Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Observation Notebook
OBJECTIVES:
STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO PRODUCE A PLAN AND A PARAGRAPH ABOUT THEIR IDEA
USING THE PRESENT PERFECT, SIMPLE PAST AND SIMPLE PRESENT TENSES IN ADDTION
TO TARGET VOCABULARYRECENTLY, YET, ALREADY, SINCE, FOR, JUST, SO FAR,
LATELY, NOT YET, UNTIL NOW AND UP TO NOW.
1:00 P.M.
Ss provide her with short response to this question and briefly discuss it.
group and they are allowed to choose who they would like to work with.
T passes out handout with discussion points such as goals and make a
what they hope and want this imagined entity to accomplish. On the back
of the handout, Ss find the target language that will be used for the task.
1. Talk/Discuss Ideas
2. Create a Plan
1:05 P.M.
Ss start work on the task, which has now been labeled a group project.
T also stops to motivate and praise the Ss on their creativity and plans.
1:40 P.M.
T tells each group to move on and start writing the paragraph once she
senses that each of the individual groups has settled on an idea and a plan.
1:45 P.M.
that only 5 minutes of class time remain but not to rush completion:
1:50 P.M.
T tells Ss that she will keep the paragraphs and that this task will be an
tomorrow and will work on something else, not the group project.
What did you learn about teaching or learning from this lesson as it relates to the
theory you have studied in your TESOL classes? Include at least one reference (with
an in-text citation) to support your response. (250-500 words)
Mrs. Houcks class was very much student-centered and relied heavily on the
communicative approach. Once that instructor had introduced the topic and had given the
students their instructions, she stepped aside and allowed the groups to work together on
the project with little supervision or guidance. This was a grammar class but it did not
follow the 8-step grammar lesson recipe1 nor was it a PPP lesson plan. It was more of a
cumulative review in that there was no practice stage. Instead, the students went straight
into the production phase. I was later informed that the students had reached the end of a
unit in their textbook. Thus, to assess the students knowledge of the unit before moving
forward, the instructor decided to have them complete a group project in lieu of a more
traditional, written test using the knowledge that they acquired in previous lessons.
planning a lesson around a unit and the importance of building upon prior knowledge.
1
Paulston, C.B., & Bruder, M.N. 2017.
weeks) and which lead to a culminating task or activity (Richards & Farrell, 2011).2 The
focus of this unit could therefore be described as something along lines of altruism in
business and the lessons have all led up to this cumulative, communicative task. The
instructor went above and beyond, however, in that the students have to use what they
have learned from prior units in addition to what they have learned from the current unit.
This exemplifies one of the core components of lesson planning: build on prior lessons.
Lastly, while this class environment was obviously student centered and
relaxing music for the groups while they worked which has been an uncommon practice
in other classes Ive observed. I cant say for certain that the instructor had
desuggestopedia in mind when she chose to play music, or that she hoped to create a
certain learning environment by doing this, but her decision stuck out to me.
To conclude, this lesson proved very helpful in showing me how lessons and
goals can play out in the long term rather than the short term. The instructor sequenced
lessons around a specific unit and dedicated an entire lesson to the production phase. It
was nice to see the milestone lesson as opposed to a PPP lessonout in the real world;
you dont have to squeeze in all three phases of a PPP lesson plan in one class session.
2
Richards, J. & Farrell, T. (2001).
References
Paulston, C.B., & Bruder, M.N. Handout Received in Grammar Class: (2017). Pp. 36-46.
Richards, J. & Farrell, T. (2001). Practice Teaching: A Reflective Approach. (p. 59).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.