Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 8
Open Channel
Design
March 2010
i
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
ii
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Table of Contents
8.1 Introduction 8-1
8.1.1 Open Channels 8-1
8.2 General Considerations 8-2
8.3 Local Authority Requirements 8-2
8.4 Fundamentals of Open Channel Flow 8-3
8.4.1 Stream Dynamics 8-3
8.4.2 Assumptions for Analysis 8-4
8.4.3 Fundamental Equations 8-4
8.4.4 Application of Fundamental Equations 8-9
8.4.5 Energy Principles 8-11
8.4.6 Hydraulic Jump 8-14
8.4.7 Hydraulic Drop 8-20
8.5 Erosive Velocities in Natural Streams 8-20
8.6 Backwater 8-20
8.6.1 Tidal Waters 8-21
8.6.2 Downstream Tributary 8-24
8.7 Tailwater Levels 8-24
8.7.1 Tailwater Effects 8-24
8.7.2 Design Tailwater Levels 8-25 8
8.8 Open Channel Design 8-26
8.8.1 Design Methodology 8-26
8.8.2 Channel Transitions 8-29
8.8.3 Energy Losses in Channel Bends 8-30
8.8.4 Superelevation in Channel Bends 8-30
8.9 Grassed Channels 8-31
8.9.1 Normal Grassed Channels 8-31
8.9.2 Reinforced Grassed Channels 8-32
8.10 Channels Lined with Hard Facings 8-33
8.10.1 General 8-33
8.10.2 Riprap and Rock Filled Wire Mattresses / Gabions 8-33
March 2010
iii
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
iv
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Chapter 8
Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-1
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
requirements for existing channels which (e) Assessing the need for channel lining,
could be: particularly for erosion resistance,
including vegetation selection and
part of soil conservation programs;
aesthetics. Ensure future
stream rehabilitation or restoration maintainability of lining is considered;
plans;
(f) Calculating flow characteristics.
riparian improvement programs; Design for subcritical flow (refer
part of natural channel design Sections 8.4.5.2 and 8.4.5.3) is
programs; or recommended. In only a small
percentage of natural streams under
other ecologically sustainable
certain conditions, flow is not
programs.
subcritical. Supercritical flow (refer
Sections 8.4.5.2 and 8.4.5.3) with its
8.2 General
highly erosive velocities should be
Considerations
avoided in a design flood except at
Considerations in open channel design channel drops or energy dissipators
include: (refer Chapter 11);
March 2010
8-2
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
roadway embankments;
cross drainage culverts;
floodways; and
March 2010
8-3
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-4
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
The Continuity Equation is: For natural channels the slope of the energy
line, S, is almost impossible to determine.
Q1 V1 A1 V2 A2 Q2
Therefore a suitable estimation of S is
The formula most commonly used for the required. The slope of the water (flow)
calculation of steady, uniform flow in open surface, Sw, could be used, however this is
channels is Mannings Equation. This also difficult to determine. The only easily
equation is used to determine the velocity available slope that can be used to estimate
of flow at a specific point in the channel, S is the channel bed, So, provided that the
and therefore the variables in the equation channel and the bed slope about the point
must be representative of the point being being assessed is reasonably uniform. If the
assessed. channel shape and bed slope is irregular,
March 2010
8-5
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
for the flow is less than 1 m, vegetal appropriate vegetal retardance curve to be
retardance curves (Figures 8A.1 to 8A.5 in used.
Appendix 8A) should be used to determine
n. Table 8.4.3(c) is used to determine the
1. Closed Conduits
Source: Based on Bureau of Public Roads, 1965. Item 1(b) and 1(c) have been added based on values
recommended by Maccaferri in their publications.
March 2010
8-6
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Type of Channel n
Main Channel
3. Mountain Streams, no vegetation in channel, banks usually steep, trees and brush
along banks submerged at high stage
(a) Bottom, gravel, shingle and few boulders 0.040.05
(b) Bottom, shingle with large boulders 0.050.07
1. Pasture, no Brush
(a) Short grass 0.0300.035
(b) High grass 0.0350.05
2. Cultivated Areas
(a) No crop 0.030.04
(b) Mature row crops 0.0350.045
(c) Mature field crops 0.040.05
6.
7.
Dense Willows, Summer, not bent over by Current
March 2010
8-7
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
n = 0.03 n = 0.04-0.045
n = 0.05-0.06
n = 0.07 n = 0.08
Notes:
1) Increase in n value with an increase in grass, weeds, shrubs and trees.
2) In general, growth of trees in photographs tends to look denser than when seen on a site
inspection.
3) Except for n = 0.03, roughness is for bank full flood heights and/or floods in upper branches of the
trees.
4) Use photographs with caution. Use in conjunction with Table 8.4.3(b)
March 2010
8-8
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Thick Longer than 750 A Rhodes grass in ungrazed scrub soil waterway
Thick 280 to 610 B Wheat 660mm tall in 180mm rows Rhodes grass
Thick 150 to 250 C Most grasses can be hold at this retardance with
mowing or grazing e.g. Rhodes grass, couch
grass, carpet grass, native grasses
Fair 150 to 250 D African star grass under low fertility conditions.
Fair 50 to 150 D -
Notes:
1. Thickness of vegetation has an important bearing on retardance, possibly more important than species.
8
2. Vegetal retardance curves have been based on tests in experimental channels.
3. Values of n = 0.15 plus have been used for fields of standing sugar cane.
4. Refer to Appendix 8A for nomographs using different vegetal retardances.
Source: Based on Soil Conservation Handbook (DPI 1978) and Rouven et al., (1981)
March 2010
8-9
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-10
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-11
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
In conventional terms, energy has two y are of similar magnitude. While strictly
components: not correct, the terms can be
interchangeable (based on condition) as the
potential energy; and
difference is small, therefore the practice is
kinetic energy. acceptable.
Now, relating conventional terms to the It is important to understand that this
energy within water, potential energy is equation differs slightly from the normal
equal to the static head and kinetic energy is form of the energy equation for open
equal to the velocity head. To illustrate channels, which is:
this, a static body of water such as a lake,
V2
has potential energy while a moving body H ( z d cos )
of water such as a creek, has both potential 2g
energy and kinetic energy. Where:
March 2010
8-12
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Figure 8.4.5.2 - Specific Energy Curve (Source: Franzini & Finnemore (1997))
March 2010
8-13
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
L = characteristic length (m). The rise and trailing turbulence is called the
roller and is shown between points 1 and
The characteristic length (L) in open
2 on Figure 8.4.6.
channel flow is equal to the hydraulic
depth, which is defined as the cross The depth, y1 before the hydraulic jump is
sectional area of flow divided by the called the initial depth, and the depth y2,
surface width of flow. Using either the after the jump is called sequent depth.
hydraulic depth or flow rate for the stream, With reference to Figure 8.4.6, the sequent
there are two commonly used forms of the depth is always lower than the high stage
above equation: alternate depth, y2, due to the loss of
March 2010
8-14
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-15
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
The first term is the momentum of the flow parameters are flow velocity, flow depth
passing though the channel section per unit and Froude Number.
time, per unit weight of water. The second
Using these parameters, the alternate or
is the force per unit weight of water.
sequent depth (y2) can be determined.
An examination of Figure 8.4.6 shows that
Considering;
while water flows at a depth (y1) for a given
discharge (Q) in any channel, there will energy and momentum principles;
always be another depth where the sum of using the initial flow velocity as V1;
the force due to velocity plus the
using the initial flow depth as y1; and
hydrostatic pressure for both depths will be
the same. experiments using a rectangular
channel.
This means that the specific forces of
sections 1 and 2 are equal, provided that the Rectangular Channels
external forces and the weight effect of
The following equation was developed to
water can be ignored. This generally can be
calculate the sequent depth (y2) in a
applied to horizontal channels with small
rectangular channel:
bed slopes (So 10%).
With respect to the rule that there is always
y2 1
y1 2
1 8 Fr2 1
two depths, the exception is at critical depth
(points C & C) where energy is at a OR
1 8F 1
minimum and there is only one depth of
y1
flow. y2 r
2
2
8.4.6.2 Jump Strength Where:
March 2010
8-16
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Weak 1.7 2.5 5 15% Weak jump; small roller; smooth rise
Fr V1 gy1
Fr
March 2010
8-17
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
8
Source: Brater et al. (1996)
March 2010
8-18
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
y2
y1
V1
Fr1
B
gA
March 2010
8-19
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-20
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-21
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
As with other effects, the selection of a Although precise tide levels are not usually
storm tide needs to consider the combined necessary at an upstream road or bridge
risk of occurrence of the storm tide and the crossing, tide levels at the mouth of the
March 2010
8-22
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
MSL
(Mean Sea-Level) The average level of the sea over a long period (preferably 18.6
years) or the average level which would exist in the absence of tides.
HAT (Highest Astronomical Tide) / LAT (Lowest Astronomical Tide) These are
the highest and lowest levels which can be predicated to occur under average
meteorological conditions and any combination of astronomical conditions. These
levels will not be reached every year. HAT and LAT are not the extreme levels
which can be reached, as storm surges may cause considerably higher and lower
levels to occur.
MHWS (Mean High Water Springs) Long term average of the heights of two
successive high waters during these periods of 24 hours (approximately once a
fortnight) when the range of tide is greatest, at full and new moon.
MLWS (Mean Low Water Springs) The long term average value of two successive
8
low waters over the same periods are defined for MHWN
AHD (Australia Height Datum) This Datum has been adopted by the National Mapping
Council as the datum to which all vertical control for mapping is to be referred.
March 2010
8-23
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
There is no correlation with tide levels, nor the relative sizes of the two streams, it may
are there any predictions for wave break not be realistic to expect floods to occur
setup and wave runup on the land. These together in the two streams.
factors will need consideration for any
design with storm surge as a factor. 8.7 Tailwater Levels
Storm surges would need to be considered Tailwater level refers to the normal water
with respect to coastal developments, the level, for a given flow, in a channel
protection of coastal roads, route immunity immediately downstream of a drainage
for evacuation purposes, and for major structure. For a proposed culvert, it is the
coastal drainage designs. Local depth of flow at the culvert outlet, measured
government may also have specific from the water surface in the downstream
requirements or data in relation to storm channel to the invert of the culvert and the
surge. depth can be significant. Tailwater levels
There is a low likelihood of occurrence of are an important control on the hydraulic
storm surge coinciding with flood events, performance of road drainage structures,
so calculation of design floods does not therefore the estimation of tailwater levels
need to consider both together, but the two is required for all hydraulic analyses for
effects should be considered independently. bridges and culverts.
Typically, tailwater level is defined by the
8.6.2 Downstream Tributary
downstream channel properties. If the
If the crossing is located on a stream which downstream channel and flow is uniform,
joins another watercourse (larger or the tailwater level may be determined using
smaller) downstream, other issues need to Mannings Equation (refer Section 8.4.3).
be considered. If the downstream flow is non-uniform, or
if it is being influenced by backwater, a
As the two open channels have different more sophisticated analysis by an
March 2010
8-24
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-25
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Each of these channel types has a specific velocity head B of the flow.
design methodology to determine the
channel cross section and these are detailed
8 in the following sections.
A
: Where flooding of adjacent land
and buildings does not represent a
8.8.1.1 General Considerations risk, the 300mm requirement can be
reduced to 150mm.
Further to the discussions in Sections 8.9 B
: Refer Section 8.4.5.1.
and 8.10, the following are aspects that
should be considered / established before
the design of the channel commences.
8.8.1.2 Hard Lined Channels
The velocity of flow in open channels is a
key aspect. Channel slope is an important With hard lined or rigid boundary channels,
factor in flow velocity. Generally, flow in the design procedure is relatively simple as
channels is intermittent, and the channel potentially erosive velocities are less
must be constructed to allow all stormwater important. Therefore, the cost of
to drain away (no ponding). Therefore the excavation and lining are primary factors in
minimum channel slope (So) for hard lined determining the geometry of the channel.
channels should not be less than 0.25% and
not be less than 0.5% for vegetated and
March 2010
8-26
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
In designing hard lined channels the (b) For best hydraulic section:
following must be initially considered:
by yX 2 y
R
lining
2 y 2 yX b
material (determines 2 2
Mannings n-value).
Based on the proposed channel lining, the and resolve for b as a function of y.
Mannings n-value can be selected from (c) Combining Mannings and Continuity
Table 8.4.3(a). Equations:
2 1
Research and experimentation has found AR 3 S f 2
that the most efficient, hydraulic section is Q
n
when the wetted perimeter (P) is minimised
for a given cross sectional area (A). Where:
Typically, in open channels, this occurs
A = by + Xy2 ; and
when the width of flow is twice the depth of
flow. Therefore the shape of channel that R = y/2
gives the best hydraulic efficiency (also So is used to approximate Sf (Friction
known as best hydraulic section) occurs Slope)
when the hydraulic radius is R
y
2 (d) Substitute b in equation with function
from (b) and solve for y.
Based on this requirement, the most
efficient shape is a semi-circle as it has the (e) With y, calculate b using function from
least wetted perimeter for a given area R (b).
is always equal to y/2 irrespective of Channel geometry can now be determined
dimensions. However the cost and and freeboard added.
difficulty of building semi-circular channels
prohibits their widespread use. Trapezoidal (f) Calculate Froude Number for channel
channels are more commonplace. The most section / flow and together with
efficient trapezoidal shape is the half-
hexagon.
velocity and depth of flow, check that
conditions are acceptable where the 8
designed channel discharges into an
For the design of hard lined channels: existing channel etc.
(a) Determine design discharge (Q), bed
slope (So), Mannings n-value and 8.8.1.3 Vegetated or Bare-earth
channel side slope (X) (refer Figure Channels
8.8.1.2).
Vegetated / bare-earth channels are erodible
boundary channels and the design
procedure is relatively simple, based on the
method of maximum permissible velocity.
This method assumes that the channel will
remain stable provided that the average
velocity of the design flow is below a
Figure 8.8.1.2 Trapezoidal Channel
Section determined threshold value. This method is
March 2010
8-27
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-28
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-29
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
Where:
hb = channel bend head loss (m);
B = channel width (m);
It will be noted that the more abrupt the (ii) Straight 0.3 0.5
transition, the greater the energy loss.
8 The difference in velocity head is always to
through
bridge
transition
be taken as positive even if mathematically
it is negative. In other words a change in
(iii) Square 0.6 0.8
section will always give a head loss.
edged abrupt
transition
8.8.3 Energy Losses in Channel
Bends Source: US Army Corps of Engineers
March 2010
8-30
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
maximum difference in these water levels is used where space permits to assist in
termed the superelevation (not to be minimising maintenance costs.
confused with the percentage
The maximum permissible velocity of flow
superelevation in geometric road design).
in a grass channel is the velocity which, if
The superelevation should be considered maintained for a reasonable length of time,
when a flood level is reported at a bend (the will not cause erosion. Permissible
exact location needing to be defined), or velocities for different vegetal covers,
where it is essential that the design flow channel slopes, and soil conditions are
does not exit from a man made channel at given in Table 8.8.1.3.
the outside edge of a bend.
The minimum non-silting velocity is
QUDM (NR&W 2008) gives the following uncertain. As a general rule the channel
equation to calculate the superelevation: velocity should not fall below 0.5 m/s.
March 2010
8-31
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-32
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
These channels are typically lined with 8.10.2 Riprap and Rock Filled
concrete, riprap or rock mattresses / gabions Wire Mattresses / Gabions
and are highly resistant to erosion. Design
velocities may be as high as 5 m/s, much Riprap is a conventional protection used to
higher than those for grassed channels. prevent channel bed and bank damage
upstream and downstream of hydraulic
Smaller cross-sections than those for
structures, at bends, at bridges and in other
grassed channels are possible to take the
channel areas where erosion potential exist.
same discharges, as side slopes of 1 on 1
are practical. Channels with hard facings The thickness of the riprap should be not
should be considered where the width is less than 1.5 times the largest diameter of
limited within the road environment. rock. Figure 8.10.2(b) shows the
relationship between bed velocity and rock
Other considerations for channels with hard
diameter (Rouven et al., 1981). When
faced linings include the provision of:
using Figure 8.10.2(b), bed velocity can be
contraction and expansion joints to taken as approximately 0.7 times the
minimise the risk of cracking and average channel velocity.
seepage and potential undermining;
Rock filled wire mattresses or gabions may
step irons (or similar device), for also be used to line the channel bank or bed
access / safety reasons, where the as shown in Figure 8.10.2(a). Smaller sized
channel side slope is steeper than 1 rocks can be used because the wire basket
on 2 and the channel depth exceeds surrounding the rock in the mattress or
0.9 m; gabion tends to make the mass act as a unit
pressure relief weep holes in
impermeable linings both within the
while retaining flexibility. Beside
providing protection against scour, rock
8
channel invert and within the channel filled gabions are useful as drops with
side slopes. Weep holes should be either vertical or stepped faces. At drops,
90 mm diameter at 1.8 m maximum the gabions should be keyed into both
centres (depends on detailed design banks, and a downstream cut-off wall
(structural) requirements); should be considered. Design and
construction of gabion protection should be
lateral protection against surface in accordance with manufacturers
flows undermining the side slopes. recommendations / specifications.
A minimum hard faced strip of width
0.45 m on both sides at the top of the
channel is recommended;
cut-off walls at the ends of the bed
and side linings. These should have
a minimum depth of 0.5 m; and
March 2010
8-33
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-34
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-35
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-36
Department of Transport and Main Roads Chapter 8
Road Drainage Manual Open Channel Design
March 2010
8-37