Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
OUTLINE FRAME
I. GENERAL .. 4
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
I. GENERAL
This Engineering Specification is issued to define design factors and performance requirements applicable to the
resistance spot welding of coated, uncoated, and laminated sheet steel
up to a thickness of 3.0 mm for individual sheets,
up to a maximum of 6.0 mm in total joint thickness, and
comprising up to three thicknesses of steel of the same or different gauge
used in the fabrication of assemblies. It harmonizes the requirements globally for Ford Motor Company and is
applicable to new programs.
The design factors and performance requirements apply to both automatic and manual welding applications.
Where manual applications may have an impact on design or performance, the relevant Body and
Manufacturing Engineering departments may agree on deviations.
Resistance spot welds of sheet steel exceeding 3.0 mm for individual sheets and/or exceeding 6.0 mm in total
joint thickness require a case-by-case exemption from the relevant Body and Manufacturing Engineering
departments. Exemptions will only be granted on the basis of a needs assessment.
Resistance spot welds comprising four thicknesses of steel are permissible as non-structural welds only, e.g. as
manufacturing tack welds.
This Engineering Specification also applies to spot welds on steel combinations which include weld sealers,
paint primers, and/or adhesives. Performance requirements of sealers and adhesives themselves are covered in
separate Engineering Specifications.
This Engineering Specification is a supplement to the released drawing part. All requirements herein must be
met in addition to all other requirements of the part drawing. Each section specifies the minimum measures
necessary for documenting compliance to this specification.
Preparation and submission of an acceptable control plan are the responsibility of the manufacturing source.
The manufacturing source will retain the original control plan and any later revisions per
QS-9000 and provide a copy to the design responsible Product Engineering activity.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Resistance welding is a process in which metals are joined by the heat generated by the resistance of the work to
the passage of electric current. This process involves a coordinated application of current and mechanical
pressure of the proper magnitudes and times. The amount of heat generated depends on three factors defined by
the following formula:
Q = I2*R*t
where:
Q = heat generated, joules
I = current, amperes
R = resistance of the work, ohms
t = duration of current, seconds
For resistance spot welding (RSW) in particular, electrodes or weld tips are used to form a nugget of weld metal
at the electrode site. See Figure 1. The characteristic parameters of this process are weld current, time, and
force.
Governing metal thickness (GMT) is used throughout this specification for the purpose of establishing design
and manufacturing parameters such as weld flange length, weld pitch, electrode selection, etc. GMT for double
or triple panel welding is defined as:
the thickness of the thinnest sheet in a double panel stackup
the thickness of the second thinnest sheet in a triple panel stackup of unequal thickness
the thickness of one of the equal sheets in a triple sheet stackup having at least two sheets of equal
thickness
Table I.3.2 outlines the generic gauge ratio limitations applicable to double and triple panel welding of sheet
steels. Ratios are based on the minimum yield strengths and positions of the steels in the stackup.
When one of the outside sheets in a stackup is a dual phase steel (DP) at or above 780 MPa minimum ultimate
tensile strength, transformation-induced plasticity steel (TRIP), martensitic steel (MSW), or boron steel, the
more stringent ratio limitations on the right side shall be used. See Table I.4.1 for relevant material
specifications. All other stackups may use the less stringent ratio limitations on the left side.
Deviations from these sheet metal gauge ratio requirements require the approval of the relevant Body and
Manufacturing Engineering departments. They can be granted on the basis of successful welding trials.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Ratio for DP
Ratio for MS,
>780, TRIP,
Rule Relationship GMT DR, HSLA, Example Example
MSW, and
and DP <780*
BORON*
1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Two Equal Thickness
1 X ~ X Y ~ X Y
(Least Concern Stack-up)
0.8 2.4 0.8 2.0
* See Section I.3.2 for additional description of rules for ratio limitations.
Table I.3.2: Gauge Ratio Limitations for Double and Triple Panel Welding
I.3.3.1 Definitions
The nugget diameter dL is the diameter of the fused material measured in a section cut as shown in
Figure 2.
The weld diameter dp is the diameter of the fused material measured in a destructive test. Figure 3
shows a button pulled out of one of the welded components. The fracture mode from a destructive test
may not always be a full button, as described below in Figures 4 through 6.
NOTE: For the purposes of this specification, dp defines the weld diameter, regardless of fracture type.
The permissibility of the partial plug or interfacial fracture is specified in Section III.5.5, Chisel Test
(Destructive).
o For pure plug fracture, the weld diameter dP is the average diameter of the surface area of the
exposed button as shown in Figure 4.
o For partial plug fracture, the weld diameter dP is the average diameter of the surface area of the
exposed button including the interfacial fracture zone as shown in Figure 5.
o For pure interfacial fracture, the weld diameter dP is the average diameter of the fractured surface
without the adhesion ring zone as shown in Figure 6.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
For double panel welding, the minimum weld diameter is determined by using the thickness of the
thinnest sheet.
For triple panel welding (defined as a single functional weld consisting of two double panel
combinations), the minimum weld diameter at each interface is determined using the thickness of the
thinnest sheet (GMT for a double panel condition). See Figure 7 for an example.
t1 = 0.7 mm
t2 = 1.0 mm
t3 = 1.3 mm
Table I.3.3.2 lists the minimum weld diameter measured following a teardown test, as described in III.5.3,
III.5.5, or III.5.6. The minimum weld diameter is the relevant dimension for joint design and weld layout. The
sheet metal thickness referenced in the table refers to the nominal thickness of the thinnest sheet at each weld
interface, as outlined on the engineering drawing or in the CAD model.
Manufacturing Welds
The following spot welds are considered manufacturing welds outside the regular spot weld pattern
supporting the Body Construction assembly process:
o spot welds executed as tack welds
o spot welds on toy tabs
o spot welds on hemmed flanges
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
These manufacturing welds can be executed as 2T, 3T, or 4T welds that do not need to comply with the
requirements listed in Table I.3.3.2 and do not need to be repaired. However, they do need to be
identified on engineering drawings and agreed upon by Body Engineering. The minimum weld
diameter requirements need to be determined during PV phase testing.
Laminated Steel
The minimum weld diameter is equivalent to that of homogeneous steel with a thickness equal to the
total thickness of the laminated steel. The weld button as described above must be pulled from all layers
of the laminated steel.
Tables I.3.4-1 and -2 define standard electrodes and associated minimum values for flange overlap and flange
width for double and triple panel welding. A design radius of 3 mm is assumed for all flange width values.
Other activities may have additional requirements for flange widths. Reductions to these standard values require
the approval of the relevant Body and Manufacturing Engineering departments.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
1) The use of 13/5 mm electrodes to achieve shorter flanges requires approval from the relevant Body and
Manufacturing Engineering departments.
2) In triple panel combinations, the 20/8 mm electrode may be replaced by a 16 mm electrode if the
thinnest sheet is 0.8 mm or less. Depending on the specific application, Manufacturing will determine
whether a 6 mm or 8 mm face is required.
3) The overall flange width dimensions Lwe shown in Figures 9 and 10 and Lww shown in Figure 10
consider the compensation of the relevant manufacturing tolerances and ensure the minimum clearance
between electrode and wall(s). They must be maintained in design as the minimum dominating
dimensions.
NOTE: The sum of Lfo and the design radius may be greater than the values for Lwe or Lww shown in
Tables I.3.4-1 and I.3.4-2. In such cases, Lwe or Lww must be increased to match that sum.
D D D
R R
d d d R
Lfo
Lfo /2
Lfo/2
(a) (b)
Figure 11: Distance of Weld from Edge for Flat Overlap (a) and Wall-to-Edge (b) Condition
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Figure 13 shows the electrode positioned in a joint condition with a large bending angle .
Lfo
Lwe
Depending on the bending angle , the flange width dimension Lwe outlined in Tables I.3.4-1 and I.3.4-2 (see
Figures 9 and 10) is reduced as follows:
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
The weld pitch is the distance between the centers of two adjacent spot welds as shown in Figure 14. The
minimum weld pitch values are listed in Table I.3.5 and must be maintained in order to reduce the risk of a
shunt effect.
NOTE: When a double panel weld is next to a triple panel weld, the minimum weld pitch based on the triple
panel GMT must be used.
0.50 - 0.79 20
S
0.80 - 1.24 25
1.25 - 1.99 30
2.00 - 3.00 35
Table I.3.5: Minimum Weld Pitch Fig. 14: Spot Weld Pitch S
Deviations from these pitch requirements require the approval of the relevant Body and Manufacturing
Engineering departments.
I.3.6 Flatness
The area to be welded should be flat and smooth to ensure proper electrode-to-metal and metal-to-metal contact.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
This Engineering Specification covers the use of the following steels categories in uncoated and coated
condition:
Table I.4.1: Applicable Categories of Base Sheet Steels Covered by this Specification
The text of the referenced Ford material specifications is available from the following web link
http://www.mats.ford.com/mats/scripts/spec_by_mtlCat.html, Metals 1A-99A.
New steel types are under constant development. In the case of steel types not covered by Table I.4-1 the
relevant Body and Manufacturing Engineering departments shall be contacted.
The use of coatings not listed in Table I.4-2 requires the approval of the relevant Body and Manufacturing
Engineering departments.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
A group size of one is not permitted. If the weld is essential, the joint should be redesigned to
incorporate a redundant weld or a mechanical fastener.
A group size of two is not recommended. If both welds are essential, the joint should be redesigned to
incorporate a redundant weld or a mechanical fastener. If a second weld was added as noted above to
avoid a one-weld group, a note can be added to the engineering drawing to allow one discrepant weld in
the group. This requires approval of the relevant Body and Manufacturing Engineering departments.
For this Engineering Specification, Table I.8.1 defines three distinct levels of quality for spot welds:
A spot weld that meets the A spot weld that meets at least A spot weld that is below
minimum weld diameter 75% of the minimum undersized or does not meet all the
requirements at each interface satisfactory weld diameter at relevant requirements of Section III.
(Table I.3.3.2) and all the each interface (Table I.3.3.2)
relevant requirements of and all the relevant Note: A missing spot weld is
Section III. requirements of Section III. classified as discrepant.
Table I.8.1: Levels of Spot Weld Quality
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Table I.8.2 defines the requirements for determining weld group effectiveness based on the quantity of welds
designated, the quantity of satisfactory welds, and the quantity of satisfactory and undersized welds combined.
NOTE: Both "Minimum Satisfactory" AND "Minimum Satisfactory + Undersized" criteria from Table I.8.2 must be met in
order to have an effective group.
Reaction plans for containment and repair according to local weld control plans shall be executed in any one of
the following cases:
the criteria in Table I.8.2 are not met
a single control weld is discrepant
adjacent welds are discrepant, even if they are from different groups (for example, if G1 and G2 in
Figure 15 had adjacent discrepant welds, reaction would be required)
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Group G1,
8 spot welds
Group G2,
Control welds 3 spot welds
as assigned Group G3,
by Body 4 spot welds
Engineering
Control
3 Thickness
2 Thickness Weld
Group G4,
10 spot welds G = Group
Examples of how to consider control welds in group testing, using Figure 15:
o Group G1 follows the requirements of Table I.8.2 for a group of eight spot welds, but none of the
control welds shown above are allowed to be discrepant.
o Group G4 follows the requirements of Table I.8.2 for a group of 10 spot welds, but the control
weld shown above is not allowed to be discrepant.
NOTE: Start or end welds of groups relevant to attribute performance may be identified as control
welds, as shown in this example.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Production Validation (PV) tests are used to obtain an initial estimate of the process potential to produce parts
that conform to engineering requirements, and to identify causal or predictive relationships between significant
design and process characteristics (to be used for process control at production rates). The tests must be
completed successfully using initial parts from production tooling and production process before Part
Submission Warrant (PSW) approval and authorization of production parts can be issued. Sampling plans for
PV testing must be included in the control plan.
In addition, tests can be done on prototype level parts or vehicles to the same extent as outlined for PV-testing.
This does not replace the necessity to run PV-phase testing as described above.
In-Process (IP) tests are used to further understand the relationship between significant design and process
characteristics and to establish a basis for continuing improvement. Tests must be completed with production
parts on an ongoing basis. Sampling plans for both IP testing and evaluation of the significant process
characteristics must be included in the control plan. When the process is found to be out of control or the test
acceptance criteria are not met, the reaction plan approved in the control plan shall be invoked.
Welds that do not meet the requirements outlined in Section II., Summary of Production Validation and In-
Process Tests, and Section III., Test Procedures and Requirements, of this Engineering Specification need to be
repaired following the reworking procedure as outlined in Section III.6.
The tables that follow summarize the various PV and IP tests and the acceptance parameters for each. They form
the basis on which to develop a complete control plan for these and their related significant process
characteristics. The control plan will include frequencies, sample sizes and reaction plans; see Ford Quality
System Requirements, QS-9000.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Test Test Characteristic Lower Tolerance Target Value Upper Tolerance Minimum Minimum
Number Limit Limit Sample Size Sample
Frequency
III.2.2 Welding Current over Time [A] As determined in As determined in As determined in see 1) see 1)
PV testing PV testing PV testing
III.2.3 Electrode Force [N] As determined in As determined in As determined in see 1) see 1)
PV testing PV testing PV testing
1)
Ford
Minimum Sample Size and Frequency to be determined by the manufacturing plant personnel responsible for the control plan in conjunction with the design responsible body-engineering activity and the
relevant quality departments as well as other appropriate functions. Reference:
Ford of Europe: Document VOPQUE-612, available at http://www.voqoeu.ford.com
Ford North America: Document VOPSSN-008, available at http://www.vo.ford.com/ss/procedures/procd-files/ssn008c.pdf
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Test Test Characteristic Lower Tolerance Target Value Upper Tolerance Minimum Minimum
Number Limit Limit Sample Size Sample
Frequency
III.3.2 Spot Weld Count As defined in Table As specified on the No additional spots see 1) see 1)
I.8.2 engineering drawing or allowed
relevant CAD model
III.3.3 Spot Weld Position 10.0 mm from target As specified on the Not applicable see 1) see 1)
position engineering drawing or
relevant CAD model
III.3.4 Distance From Edges As defined in III.3.4 As defined by the spot Not applicable see 1) see 1)
weld position
III.3.5 Classes of Weld Finish, See Section III.3.5 for See Section III.3.5 for See Section III.3.5 for see 1) see 1)
Surface Indentation, and details details details
Expulsion
III.3.6 Burn Through Not applicable Not present Not applicable see 1) see 1)
III.3.7 Surface Cracks Not applicable Not present Not applicable see 1) see 1)
III.3.8 Surface Porosity Not applicable Not present Not applicable see 1) see 1)
1)
Ford
Minimum Sample Size and Frequency to be determined by the manufacturing plant personnel responsible for the control plan in conjunction with the design responsible body-engineering activity and the
relevant quality departments as well as other appropriate functions. Reference:
Ford of Europe: Document VOPQUE-612, available at http://www.voqoeu.ford.com
Ford North America: Document VOPSSN-008, available at http://www.vo.ford.com/ss/procedures/procd-files/ssn008c.pdf
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Test Test Characteristic Lower Tolerance Target Value Upper Tolerance Minimum Minimum
Number Limit Limit Sample Size Sample
Frequency
III.4.2 Nugget Diameter 85 % of required Matching Not applicable see 1) see 1)
minimum weld minimum weld
diameter (Table diameter (Table
I.3.3.2) I.3.3.2)
III.4.3 Weld Penetration See Section III.4.3 Not applicable See Section III.4.3 see 1) see 1)
for details for details
III.4.4 Porosity Permitted in center of Not present Not applicable see 1) see 1)
weld at individual or
cumulative size of
25% of weld area.
III.4.5 Cracks Permitted in center of Not present Not applicable see 1) see 1)
weld at individual or
cumulative length of
20% of nugget
diameter.
III.4.6 Inclusions Permitted in center of Not present Not applicable see 1) see 1)
weld at individual or
cumulative length of
20% of weld area.
III.4.7 Hardness Limits See Section III.4.7 See Section III.4.7 See Section III.4.7 see 1) see 1)
for details for details for details
1)
Ford
Minimum Sample Size and Frequency to be determined by the manufacturing plant personnel responsible for the control plan in conjunction with the design responsible body-engineering activity and the
relevant quality departments as well as other appropriate functions. Reference:
Ford of Europe: Document VOPQUE-612, available at http://www.voqoeu.ford.com
Ford North America: Document VOPSSN-008, available at http://www.vo.ford.com/ss/procedures/procd-files/ssn008c.pdf
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Test Test Characteristic Lower Tolerance Limit Target Value Upper Minimum Minimum
Number Tolerance Limit Sample Size Sample
Frequency
III.5.2 Static Tensile Test As determined by Body Not applicable Not applicable see 1) see 1)
Engineering
III.5.3 Peel Test Minimum weld diameter dP Not applicable Not applicable see 1) see 1)
as outlined in Section I.3.3.2
III.5.4 Impact Test See Section III.5.4 for details See Section III.5.4 for See Section see 1) see 1)
details III.5.4 for details
III.5.5 Chisel Test Minimum weld diameter dP Not applicable Not applicable see 1) see 1)
(Destructive) as outlined in Section I.3.3.2
III.5.6 Destructive Test Minimum weld diameter dP Not applicable Not applicable see 1) see 1)
Using a Machine as outlined in Section I.3.3.2
III.5.7 Ultrasonic Test Not applicable See Section III.5.7 for Not applicable see 1) see 1)
details
III.5.8 Chisel Test Not applicable No separation of sheets in Not applicable see 1) see 1)
(Non-Destructive) stackup
III.5.9 Durability/Fatigue Not applicable No cracks in weld or HAZ and Not applicable see 1) see 1)
Test no separation following
completion of full vehicle
PASCAR Phase 1 and 50 % of
PASCAR Phase 2 testing
according to CETP 00.00-
R310
1)
Ford
Minimum Sample Size and Frequency to be determined by the manufacturing plant personnel responsible for the control plan in conjunction with the design responsible body-engineering activity and the
relevant quality departments as well as other appropriate functions. Reference:
Ford of Europe: Document VOPQUE-612, available at http://www.voqoeu.ford.com
Ford North America: Document VOPSSN-008, available at http://www.vo.ford.com/ss/procedures/procd-files/ssn008c.pdf
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
III. 1 Applicability of Test Procedures for Production Validation (PV) and In-Process (IP) Test Phases
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
III.2.1 Introduction
Resistance spot welding equipment used for the production of parts according to this Engineering Specification
shall be equipped with a built-in weld parameter control and monitoring unit. The target values and the upper
and lower tolerance limits for the parameters below shall be determined in Product Validation (PV) tests
individually for each spot welding application. They shall be included in the process control plan and later be
applied on the basis of a 100 % sampling rate during In Process (IP) conformance testing. Non-conforming
welds should be identified and processed for additional inspection and possible rework.
During IP-monitoring, the welding current over time shall stay within the welding current window as defined in
PV-testing individually for each spot welding application.
During IP-monitoring, the electrode force shall stay within the force window as defined in PV-testing
individually for each spot welding application. Note that 100% sampling may only be possible if the weld gun is
equipped with a load cell or transducer.
III.3.1 Introduction
Visual inspection shall be performed without the aid of magnification to detect obvious discrepancies on the
surface of the weld. The intent of this type of inspection is also to verify that the number and location of the
welds is as outlined on the engineering drawing or relevant CAD model.
Dimensional compliance shall be checked using a caliper gauge, scale, or a template where applicable.
Table III.3.2: Target Value and Tolerance Limits for Spot Weld Count
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Spot welds shall be placed as specified on engineering drawings or relevant CAD models. Figure 17 shows the
permissible deviation of the spot weld location (center of weld) from its nominal position. Note that
discrepancies such as Edge Condition UA1 described in III.3.4 may override this positional tolerance.
Nominal Position
(Center of Weld)
20 mm
NOTE: The weld pitch shall not be reduced below the minimum pitch (see Section I.3.5).
Acceptable Conditions - The following two distance-from-edge conditions are considered to be acceptable
under the described restrictions and do not represent a discrepant weld:
Condition A1: Describes a position where both the inner (A) and outer (B) diameter of the visible
electrode indentation (ISO 5821 Type B electrode) remain inside the trim edge without causing trim
edge deformation. This condition is acceptable for ALL types of flanges.
Condition A2: Includes the effect of trim edge deformation. It is acceptable provided diameter A stays
within the projected trim edge as shown. This condition is acceptable only for Class 2 and Class 3
flanges that are not classified as functional flanges1).
B B
A A
1) Flanges are classified as functional if they carry a secondary function such as the attachment of a seal
against water ingress (e.g. the door opening flange). See Section III.3.5 for the definitions of surface
classes.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Unacceptable Conditions - The following distance-from-edge conditions are considered to be unacceptable and
represent a discrepant weld:
Condition UA1: Describes a position where the inner diameter A of the visible electrode indentation
(ISO 5821 Type B electrode) extends beyond the trim edge. This condition is not acceptable and
represents a discrepant weld.
Condition UA2: Describes a case where the trim edge has been smashed. This condition is not
acceptable and represents a discrepant weld.
B
A
The weld finish requirements described below are based on the requirements for surface quality per Engineering
Specification ESF75B-11007-AA, available from http://forddoc.secure24.ford.com/.
This weld finish classification covers sheet metal surfaces that must be free from surface markings or
imperfections after metal finishing to the extent that they are not apparent after painting and within the
limits as described below. Spot welds for subsequent metal finish to a Class 1 metal surface should be
held to the least possible marking on the surface to be metal finished. Weld marking must not exceed a
depth such as can be removed by metal finishing. Metal finishing shall not remove more than 10 % of
the surface thickness, meaning a marking in excess of 10 % of surface sheet thickness must be filled
prior to metal finishing. No surface expulsion of metal will be acceptable.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
The term surface indentation describes the geometry of the depression caused by the electrodes. The key
dimensions as shown in Figure 22 are:
Indentation I, expressed as a percentage of the thickness of the outer sheet and
Minimum remaining total thickness X, expressed as a percentage of overall stackup (t1 + t2 + t3)
I t1
t2
X
t3
Table III.3.5.2: Target Value and Tolerance Limits for Surface Indentation and Expulsion
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Figure 23: Top View of Weld Figure 24: Section Cut with Acceptable
with Acceptable Indentation Indentation (Same Weld as Fig. 23)
Figure 25: Top View of Weld Figure 26: Section Cut with Unacceptable
with Unacceptable Indentation Indentation (Same Weld as Fig. 25)
A spot weld shall be classified as discrepant if it shows any sign of a hole through the weld.
A spot weld shall be classified as discrepant if it shows any sign of surface cracks.
A spot weld shall be classified as discrepant if it shows any sign of surface porosity.
III.4.1 Introduction
Dimensional and visual inspection of a section cut gives an insight into the weld properties and could be used
during the series of PV- or IP-tests. Section cuts may be analyzed to detect the discrepancies described below.
In addition, section cut analysis could be used for root cause analysis in case of discrepancies during the IP-
phase. Section cuts shall be made through the center of the weld, perpendicular to the sheets.
NOTE: Relevant expert departments shall be consulted in case these acceptance criteria cannot be met.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Measured in a section cut, the nugget diameter, dL, shall be at least 85 % of the minimum weld diameter as listed
in Table I.3.3.2.
Figure 28 shows the relevant diameter dL for a double panel welding condition.
Nugget
t1
p1
p2
t2
dL
Figure 28: Nugget Diameter and Weld Penetration Double Panel Welding
In the case of section cut analysis on triple welding conditions, dL1 and dL2 are measured to determine
compliance with the minimum nugget diameter requirements, as shown in Figure 29.
dL1 Nugget
p1
t1
t2 p2
p3
t3
dL2
Figure 29: Nugget Diameter and Weld Penetration Triple Panel Welding
The weld penetration, p, shall be measured in a section cut as shown in Figures 28 and 29. The upper and lower
tolerance limits listed below serve as guidelines:
p1 p
Double Panel Welding: 0.4 0.8 and 0.4 2 0.8
t1 t2
p1 p2 p
Triple Panel Welding: 0.3 0.8 and = 1 and 0.3 3 0.8
t1 t2 t3
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
III.4.4 Porosity
Pores are cavity type discontinuities formed by gas entrapment during solidification. Pores should not be
present, but are permitted in the center of the weld at an individual or cumulative size of 25% of the weld area.
III.4.5 Cracks
Cracks are fracture type discontinuities characterized by a sharp tip and high ratio of length and width to
opening displacement. Cracks should not be present, but are permitted in the center of the weld at an individual
or cumulative size of 20% of the nugget diameter (dL for double panel or dL1 for triple panel welding).
III.4.6 Inclusions
Inclusions are foreign solid materials such as impurities entrapped in the weld. Inclusions should not be present,
but are permitted in the center of the weld at an individual or cumulative size of 20% of the weld area.
NOTE: The relevant Body and Manufacturing Engineering departments shall be consulted in case that the
imperfections described in III.4.4, III.4.5, or III.4.6 occur off the center of the weld and/or in case more than
one discrepancy occurs in a single weld.
Hardness testing shall be performed according to ISO 14271 (Europe) on spot weld section cuts to determine the
Vickers hardness (low load range, HV 1) of the weld nugget, the heat affected zone, and the parent sheet metal.
Initial Parent Sheet Hardness In Table III.4.7 lists the permissible increase in
Metal Hardness Weld Nugget hardness based on the initial parent sheet metal
[HV 1] [HV 1] hardness.
< 120 < 350
The material used and the welding techniques
> 120 < 200 < 450
employed shall be such that the hardness of the
> 200 < 300 < 550 weld nugget and the heat-affected zone do not
> 300 < 600 exceed the limits listed in Table III.4.7.
NOTE: The relevant expert department shall be consulted in case that these limits cannot be met.
III.5.1 Introduction
Weld strength tests are performed as PV- and IP-tests to ensure that the weld joint meets the individual
performance requirements in terms of static and dynamic loads. Fracture or separation during a test is supposed
to occur in the base metal or the heat-affected zone (HAZ), but not in the weld. For non-destructive tests, the
applied test method shall indicate the presence of a weld.
Note: Non-destructive tests are not suitable to determine compliance with the minimum weld diameter
requirements outlined in Section I.3.3.2.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
The static tensile test shall be performed in accordance with one of the following:
ISO 14273, Specimen Dimensions And Procedure For Shear Testing Resistance Spot, Seam And
Embossed Projection Welds (Europe).
AWS D8.9M:2002 Recommended Practices for Test Methods for Evaluating the Resistance Spot
Welding Behavior of Automotive Sheet Steels (North America).
The test specimen shall be manufactured using base sheet metal identical to production conditions in terms of
material specification, gauge and base sheet metal coating. The weld diameter shall be as indicated in Section
I.3.3.2. The test specimen shall be loaded gradually and continuously until separation occurs. Figure 30 shows
the test setup and loading direction. Table III.5.2, as a reference, lists typical minimum shear strength values for
two sheets of Mild Steel in equal thickness combinations.
Figure 30: Static Tensile Test, DIN EN ISO 14273 Table III.5.2: Ultimate Shear Strength
Additional strength data for other steel combinations may be available from relative Body and Manufacturing
Engineering departments or from active databases such as Join-NET at
http://gbwux014.gothenburg.vcc.ford.com/mtdatab/joinnet/.
The static peel test shall be performed in accordance with one of the following:
ISO 14270, Specimen Dimensions And Procedure For Mechanized Peel Testing Resistance Spot, Seam
And Embossed Projection Welds (Europe).
AWS D8.9M:2002 Recommended Practices for Test Methods for Evaluating the Resistance Spot
Welding Behavior of Automotive Sheet Steels (North America).
The test specimen shall be manufactured using base sheet metal identical to production conditions in terms of
material specification, gauge and base sheet metal coating. The weld diameter shall be as indicated in Table
I.3.3.2. The test specimen shall be loaded gradually and continuously until separation occurs. Separation is
acceptable in the base sheet metal or in the HAZ, but not in the weld.
Impact tests shall be performed with those welded joints that are subjected to loads at high speeds to verify
integrity of the welded joint.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
The test set up and test conditions shall be agreed upon with the relevant Safety Attribute Team taking into
consideration the location and loading condition of the relevant joint on the vehicle. Testing can be performed
on either components or subassemblies (e.g. sled testing, drop testing) that contain the welded joint.
Destructive chisel testing requires separating the base sheet metal adjacent to the weld using a chisel. The chisel
test can be applied on a subassembly or complete body. It is performed to validate adequate fusion by
measuring weld diameter and comparing it against the minimum weld diameter requirements as outlined in
Section I.3.3.2. The chisel according to ISO 10447 is shown as an example in Figure 26 for Europe. Figure 27
shows the chisel used in North America.
40
R 70
All edges to be
15 free of burrs
24 9 12.5
Figure 27: Destructive Test Chisel Used in North America (ref. tool # 5ZF-15063)
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Figure 6 in Section I.3.3.1 illustrates a typical interfacial fracture face. It is characterized by a lack of a
button. The occurrence of the interfacial fracture or partial plug fracture is acceptable for the
combinations listed below provided there is evidence of good metal bonding at the weld, i.e. the fracture
face is crystalline and there is metal distortion in the parent metal around the weld.
An interfacial fracture typically occurs in conjunction with combinations of thick sheets (for
example 2.0 mm GMT).
A partial plug or interfacial fracture may occur on spot welded joints involving homogenous and
heterogeneous combinations of the sheet steel categories DP, TRIP, MSW and BORON, even at
lower gauges. The permissibility of these fractures shall be determined during PV testing.
The occurrence of a partial plug failure or interfacial fracture is permissible for these combinations
only on the basis of compliance with the weld penetration requirements as outlined in Section
III.4.3.
NOTE: The relevant expert departments shall be consulted in case partial plug failures or
interfacial fractures occur on combinations other than those listed above.
A peel testing bench (weld teardown machine), tensile machine, and/or hydraulic tool ("jaws of life") may be
utilized in lieu of a chisel for destructive inspection. Welds are evaluated using the same criteria.
Spot welds can be evaluated by reading the echo from an ultrasonic probe. Some of the conditions that may be
observed during ultrasonic inspection are small nugget size, lack of fusion, poor penetration, burnt welds (too
hot), voids, and pores. These are considered discrepancies if they exceed the limitations defined in other
sections of this specification. For triple panel welding, the nugget diameter at the two-sheet interface with the
smaller GMT, defined as dL1 in Section III.4.2, is the dominating dimension in ultrasonic testing.
In a non-destructive chisel test, a chisel or pry bar is used as shown in Figure 32 to separate the steel sheets
between adjacent spot welds. The chisel is driven with a hammer until the sheets start to separate at the sides of
the weld nugget. The purpose is to apply enough force to deform the material and show the sheets are fused, but
not completely separate the sheets. Sheets that separate with no evidence of fusion indicate a discrepant weld
condition. If a button is accidentally pulled during this test, the sheets must be brought back together and the
weld must be repaired.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Figure 31: Pry Bar Chisel Used in North America (ref. tool # 5ZF-12236)
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Full vehicle durability testing according to CETP 00.00-R310 (PASCAR test) shall be performed on a test
vehicle equipped with the relevant welded joints. These joints shall be welded to meet all requirements of this
specification.
No fatigue cracks in the welded joints and no lack of compliance to full vehicle PASCAR Phase 1 and
completion of half of PASCAR Phase 2 testing.
Spot welds that do not meet the acceptance criteria of this Engineering Specification may be repaired by one of
the following methods. The preferred method is resistance spot welding. Specific permission must be obtained
from Product Development Engineering to use other methods, but agreements may be made to cover general
situations.
An additional effective spot weld shall be placed as close as possible to the actual position of the discrepant spot
weld without interfering with it. If spacing allows, it shall be placed half way between the discrepant and the
next existing spot weld.
A plug weld using gas metal arc welding as described in specification ESBM5A-1B310 may be used as a repair
for a single spot weld or two plug welds for two adjacent spot welds. That specification includes the wire type
to be used.
The plug weld is made on the side of the thinnest metal, so the hole drilled for the weld shall be in the thinnest
outer metal. The hole is made with a specially ground drill so that the heavy metal backup thickness is left
essentially intact after drilling completely through the thinner metal(s). The following table shows required hole
sizes for plug welds.
In a plug weld repair, the entire hole, including the periphery of the hole, must be fused to the heavy metal part.
Weld build-up that is detrimental to the dimensional integrity, appearance, or function must be made nearly
flush by grinding (grinding completely flush may reduced the strength of the weld).
Note: For triple panel welding, the thinnest permissible backup metal thickness which is not drilled is 2.0mm.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Fusion fillet welding as described in the latest version of the gas metal arc welding specification ESBM5A-
1B310 may be used as a repair for suspected discrepant welds. That specification includes the wire type to be
used. The following table shows the required fusion weld length for each discrepant spot weld.
A suitable sealer shall be applied over all fusion welds that are used to repair missing spot welds located in areas
of the product that are vulnerable to water and dust leaks.
III.6.4 Riveting
One suspected discrepant spot weld may be repaired by replacement with one blind rivet per the following table.
The type of repair rivet used is to be a domed head steel rivet with a steel mandrel. To insure discrepant spot
weld repairs are leak free, apply a suitable sealer over all rivet repairs that are vulnerable to water and dust leaks.
Blind rivets must not be used in the proximity of fuel tanks, fuel lines, brake lines or emission lines.
Note: To determine the Total Metal Thickness for applications using laminated steel, the total thickness of
the laminated steel should be used.
This repair is only allowed if agreed upon between Body and Manufacturing Engineering. The repair is limited
to double panel welding with a GMT up to 1.2mm and must follow the appropriate brazing guidelines described
in the latest version of the gas metal arc brazing specification ESBM5A-1A336. A plug braze repair could also
be executed and would following the requirements of III.6.2 above.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
Any of the following conditions that affect the welding operation require a re-run of Production Validation (PV)
tests as agreed upon by the relevant Body and Manufacturing Engineering Departments.
Process Change - Any change in the process which could alter its capability to meet the design
requirements or durability of the product. This includes:
o New, different, relocated, or rehabilitated production machinery or equipment
o Any change in subcontracted products or services including the use of engineering-approved
alternate materials
o Changes to rework methods
o Changes in the sequence of operations
o Changes in chemical compounds such as lubricants, which are part of the product
Engineering Change - Any change in the part(s) initiated by Ford Motor Company.
Material and Coating Change - Any change in the material or coating, when optional materials or
coatings are specified. This includes:
o A switch from mild steel to high strength steel with a yield strength > 260 MPa
o A change in steel supplier for steels having a yield strength equal to or exceeding 310 MPa
(representing DP600) in the "as received condition"
Sub-Supplier Change - Any change in the source of subcontracted components.
Adopting Optional Design - Any change where the supplier incorporates optional designs specified on
the released engineering drawing or relevant CAD model.
NOTE: See QS-9000, Control of Subcontracted Suppliers; Retention of Inspection and Test Samples;
Notification of Completion of Inspection and Testing; Changes in Manufacturing Process; Change Approval
Certain process parameters will have a great influence on the weld quality. The control plan, as defined in Ford
QS 9000, is an essential part of a quality product. Some recommended process variables to include in the control
plan are:
Control Plans address all significant design and process characteristics, which include all ES tests and Control
Item characteristics. They describe the process potential studies that will be performed for product validation
(including PV tests) and the ongoing product and process evaluation for continuing improvement (including IP
tests). They include acceptance criteria, sample size, frequencies, data analysis methods and reaction plans.
The control plan is developed, and updated as necessary by the manufacturing source in conjunction with the
design responsible Product Engineering activity and other appropriate functions such as Supplier Technical
Assistance (STA). The control plan defines the management of the upstream production process and part
variables (significant process characteristics) that affect the outcome of the ES tests or other significant design
characteristics. The Control Plan also identifies the specific ES tests that, with their sample sizes and
frequencies, will be performed in order to:
Confirm whether the process is being managed effectively.
Further identify significant process characteristics.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e
Engineering Specification
For any part on which ES tests have been specified, the manufacturing source must present the Control Plan and
any revisions to the design-responsible Product Design activity for review. This Product Engineering activity
has flexibility to honour business relationships with suppliers having proprietary processes.
Examples of formats for Control Plans are shown in Quality System Requirements, QS-9000.
PD November 28, 2008 EBIW E 12173768 000 Resistance Spot Welding ESBM5A-1N261-AA
May92
3947a2e