, 2013. Incentive data included are based on the most recent awards or most recently
completed fiscal year. All figures are reported in thousands of Canadian dollars for full-time equivalent employees.

2013 OSPE Employer Compensation Survey Profile

Organizations Participating in the Survey.................................................................................. 212


Engineers Represented ........................................................................................................ 15,448
Date Effective.............................................................................................................June 1st, 2013

All data in these results have been reviewed and verified for accuracy. Where necessary, individual responses have
been verified with participants. Mercer reserves the right to exclude data which it considers statistically invalid or
which may result in a breach of confidentiality for any survey participant.

Confidentiality & Privacy


Mercer ensures all data collected for this survey are treated as confidential. In instances where these data may be
used in other OSPE survey reports, such as custom analyses, company names may appear in the participant list.
The 2013 OSPE Employer Compensation Survey data do not form part of Mercers general industry database.
Summary statistics from the OSPE Employer Compensation Survey are published in electronic format as a PDF for
both employers and OSPE members. In addition, summary statistics can be queried in Mercers Reporting Tool
(available to employers only). In all cases, it is Mercers policy to continue to maintain the confidentiality of all data
submitted during the data collection process. Mercer is committed to protecting the privacy of employee data and to
meeting its obligations under Canadian privacy law.

Mercers confidentiality policy is to report data only where a minimum sample size guarantees that all individual
inputs and salary records are fully masked and protected. In all cases, Mercer maintains the highest level of data
security and ensures confidentiality of all data submitted.

About OSPE
The Ontario Society of Professional Engineers (OSPE) is the Voice of Ontarios Engineers. OSPE promotes and
supports excellence in all aspects of engineering by enhancing the professional recognition of Ontarios 70,000+
professional engineers among employers and all levels of government; increasing their public profile; and advancing
their economic interests by offering exemplary continuing education, career advancement and affinity programs. For
more information, please visit www.ospe.on.ca.
If you have any questions about the history of the salary surveys or OSPE services, please contact OSPE:
Phone: 416 223 9961 (Toll Free: 1 866 763 1654)
Email: info@ospe.on.ca
Mail: Ontario Society of Professional Engineers
4950 Yonge Street, Suite 502
Toronto ON M2N 6K1

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 2


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Survey Overview

Data in This Report


Base salary and total cash compensation figures are reported in this Member Market Compensation Summary on
the following basis:
By Engineering Responsibility Level
By Primary Industry
By Year of Graduation
By Incumbent Location

The OSPE Employer Compensation Survey -


Detailed Report Findings & Mercers Reporting Tool Premium Access
The complete findings of the OSPE Employer Compensation Survey are available to members in PDF format and to
employers of engineers in Ontario in Mercers reporting tool, an online database. These products afford users of the
survey the opportunity to analyze base salary, incentives granted as a percentage of salary, and total cash
compensation based on the following scopes:
Engineering Responsibility Level
Year of Graduation
Primary Industry
Incumbent Location
Job Type
Revenue/Operating Budget
# of Engineers Employed in Ontario
Incentive Eligibility
Gender*
Overtime Eligibility*
Total Number of Employees*
Engineering Discipline*
Annual Incentive Target (% of Base)
Unionized

Participant employers may use the Premium Edition of Mercers reporting tool to analyze the survey data in non-
standard categories (i.e., define custom cuts of the data).
Example: Total cash for Level C employees that graduated in 1995 and work in Durable Manufacturing
organizations with revenues of less than $150 million.
*Mercers reporting tool Premium Edition only

Mercers reporting tool Premium access to survey report data allows participant employers to request custom peer
groups by organization name for an additional fee of $325.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 3


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Survey Overview

Terms & Definitions


Num Orgs
The number of organizations reporting information for the position.
Num Obs
The number of incumbents for which information is reported.
Rates
Rates represent actual base salary and variable pay information, and Year(s) from Graduation values.
Base Salary
Each incumbents base salary information is given equal weight in the computation of the statistics. The results
therefore reflect the influence of those organizations reporting multiple incumbents.
Total Cash Compensation
Annual base salary and incentives, if any, for all incumbents in the sample whether or not they were eligible for or
received an incentive. Each incumbent is given equal weight in the computation of the statistics. The results
therefore reflect the influence of those organizations reporting multiple incumbents.
Average (Mean)
The sum of the rates reported divided by the number of rates in the sample (also known as the Mean).
Low & High Values
Low and high values reported represent the top and bottom of the mid-range for competitive pay. Detailed quartile
and decile statistical analyses are available in the full report.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 4


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Survey Overview

OSPE Regions

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 5


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Survey Overview

Industry Groupings
This page summarizes the industry groupings for reporting and further analysis in Mercers reporting tool:

Consulting Services
Consulting Services

Transportation/Utilities
Transportation/Utilities Electric Power
Transportation/Utilities Gas
Transportation/Utilities Transportation

Durable Manufacturing
Durable Manufacturing Machinery
Durable Manufacturing Metal Fabrication/Primary Metals
Durable Manufacturing Transportation Equipment
Durable Manufacturing Other

Non-Durable Manufacturing
Non-Durable Manufacturing Chemical
Non-Durable Manufacturing Petrochemical/Crude Petroleum
Non-Durable Manufacturing Pharmaceuticals
Non-Durable Manufacturing Rubber/Plastics
Non-Durable Manufacturing Other

Public Sector & Not-for-Profit


Public Sector & Not-for-Profit Federal/Municipal Government
Public Sector & Not-for-Profit Non-Profit Organization
Public Sector & Not-for-Profit Other

High-tech/Electrical Products/Telecommunications (HET)


HET Electrical Products
HET Telecommunications
HET High-tech

Other
Other Mining Metals
Other Retail

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 6


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Sample Overview

SAMPLE OVERVIEW
This section provides the broader market context that will enable members to gain a greater insight into this years
survey sample.

Sample Size by Engineering Responsibility Level


The following table shows the number of incumbents for whom data were received for each engineering
responsibility level:
Level Num Orgs Num Obs
All Levels 212 15,448
Level A 109 2,016
Level B 109 2,237
Level C 176 4,400
Level D 171 3,849
Level E 160 2,186
Level F 95 760

Distribution of Incumbents by Location


The incumbent distribution for selected geographic locations is as follows:
Region (N=15,448) % of Sample
Eastern Ontario 10.6
Greater Toronto Area 60.6
Northern Ontario 4.7
Southwestern Ontario 24.1

Spread of Actual Years from Graduation


The table below indicates the spread of actual years from graduation for each engineering responsibility level:
Year(s) from Graduation

Engineering Level Num Orgs Num Obs Low Average High


Level A 66 718 1 4 5
Level B 90 1,051 3 8 11
Level C 97 1,618 6 14 21
Level D 99 1,513 11 20 28
Level E 93 1,017 15 24 32
Level F 78 452 21 28 35

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 7


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Sample Overview

Standard Work Week


The following chart indicates the number of hours in a standard work week for engineers in Ontario:

Standard Work Week (N = 15,255)

40 Hours/Week
48%

37.5 Hours/Week
29%

Other
10%
35 Hours/Week
13%

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 8


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Compensation Data

COMPENSATION DATA
Compensation Data by Engineering Level
The graph and table below illustrate average base salary and total cash compensation by engineering responsibility
level:

Base Salary & Total Cash Compensation Total Cash


by Engineering Responsibility Level Base Salary

$180,000

$160,000

$140,000

$120,000
Mean Compensation

$100,000

$80,000

$60,000

$40,000

$20,000
Level A Level B Level C Level D Level E Level F

Base Salary Total Cash Compensation


Num Num
Orgs Obs Low Average High Low Average High
All Levels 212 15,448 70.0 94.0 115.2 71.9 98.1 117.7
Level A 109 2,016 53.8 63.3 75.1 54.1 64.4 76.1
Level B 109 2,237 62.1 72.6 83.6 63.0 74.2 85.0
Level C 176 4,400 75.0 88.5 105.2 77.3 90.9 108.1
Level D 171 3,849 89.3 102.6 113.2 93.9 106.8 117.8
Level E 160 2,186 105.8 121.5 135.0 110.6 129.6 145.2
Level F 95 760 125.0 147.1 165.0 134.4 165.1 188.7

Note: Above compensation data are displayed in CAD $000 for a full-time equivalent employee. All data are incumbent weighted.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 9


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Compensation Data

Compensation Data by Primary Industry


The following graph illustrates average base salary and total cash compensation by primary industry for all
engineering responsibility levels combined.

All Levels Combined


Base Salary & Total Cash Compensation Total Cash
by Primary Industry Base Salary
$140,000

$120,000

$100,000
Mean Compensation

$80,000

$60,000

$40,000

$20,000
Consulting Transportation/ Durable Mfg. Non-Durable High-tech/ Public Sector Other
Services Utilities Manufacturing Elect. Prod./ & Not-for-Profit
Telecom

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 10


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Compensation Data

Base Salary by Year of Graduation

All Levels Num Orgs Num Obs Average Level D Num Orgs Num Obs Average
Year(s) from/of Grad. 212 15,448 94.0 Year(s) from/of Grad. 171 3,849 102.6
< 2 Years 59 272 58.0 < 5 Years 6 14 106.3
2-4 2009-2011 83 818 64.5 5-7 2006-2008 22 76 96.8
5-7 2006-2008 87 895 75.1 8-10 2003-2005 48 166 96.6
8-10 2003-2005 83 684 85.7 11-15 1998-2002 69 294 97.7
11-15 1998-2002 90 860 95.1 16-20 1993-1997 58 285 102.0
16-20 1993-1997 91 734 103.7 21-25 1988-1992 55 228 103.2
21-25 1988-1992 85 661 108.0 26-30 1983-1987 57 230 105.4
> 25 Years 95 1,445 117.1 > 30 Years 55 220 105.3
No Degree 5 171 86.2 No Degree 3 50 94.4
Not Available 139 8,908 94.8 Not Available 92 2,286 103.5

Level A Num Orgs Num Obs Average Level E Num Orgs Num Obs Average
Year(s) from/of Grad. 109 2,016 63.3 Year(s) from/of Grad. 160 2,186 121.5
< 2 Years 48 222 55.6 < 11 Years 26 77 120.1
2-4 2009-2011 50 337 58.0 11-15 1998-2002 51 152 115.2
5-7 2006-2008 30 93 60.7 16-20 1993-1997 55 177 119.6
8-10 2003-2005 9 28 63.6 21-25 1988-1992 56 178 124.7
> 10 Years 11 38 62.9 26-30 1983-1987 54 174 126.2
No Degree 2 13 -- > 30 Years 60 259 129.2
Not Available 58 1,285 66.3 No Degree 1 22 --
Not Available 86 1,147 120.0
Level B Num Orgs Num Obs Average
Year(s) from/of Grad. 109 2,237 72.6 Level F Num Orgs Num Obs Average
< 2 Years 16 40 62.2 Year(s) from/of Grad. 95 760 147.1
2-4 2009-2011 68 373 63.6 < 11 Years 7 9 122.4
5-7 2006-2008 65 317 68.7 11-15 1998-2002 20 32 141.4
8-10 2003-2005 34 110 71.7 16-20 1993-1997 26 49 146.4
> 10 Years 44 211 72.4 21-25 1988-1992 37 75 144.9
No Degree 2 29 -- 26-30 1983-1987 45 124 148.7
Not Available 35 1,157 77.2 > 30 Years 56 163 147.6
No Degree 1 6 --
Level C Num Orgs Num Obs Average
Not Available 34 302 147.9
Year(s) from/of Grad. 176 4,400 88.5
< 5 Years 28 88 78.1
5-7 2006-2008 75 392 77.7
Note: Above compensation data are displayed in CAD $000 for a
8-10 2003-2005 65 327 81.3
full-time equivalent employee, unless otherwise indicated.
11-15 1998-2002 70 299 84.2 All data are incumbent weighted.
16-20 1993-1997 53 166 88.6
21-25 1988-1992 46 130 86.9
26-30 1983-1987 32 104 87.2
> 30 Years 31 112 94.5
No Degree 2 51 --
Not Available 104 2,731 91.8

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 11


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Compensation Data

Compensation Data by Location

Base Salary Total Cash Compensation


Scope Category Num Orgs Num Obs Low Average High Low Average High
Level A
Eastern Ontario 30 158 54.1 58.4 58.0 54.3 58.7 58.3
Greater Toronto Area 75 1,096 56.6 65.0 68.5 57.0 65.4 69.0
Northern Ontario 23 156 58.1 64.2 64.9 58.4 64.6 65.4
Southwestern Ontario *49 606 56.6 61.5 64.3 57.3 63.9 68.5

Level B
Eastern Ontario 33 195 63.6 68.0 70.5 65.0 69.2 72.3
Greater Toronto Area 70 1,526 66.0 73.7 75.5 67.3 75.0 77.9
Northern Ontario 20 100 66.7 76.4 80.4 67.2 77.5 81.2
Southwestern Ontario 43 416 63.0 69.6 72.0 64.2 72.9 80.7

Level C
Eastern Ontario 47 358 80.0 86.8 90.6 81.4 88.5 91.8
Greater Toronto Area 116 2,794 80.3 90.9 96.1 82.2 92.9 99.1
Northern Ontario *26 217 81.3 92.0 99.0 83.4 93.7 101.3
Southwestern Ontario 70 1,031 74.8 81.9 83.2 77.5 85.7 91.4

Level D
Eastern Ontario 49 607 102.6 106.1 109.8 102.8 108.2 111.4
Greater Toronto Area 106 2,173 96.3 103.1 105.8 99.7 106.6 108.9
Northern Ontario 22 143 95.6 102.0 102.6 97.8 104.7 103.8
Southwestern Ontario 72 926 88.0 99.3 102.5 96.0 106.6 104.5

Level E
Eastern Ontario 41 236 118.1 122.4 128.6 119.0 129.8 136.7
Greater Toronto Area 106 1,348 114.6 121.1 127.2 117.0 128.1 133.4
Northern Ontario 20 77 111.1 123.9 128.3 113.1 135.2 141.3
Southwestern Ontario 62 525 109.2 121.9 125.5 115.8 132.6 137.3

Level F
Eastern Ontario 24 88 137.7 150.0 156.1 147.2 169.2 183.5
Greater Toronto Area 61 420 136.0 150.6 154.3 143.5 167.2 168.9
Northern Ontario 12 32 134.0 147.2 158.3 140.7 158.6 174.5
Southwestern Ontario 34 220 122.1 139.1 145.1 136.5 160.3 164.1

* More than 35% of the rates within the sample are supplied by one organization.
Note: Above compensation data are displayed in CAD $000 for a full-time equivalent employee, unless otherwise indicated.
All data are incumbent weighted.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 12


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Classification Guide

CLASSIFICATION GUIDE OF ENGINEERING RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS


(Reproduced with the permission of the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers)
Level of Responsibility LEVEL A LEVEL B LEVEL C
Duties Receives training in the Normally regarded as a Generally would be a fully
various phases of office, continuing portion of an qualified professional engineer.
plant, field or laboratory engineers training and Carries out responsible and
engineering work as development. Receives varied engineering
classroom instruction or on- assignments of limited scope and assignments requiring general
the-job assignments. Tasks complexity, usually minor phases familiarity with a broad field of
assigned include: preparation of broader assignments. Uses a engineering and knowledge of
of simple plans, designs, variety of standard engineering reciprocal effects of the work
calculations, costs and bills of methods and techniques in upon other fields. Problems
material in accordance with solving problems. Assists more usually solved by use of
established codes, standards, senior engineers in carrying out combination of standard
drawings or other technical tasks requiring procedures, modification of
specifications. May carry out accuracy in calculations, standard procedures, or
routine technical surveys or completeness of data and methods developed in previous
inspections and prepare adherence to prescribed testing, assignments. Participates in
reports. analysis, design or computation planning to achieve prescribed
methods. objectives.
Recommendations, Few technical decisions Recommendations limited to Makes independent studies,
Decisions and called for and these will be of solution of the problem rather analyses, interpretations and
Commitments routine nature with ample than end results. Decisions conclusions. Difficult, complex
precedent or clearly defined made are normally within or unusual matters or decisions
procedures as guidance. established guidelines. are usually referred to more
senior authority.
Supervision Received Works under close Duties are assigned with detailed Work is not generally
supervision. Work is reviewed oral and occasionally written supervised in detail and
for accuracy and adequacy instructions, as to methods and amount of supervision varies
and conformance with procedures to be followed. depending upon the
prescribed procedures. Results are usually reviewed in assignment. Usually technical
detail and technical guidance is guidance is available to review
usually available. work programs and advise on
unusual features of
assignments.
Leadership Authority May assign and check work May give technical guidance to May give technical guidance to
and/or Supervision of one to five technicians or one or two junior engineers or engineers of less standing or
Exercised helpers. Does not supervise technicians assigned to work on technicians assigned to work
junior engineers. a common project. on a common project.
Supervision over other
engineers not usually a regular
or continuing responsibility.
Guide to Entrance Bachelors degree in Bachelors degree in Engineering Bachelors degree in
Qualifications Engineering or Applied or Applied Science or its Engineering or Applied
Science or its equivalent with equivalent, normally with two to Science or its equivalent,
zero to two years experience. four years working experience normally with four plus years
Will not likely have their from the graduation level. May related working experience
P.Eng. have a P.Eng. from the graduation level.
Typically holds a P.Eng.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 13


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Classification Guide

Classification Guide of Engineering Responsibility Levels


(Reproduced with the permission of the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers)
Level of Responsibility LEVEL D LEVEL E LEVEL F
Duties First level of direct and Usually requires knowledge of Usually responsible for an
sustained supervision of other more than one field of engineering administrative
professional engineers OR first engineering OR performance by function, directing several
level of full specialization. an engineering specialist in a professional and other groups
Requires application of mature particular field of engineering. engaged in interrelated
engineering knowledge in Participates in short and long engineering responsibilities;
planning and conducting range planning; makes OR as an engineering
projects having scope for independent decisions on work consultant, achieving
independent accomplishment methods and procedures within recognition as an authority in
and co-ordination of difficult and an overall program. Originality an engineering field of major
responsible assignments. and ingenuity are required for importance to the
Assigned problems make it devising practical and organization. Independently
necessary to modify established economical solutions to conceives programs and
guides, devise new approaches, problems. May supervise large problems to be investigated.
apply existing criteria in new groups containing both Participates in discussions,
ways, and draw conclusions professional and non- determining basic operating
from comparative situations. professional staff; OR may policies, devising ways of
exercise authority over a small reaching program objectives
group of highly qualified in the most economical
professional personnel engaged manner and of meeting any
in complex technical unusual conditions affecting
applications. work progress.
Recommendations, Recommendations reviewed for Makes responsible decisions Makes responsible decisions
Decisions and soundness of judgment but not usually subject to technical on all matters, including the
Commitments usually accepted as technically review on all matters assigned establishment of policies and
accurate and feasible. Involved except those involving large expenditure of large sums of
with progressively larger sums of money or long range money and/or implementation
financial decisions. objectives. Takes courses of of major programs, subject
action necessary to expedite the only to overall company
successful accomplishment of policy and financial controls.
assigned projects. Responsible
for some financial decisions.
Supervision Received Work is assigned in terms of Work is assigned only in terms Receives administrative
objectives, relative priorities and of broad objectives to be direction based on
critical areas that impinge on accomplished, and is reviewed organization policies and
work of other units. Work is for policy, soundness of objectives. Work is reviewed
carried out within broad approach and general to ensure conformity with
guidelines, but informed effectiveness. policy and coordination with
guidance is available. other functions.
Leadership Authority Assigns and outlines work; Outlines more difficult problems Reviews and evaluates
and/or Supervision advises on technical problems; and methods of approach. technical work; selects,
Exercised reviews work for technical Coordinates work programs and schedules, and coordinates
accuracy, and adequacy. directs use of equipment and to attain program objectives;
Supervision may call for material. Generally makes and/or as an administrator
recommendations concerning recommendations as to the makes decisions concerning
selection, training, rating and selection, training, discipline and selection, training, rating,
discipline of staff. remuneration of staff. discipline and remuneration
of staff.
Guide to Entrance Bachelors degree in Bachelors degree in Bachelors degree in
Qualifications Engineering or Applied Science Engineering or Applied Science Engineering or Applied
or its equivalent, normally with or its equivalent, normally with Science or its equivalent,
eight plus years of experience in twelve plus years of engineering normally with fifteen plus
the field of specialization from and/or administrative years of engineering
the graduation level. Typically experience from the graduation experience, including
holds a P.Eng. level. Typically holds a P.Eng. responsible administrative
duties. Typically holds a
P.Eng.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 14


OSPE | 2013 Employer Compensation Survey Mercer Services

MERCER SERVICES
About Mercer
Mercer helps clients understand, develop, implement, and quantify the effectiveness of their human resource programs
and policies. Our goal is to help employers create measurable business results through their people.

We work with clients to address a broad array of their most important human resource issues, both domestically and
globally. We have specialist expertise in all areas of human resource consulting, including compensation, employee
benefits, communication, and human capital strategy. Of equal importance are our investment consulting expertise and
the solutions we provide in program administration.

With more than 20,000 employees serving clients from more than 180 cities and 40 countries and territories worldwide,
we have the local knowledge and worldwide presence to develop and implement global human resource solutions.
Mercers information services business is dedicated to helping our clients make decisions regarding HR-related matters
by providing timely, comprehensive, and high-quality HR information and metrics for any major location around the world.

Marsh & McLennan Companies is a global professional services firm with annual revenues exceeding $11 billion. It is the
parent company of Marsh Inc., the world's leading risk and insurance services firm; and Mercer Inc., a major global
provider of consulting services. More than 50,000 employees provide analysis, advice, and transactional capabilities to
clients in over 100 countries. Its stock (ticker symbol: MMC) is listed on the New York, Chicago, Pacific, and London stock
exchanges. Marsh & McLennan Companies website address is www.mmc.com.

2013 Mercer LLC and the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers 15

Вам также может понравиться