Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:600462 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
Entrepreneurial
The relationship between an behaviour of the
entrepreneurs culture and firm
the entrepreneurial behaviour
111
of the firm
Levent Altinay
Department of Hospitality, Leisure and Tourism Management,
The Business School, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
Abstract
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
Purpose This paper seeks to evaluate the relationship between Turkish entrepreneurs cultural
attributes and the entrepreneurial behaviour of their firms.
Design/methodology/approach The paper reports and analyses the findings of 227 face-to-face
structured interviews with Turkish entrepreneurs.
Findings This study illustrates that there is a strong relationship between the religion of an
entrepreneur and the firms recruitment, market segmentation and advice-seeking practices. The
English fluency of the entrepreneurs also influences their choice of using formal channels for advice.
Research limitations/implications Data collection was limited to London, and non-Turkish
entrepreneurs were excluded. Therefore, care should be taken in making generalisations from the
sample.
Practical implications This paper identifies those cultural attributes of the ethnic entrepreneurs
that need to be aligned with the wider economic environment of the host country.
Originality/value This study focuses on the most critical player in an ethnic firm the owner. It
evaluates the linkage between the cultural attributes of the owner and the entrepreneurial behaviour of
the firm.
Keywords Entrepreneurialism, Business ethnics, Organizational behaviour, Education, Language,
Turkey
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Recent studies showed that if ethnic businesses stay within their community, then their
business growth is limited. Inability to attract customers from outside of the ethnic
market, heavy reliance on unskilled co-ethnic labour, poor advice and limited capital
are the key constraints limiting the growth of ethnic businesses (Altinay and Altinay,
2006; Basu and Altinay, 2002; Barrett et al., 2002; Jamal, 2005; Nwankwo, 2005; Schnell
and Sofer, 2002). Therefore, to enable the growth of a business, a strategic breakout
into the mainstream markets is needed. This, however, requires innovation the
notion of openness to new ideas as an aspect of a firms culture (Hurley and Hult, 1998,
p. 44). Bamberger (1982) suggests that owners values and backgrounds are important
determinants of a small firms culture and its business practices. He states that: Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development
Vol. 15 No. 1, 2008
The author would like to acknowledge the support of The British Academy for the project The pp. 111-129
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Interrelationship between Culture and Entrepreneurship: An Exploration of Londons Turkish 1462-6004
Businesses (Project Reference: SG40942). DOI 10.1108/14626000810850874
JSBED The managers value systems determine whether a firm pursues the objective of growth or
independence, diversifies, enters foreign markets, adopts an active or passive behaviour on
15,1 the market . . . (Bamberger, 1982, p. 46).
Confirming these arguments, Lumpkin and Dess (1996) also advocate that a small
firms orientation is grounded in the values, intentions and actions of the individual
who is in charge; a small firm is simply an extension of the individual entrepreneur,
112 and therefore influenced by the inherent characteristics of the entrepreneur.
Looking at the inherent characteristics of the entrepreneur, ethnic minority
entrepreneurship literature suggests that cultural attributes of the entrepreneur
including education, language and religion play an important role in developing
entrepreneurial abilities and contributing to the survival of the entrepreneurs business
(Altinay and Altinay, 2006; Basu and Altinay, 2002; Basu and Goswami, 1999; Casson,
1991). However, in empirical terms, the relationships between the cultural attributes of
the entrepreneur and the entrepreneurial behaviour of the firm, still need to be
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
investigated. It is still not known whether the differences in the cultural backgrounds
of the entrepreneurs lead to any differences in their reliance on their ethnic resources, in
other words, on the use of ethnic capital, labour, advice and customers. Given this, this
paper aims to evaluate the relationship between Turkish entrepreneurs cultural
attributes and the entrepreneurial behaviour of their firms.
In this study, cultural attributes are operationalised in terms of: religion; the attitude
to education, since they both shape values and beliefs (Basu and Altinay, 2002), and an
entrepreneurs cultural skills (e.g. English fluency), since they are crucial in accessing
and leveraging social, financial and organisational resources (Ucbasaran et al., 2003,
Westhead and Cowling, 1995).
The entrepreneurial behaviour of the firm will be analysed in terms of the ethnic
firms reliance on co-ethnic capital, co-ethnic labour, co-ethnic information, since
during the early stages of their growth ethnic minority business survival depends on
ethnic resources (networks) such as access to cheap family labour and close community
networks which may offer advice and low-cost capital (Fadahunsi et al., 2000;
Waldinger et al., 1990), and co-ethnic market, since dealing with co-ethnic customers
influences business growth because it may be easier to transact business in a language
with which the entrepreneur is familiar (Werbner, 1990). The above classification of
cultural attributes and entrepreneurial behaviours is based on the broad guidelines
offered by the findings of previous research on ethnic enterprises (see Basu and
Goswami, 1999; Basu and Altinay, 2002; Altinay and Altinay, 2006).
Literature review
Religion and entrepreneurial behaviour
The previous studies which investigated the relationship between the religion and the
entrepreneurial behaviour of the firm (see Basu and Altinay, 2002; Metcalf et al., 1996;
Rafiq, 1992; Smallbone et al., 1999) treated Muslims as a homogeneous group and did
not differentiate between Muslims who practise their religion and those who do not.
We therefore divided our sample between practising and non-practising Muslims and
tried to find out if there are any differences between these two groups in terms of their
borrowing, recruitment, market segmentation and advice-seeking practices.
Religion and co-ethnic capital. Ethnic minority entrepreneurship literature suggests
that religion can be a barrier in front of business growth. Metcalf et al. (1996) found that
Pakistanis are less successful than Indians in self-employment because of cultural Entrepreneurial
factors, for example the influence of religion which prohibits the payment of interest on behaviour of the
(bank) loans. Similarly, Smallbone et al. (1999) argue that Pakistanis who wish to live
according to Islamic values are less willing to integrate with western culture and firm
consequently have not performed as well as non-Muslim businesses. This is supported
by other studies like that of Rafiqs (1992) which emphasises that Asian Muslim
businesses have not performed as well as non-Muslim businesses. The religion of the 113
owner/manager constitutes a barrier to capital access from banks and these Muslim
managers rely on the capital from co-ethnics for their business start-ups and
entrepreneurial activities. Contrary to these arguments, Basu and Altinay (2002) found
that Muslim entrepreneurs, including Turkish entrepreneurs, are pragmatic
businessmen who realise that they have to rely on bank borrowing if they wish to
start a business and if alternative modes of finance are unavailable. In our study, we
divided our sample into those Turkish entrepreneurs who practise their religion and
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
propose that:
H6. Turkish entrepreneurs who attain a higher level of education rely less on a
co-ethnic labour force.
Education and co-ethnic customers. In terms of expanding a business, recent research
found a positive effect of ones educational level on the likelihood to perceive
entrepreneurial opportunities (Clercq and Arenius, 2006). Walker (1988) noticed that
the businesses owned by Greeks in his inner city Sydney study sample underwent
expansion when a university-educated son joined the firms ranks. Peters (2002) states
that the Greek Kailis brothers attribute their success as exporters of lobster and other
seafood to their secondary/tertiary qualifications which, they maintain, better
equipped them to remain flexible and open to market forces and opportunities.
Levent et al. (2003) identified lack of education as an ethnic based obstacle to the
entrepreneurship and argued that those entrepreneurs who are keen on breaking out
into the mainstream market will need to attain higher levels of education.
Bachkaniwala et al. (2001) state that higher levels of education attainment may
lower the break out barriers. A higher level of education develops both the analytical
ability and the computational skill of the entrepreneur as well as communication skills.
Those who attain a higher level of education are better equipped to communicate with
customers, gather market intelligence and develop appropriate strategies which then
lead to a higher growth in their businesses (Casson, 1991). Based on these arguments,
we can advance our hypothesis:
H7. Turkish entrepreneurs who attained a higher level of education rely less on
co-ethnic customers and more on mainstream customers.
Education and co-ethnic advice. In the context of business planning and development,
business owners have regular meetings with the banks and venture capitalists and
received feedback on their applications for financial loans (Richbell et al., 2005).
Education can always contribute to the development of good relationship with a credit
officer (banker), as can good interpersonal skills (Basu and Goswami, 1999; Ibrahim
and Goodwin, 1986; Storey et al., 1989). It is also possible that firm owners with higher
levels of education have a higher level of confidence in themselves to seek advice from
JSBED banks, financial institutions and mainstream business advisers (Coleman, 2005; Rogers
15,1 et al., 2001; Young, 2002). Based on these arguments, we can advance our hypothesis:
H8. Turkish entrepreneurs who attain a higher level of education seek less advice
from co-ethnic sources.
Research design
This study investigated the entrepreneurial behaviour of Turkish speaking small
businesses in London by conducting 227 face-to-face structured interviews with
entrepreneurs who were working in service, retailing, catering, and import/export
sectors[1]. All the interviews were conducted in English and lasted about one hour, on
the basis of a detailed semi-structured interview schedule. Informants were asked
closed as well as open-ended questions on a wide range of issues relating to their
personal characteristics, family backgrounds, business form and structure, business
entry characteristics, business characteristics including operations and finance (see
Appendix, Figure A1 for a sample of questions).
The sample is drawn from a database of 1,200 Turkish-speaking entrepreneurs who
own micro (minimum two, maximum nine employees) and small businesses (minimum
ten, maximum 49 employees) in different boroughs of London. The database was
constructed by the researchers through ethnic minority business directories and
unpublished lists of names obtained from Turkish high commissions. The researchers
also managed to identify other businessmen via corporate databases published by
FAME, Turkish-British Chamber of Commerce, Olay Gazetesi and Turkish Business
Associations in London. The Turkish Business Guide (2000, 2001, 2002, 2003) was also
used to locate boroughs with a high concentration of Turkish-speaking businesses for
the study. The sample was randomly selected and an effort was made to include
entrepreneurs operating not only in traditional sectors like catering and retailing, but
also wholesaling and manufacturing.
This research marries the strengths of qualitative and quantitative research. In
particular, open-ended questions were used to collect qualitative data on a wide range
of issues pertinent to the entrepreneurs personal characteristics, family backgrounds,
business form and structure, business entry characteristics and ways of running
businesses (such as operations and finance). Closed questions were used to collect
JSBED quantitative data to measure differences in the entrepreneurs socio-cultural
15,1 backgrounds. The research results have been examined by using Chi-square
analysis in order to see the relationship between the entrepreneurs cultural attributes
and the entrepreneurial behaviour of the firm.
Qualitative data obtained from the open-ended questions were analysed by using
the coding analysis which allows for constant examination of conceptual interactions
118 and relationships, and the conditions under which they occur (Strauss and Corbin,
1990). A coding scheme was derived from the literature which reflected the research
framework, highlighting key elements that emerged. This coding scheme was a
two-by-two matrix encompassing the entrepreneurial behaviour of the firm as one axis
and the other components of the theoretical framework as the other axis (i.e. language,
education, religion). Much of the data analysis consisted of breaking down the answers
to open-ended questions manually into manageable blocks in order to classify them
under each code/grouping. This approach helped to cross-classify logically the
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
Do not practise
religion 97 53.3 182 62 34.3 181 38 20.7 184 21 11.6 181
Practise religion 23 53.5 43 21 48.8 43 20 46.5 43 11 25.6 43
Total 120 53.3 83 37.1 58 25.6 32 14.3
Pearson x 2 0.001 3.16 12.253 5.54
p 0.982 0.075 * 0.000 * * * 0.019 * *
df 1 1 1 1
Number of valid
cases 225 224 227 224
Notes: * Significant at 10 per cent level; * * significant at 5 per cent level; * * * significant at 1 per cent level
Entrepreneurial
entrepreneurial
behaviour
religion and
The relationship between
firm
behaviour of the
119
Table I.
JSBED their religion employ only one third. This is significant according to the Pearson
15,1 Chi-square analysis (see Table I). These findings to some extent confirm the arguments
of Manshor et al. (2003) that hiring managers religious characteristics influence their
selection preferences. Religious association appears to be stronger in the case of small
ethnic minority firms because as stated by one of the informants:
Small businesses are trying to survive against the competition and all other problems. We
120 have to have integrity among ourselves. If people from the same religion and the background
do not help and support each other, who else would do so?
It was also observed during the data collection stage that the help and support
mentioned above is mutual; cultural integrity and personal relationships between the
entrepreneurs and employees allow entrepreneurs to employ lower paid co-ethnics
with limited training and other incentives.
In terms of market segmentation, almost half of the customers of those
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
entrepreneurs who practise their religion have the same ethnic origin as the
entrepreneur. For those entrepreneurs who do not practise their religion, the figure is
only 20 per cent, which again is statistically significant (see Table I). These findings
raise questions about the findings of Basu and Altinay (2002) concerning the neutral
influence of the religion on the entrepreneurial behaviours of Muslim business
owners. The findings of this study showed that it is important to make a distinction
between those Muslims who practise their religion and those who do not. Those
Turkish entrepreneurs who do not practise their religion are more willing to break
out of their religious territories and make concessions like serving alcohol and
selling bacon and pork dishes in order to be able to respond to the competitive
demands of the market.
There is also a significant difference between those Turkish entrepreneurs who
practise their religion and who do not in terms of their sources of advice. The findings
of the study showed that those who practise their religion rely more on the advice from
co-ethnics whereas those who do not practise the religion rely less on co-ethnics for
advice (see Table I). In line with the arguments of Feld (1984) and Chaudhry and Crick
(2003), the preference of some Turkish entrepreneurs for using can be closely
associated with trust. The common religion appears to be a bridge between the
entrepreneurs and the co-ethnics in building and maintaining the trust between these
parties.
entrepreneurial
behaviour
education and
The relationship between
firm
behaviour of the
121
Table II.
JSBED higher levels of education rely more on co-ethnic advice from family and friends and
15,1 those who do not possess higher qualifications rely on more formal sources for advice.
This anomaly can be explained by the fact that those entrepreneurs who possess
higher qualifications either from their country of origin or from the UK do not have
enough business experience through a family or non-family business or as a
professional and they tend to rely on a trustworthy source to complement their
122 strengths. On the other hand, those who do not possess higher qualifications rely more
on formal sources for advice because they believe those advisers that they deem to be
professional sources of management expertise can complement their strength of
having experience in running businesses.
borrowing, recruitment and market segmentation practises (see Table III). This is
again surprising given that the ability to use language effectively helps entrepreneurs
to build confidence in their relationships with the banks, mainstream customers and
workforce (Levent et al., 2003; McEvoy and Hafeez, 2006).
What is interesting regarding the findings of the study is that those Turkish
entrepreneurs who are less fluent with the language rely more on co-ethnic sources
for advice and those are more fluent use formal sources for advice. Good language
communication skills give them a higher level of confidence in themselves to seek
advice from formal sources and this finding is in line with the arguments of Coleman
(2005), Rogers et al. (2001) and Young (2002). What is also distinctive with Turkish
entrepreneurs is that their inability to use the language effectively affects their level
of trust in formal sources. As one of the entrepreneurs stated:
I cannot even communicate with them effectively. How an earth I will find their advice
trustworthy or reliable.
These entrepreneurs do not have the confidence to use formal sources for advice
because of their English level.
Not fluent in
English 45 36.0 125 45 36.0 125 32 25.2 127 23 18.3 126
Fluent in English 37 37.4 99 38 38.4 99 26 26.0 100 9 9.2 98
Total 82 36.6 83 37.1 58 25.6 32 14.3
Pearson x 2 0.045 0.135 0.019 3.704
p 0.832 0.714 0.890 0.054 *
df 1 1 1 1
Number of valid
cases 224 224 227 224
Note: * Significant at 5 per cent level
Entrepreneurial
entrepreneurial
behaviour
English fluency and
The relationship between
firm
behaviour of the
Table III.
123
JSBED ethnic minority firms owners play an equally important role in determining the
15,1 entrepreneurial behaviour of the firm.
An internal orientation may offer a more protected market for ethnic minority firms,
but might not lead to break out and consequently to market expansion. An external
orientation, however, requires more skills and stronger cultural backgrounds both for
the entrepreneurs and for the business advisers and the policy makers. Language skills
124 appear to be essential for those who need to seek advice from external professional
sources. Given that the future survival of the ethnic minority firms depends on their
ability to benefit from the advice provided by business support networks and
government policy makers (Coleman, 2005; Smallbone et al., 2001), it appears essential
for ethnic minority business owners to strengthen their medium of communication
with these key stakeholder groups.
Alternatively, business support advisers and other professional bodies will need
to adapt their communication strategies with these ethnic minority groups in order
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
to be able to pass the message across to those who are not comfortable with the
language. In addition, having identified that those Turkish entrepreneurs with
higher levels of education rely more on co-ethnic advice, it appears that there is a
need to sell the benefits of advice to this group from those professionals outside
their community.
The findings of this study also revealed that religious practice can lead to a more
conservative management approach leaving very little room for entrepreneurial
behaviour or break out. Religion is a socio-cultural variable that needs to be properly
managed by the entrepreneurs. Religion and the spiritual integrity are between God
and the individual and should not act as an enabler for inward looking management
practices. Muslim entrepreneurs need to separate their religious beliefs from their
management practices or at least balance these two in order to be able to set an
external and long-term orientation for their firms.
At the moment, very little is known about Turkish minority businesses, how they
are evolving, the depth of ethnic and non ethnic-based networks that they create or
are drawn into, and very importantly, how they are managing to survive.
Accordingly, this paper initiates some points of discussion in seeking to provide a
systematic body of knowledge relating to the Turkish entrepreneurial processes in
the UK.
The findings of this study indicated that Turkish entrepreneurs exploit their
cultural backgrounds in order to gain competitive edge and contribute to the UK
economy. Those who have strong cultural backgrounds (i.e. language) move away
from their culturally protected environments and seek opportunities in the wider
liberal world. On the other hand, religion appears to lead to more conservative and
inward looking management practices. Turkish entrepreneurs need to adapt the
way religion is perceived in order to respond to changing global economic
conditions. Given that Turkey has started its accession talks with the European
Union (EU), it is important that the influence of Turkish entrepreneurs cultural
backgrounds on their management practices is more aligned with those in the EU.
Such a socio-cultural move could help them to further exploit their multifarious
cultural heritages and contribute to the economic and social development of a
broader-based community.
Note Entrepreneurial
1. Notes: service sector includes: dry cleaners, auto repairs, internet cafes, mini-cab operators, behaviour of the
money exchange, hair salons, and property management. Retail includes: car dealers, fashion
shops, supermarkets, travel agents, off-licences, second hand exchange goods, jewellery firm
shops, catering equipment dealers, cassette shops, butchers, frozen foods, drink and spirit
dealers, electrical goods and motor parts. Import/Export includes: garment manufacturers,
upholstery, food manufacturers and curtain manufacturer, food and drink wholesalers. 125
Catering includes: fishnchips, kebab and burgers, pizza, sandwich and fried chicken,
Mediterranean cuisine, Cypriot cuisine, Turkish cuisine, steak houses, and fish cuisine.
(Source: Personal Survey.)
References
Abdullah, A. (1992), The influence of ethnic values on managerial practices in Malaysia,
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
Jamal, A. (2005), Playing to win: an explorative study of marketing strategies of small ethnic
retail entrepreneurs in the UK, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 12 No. 1,
pp. 1-13.
Jones, T., McEvoy, D. and Barratt, G. (1992), Ethnic identity and entrepreneurial predisposition:
business entry motives of Asians, Afro-Caribbeans and Whites, paper presented at the
ESRC Small Business Initiative, University of Warwick, Coventry, 4 February.
Kloosterman, R., Van Der Leun, J. and Rath, J. (1999), Mixed embeddedness: in (formal)
economic activities and immigrant businesses in The Netherlands, International Journal
of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 252-67.
Levent, B.T., Masurel, E. and Nijkamp, P. (2003), Diversity in entrepreneurship: ethnic and
female roles in urban economic life, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 30
No. 11, pp. 1131-61.
Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (1996), Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and
linking it to performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 135-72.
McEvoy, D. and Hafeez, K. (2006), The changing face of ethnic minority entrepreneurship in
Britain, paper presented at the 4th Interdisciplinary European Conference on
Entrepreneurship Research, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, 22-24 February.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, M. (2001), Birds of a feather: homophily in social
networks, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 415-44.
Manshor, T.A., Jusoh, M. and Simun, M. (2003), Diversity factors and preferential treatments in
selecting employees, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 643-56.
Marlow, S. (1992), Take-up of business growth training schemes by ethnic minority-owned
small firms, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 34-46.
Metcalf, H., Modood, T. and Virdee, S. (1996), Asian Self-employment: The Interaction of Culture
and Economics in England, Policy Studies Institute, London.
Nwankwo, S. (2005), Characterisation of Black African entrepreneurship in the UK: a pilot
study, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 120-36.
Peters, N. (2002), Mixed embeddedness: does it really explain immigrant enterprise in Western
Australia?, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 8 Nos
1/2, pp. 32-53.
Rafiq, M. (1992), Ethnicity and enterprise: a comparison of Muslim and non-Muslim owned
Asian businesses in Britain, New Community, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 43-60.
Ram, M. and Sparrow, J. (1993), Minority firms, Racism and Economic Development, Vol. 8 Entrepreneurial
No. 2, pp. 117-29.
Rasheed, S.H. (2004), Capital access barriers to government procurement performance:
behaviour of the
moderating effects of ethnicity, gender and education, Journal of Developmental firm
Entrepreneurship, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 109-26.
Richbell, M.S., Watts, D.H. and Wardle, P. (2005), Owner-manager and business planning in the
small firm, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 496-514. 127
Rogers, C.D., Gent, M.J., Palumbo, G.M. and Wall, R.A. (2001), Understanding the growth and
viability of inner city businesses, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol. 6 No. 3,
pp. 237-54.
Schnell, I. and Sofer, M. (2002), Unbalanced embeddedness of ethnic entrepreneurship: the
Israeli Arab case, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 8
Nos 1/2, pp. 54-68.
Smallbone, D., Fadahunsi, A., Supri, S. and Paddison, A. (1999), The diversity of ethnic minority
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
15,1
128
JSBED
Appendix
Entrepreneurial
behaviour of the
firm
129
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
Figure A1.
Interview schedule
1. Erik E. Lehmann, Nikolaus Seitz, Katharine Wirsching. 2017. Smart finance for smart places to foster
new venture creation. Economia e Politica Industriale 44:1, 51-75. [CrossRef]
2. Vanessa Ratten, Hussain Rammal, Veland RamadaniIslamic Finance: An Entrepreneurial Management
Perspective 119-132. [CrossRef]
3. Salime Mehtap, Andrea Caputo, Massimiliano M. PellegriniEncouraging Female Entrepreneurship in
Jordan: Environmental Factors, Obstacles and Challenges 207-225. [CrossRef]
4. Vanessa Ratten, Veland Ramadani, Lo-Paul Dana, Shqipe Grguri-RashitiIslamic Entrepreneurship and
Management: Future Research Directions 227-242. [CrossRef]
5. Nurdan Ozaralli, Nancy K. Rivenburgh. 2016. Entrepreneurial intention: antecedents to entrepreneurial
behavior in the U.S.A. and Turkey. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research 6:1. . [CrossRef]
6. KremelAnna Anna Kremel The School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mlardalen University,
Vsters, Sweden . 2016. Fulfilling the need of business advisory services among Swedish immigrant
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy 5:3, 343-364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
7. Roxanne Zolin, Artemis Chang, Xiaohua Yang, Elly Yi-Hsuan Ho. 2016. Social Capital or Ethnic Enclave
Location? A Multilevel Explanation of Immigrant Business Growth. Thunderbird International Business
Review 58:5, 453-463. [CrossRef]
8. Chiara Peroni, Cesare A. F. Riillo, Francesco Sarracino. 2016. Entrepreneurship and immigration: evidence
from GEM Luxembourg. Small Business Economics 46:4, 639-656. [CrossRef]
9. Mehmet Ali Kseoglu, John A. Parnell, James D. Doyle. 2015. Market Orientation, Strategy and Revenue
Growth in the Turkish Hotel Industry. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 32:8, 1099-1116.
[CrossRef]
10. Darush Yazdanfar Department of Business, Economics and Law, Centre for Research on Economic
Relations, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden Saeid Abbasian Department of Tourism studies
and Geography, Mid Sweden University, stersund, Sweden Patrick Brouder School of Tourism and
Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa . 2015. Business advice strategies of
immigrant entrepreneurs in Sweden. Baltic Journal of Management 10:1, 98-118. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
11. Alessandro Arrighetti, Daniela Bolzani, Andrea Lasagni. 2014. Beyond the enclave? Break-outs
into mainstream markets and multicultural hybridism in ethnic firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional
Development 26:9-10, 753-777. [CrossRef]
12. Angela M. Balog, LaKami T. Baker, Alan G. Walker. 2014. Religiosity and spirituality in
entrepreneurship: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion 11:2,
159-186. [CrossRef]
13. Senay Sabah, Alan L. Carsrud, Akin Kocak. 2014. The Impact of Cultural Openness, Religion, and
Nationalism on Entrepreneurial Intensity: Six Prototypical Cases of Turkish Family Firms. Journal of
Small Business Management 52:2, 306-324. [CrossRef]
14. Waleed Omri, Audrey Becuwe. 2014. Managerial characteristics and entrepreneurial internationalization:
A study of Tunisian SMEs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 12:1, 8-42. [CrossRef]
15. Levent Altinay, Mark N. K. Saunders, Catherine L. Wang. 2014. The Influence of Culture on Trust
Judgments in Customer Relationship Development by Ethnic Minority Small Businesses. Journal of Small
Business Management 52:1, 59-78. [CrossRef]
16. Mehmet Ali Kseoglu, Cafer Topaloglu, John A. Parnell, Donald L. Lester. 2013. Linkages among
business strategy, uncertainty and performance in the hospitality industry: Evidence from an emerging
economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management 34, 81-91. [CrossRef]
17. Shiv K. Tripathi, Wolfgang Amann, Faustin KamuzoraTowards a Humanistic and Responsible Managerial
Decision Making Model: The Corporate Ubuntu Approach 122-134. [CrossRef]
18. Sonny NwankwoRoyal Docks Business School, University of East London, London, UK Ayantunji
GbadamosiRoyal Docks Business School, University of East London, London, UK Sanya OjoRoyal
Docks Business School, University of East London, London, UK. 2012. Religion, spirituality and
entrepreneurship. Society and Business Review 7:2, 149-167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
19. Levent Altinay, Melih Madanoglu, Roberto Daniele, Conrad Lashley. 2012. The influence of family
tradition and psychological traits on entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Hospitality
Management 31:2, 489-499. [CrossRef]
20. Donald B. KraybillElizabethtown College, Young Center for Anabaptist and Pietist Studies,
Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, USA Steven M. NoltHistory and Political Science Department, Goshen
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 23:13 19 May 2017 (PT)
College, Goshen, Indiana, USA Erik J. WesnerElizabethtown College, Young Center for Anabaptist
and Pietist Studies, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, USA. 2011. Sources of enterprise success in Amish
communities. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 5:2, 112-130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
21. Eda Gurel, Levent Altinay, Roberto Daniele. 2010. Tourism students entrepreneurial intentions. Annals
of Tourism Research 37:3, 646-669. [CrossRef]
22. Levent AltinayThe Business School, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK Catherine L. WangSchool
of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK. 2009. Facilitating and maintaining
research access into ethnic minority firms. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 12:4,
367-390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]