Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

energtica india

Solar Manufacturing in India;


A KMPG Report
Solar power is a strategic need for India as solar power can potentially save around USD 20 bn.
in fossil fuel imports annually by 2030. A sustainable domestic manufacturing industry can save
USD 42 bn. in equipment imports by 2030 and create 50,000 direct jobs and at least 125,000
indirect jobs in the next 5 years, besides providing equipment supply security.

Why India needs to build Solar Capabilities are built to compete effec-
Manufacturing Capacity tively in competitive global markets
Indias energy imports have risen sharply
Solar manufacturing Strong ancillary industry is created
from USD 43 bn. in 2005-06 to USD 167 can also create direct Clusters for knowledge and infrastruc-
bn. in 2013-14. In comparison Indias trade employment of more ture sharing are developed
deficit in 2013-14 was USD 139 bn (table 1). Research institutions develop industry
Solar power is a strategic need for the than 50,000 in the next linkages and support innovation
country as solar power can potentially save 5 years assuming local
USD 20 billion in fossil fuel imports annu- Global Solar Manufacturing
ally by 2030 and domestic manufacturing
manufacturing captures Scenario
can save USD 42 billion in equipment im- 50% domestic market Globally, there are examples of countries pro-
ports by 2030. share and 10% global viding strategic support to solar energy also
In the absence of manufacturing, India supporting solar manufacturing (table 2).
will need to import USD 42 bn. of solar
market share China has developed solar champions
equipment by 2030 corresponding to 100 in a systematic manner through massive
GW of installed capacity. subsidies, low interest loans, grants and
Solar manufacturing can also create di- easy access to land and utilities
rect employment of more than 50,000 supply to Japan or supply of gas by Globally, manufacturing bases are be-
in the next 5 years assuming local manu- Russia to European nations) ing planned as integrated solar indus-
facturing captures 50% domestic market trial clusters with strong Government
share and 10% global market share. An- Why it is necessary for India to support a support (table 3).
other at least 125,000 indirect jobs will be strategic industry [Solar] at early state of
created in the supply chain the life cycle? Indian Solar Manufacturing
India may not be able to utilize its large Economies of scale results in lower cost Industry
solar energy resources, if imports of solar and brand building Indias Manufacturing Policy recognizes
panels get impacted due to Skilled manpower gets developed with solar manufacturing as an industry with
Major exporters using their production passage of time strategic importance. However, the policy
for their domestic use. Overall strategy for innovation and ex- is yet to have the intended effect:
Sudden jump in prices in the future ports are developed at an early stage 40% of the Indian solar cell manufac-
due to supply shortages (e.g.. Polysili- Appreciation of industry and competi- turers have shut down with industry
con price jump in 2008) tive dynamics utilization at only 21%
Dispute with major suppliers (as evi- Large domestic market helps in ex- The industry has suffered due to sud-
denced in case of Chinas rare earth panding capacity den and sharp price declines due to

TABLE 1
In billion USD 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Coal 3 4 5 9 8 9 17 16 15
Crude Oil 39 48 68 77 80 100 140 144 143
LNG 1 1 2 3 2 3 7 8 9

4 energtica india JAN|FEB15


TABLE 2
Country 2013 Solar Installations (MW) Manufacturing Capacity (MW) -- As a result, REE Prices more than
China 12.900 45.000 tripled in 2011 and Japanese pro-
Japan 6.900 3.597 duction was severely disrupted
USA 4.800 1.500
World 39.000 65.000
2. Creating Solar National Champi-
Note-Japanese and US companies have large manufacturing capacities abroad in addition to domestic ons has become a strategic impera-
capacity. tive for large nations
Support will be provided to major enter-
prises to grow stronger so that by 2015,
global over-supply and lack of a level Direct taxes on manufacturing: Do- leading polysilicon enterprises will reach
playing field mestic capacity of about 10GW by 50,000 metric tons per year, and major
Indian manufacturing costs are higher 2024 = USD 870 million enterprises will reach 10,000 metric tons
due to three major reasons: Direct taxes on Salaries: Employment per year; leading solar cell enterprises will
Lack of scale -Indian factory sizes are generation of about 75,000 by 2024 = reach the 5GW level, and major enterpris-
only one-fifth the size of a typical USD 90 million es will reach the 1GW level. By 2015, in
Asian factory Impact on taxes owing to GDP increase China there will be one PV enterprise with
Insufficient government support -Oth- and factoring tax/ GDP ratio = USD annual sales revenue exceeding RMB 100
er countries have provided massive 980 million billion, 3-5 PV enterprises with annual sales
loans, tax holidays, subsidized utility Following are some global examples and revenue exceeding RMB 50 billion, and 3-4
services, easy access to land and tech- case studies that India needs to look at: enterprises specializing in PV equipment
nology support manufacturing with annual sales revenue
Underdeveloped supply chain Indian exceeding RMB 1 billion Chinese 12th
TABLE 4, Average Solar PV Plant Cost in India
manufacturers have no access to do- Domestic Panels Foreign Panels
Five Year Plan
mestic upstream raw material supplies Rs. Cr/MW 7,5 6,5 China already has 7 of the 10 global
of polysilicon and wafers solar champions and it is plans to make
The Indian government would be a net them even more dominant as solar energy
beneficiary by encouraging solar manufac- 1. Case Study: Chinese Export Em- becomes an increasingly important com-
turing as jobs would be created and taxes bargo impact on REE price showing ponent of the global energy basket.
will increase. The Potential Impact by 2024 how overdependence on critical fuel
on NPV basis will be: sources and materials can prove to 3. Case Study: It has become very costly
Potential loss due to higher prices = be disruptive and difficult for India to catch-up in
USD 851 million -- Rare Earth Elements (REE) are criti- electronics manufacturing
cal inputs for Japanese giants like -- Despite being one of the worlds
Mitsubishi, Toyota and Sony in hi- largest consumers of electronic,
tech manufacturing of electric ve- Imports account for more than
The Indian hicles, wind turbines and defense 60% of domestic demand
government would equipment -- Electronics industry was not given
-- China controlled 97 percent of due importance during early stages
be a net beneficiary the global REE supply and Japan of evolution
by encouraging solar imported 80 percent of its REE re- -- As a consequence, Electronic im-
manufacturing as jobs quirements from China ports now are the 4thbiggest item
-- In 2010, China cut its REE export in Indias import basket accounting
would be created and quota by 39 percent while banning for 23% of trade deficit
taxes will increase the export of 41 rare earth-related -- Asian economies such as South
processed products Korea, Taiwan and China have be-

TABLE 3
Low interest Loans Preferential
Support in Subsidized R&D Tax Anti-Dumping
Country and Capital Subsidies Domestic
Acquiring Land Utilities Support Breaks Duties
Guarantees Procurement
China Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
USA Yes Yes Yes - Yes Yes Yes Yes
Taiwan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - -
Malaysia Yes Yes Yes Yes - -
Yes; but not
disbursed to any
India - - - - - - Yes
manufacturer till
date

energetica india JAN|FEB15 5


TABLE 5. top 10 global solar companies
Yingli Green, Trina Solar, Canadian Solar, Sharp Solar, Jinko Solar, ReneSola, Hanwha Solar,
First Solar, USA Kyocera, Japan JA Solar, China
China China (Canada-China) Japan China China (Korea-China)
Shipments in MW 3300 2600 1894 1865 1800 1750 1600 1300 1200 1200

come significant global players and Post Anti-Dumping Duty


have succeeded in creating large Support will be -- Domestic production of PP kept
scale employment pace with domestic demand, in-
-- The Indian government in contrast provided to major creasing from 1844 KT in 2006 to
has inadvertently created hostile enterprises to grow 3692 KT in 2012 (CAGR of 12.3%)
conditions for electronics manu-
stronger so that -- India exported over 800 KT of PP in
facturing which has made foreign 2011 and 2012
manufacturers close even existing by 2015, leading
facilities polysilicon enterprises 5. Case Study: DCR requirements helped
-- Government has belatedly tried to establish the entire solar value chain
promote domestic manufacturing
will reach 50,000 metric in Canada attracting substantial
through 20-25% capital subsidy tons per year, and major investments
and incentives such as interest free enterprises will reach -- Ontario linked subsidies to DCR in
loans and tax breaks. 2009 which led a sharp increase in
-- But, it has been hard to encourage
10,000 metric tons per FDI and domestic investments in so-
domestic manufacturing owing year; leading solar cell lar manufacturing
to poor scale economics amongst enterprises will reach -- In 2014, DCR was removed due to
other reasons a WTO case by Japan. However,
India cannot afford to repeat the mistake the 5GW level, and growth is continuing due to deep
in case of the solar industry major enterprises will roots that the industry has estab-
lished in the province
reach the 1GW level
4. Case Study: Imposition of Anti- -- The development of the solar pan-
Dumping Duty turned India from els industry was followed by the de-
a Polypropylene Importer to an velopment of solar inverter industry
Exporter -- Ancillary industries such as rack-
Before Anti-Dumping Duty -- Petition for Anti Dumping Duty ing systems and wiring also started
-- In FY08, India imported around was filed by Reliance and support- showing strong growth
25,000 tons of Polypropylene (PP) ed by HaldiaPetrochemicals -- Domestic industry gained technical
from Saudi Arabia as it was 10% -- Consequently anti-dumping duties expertise and became competitive
cheaper than locally-manufactured were levied on Oman, Singapore in global markets. Local companies
PP and Saudi Arabia have now become exporters

TABLE 6. INSTALLED SOLAR CAPACITY IN ONTARIO


2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Installed Solar Capacity in MW 0 26 33 95 281 558 766 814

6 energetica india JAN|FEB15

Вам также может понравиться