Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SLEUTHS OUT
HIDDEN CAUSES
By Stanley R. Bognatz, P.E.
Adding it up time went on, there were diminishing returns. It was appar-
ent that other reliability problems had yet to be identified.
We then explored structural vibration looking for
problematic vibratory modes using EMA on a spare cen-
trifuge combined with ODS testing of several units in the
production area.
Shop testing
Figure 2. A shop modal test overlay of 435 frequency response Modal testing on the spare unit developed and fine-
functions (FRFs) over a 300 Hz frequency span showed several tuned the model, optimized the data, and captured the
structural modes in the operating speed range. detail necessary for accurate results. This was important
because any testing in the production area would be
Based on the testing, the plant modified its operational at temperatures below 35F, where working conditions
procedures and replaced the bushings more frequently wouldnt be as favorable.
to keep clearances tighter. Other changes included bet- The model shown in Figure 1 was constructed using
ter maintenance procedures to minimize soft-foot and 150 test points (degrees of freedom, or DOFs). These cap-
frame strain, along with operational changes around bowl tured the structures global bending and twisting modes
handling, swing-arm tightness, belt tension, and drag-link and any localized modes of individual components and
maintenance. frame plate sections.
These relatively simple changes reduced monthly mainte- A control study established baseline responses. In prep-
nance expenditures nearly 50% within a few months. But, as aration for the test, the frame was mounted, the soft-foot
at each corner was reduced to below 0.005 in. through
shim adjustment, and hold-down bolts were equally
torqued. The bowl was filled with weights to simulate the
product mass.
Our first After establishing driving (reference) points, a force
hammer and tri-axial accelerometer captured single input,
multimeter with multiple output (SIMO) data to generate frequency response
Bending steel
Blower
Motor
Frame
Figure 4. A 203-Hz bending mode caused large vertical swing-arm Figure 6. Computer model of the air blower.
deflection at the spindle bearing.
The control test revealed several significant structural frequencies changed somewhat, but that the fundamental
modes in the operating speed range (Figure 2). These bending and torsional frame modes remained.
included an 11-Hz frame cantilever rocking mode, a pro-
nounced 43-Hz torsional mode around the vertical axis, Production area testing
and several combined bending/torsional modes at higher We chose a reliable centrifuge as a control unit for
frequencies. production-area ODS testing, using a roving tri-axial and
Figure 3 shows the 43-Hz torsional mode front-view. a stationary reference accelerometer. We collected cross-
From above, the swing-arm pivoted around the vertical spectral data from a majority of the DOFs used in the
(Z) axis very near the center of the frame, with significant
lateral movement at the spindle bearing. This mode would
increase the likelihood of contact between the spindle and
its bushing. The contact contributed to the known failure
mode characterized by surface galling defects from frame
bushing contact that caused spindle failure.
Additional tests were then performed with soft-foot and
hold-down bolt torque variations to gain better understand-
ing of how mounting variations affected the structural
responses. Overall, we noted that the mode shapes and
And here.
Comparing notes
impact testing. The testing revealed several significant SHAKING FROM THE BOTTOM UP
bending and torsional modes:
The bowl operating-speed response (262 Hz) produced
lateral spindle bearing deflection.
Distinct modal side-bands occurred at +/- 60 Hz cen-
tered around 262 Hz. These sidebands are analogous to
sideband activity in gearbox vibration, where the side-
band frequency helps identify an underlying cause.
The 203-Hz bending mode caused large vertical swing- Figure 7. Blower frame showing the 59.7 Hz (operating frequency)
arm deflection at the spindle bearing (Figure 4). lateral mode shape.
A torsional frame mode at 178 Hz caused lateral spindle
motion, similar to that in the shop model. cross-spectral data from the three machines. The unreliable
The lowest mode at motor speed (60 Hz) showed front- centrifuges showed a much broader array of modal activity,
to-rear frame rocking and upper frame torsion. and the relative responses at most frequencies were consid-
We then performed ODS testing on two unreliable cen- erably higher.
trifuges. Both machines had numerous spindle and drag Overall, the data from the shop and production areas
bushing failures throughout the previous year. The data showed primary bending and torsional modes that aggra-
showed fundamental frequencies at 60, 178, 203, and 262 vate spindle shaft deflection. That increases the likeli-
Hz, but with greater swing arm motion. We saw motor- hood of damage through contact with the frame bushing.
related 60-Hz sidebands around the structural modes fre- More localized modes that contributed to the overall
quencies of 178 and 262 Hz. Figure 5 is a comparison of the vibration were present on the swing arm, motor mount,
and side panels. Without the benefit of modal analysis,
these dynamics wouldnt have been revealed and reliabil-
ity would continue to suffer.
The plant is now investigating several alternatives to
increase the lateral and torsional frame sti ness and swing
arm bending stiff ness.
resonance that coincided with the operating speed, as that shapes of interest.
more resources at www.plantservices.com
was the most troublesome vibration frequency. However,
background noise from the adjacent Blower #2 made the TOPIC SEARCH
FRF data at 59.7 Hz too noisy to be useful, despite averaging Vibration and alignment Measuring your vibes
of multiple FRFs. The data outside of the operating speed Integrated maintenance Fix me
range showed more typical modal activity. Condition monitoring New tools for PdM
Because the two units both operate at 59.7 Hz, it stood to Vibration analysis Condition monitoring
under control
reason that the background vibration from Blower #2 could
PdM trends New tricks
be used as an excitation source for Blower #1.
Because there was sufficient vibration present on Blower #1, For more, search www.PlantServices.com using the
the background vibration would serve as a shaker tuned at keywords bearing, deflection, and resonance.
precisely the frequency needed to provide the excitation for
what we called the non-operating ODS. A roving triaxial and a
stationary reference accelerometer provided the cross-spectral Excessive vibration from resonances near running
data from 117 DOFs on the frame, motor, and blower. speed, or those excited during transient speed operation,
The non-operating ODS data in Figure 7 indicated the can reduce reliability. Modal analysis can be used to
frame was subject to a significant lateral (horizontal) reso- determine corrective actions.
nance at 59.7 Hz, causing it to flex in an S shape. This lateral
resonance and mode shape clearly explained the vibration Stanley R. Bognatz, P.E., is president, M&B Engineered Solutions,
sensitivity of Blower #1 to any changes in alignment, frame Inc. in Carbondale, Pa. Contact him at SRB@mbesi.com and (570)
position, and balance quality. With the resonance being 282-4947.
coincident with operating speed, any changes in these vari-
ables directly affected the units 1X vibration response in a
non-linear manner.
To correct this situation, 1 in. thick baseplates were
installed beneath the motor and blower. The blower base-
plate, 30.5 in. wide x 88 in. long, added 740 pounds to the
structure. It eliminated the resonance and the added mass