Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction (Lec1)
- Begin with the practical intention to solve the labor problem in a particular context,
place and time
- Core principle: Labor is human (+) but labor is not a commodity (-)
o Labor is a factor of production
o Labor markets behave differently from standard commodity markets and has to
be treated with higher moral significance because it is embodied in humans
- ER adopts an interdisciplinary approach, as it is one of the few fields that draws from
multiple social science disciplines
- Employment Relations: the study of the relations between labor and management
o The study of all aspects of people at work, their ERs and how these relationships
are governed. The 3 aspects of ER are:
o Labor: All working people who are in an ER and do not exercise substantive
authority, but are instead in a position of subordination to those who do.
Includes both union and non-union workers
Labor unions org of workers intended to rep and advance the interests
and values of its members. Are not legally recognized unless they have a
collective bargain agreement. A formal negotiation between management
representatives.
Union Density percent of paid member of the union. Density is higher in
larger workplaces
Labor federations associations of unions at provincial/national level
(CLC)
o Management: All working people who exercise substantive authority over others
in the workplace, but also authority with regards to organization decisions.
Authority comes from legal rights attached to property rights. Mangers are also
employees exercising power on behalf of capitalist/owners
o Capital: Part of a persons wealth/stock that results in revenue generation
Capitalists: those who invest stock into trade
- Relations: the relationship between capital/management/labor. The relationship is both
economic and social
o Economic: Workers sell their ability to work to management and are subject to
agreed upon terms and conditions of employment
o Social: In selling their ability to work, agree to submit to managerial authority
comply with day-to-day rules. Involves an interplay between
Cooperation: both parties function jointly to produce particular goods
and services, acting in accordance to a system of rules which each party
expects the other to adhere to
Conflict: when interests, goals, expectations of one party differs from
another
Power: ability to affect outcomes of others
Authority: ability to make decisions on behalf of those who legally
own/control the organization
- Governance: who gets to decide what and how, different parties depend on each other
to achieve different outcomes. One party affects others - could-be formal or informal.
Arrangement will result in different sources of power and authority; different outcome
Frames of Reference
- Competing perspectives/ideologies on the employment relationship that arise from
individuals theories about how the world works and ppl behave
o Neoliberal/Egoist:
o Managerial/unitarist:
o Orthodox (Pluralist)
o Liberal (Pluralist)
o Radical/Critical
- All perspectives recognize that L-M can have different goals/interests but they differ over
the extent to which this is the case and the ease with which these differences are
resolved in a market economy. They also differ over the impact and effectiveness of
unions and the need for changes to the current system. Also differ over the role of
power and conflict, who is at a disadvantage.
What is work?
1. Curse: everything was provided for Adam & Eve before they sinned, now they have to
work as punishment -> labor
2. Freedom: through ownership and markets
3. Commodity: people are a factor of production. Became deskilled and taken over by
technology
4. Occupational Citizenship: pursued by humans entitled to certain rights
5. Disutility: Detracts from your happiness, makes leisure expensive
6. Personal fulfillment: deindustrialization
7. Social Relations: Interaction is about social norms, institutions, power structures
8. Caring for others: like womens rights
9. Identity: who you are and where you stand in the social structure
10. Service: efforts to others
1900s-1920s
WWI (1914-1918)
- Countries tried to organize and harness their economies to maximize productivity for the
war effort
- War production led to an economic boom, low unemployment, higher employee
turnover, escalating wage pressures and problems with discipline and work effort
- Income inequality historically very high
Russian Revolution (1917)/Violent Labour unrest
- Winnipeg general strike (1919) strikes, unions organizing
- Bolshevik revolution (1917) caused concern that the labour problem would lead to
revolution in other countries
- Large corporations responded with more progressive employment practices
o Good will or high commitment approaches
o Industrial citizenship models of democratic workplace governance
o Invested in the development of human skills and education viewed I more
positive light
- By the 1920s the pre-war market model of HRM was abandoned
o Labour is human
o Central purpose of HR/IR/ER was to foster cooperation and a unity of interest
b/w L-M
o Still no formal HR functions until early 1900s
Paternalistic Approach:
- Industrial welfare/welfare capitalism
- Started providing workers with benefits
- Production increase in response to labour unrest after WWI
- Staff positions created to oversee and administer these activities, later a separate
employment office is created
- German companies were pioneers but most countries participated
- Assumed managers had a responsibility to look after workers
1930s-1965
Great Depression (1929-1939)
- Loss of profits led to reduced investment in employees
- Mass unemployment
- Labor increasingly looked to legislation rather than good personnel management for
solutions; institutionalization of conflict
o National labour relations act (1935) rights and protections for workers
o The Wagner Act right to organize a union and to bargain with management
o PC 1003 in Canada (1944) NDP precursor, govt intervention
HR School (1930-1940s)
- Hawthorne experiments what management does to improve productivity matters less
than whether employees see it as being done for their benefit or not
- Individuals are motivated by social needs and good on-the-job relationships and respond
better to work-group pressure than to management control activities
- Later extension into behavioral science
o Hierarchy of needs
o Theory X & Y of human behavior
WWII (1939-45)
- Collective bargaining and govt regulation of employment expanded
- Post-war production and hiring oom
- Employment benefit programs
Post-war Boom (1945-1965)
- Mass production for mass consumption
- 1950s and 60s were calm periods for HR
- union density receeds in 1950s
- HR focused on union prevention and maintaining a stable motivated workforce
- HR viewed as low status, little strategic value
- Highly developed and structured labor markets
Contemporary History
Mid 1960s-late 1970s
- End of post-war consensus between employers and labour
- Labour unrest/union military/strikes
o Heightened worker expectations, slowing economic growth
o Growing discontent with authoritarian nature of work organizations
o Rising consciousness of income inequalities, esp b/w male and female dominated
occupations
o Growing social and political consciousness
- Union density increased due to govt legalization of public sector collective bargaining
1980s
- Economic environment became increasingly hostile; globalization, free trade, shift
towards neo-liberal and regressive policies
1990s
- Focus on improving productivity and performance
- Downsizings were common
- Emerging view that people are an asset not a cost; HR should play a strategic role
- Gap b/w HR ideas and practices
- But if employees are an asset, why downsize?
o New technologies and management techniques
o Decline in union power & density