Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
To cite this article: Leni D. Camacho, Dixon T. Gevaa, Antonio P. Carandang & Sofronio C.
Camacho (2016) Indigenous knowledge and practices for the sustainable management of
Ifugao forests in Cordillera, Philippines, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem
Services & Management, 12:1-2, 5-13, DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2015.1124453
Special Issue: Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services
the land are community-based and passed on programmes of the government and non-government
through inheritance. With the implementation of organizations that promote these traditional forest
the Community-Based Forest Management Program knowledge systems were also identified and described
in the country in 1995 (based on the Integrated Social from the survey.
Forestry Program in 1976), Certificates of Ancestral
Domain Claim were issued providing security of
3 Results
tenure for 50 years, which in effect legitimized the
presence of indigenous communities. A number of 3.1 Muyong
certificate of ancestral domain claim were awarded to
According to Butic and Ngidlo (2003), the Ifugao
the Ifugao, thus giving the right for the indigenous
mountain ranges called pugu or duntug are predo-
communities over their ancestral domain to occupy,
minantly covered by privately or clan-owned forests
develop and manage the land.
that are collectively termed as muyong (Figure 2).
In 1997, the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act was
These watersheds provide ample water supply and
passed, which provided for an absolute Ancestral
nourishment to rice paddies and help minimize soil
Domain Title promoting the practice of local peoples
erosion.
customs and traditions in the development and man-
Muyongs were generally described by the key
agement of their land. Hence, the Ifugaos have the
informants as a traditional land-use zoning system
rightful ownership of their muyongs.
that is usually placed along mountain peaks down
to mid-slopes. These woodlots are also sources of
2.2 Data collection their fuel wood, wood for house construction and
various edible fruits such as the areca nut (Areca
Focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant catechu). The Bagong Pagasa Foundation Inc. (as
interviews were conducted among 50 local famers in cited by Serrano & Cadaweng 2005) noted the sizes
Kiangan and Hungduan municipalities of Ifugao of muyongs often range from half to three hectares
Province (see the appendix). The respondents were and have emerged as a land-use system because of the
distributed across the sites. The respondents were following possible reasons:
chosen using purposive sampling. Respondents of
FGDs include farmers and village leaders in the (1) Ifugaos are aware of the relationship between
area. Key informants include selected repondents forest and water table and hence retaining
from the Save the Ifugao Terraces Movement verdant cover at the hilltop will create a stable
(NGO), and Municipal Environment and Natural water source.
Resources Office (local government agency), govern- (2) Muyongs are deemed major source of fuel
ment officials from the Department of Environment wood for the local people.
and Natural Resources and Department of Agrarian (3) Size of woodlots indicates economic status;
Reform, tribal farmer leaders and officials from the hence the larger the muyongs, the greater the
local government units in the areas. respect and recognition a clan or family will
Common indigenous forestry practices that are get from others.
being practiced in the two sites were identified from
the survey. The farmers own and manage a woodlot Muyong was also described by the key informants as a
known as muyong and rice paddies called payoh that buffer that delineates boundaries. Other land uses
form part of the Ifugao Rice Terraces. Extension that are linked with muyongs are settlement or
Figure 2. A typical view of Ifugao Rice Terraces showing muyong (woodlot) and payoh (rice terraces).
8 L. D. CAMACHO ET AL.
Table 1. Perceived changes in land uses in relation to 3.2.6 Forest extension programmes
muyong system. The inscription of Ifugao Rice Terraces in the
Land use Perceived changes Role of muyong system UNESCO World Heritage List proved beneficial in
Natural Natural forest cover has Biodiversity has increased
forest increased since the earlydue to natural
attracting more agriculture and forestry programmes
(bilid) 1990s. This can be because
regeneration process. in Ifugao. One of these is the FAOs Globally
of the abandonment of Muyong helps in Important Agricultural Heritage Sites (GIAHS nd)
many swidden farms from providing seeds and
their supposedly fallow regenerants for the project, which aims to conserve the agricultural heri-
stage. nearby bilid. tage systems and their significant biodiversity, asso-
Agroforestry Erosion-prone swidden Lessened soil erosion in
(uma) farms have decreased and sloping swidden farms ciated landscapes, multiple goods and other
become part of the natural
since diversified planting ecosystem services. Key informants believe that the
forests because of their was adopted. Alnus spp,
long fallow period and Calamus spp. were GIAHS project is valuable in protecting their
(20 years) introduced in muyong muyongs and payoh. Specifically, they believe that
and uma.
Tree Land cover increased by as Tree plantations were
this project can help in the following ways:
plantation much as 10% since 1990 established in degraded/
due to reforestation and open muyongs. Multi- Promote land and water conservation, rehabili-
introduction of coffee storey agroforestry
orchard. technique was adopted to tation and protection of the natural landscapes.
help create income from Resolve ownership and policy issues impinging
timber as well as non-
timber resources such as rice terraces and other GIAHS landscapes con-
fruits, vines, honey, coffee servation and management.
and others.
Develop institutional support mechanisms for
Natural Only occurs in small None. Planting crops or
grassland patches; did not change timber is nearly short-term and long-term sustainability and the
(buludna) considerably since impossible in these areas.
grasslands are mostly
adaptive management of GIAHS.
common along deep Create awareness and recognition of customary
ravines and hilly institutions and forms of social organization that
mountainside.
Settlement With as much 1.7% annual Despite the increasing underpin the traditional agricultural systems
population growth rate, demand for settlement through simultaneous educational, environmental,
settlement area has space, many muyongs
increased by about 30% have remained intact agricultural and rebuilding values programmes.
since the 1990s. since they are Develop a niche for eco-agro-tourism industry.
communally owned.
Develop a niche for marketing farm products.
Settlement development
was more common in Develop alternative livelihood/ economic activ-
areas along or nearby
roads and town centre.
ities that are based on and compatible with the
Rice fields Not much change in cover Muyongs are kept to bio-physical, socio-economic and cultural
(payoh) since irrigation water provide water for the characteristics.
supply is scarce, farmer payoh especially during
numbers are decreasing, the dry months.
farmers have aged and In terms of indigenous knowledge promotion, the
capital requirement for respondents lauded the beneficial outcomes of the gov-
planting has increased.
ernments School of Living Traditions (SLT) programme.
This is an educational programme that aims at raising
restriction on the allowable volume/number of spe- the awareness and appreciation of youths about their
cies to be harvested as raw materials for livelihood own traditional agriculture, music, dances, rituals, wood-
projects. Likewise, maintenance of muyong is carving and other arts. Learning modules were devel-
required according to the accepted practices and oped to better impart indigenous knowledge systems
rules of the DENR. Moreover, clear cutting of tree and practices in the formal schools, particularly primary
species within the area is prohibited. This permit and secondary education. The programme was made
serves as a policy instrument to regulate timber possible through the collaboration of National
extraction in muyong and bilid. Commission for Culture and the Arts (NCAA),
Table 1 further shows the focus groups perception National Commission for Indigenous Peoples (NCIP),
of the importance of muyong vis--vis the perceived Department of Education (DepEd) and Save the Ifugao
changes in land-use changes. The muyong system was Terraces Movement (an NGO).
perceived as vital in sustaining other land uses such
as natural forest, agroforestry farms, tree plantations, 3.2.7 Perceived problems in the Ifugao forests
grasslands and rice fields. Despite the demands for Two major threats to the integrity of muyongs and
settlement and agricultural spaces to support a grow- payoh were identified by the FGD participants. One is
ing population, the perceived critical roles of muyong the transition from the traditional organic to inor-
in soil and water conservation, regeneration, orchard ganic farming methods, which has generated negative
and agroforestry livelihood source have helped the impacts on soil and water. The use of synthetic ferti-
local community firmly keep their muyongs healthy. lizers was perceived to have degraded soil drainage
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES & MANAGEMENT 11
other purposes. Congress of the Philippines (Tenth 5. Are there formal or non-formal organizations in the com-
Congress); 1997 Oct 29; Manila. munity who are in charge of muyong? If yes, what are these
Rondolo M. 2001. Fellowship report. Tropical forest update (customary groups or created by NGO or govt for the project)
Vol. 11. No. 4. Japan: ITTO. 6. Who (group or individuals) have better access in
Rser RC. 2011. Indigenous people and traditional knowl- major decision-making and planning activities in muyongs
edge [Internet]. Berkshire Encyclopedia of Sustainability. (cutting, boundary delineation)?
[cited 2014 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.academia. How do community members participate in decision-
edu/841635/Indigenous_and_Traditional_Knowledge making and planning activities on muyong (planning, uti-
Serrano RC, Cadaweng EA. 2005. The Ifugao muyong: lization, monitoring and evaluations)?
sustaining water, culture and life. In: B. Durst et. al. Do you have muyong plans or documents?
editor. In search of excellence: exemplary forest manage- 7. Are there gender roles in muyong system? Please
ment in Asia and the Pacific. RAP Publication 2005/02. enumerate and describe?
Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organization of the 8. Are there new technologies in muyong (externally
United Nations; p. 103112. introduced)? Do these technologies agree or disagree with
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and traditional forestry/agricultural practices? (possible before
Cultural Organization). 2008. Impacts: the effects of and after UNESCO inscription comparison)
tourism on culture and the environment in Asia and Are there modifications in traditional forest manage-
the Pacific: sustainable tourism and the preservation of ment practices to ensure food security and healthy forest
the World Heritage sites of Ifugao Rice Terraces, cover?
Philippines; Bangkok. II. Forest extent and conditions
United Nations Development Programme Philippines. 1. How do you perceive changes in forest cover?
2010. Indigenous peoples in the Philippines. UNDP (increase or decrease, by how much in area or percentage)
Philippines [Internet]. [cited 2014 Sep 1]. Available - Area covered by natural forests (pine, rain tree,
from: http://www.undp.org/content/philippines/en/ dipterocarp)
home/library/democratic_governance/FastFacts-IPs. - Area covered by secondary forest (previously logged
html. stands)
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 2012. - Area covered by plantations (Gmelina, Mahogany
World intellectual property rights indicators. Geneva: planted)
WIPO; 198pp. - Area covered by grasses (cogon, runo and other
shrublands)
- Settlement areas
Appendix - Area covered by terraces/rice paddies
III. Ecosystem health
Guide Questions Used for Key Informants Interviews and - Deforestation trend, increasing or decreasing? (before
Focus Group Discussions Activities on the Indigenous and after 1995); what traditional knowledge help conserve
Knowledge and Practices for the Sustainable Management forests?
of Ifugao Forests in Cordillera, Philippines - Trend in areas covered with rice paddies (before and
I. Criteria: Enabling condition for SFM after 1995); what traditional knowledge help conserve
1. What are the customary laws, traditions, rituals paddies?
related to conservation of muyongs? - Any incidence(s) of landslide, forest fire that can be
Wood, water, land, wildlife, mountain attributed to mismanagement of forest?
2. How many households are still practicing traditional - Do you think poor forest management will affect
muyong today? (in percentage) (comparing before and after agricultural production and aesthetic value of the terraces?
UNESCO inscription in 1995) Please describe?
What factors enhance/degrade traditional forest man- IV. Forest production
agement? socio-economic, political, cultural? - Perceived changes in timber yield (for wood carving,
3. Are there conflicts between customary and govern- house construction etc.; please specify species) possible
ment policies and regulations on muyong management? before and after 1995 comparison
- Tenure rights (occupancy) - Perceived changes in non-timber yield (for fuel wood,
- Forest utilization rights (e.g. need to secure muyong medicine, etc.) possible before and after 1995 comparison
permit) - Perceived changes in farm yield (rice: tinawon and
- Others. other traditional varieties; non-traditional varieties) possi-
4. Are there financial support (from UNESCO, govt., ble before and after 1995 comparison
NGOs) for farmers to conserve muyong sites? projects on - How do traditional knowledge affect the profitability/
watershed protection, sustainable agriculture, reforestation, etc. marketability of forest and non-forest products?
Are/were these sustainable? V. Biological diversity
Do you consider external (UNESCO, DENR, National - Are there specific muyong practices that aim to pro-
Commission for Indigenous Peoples, or NGOs) fundings, mote habitat protection? Please describe
projects or programs helpful/harmful to promote/conserve - Are there species (flora and fauna) dwindling in
muyong practice/s? Why? number?
Policies - Do new and non-traditional technologies (forest and
Funds agriculture) affect biodiversity? How?
Promotion of tourism - Are there pests and diseases affecting muyong sites?
Promotion of forest conservation Possible before and after 1995 comparison
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES & MANAGEMENT 13
VI. Soil and water protection - What traditional knowledge help improve soil
- Water supply (decrease or increase) stability
- What traditional knowledge help sustain water supply VII. Economic, social and cultural aspect
- Water quality (improve or degrade) - Existence of mechanisms for equitable sharing of costs
- What traditional knowledge help improve water quality and benefits
- Soil fertility (improve or degrade) - Existence of conflict resolution mechanisms for resol-
- What traditional knowledge help improve soil fertility ving disputes among stakeholders