Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DECISION
Docket No. 03-10-07 Page 2
I. INTRODUCTION
The Petitioner states that over pressurization exists in many drinking water
systems where water is sourced from watersheds in mountainous areas then
transported by pipeline to customers at significantly lower elevations. The water flowing
downhill, in a pipe, can create a tall water column. At the bottom, water can be under
very high pressure, which must be reduced before it is distributed to end-users.
Presently, public water main systems utilize devices called pressure reduction valves
(PRVs) to reduce water pressure to ideal levels, but essentially waste the energy in the
high-pressure water. Petition p. 1. Existing PRVs are located mainly in underground
concrete vaults or small, inconspicuous aboveground blockhouse structures. The
turbine-generators proposed by Rentricity will mimic the functionality of PRVs and
transform the surplus energy into electricity. Water volume changes by hour and day
and pressure also can be variable. Therefore, the amount of available power in a water
main will not be constant. The turbine will be sized most efficiently to capture the
surplus energy and transform it into electricity. As the pressure of the water changes so
will the speed of the turbine, its attached generator and electricity output. Rentricitys
installations will contain a PRV immediately downstream of the turbine to dissipate any
excess pressure not removed by the turbine. Response to Interrogatory EL-6.
The Petitioner states in its Petition that the turbine-generators will have virtually
no environmental impact. These generators will not combust any fuel and therefore will
not produce any air emissions. Rentricity states that no expansion of dams or
impoundments is required to capture the surplus pressure in water mains. Petition pp.
1-2. The turbines installed by Rentricity would not in any way result in increased
pumping costs on the part of the host water company. Rentricity is tapping into only the
surplus energy already contained within water mains, which at present is being wasted.
Response to Interrogatory EL-11. The proposed small-scale turbine-generators usually
Docket No. 03-10-07 Page 3
will be connected to the New England Power Pool at the closest available
interconnection point to the grid. The Petitioners small-scale turbine-generators would
be separately metered. Response to Interrogatory EL-2.
The turbines will be remotely monitored using a secure data link to the internet.
Both the water utility and Rentricity will have access to the turbine and water system
performance data, which can be viewed from any computer terminal that has an Internet
connection. Initially, the turbines will not be controlled remotely; they only will be
remotely monitored. Rentricity will monitor the turbines from Rentricitys headquarters
in Skillman, NJ. If adjustment is required to a turbine, changes will be made physically
to the unit at its installation site by maintenance staff of the respective water utility.
Response to Interrogatory EL-7.
(A) energy derived from solar power; wind power; a fuel cell;
methane gas from landfills; ocean thermal power; wave or
tidal power; low emission advanced renewable energy
conversion technologies; a run-of-the-river hydropower
facility provided such facility has a generating capacity of not
more than five megawatts, does not cause an appreciable
change in the river flow, and began operation after the
effective date of this section; or a biomass facility, including,
but not limited to, a biomass gasification plant that utilizes
land clearing debris, tree stumps or other biomass that
regenerates or the use of which will not result in a depletion
of resources, provided such biomass is cultivated and
harvested in a sustainable manner and the average
emission rate for such facility is equal to or less than .075
pounds of nitrogen oxides per million BTU of heat input for
the previous calendar quarter, except that energy derived
from a biomass facility with a capacity of less than five
hundred kilowatts that began construction before July 1,
2003, may be considered a Class I renewable energy
source, provide such biomass is cultivated and harvested in
a sustainable manner; or (B) any electrical generation,
including distributed generation, generated from a Class I
renewable energy source.
Based on the Petitioners assertions, the Department agrees that this proposed
innovative and very-low impact technology would qualify as a low emission advanced
renewable energy conversion technology defined as a Class I renewable energy
source.
Docket No. 03-10-07 Page 4
1. CONCLUSION
Based upon the project as described herein, the Department finds that as
proposed the fuel source/technology would qualify as a low emission advanced
renewable energy conversion technology Class I renewable energy source. However,
when the proposed Rentricity operations commence, the Petitioner needs to apply for a
Connecticut Class I registration.
2. ORDERS
1. While the Department concludes in this Decision that the Rentricity project
would qualify as a Class I renewable energy source pursuant to Conn. Gen.
Stat. 16-1(26), the Petitioner must still apply for registration in the
aforementioned application system once registered in the New England
Generation Information System (GIS).
Linda J. Kelly
Anne C. George
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Decision issued by the
Department of Public Utility Control, State of Connecticut, and was forwarded by
Certified Mail to all parties of record in this proceeding on the date indicated.