Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
81-22 CP1447
Abstract: A simplified model, which is composed of one not reflect the practical condition. If the wind load calculated
tower and two spans of conductors, is given for overhead is on the low side, the tower will be unsafe. While if the load
transmission line system. With tower regarded as cantilever is on the high side, the tower will be heavy, and dynamic load
beam and conductor as string, analytical calculation method induced destroy is not sure to be avoided. Dynamic wind load
of wind-induced vibration response of the mechanics system affects the safety and economics of transmission tower; it
are studied based on the random vibration theory. A factor should be calculated as accurate as possible.It is necessary to
called dynamic load factor is introduced to the tower. consider the coupled vibration of tower and conductor into
Vibration response and dynamic factor of a typical tower design and transmission line operation.
transmission line is calculated with the method. Results In this paper, with a simplified mechanics model,
getting from the analytical method are almost the same as that consisted of one tower and two spans of conductors,
from Finite Element Method (FEM). It indicates the analytical calculation method of wind-induced vibration
simplified mechanics model is reasonable and practicable, as response of the system are studied based on the random
well as the analytical method. Although responses of tower vibration theory. Vibration response of a typical transmission
are different on conditions considering and not considering line is calculated with the analytical method, and compared
the coupled vibration affection of conductors, while the with that of Finite Element Method (FEM). It shows the
factors are about the same value. Then, dynamic load of tower simplified mechanics model is reasonable and practicable, as
of the former condition is small than that of the later. well as the analytical method. Dynamic load of tower
Keywords: Transmission line, Wind-induced vibration, obtained from the analytical method this paper given is small
Coupled, Wind-induced dynamic load factor of tower than that of not considering the coupled vibration affection of
conductors on tower presently using.
1. Introduction
2. Simplified Mechanics Model of
Overhead transmission line is composed of conductors,
Transmission Line
towers, foundations and some attachments, and is a
continuous and coupled space structure. But the ingredients of Transmission line can be simplified as a model
that are analyzed independently at present in the process of composed of one tower and two spans of conductors. It is
design, and the vibrating interaction of tower and conductor because characteristics of the coupled system obtained from
are not considered. But for UH~ long span transmission lines the model is identical to that from other more complicate
and some multi-circuit transmission lines on same tower, the model, such as a model with three towers and two spans of
height of tower are greatly increased, and also the flexibility conductors [1,2,3]. FEM analysis of a typical line indicates
and wind-induced vibration response. On the other hand, that end constrain of conductor has little affection on the
large-section and multi-bundle conductors are now commonly characteristics of tower [4,5]. Span of two adjacent towers
used in China, which cause the growth of weight and wind usually reach to hundreds even thousands of kilometres is the
load of conductors. Then, the coupled vibration between main reason. With tower regarded as cantilever beam and
tower and conductors is increased distinctly because of these conductor as string, we obtain a mechanics model of
new changes on transmission lines. Thus, the wind-induced tower-conductor coupled system as shown in Fig.l.
load of tower, obtained from the calculation method not
considering the coupled vibration affection of conductors, can
CICED2008 Technical Session 1 Distribution network equipment
The predominant frequency of natural wind is below The motion equation of tower under pulsing wind can be
than the first vibration frequency of transmission line usually. expressed as (Ref. [6])
.r 1
Po(z)v (z)dz + 2 1'2 P2(Z)V2(x 2)dx2 SF(n) =
.r.r VI(z)v.(z')Sw(z, z', n)dzdz'
2 +
q = (3) m
s (21in1)2 m
Ys(z) =
.r Po(z)v.(z)dz + 2 1'2 P2(Z)V2(x 2)dx2 v1(z)
2 (4)
(14)
(21i~) m that is
where
(5)
2
CICED2008 Technical Session 1 Distribution network equipment
V2(X;)Jl:C rr
C~ (;~ 2
D R(x ,x';z ,z' ;n)Sv(n)dzdz'dx2dx;]
(15)
Tab .r
type
Parameters of conductor and ground wire
sectional
area
outer weight working
modulus
elastici~
diameter(mm) (kglkm) tension
(mm') (kglmm)
The auto-power spectrum of tower displacement
response (Ref [8]) is conductor 546.24 30.95 3920 138180 14200
2
Sy(z,n) = v:(z)IH.(in)1 SF(n) (16) ground
wire 327.7 23.6 2400 87710 15400
and the square root of deviation is
0 .3
0.2
01
3
CICED2008 Technical Session 1 Distribution network equipment
......
5.2 Calculation of FEM
u
Tab.3 lists the deformation of the tower and conductor
under different direction of static wind. Fig.5 shows the ;w
I"..~
deformation of tower are all large.
.
Tab.J The largest deformation of tower and ""
_.1l/1l
r
conductor under static wind (m)
"""
''''
deformation direction "'"
' M
4
CICED2008 Technical Session 1 Distribution network equipment
considering the coupled vibration affection of conductor, are [4] Yang Jingbo, Li Zheng, Jiang Jun. Dynamic
given in this paper. And a transmission line as an example is Characteristics of Wind-induced Coupled Vibration
analyzed with the method, as well as FEM. The results of Between Conductor and Tower of Transmission Line.
response and factor getting from the two methods are close. It Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis.
indicates the analytical methods are reasonable and 2008(2): 147-150
practicable. In addition, the factor of the coupled system is [5] Hu Song, Tang Guoan, Yang Yuanchun. Study on
close or little small than that of the single tower. Then, dynamic characteristics of long span transmission tower.
dynamic load of tower considering the affection of conductor Steel Structure, 2000, 15(47):39-41
is small than that according to the Standard presently using [6] L. Meriovitch, Elements of vibration Analysis, 2nd edition,
[9]. McGraw-Hill, 1986.
[7] E. Simiu, R. H. Scanlan, Wind Effects on Structures: An
References Introduction to Wind Engineering, 2nd edition,
[1] S. Ozono, J. Maeda, M. Makino. Characteristics of in Wiley-Interscience. 1986.
plane free vibration of transmission line systems[J]. [8] T. T. Soong, M. Grigoriu, Random Vibration of
Engineering Structures, 1988,10(3):272-280 Mechanical and Structural Systems, Prentice-Hall, 1993.
[2] Zhu Jihua. Theoretical and experimental study on dynamic [9] Chinese Standards of Power Electric Industry. Technical
responses of electrical transmission tower-line system [D]. regulation of design for tower and pole structures of
Master's degree paper of Wuhan University,2002 overhead transmission line. Beijing: China Power
[3] Yin Huijun. Wind-induced response and vibration control Electric Press, 2002.
of long-span transmission system [D]. Master's degree
paper of Wuhan Technology University, 2003