Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chemical Composition
Natural gas is a fossil fuel, The chemical composition of natural
gas is a function of the gas source and type of processing. It is
a mixture of methane, ethane, propane and butane with small
amounts of heavier hydrocarbons and some impurities, notably
nitrogen and complex sulphur compounds, water, carbon
dioxide and hydrogen sulphide which may exist in the feed gas
but are removed before liquefaction. Pipeline natural gas may
contain small amounts of water vapour.
Boiling point is one of the most significant properties because it
defines when gas becomes a liquid. Webster-Merriman on line
(www.webster-merriman.com) defines boiling point as the
temperature at which a liquid boils or converts rapidly from a
liquid to a vapour or gas at atmospheric pressure. The boiling
point of pure ater at atmospheric pressure is 100C (212F).
The boiling point of LNG varies with its basic composition, but
typically is -162C (-259F).
When cold LNG comes in contact with warmer air, water, or the
environment, it begins to boil at that interface because the
surrounding temperatures are warmer than the LNGs boiling
point, as shown in
shows the boiling points of water and common gases. The
liquefaction process cools natural gas to change it to a liquid
which reduces the volume occupied by the gas by
approximately 600 times. LNG is converted back into natural
gas for distribution to industrial and residential consumers. The
LNG regasification process warms the
LNG and converts it back into its gaseous form
Density and Specific Gravity
Density is a measurement of mass per unit of volume and is an
absolute quantity. Because LNG is not a pure substance, the
density of LNG varies slightly with its actual composition. The
density of LNG falls between 430 kg/m3 and 470 kg/m3 (3.5 to
4 lb/US gal). LNG is less than half the density of water;
therefore, as a liquid, LNG will float if spilled on water. Under
ambient conditions, LNG will become a vapour because there is
no place on earth with a temperature of -162C (-259F). As
LNG vaporises, the cold vapours will condense the moisture in
the air, often causing the formation of a white vapour cloud
until the gas warms dilutes, and disperses
Flammability
Flammability is the property which makes natural gas desirable
as an energy source, and yet for the same reason flammability
can be a safety hazard. It is very important to be clear: natural
gas is flammable but LNG (the liquid form of natural gas) is not
because of the lack of oxygen in the liquid. A source of fuel
(e.g., flammable gas or vapour),
Air (oxygen), and
A source of ignition (e.g., spark, open flame, or high-
temperature surface). The flammability limits for methane are
5% LFL and 15% UFL by volume in air. Outside of this range,
the methane/air mixture is not flammable
Ignition and Flame Temperatures
The ignition temperature, also known as auto-ignition
temperature, is the lowest temperature at which a gas or
vapour in air (e.g., natural gas) will ignite spontaneously
without a spark or flame being present. This temperature
depends on factors such as air-fuel mixture and pressure. In an
air-fuel mixture of about 10% methane in air, the auto ignition
temperature is approximately 540C (1,000F). Temperatures
higher than the auto ignition temperature will cause ignition
after a shorter exposure time to the high temperatureThe
precise auto ignition temperature of natural gas varies with its
composition. If the concentration of heavier hydrocarbons in
LNG increases (e.g., the methane portion of the natural gas
begins to evaporate or be removed from the mix), the auto
ignitiontemperature decreases. In addition to ignition from
exposure to heat, the vapours from LNG can be ignited
immediately from the energy in a spark, open flame, or static
electricity when they are within the flammable limits.
LNG has a very hot flame temperature. Simply stated it burns
quickly and is a better heat source than other fuels, e.g.,
gasoline. The methane in LNG has a flame temperature of
1,330C (2,426F). In comparison, gasoline has a flame
temperature of 1,027C (1,880F), which means LNG burns
hotter. Also, LNG burns quickly, at a rate of about 12.5
m2/minute, compared to gasolines burn rate of 4 m2/minute.
LNG produces more heat when burning because its heat of
combustion is 50.2 MJ/kg (21,600 Btu/lb), compared to that of
gasoline which has a heat of combustion of 43.4 MJ/kg
(18,720Btu/lb). The combustion of LNG produces mainly carbon
dioxide and water vapour. The radiant heat of an LNG fire is a
frequent safety concern of government regulators and officials,
and the public.
2 History
Experiments on the properties of gases started early in
the seventeenth century. By the middle of the seventeenth
century Robert Boyle had derived the inverse relationship
between the pressure and the volume of gases.
About the same time, Guillaume Amontons started looking
into temperature effects on gas. Various gas experiments
continued for the next 200 years. During that time
there were efforts to liquefy gases. Many new facts on
the nature of gases had been discovered. For example,
early in the nineteenth century Cagniard de la Tours had
shown there was a temperature above which a gas could
not be liquefied. There was a major push in the mid to
late nineteenth century to liquefy all gases. A number of
scientists including Michael Faraday, James Joule, and
William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), did experiments in this
area. In 1886 Karol Olszewski liquefied methane, the primary
constituent of natural gas. By 1900 all gases had
been liquefied except helium which was liquefied in 1908.
The first large scale liquefaction of natural gas in the U.S.
was in 1918 when the U.S. government liquefied natural
gas as a way to extract helium, which is a small component
of some natural gas. This helium was intended for use in
British dirigibles for World War I. The liquid natural gas
(LNG) was not stored, but regasified and immediately put
into the gas mains.[5]
The key patents having to do with natural gas liquefaction
were in 1915 and the mid-1930s. In 1915 Godfrey
Cabot patented a method for storing liquid gases at very
low temperatures. It consisted of a Thermos bottle type
design which included a cold inner tank within an outer
tank; the tanks being separated by insulation. In 1937
Lee Twomey received patents for a process for large scale
liquefaction of natural gas. The intention was to store natural
gas as a liquid so it could be used for shaving peak
energy loads during cold snaps. Because of large volumes
it is not practical to store natural gas, as a gas, near atmospheric
pressure. However, if it can be liquefied it can be
stored in a volume 600 times smaller. This is a practical
way to store it but the gas must be stored at 260 F.
There are basically two processes for liquefying natural
gas in large quantities. One is a cascade process in which
the natural gas is cooled by another gas which in turn has
been cooled by still another gas, hence a cascade. There
are usually two cascade cycles prior to the liquid natural
gas cycle. The other method is the Linde process.
(A variation of the Linde process, called the Claude process,
is sometimes used.) In this process the gas is cooled
regeneratively by continually passing it through an orifice
until it is cooled to temperatures at which it liquefies.
The cooling of gas by expanding it through an orifice wasume which is known as the
energy density expressed in
MJ/liter. The density of LNG is roughly 0.41 kg/liter
to 0.5 kg/liter, depending on temperature, pressure, and
composition,[3] compared to water at 1.0 kg/liter. Using
the median value of 0.45 kg/liter, the typical energy
density values are 22.5 MJ/liter (based on higher heating
value) or 20.3 MJ/liter (based on lower heating value).
The (volume-based) energy density of LNG is approximately
2.4 times greater than that of CNG which makes
it economical to transport natural gas by ship in the form
of LNG. The energy density of LNG is comparable to developed by James Joule and
William Thomson and is
known as the Joule-Thomson effect. Lee Twomey used
the cascade process for his patents.
4 Production
The natural gas fed into the LNG plant will be treated to
remove water, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide and other
components that will freeze (e.g., benzene) under the low
temperatures needed for storage or be destructive to the
liquefaction facility. LNG typically contains more than
90 percent methane. It also contains small amounts of
ethane, propane, butane, some heavier alkanes, and nitrogen.
The purification process can be designed to give
almost 100 percent methane. One of the risks of LNG
is a rapid phase transition explosion (RPT), which occurs
when cold LNG comes into contact with water.[9]
The most important infrastructure needed for LNG production
and transportation is an LNG plant consisting of
one or more LNG trains, each of which is an independent
unit for gas liquefaction. The largest LNG train
now in operation is in Qatar. These facilities recently
reached a safety milestone, completing 12 years of operations
on its offshore facilities without a Lost Time
Incident.[10] Until recently it was the Train 4 of Atlantic
LNG in Trinidad and Tobago with a production capacity
of 5.2 million metric ton per annum (mmtpa),[11] followed
by the SEGAS LNG plant in Egypt with a capacity
of 5 mmtpa. In July 2014, Atlantic LNG celebrated
its 3000th cargo of LNG at the companys liquefaction
facility in Trinidad.[12] The Qatargas II plant has
a production capacity of 7.8 mmtpa for each of its two
trains. LNG sourced from Qatargas II will be supplied
to Kuwait, following the signing of an agreement in May
2014 between Qatar Liquefied Gas Company and Kuwait
Petroleum Corp.[12] LNG is loaded onto ships and delivered
to a regasification terminal, where the LNG is allowed
to expand and reconvert into gas. Regasification
terminals are usually connected to a storage and pipeline
distribution network to distribute natural gas to local distribution
companies (LDCs) or independent power plants
(IPPs).
4.2 World total production
The LNG industry developed slowly during the second
half of the last century because most LNG plants are located
in remote areas not served by pipelines, and because
of the large costs to treat and transport LNG. Constructing
an LNG plant costs at least $1.5 billion per 1
mmtpa capacity, a receiving terminal costs $1 billion per
1 bcf/day throughput capacity and LNG vessels cost $200
million$300 million.
Global LNG import trends, by volume (in red), and as a percentage
of global natural gas imports (in black) (US EIA data)
Trends in the top five LNG-importing nations as of 2009 (US EIA
data)
In the early 2000s, prices for constructing LNG plants,
receiving terminals and vessels fell as new technologies
emerged and more players invested in liquefaction and regasification.
This tended to make LNG more competitive
as a means of energy distribution, but increasing material
costs and demand for construction contractors have put
upward pressure on prices in the last few years. The standard
price for a 125,000 cubic meter LNG vessel built
in European and Japanese shipyards used to be US$250
million. When Korean and Chinese shipyards entered
the race, increased competition reduced profit margins
and improved efficiencyreducing costs by 60 percent.
Costs in US dollars also declined due to the devaluation
of the currencies of the worlds largest shipbuilders: the
Japanese yen and Korean won.
Since 2004, the large number of orders increased demand
for shipyard slots, raising their price and increasing ship
costs. The per-ton construction cost of an LNG liquefaction
plant fell steadily from the 1970s through the 1990s.
The cost reduced by approximately 35 percent. However,
recently the cost of building liquefaction and regasification
terminals doubled due to increased cost of materials
and a shortage of skilled labor, professional engineers,
designers, managers and other white-collar professionals.
Due to natural gas shortage concerns in the northeastern U.S. and surplus nature gas in
the rest of the country,
many new LNG import and export terminals are being
contemplated in the United States. Concerns about the
safety of such facilities create controversy in some regions
where they are proposed. One such location is in
the Long Island Sound between Connecticut and Long
Island. Broadwater Energy, an effort of TransCanada
Corp. and Shell, wishes to build an LNG import terminal
in the sound on the New York side. Local politicians
including the Suffolk County Executive raised questions
about the terminal. In 2005, New York Senators Chuck
Schumer and Hillary Clinton also announced their opposition
to the project.[19] Several import terminal proposals
along the coast of Maine were also met with high levels
of resistance and questions. On Sep. 13, 2013 the U.S.
Department of Energy approved Dominion Cove Point's
application to export up to 770 million cubic feet per
day of LNG to countries that do not have a free trade
agreement with the U.S.[20] In May 2014, the FERC concluded
its environmental assessment of the Cove Point
LNG project, which found that the proposed natural gas
export project could be built and operated safely.[21] Another
LNG terminal is currently proposed for Elba Island,
Ga.[22] Plans for three LNG export terminals in the U.S.
Gulf Coast region have also received conditional Federal
approval.[20][23] In Canada, an LNG export terminal is
under construction near Guysborough, Nova Scotia.[24]
Cheniere is planning to begin exports from its Sabine Pass
export terminal in Oct. 2015.[8]