Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Teaching and learning for decimal fraction understanding has been shown to be complex and plagued with a myriad of opportunities for misconceptions
(Lortie-Forgues, Tian, & Siegler, 2015). The bodies of research into decimal understandings and misconceptions have developed over many years to diagnose
how this central component of mathematical content creates so much confusion and maintains issues into later years despite its presence in the learning
curriculum (Roche & Clarke, 2006).
69 words
A longitudinal study by Stacey (2005), assessing students capabilities from grades 4-10 highlights the prevalence of two prevalent misconceptions that students
often hold; longer-is-larger (L thinking) and shorter-is-longer (S thinking) thinking. The extensive study of 3204 students throughout Melbourne and tracked
them over 4 years from the year in which decimal fractions are introduced, grade 4, (Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority, VCAA, 2016) to year 10.
Stacey (2005) employed a system of analysing errors in students ability to compare decimals called Decimal Comparison Test (DCT2) and considered patterns
evident over the timeframe of learning.
This analytical technique for assessing students decimal understanding has been used in a variety of other studies and developed over the years (Brueckner,
1928; Foxman, Ruddock, Joffe, Mason, Mitchell, & Sexton, 1985; Roche & Clarke, 2006; Stacey, 2005 Steinle, 2004). It was also seen in the 2006 study by
Roche & Clarke, and to a lesser extent by Steinle (2004) who asked students to circle the larger number of two decimal fractions. It is seen as helpful data to
identify common misconceptions presented throughout decimal teaching and learning process in schools, where teachers and education professionals are able to
reflect on current practices, diagnose practices that aid the development of misconceptions and plan for ways it can be combated and avoided in the future
(Fuglestad, 1998; Stacey, 2005; Steinle, 2004).
The studies of Stacey (2005) and Roche & Clarke (2006) found that there was greater prevalence of L thinking among students, where they incorrectly believed
that the more numbers present after the decimal point indicated a larger number (e.g. 0.49<0.2375). Previously labeled as whole number rule by Resnick,
Nesher, Leonard, Magone, Omanson, & Pelle (1989), this naive misconception (Stacey, 2005, p. 27) is reflective of thinking applied to whole numbers before
the decimal point, where numbers with more digits are larger. For example, students using this type of thinking would consider 0.812 as a larger number than
0.93 because the extra digit makes it larger, such as when considered as 812 and 93.
Although it is not as prevalent as seeing decimals with more digits as longer, another misconception is to see the opposite - that shorter is larger (Stacey, 2005).
This misconception is rooted in more developed, although incorrect, application of place values (Roche & Clarke, 2006; Steinle, 2004). Students who exhibit
this thinking appear to have a lack of understanding of number density and see the number as larger by applying their understanding that tenths are larger than
hundredths (Roche & Clarke, 2006).
EDMA360 Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2_2016 Melissa Kelly
Another issue in the teaching and learning of decimal fractions found through the study of Roche & Clarke (2006) is the use of adding and annexing zeros to
use whole number thinking. For example, changing 0.37 to 0.370, therefore making it easier to decide that 0.37 is larger than 0.24. While this would not present
as an issue when simply looking for a correct answer to the question of which is larger, it neglects conceptual understanding of decimals as a number (Roche &
Clarke, 2006). This can be explored through the use of open-ended questions, comparison of more than two decimals and other occasions where students need
to prove their reasoning (Roche & Clarke, 2006).
Stacey (2005) boosts that the refined focus of her research provides knowledge of the journey (p. 19) students take in understanding decimals throughout
their schooling in a way that can be generalised to other content areas within and outside. However, when complete and relational understanding is strived for
in teaching and learning, care should be given to the interrelated nature of mathematical content knowledge and skills when teaching, particularly with the
connections between decimals and fractions (Skemp, 1976). Furthermore, the presence of whole number, place value and multiplicative thinking are indicated
as essential elements for decimal understanding (Wright, 2004). The 2005 paper goes on to reflect on possible influences in secondary schooling with students
learn about negative numbers and are increasingly asked to round numbers to two decimal places on decimal understanding. Upon speculation, one limitation to
this study could be the act of solely focusing on decimal comparison errors, without broader understanding of teaching and learning practices present behind
them and the same students performance in related concept areas (e.g. conceptual knowledge of fractions) could be .
Additionally, the statement by Stacey (2005) that much school instruction does not make an impact on the thinking of many students (pp. 33-34) cannot be
upheld as the research does not consider the individual instruction experienced by students. It could be proposed that instructional techniques prevalent within
those schools and classrooms could have neglected best practiced and fostered those misconceptions rather than worked to combat them.
689 words
Decimal fractions are first introduced into the Victorian Curriculum (VCAA, 2016) during grade 4, where students are expected to extend their knowledge of
place value to tenths and hundredths by making connections to prior fractions knowledge. This is then further developed beyond the hundredths in grade 5,
where students are asked to begin comparing, ordering and representing decimals. It is in grade 6 that students are expected to learn the bulk of fraction and
division tasks are placed, with students learning within 7 learning outcomes throughout the year. This could present a strain on teachers to ensure that these
areas are adequately learnt for relational understanding that avoids the common misconceptions talked about above for they move into secondary school where
teaching begins to overemphasis round to 2 decimal places (Stacey, 2005; Skemp, 1976).
Despite the troubling presence of these incorrect understandings within classrooms, Steinle (2004), Roche & Clarke (2006), and Stacey (2005) all maintain that
these misconception can be challenged and learnt from. This has been shown to more common for students with L thinking, due to the more basic reasoning
behind that misconception (Stacey, 2005). However, more concerning is the prevalence of S thinking, which maintains its presence into secondary schooling
(Steinle, 2004). Steinle shows that the comparison of this with the use of L thinking moving from approximately 80% to 10% of students, while S thinking
starts just under 10% in grade 4, moving to just under 20% in grade 6 and only decreasing to 10 percent in grade 10 (Steinle, 2004). This indicates that this
EDMA360 Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2_2016 Melissa Kelly
thinking actually increases during the years of decimal fraction learning and concludes with a level of S thinking higher than when first introduced (Steinle,
2004).
Victorian curriculum documents additionally, only introduce the idea of comparing, ordering and representing decimals in grade 5 (VCAA, 2016). It is
important in effective teaching and learning that students are supported in making connections between symbols, words and representations within mathematics
(Wright, 2004; Wright & Tjorpatzis, 2015). The implications presented in the curriculum fraction and decimal sequence suggest that representation and
concrete models are not important when first introducing topics, which is grossly disputed by research (Wright, 2004; Van de Walle, Karp, & Bay-Williams,
2015).
Understanding of what decimal and fraction numbers is seen as a commonly lacking in all levels of society, and consideration should be given to how this
develops (Stacey, Helme, Steinle, Baturo, Irwin & Bana, 2001, in Steinle, 2004). While it could be argued that some incorrect errors or interpretations are
unavoidable as students work to make sense of new information (Resnick, et al., 1989), educational professionals need to be aware of them and how they can be
corrected before impeding on future learning (Moloney & Stacey, 1997). The extensive research into the area of decimal fraction misconceptions and ways they
can be avoided should be considered during teaching at all levels and through the structure of school, state and national curriculum documents.
326 words
LESSON PLANNING
Rationale:
This series of lessons focuses on decimal fractions within grade 5, which has been shown as an area students struggle with in later years due to
misconceptions (Lortie-Forgues, et al., 2015; Wright, 2004). The lessons within this unit aim to introduce students to decimal numbers using thousandths while
EDMA360 Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2_2016 Melissa Kelly
emphasising how the role of each digit within the base ten place value system, hopefully combating the existence of misconceptions regarding length of
decimals and the presence of zeros.
LESSON 1
Extending: Students are asked to find as many examples of decimals in everyday life as
possible, using Ipads to research.
GROUPING:
- Grouping will be determined by where the students are sitting, however the
teacher will intervene when students are identified as ones who do not work well
together, or who have common learning difficulties.
PROMPTING QUESTIONS:
- Have you seen any different ways of representing of decimals?
- Can you think of any keywords that might be used when working with decimals?
- Where have you seen decimals in everyday life?
- What other mathematical concepts are used with decimals?
LESSON 2
EDMA360 Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2_2016 Melissa Kelly
GROUPING:
Groups of 3 are made of mixed ability students.
PROMPTING QUESTIONS:
- Is there an easy way of working out where a number fits in comparison to the others?
- Why is this number closer to zero, and therefore smaller when there are more numbers in it?
LESSON 3
Extending: ask students to determine the quickest why possible to win or how they
could alter the dice to change the game.
GROUPING:
Mixed grouping - teacher to pay attention to students with particular learning
difficulties that may be better off placed in groups of 3 or with other student who are
patient.
PROMPTING QUESTIONS:
- What does 1/100 look like on the decimat? How would it look different if it was 6/100?
- What does the numerator/denominator represent in a fraction?
- What is the quickest combination of fractions to win the game?
LESSON 4
Students are then to move to their seats in groups of 4 to play their own version of
Guess my number. 2 students are to pick a number for the other two to guess.
At the conclusion of class, students are to individually write what they did during the
game, what they found challenging and easy and to finish the following sentence;
When I found out that the number was between two consecutive numbers (e.g. 3
& 4; 2.5 & 2.6; 4.829 and 4.828), I knew ....
Extending: Students can move into more decimal places or play Decimal Challenge
on computers in pairs.
GROUPING:
Groups of 4 will be created based on ability to ensure differentiation can be applied
without negatively affecting the learning of others.
EDMA360 Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2_2016 Melissa Kelly
PROMPTING QUESTIONS:
- What numbers do we know are too high?
- If the number is between those two, think about what numbers are between 0-1?
LESSON 5
- To summarise their learning, students are to revisit the brainstorm from the first
lesson. This time, they are to include as many facts in the outer section to
represent their learning throughout the unit.
Extending: Ask students to think about and list what the decimal would be if the whole
was not 1m but another length. 10cm? 1cm? 100m?
GROUPING:
Students will be grouped in mixed ability groups
PROMPTING QUESTIONS:
- How many parts of 1/100 makes 1/10? How can this be shown using a decipipe?
- What is the size of the whole that the hand is being compared to?
- How can we use/how have we previously used the place value chart to write decimals?
REFERENCES:
Brueckner, L. J. (1928). Analysis of Difficulties in Decimals. Elementary School Journal, 29, 32-41.
Foxman, D., Ruddock, G., Joffe, L., Mason, K., Mitchell, P & Sexton, B. (1985). A Review of Monitoring in Mathematics 1978 to 1982 (Vol. 1).
London: Dept of Ed. & Science.
Fuglestad, A. B. (1998). Computer Support for Diagnostic Teaching. A case of decimal numbers. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education
(Nordisk Matematikk Didaktikk), 6(3-4), 25-50.
Kaur, H (2016, August 22). Teaching and learning of decimal fraction concepts: Lecture week 4 [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from
http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/ ~econ481/#ppt
Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult? Developmental Review, 38,
EDMA360 Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2_2016 Melissa Kelly
201221.
Moloney & Stacey, (1997). Understanding decimals. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 52(1), 4-8.
Resnick, L. B., Nesher, P., Leonard, F., Magone, M., Omanson, S., & Pelle, I. (1989). Conceptual bases of arithmetic errors: The case of decimal
fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 8-27.
Roche, A. & Clarke, D. M. (2006). When successful comparison of decimals doesnt tell the full story. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N.
Stehlikova (Eds.), 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 425432). Prague:
PME.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Teaching Mathematics, 77, 20-26.
Stacey, K (2005). Travelling the road to expertise: A longitudinal study of learning. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 29 th
Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 19-36. Melbourne: PME.
Steinle, V. (2004, December 3rd). Detection and remediation of decimal misconceptions. Paper presented at MAV Conference: Towards
Excellence in Mathematics, Melbourne. Retrieved from https://www.mav.vic.edu.au/files/conferences/2004/Steinle-formatted.pdf
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2015). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (9th ed).
Boston, MA: Pearson.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2016). Mathematics Number and Algebra: Foundation Level 6. Retrieved from
http://victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/mathematics/introduction/scope-and-sequence
Wright, V. (2004). DecimalsGetting the point. Paper presented at the Towards excellence in Mathematics: 2004 MAV Annual Conference,
Monash University, Clayton, 23 December 2004.
Wright, V., & Tjorpatzis, J. (2015). Whats the point? A unit of work on decimals with year 3 students. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom,
20(1), 30-34.
EDMA360 Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2_2016 Melissa Kelly
APPENDICES:
Word
Symbol Collection