Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 20

.

- -
-

:
. -
II ,
. -
,
. -
,
. -
,
. -
,


. -
-
. -
-
. -
-

. -
-
. - -

-
. -
-
. -
- -
. -
-
. -
-

. -
-

. -
-
. -
- -
. -
-
. -
-
. -
-
. -
-
. -
Expert consensus document
V -
. -

on angiotensin converting
. -
-
. -
enzyme inhibitors
-
. -
-
in cardiovascular disease
:
. - -
, , M
The Task Force on ACE-inhibitors
1431 , 1
e-mail: bgcardiology@mail.bg
of the European Society of Cardiology
GSM - 0897 926374, .: (02) 9320 725

. 2/2006 XII
ISSN 1310 - 7488



: -

:
24


- European Heart Journal (2004) 25, 1454-1470


1
www.bgcardiology.com
European Heart Journal (2004) 25, 1454-1470

Expert consensus document on angiotensin converting


enzyme inhibitors in cardiovascular disease
The Task Force on ACE-inhibitors of the European Society
of Cardiology

Task Force Members, Jos Lpez-Sendn, Chairperson* (Spain), Karl Swedberg


(Sweden), John McMurray (UK), Juan Tamargo (Spain), Aldo P. Maggioni (Italy),
Henry Dargie (UK), Michal Tendera (Poland), Finn Waagstein (Sweden),
Jan Kjekshus (Norway), Philippe Lechat (France), Christian Torp-Pedersen (Denmark)

ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), Silvia G. Priori (Chairperson) (Italy),
Maria Angeles Alonso Garcia (Spain), Jean-Jacques Blanc (France), Andrzej Budaj (Poland),
Martin Cowie (UK), Veronica Dean (France), Jaap Deckers (The Netherlands),
Enrique Fernandez Burgos (Spain), John Lekakis (Greece), Bertil Lindahl (Sweeden),
Gianfranco Mazzotta (Italy), Keith McGregor (France), Joo Morais (Portugal),
Ali Oto (Turkey), Otto A. Smiseth (Norway)

Document Reviewers, Maria Angeles Alonso Garcia (CPG Review Coordinator) (Spain),
Diego Ardissino (Italy), Cristina Avendano (Spain), Carina Blomstrm-Lundqvist (Sweden),
Denis Clment (Belgium), Helmut Drexler (Germany), Roberto Ferrari (Italy),
Keith A. Fox (UK), Desmond Julian (UK), Peter Kearney (Ireland), Werner Klein (Austria),
Lars Kber (Denmark), Giuseppe Mancia (Italy), Markku Nieminen (Finland),
Witold Ruzyllo (Poland), Maarten Simoons (The Netherlands) Kristian Thygesen (Denmark),
Gianni Tognoni (Italy), Isabella Tritto (Italy), Lars Wallentin (Sweden)







-
- -


-



-

2


-
a -
, I / ,

-
. II /
. /
/
-
-
(, SC) II /
. /
- IIb / -
, /
.
, III* / ,
- ,
-
.
* III
,
-
,
-
, -
1985 1998 . , ,
-
. - .

B ,
. , -
-

-
.

()
K C
/
, -
. , -
, -
, -
, - ()
- - .
. - -
European Heart
House, .
, - - -
. (-I) .
- -
/ -
- (), (), -
: . -
-
-I
- .


- -
-

3
(, SC). - ,
- - -
, Medline. ; -
. -
/ - -
, - : -
ACE-I. - , , -
, - ;
, ; -
. , -
o - ,
. - . , -
, -

1. II


noradrenalin, aldosteron, vasopressin endothlin-1




P, LHRH ACTH


( > )
a
Na



NO ( )
oxLDL (LOX-1)


PAI-1 2

(VCAM-1, ICAM-1, P-selectin),
(MCP-1) (IL-6)

,
- (fos, myc, jun) MAPKs (ERKs JNK)
(PDGF, bFGF, IGF-1, TGF1 2)
(,
-I III, -1 2)
NADH/NADPH-
,

ACTH= ; bFGF= ; ERKs= -


- ; JNK=Jun N- ; LHRH= -
; ICAM= ; IGF-1= ; IL-6=-
6; LOX-1=-1; MCP-1= 1;MAPKs=--
; PDGF= ;NADP/NADPH= /
; NO= ; PAI= ;
TGF= ; VCAM= .

4
-
, -. - . II
- . 1.
. ACE-I

, -
,
, ACE-I -

: , -
. -

European Heart Journal -
(. 2).4
.
-
ACE-I -
. (25-75%), -
- o,
. . ACE-I (pro-drugs)
,
-
, .1-3
, a , -
, - 1-4 .
. - --
, -
. ACE-I
-
- (ACE-I) - , Fosinopril, Zofenopril, Trandolapril
.1-3 ACE Spirapril -
, .5 Captopril
, - - , e -
I -
II. ACE-I (<6 h), Rami prilat ( -
, - Rami pril Trandolaprilat

2. ACE-I

(mg) (mg)

(%)
CrCl 10-30 ml/min

-I,
Benazepril* 11 85 2 x 2,5-20 2 x 2,5-10
Captopril 2 95 3 x 25-100 3 x 6,25-12,5
Zofenopril* 4,5 60** 2 x 7,5-30 2 x 7,5-30
-I,
Cilazapril 10 80 1,25-5 0,5-2,5
Enalapril* 11 88 2 x 2,5-20 2 x 2,5-20
Lisinopril* 12 70 2,5-10 2,5-5
Perindopril* >24 75 4-8 2
Quinapril* 2-4 75 10-40 2,5-5
Rami pril* 8-14 85 2,5-10 1,25-5
Spirapril 1,6 50** 3-6 3-6
Trandolapril 16-24 15** 1-4 0,5-1
-I,
Fosinopril* 12 50** 10-40 10-40

CrCl = *
**

5
- ACE-- () ,
(. 2). .1-4
-
II
. - .
,
ACE-I -
- -
. . ,
( - , -
30 ml/min) -
.5 Fosinopril, Sprirapril, , / -
Trandolapril Zofenopril - .
, - -
.11
(. 2). ACE-I
12 -
-
ACE-I
, , -
I II -
.6,13-15 -
II.
-
ACE-I
-

NO .14,15
, -
ACE-I -
II. 1 2--
, e II .1-4 -
- -
.1-4,6,2 ACE-I - (capacitance), -
II ,
, 2- , - -
NO e , -
( .
2).8.9
.
CE - , ACE-I
- - , -
-
( , , .3,4,6
).10
-I ACE-I
, - II -
. , -
- I.16,17,18 -
II
, -
- , 7 -
. I , -
o - . -
. I
, -I ,1-7 -
-
(). II ,
-I ( ).19 --
, -
. II -
-
-I
(
). -
ACE-I - -

6
, - , -
.21,22 -I - .
, SAVE31 (Survival And Ventricular
NO, - Enlargement) SOLVD32 (Studies Of Left Ven-
, - tricular Dysfunction),
. 33 , -I -
20-25%
-
-I -
. -
( , -
- HOPE34 , Rami pril -
)
. - --
. SECURE (the study to evaluate
- carotid ultrasound changes in patients treated with
, rami pril and vitamin E), HOPE,
II - , -I
,
, ,
.11,12 -I -
.35
. -I
- -I
. II,
PAI-1 ( -
-I - 1) -
, - -
. - .36
() - -I PAI-
, - 1 PAI-1 -
. - . -I -
- ,
II, -
, NO .
.25

-I .
, -

,
.1,2,37
-
.
II. AE-I

-
II ,
,26 -
ACE-I, -
-

27 -
( -
-
).

5-10% -
.28
-
-
- .41 -
.6 - , -
-I - P
.29,30 - . -
, -
II, - , -
-
NO, - , -
, -
- -

7
. - , , -
, - , -
3-5 . - ).46
I - , -I,
.
- ( ), -
- . , -
,
. - .
, -

, + -
, -
().42,43 -I -
. -I , -
- . -I -
. - ,
o - -
- -
. - .4,46-48 (
- - <90 mmHg) -I
, , .
, - >6,0 mmol/L -
, >50% 3 mg/dL (256 mol/
L) -I .
. - (
3 mg/dL 256 mol/L,
II, - ( 6,0 mmol/L)
- ( 90 mmHg)
-I,
. -I -
II, .
-
, , -
. , , -
- ,
- . -I, -
-I.44 ,
. -I -
. , , .49
-I,
,
-
,
-I. -
( ).
-
, -
. - -I. +-
(- ,
, , , ) - +
. -I -
-
. . , -
-I.41,45 - , -I
- Spironolacton .
- ,
- 1 -
. (. ,
. Cyclosporin). ACE-I
- . , -
, -I - , -
( , ACE-I.

8
- ,
A-I -
ACE-I. , .
20 000 , , The Cooperative North
ACE-- Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSEN-
Aspirin.47 SUS)54 SOLVD55 , AC-I -


ACE-I
(I-IV NYHA).
.
,
. 2 -

, . 4
. CONSENSUS54
.
IV NYHA 188
. -
AC-I (Enalapril)
(44% 26%). SOLVD55 II
-I
III NYHA 3,45

. 39,7% -
- . -
35,3% -
-
. 45
, -
- 1000 -
, ,
-
-
() 22 3,5
. -
-

. -I
-I.
(
-I ,
,
+;
). SOLVD 4,5 3,5
, -
-
-
3,0
.
.
VheFT-II56 (The second Vasodi-
-I lator Heart Failure Trial) Enalapril
Hydralazine
( <40-45%), Isosorbide Dinitrate -
. -
( I, ) (. 3).50,51 - - Enalapril, -
- Hydralazin - Isosorbide Dinitrate
, (18 25%). -
, Enalapril -
, , -
- .52,53 AC- - - -
I - (I II NYHA).
, Hydralazin - Isosorbid Dinitrate -

.
(. 4) ( I, ).50, 51 Rami pril

3. ACE-I

, II-IV I A 50, 51
/ I A 50, 51
( <40-45%) , I A 50, 51
IIa C 50, 51

= ; =

9
4. ACE-I 64

ACE-I

( , ,
)
:
( > 2,5 mg/dl 221 mol/l);
(K > 5,0 mmol/l);
( < 90 mmHg).
:
, - (. Spironolactone),
K, , .


.
.
ACE-I
- a .

ACE-I (mg) (mg)


Captopril 3 x 6,25 3 x 50-100 31
Enalapril 2 x 2,5 2 x 10-20 54 -56
Lisinopril 2,5-5 30-35 62
Rami pril 2,5 2 x 5 10 57
Trandolapril 1,0 4,0 73


2 (-
, , )
-

,
:

: ,
,


: , ,


( / , )

-I,

(< 3 mg/dl 266 mol/l)
(<6 mmol/l). - . .
(),
, - . .
/ , ACE-I.
. .

= . ACE-I, ,
- .

10
ACE-I.
() - , -
AIRE57 (the Acute Infarction Rami pril Effi- , -
cacy), - .
,
. ACE-I . 4.64
, - -I --
, -I , -
-
ACE-I -
, -
. - -II--
ACE-I () .
e - -
.58,59 ACE-I.
,60,61 ELITE-2 (The second losartan in heart
, - failure survival study)65 3152 -
- ,
, Losartan Captopril 555-
- (1,7 10,4%).
. OPTIMAAL (The Optimal Trial in Myocardial Inf-
arction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan)66
5447
- Losartan Captopril.
ACE-I (. 4) - 2,7
. ( 18 16%).
, , - VALIANT (Valsartan in Acute Myo-
, - cardial Infarction)67 15 703
. ,
, ATLAS62 (the /
Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril And Sur- Captopril, Valsartan -
vival), . 24,7- -

ACE-I II-IV
NYHA. . , -
, - CHARM-added (Candesartan in Heart Failure:
- Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbid-
- ity)68 Candesartan ACE-I -
, -
(24% ). - ,
- .
,
, ACE-I , ACE-I
- -
ACE-I. .
NETWORK63 , -
II-IV NYHA -
Enalapril 2 x 2,5 mg 2 x 10 mg. ,
Enalapril - -
24- -
. - .
4,2, 12,9 2,9% (- ACE-I
). Omapatrilat . -
, , - OVERTURE (Omapatrilat Versus
Enalapril Randomised Trial of Utility in Reducing
( 12,3, 12,9 14,7%, Events)69
). 5 570 , Enalapril
- Omapatrilat ( -
ATLAS NETWORK, - ACE ).
14,5

11
vival and Ventricular Enlargement)31 TRACE (the
Omapatrilat Enalapril Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation)73,74, -
-
. , -
Captopril Trandolapril.

- -
( <40-45% ACE-I , -
( I,
) (. 3).50,51 .75,76 ACE-I -
, - . -
SOLD (SOLVD-P)70 -
( 35%), -
, Enalapril. - .77-79
- ACE-I
. -
3,12 . - ( IIa, -
C) (. 3).50,51 -
24,5 20,6%. - e ,
- Candesartan
70 - 1000 ( CHARM - pre-
( 3 = 14). - served.80) -
- -
38,6% 29,8% -
- .
8,3
22,3 ACE-I. ACE-I
, , 36
( IIa, -
SOVD-P ), ,
3,2 . Jong ( I,
.71 ) (. 5).81,82
( 56,4 50,9%) - -
SOLVD-P, -
11,3 . , Enalapril ACE-I ( I, -
e )50,51,81,82 (. 5). ACE-I
-
, .83
.72
ACE-I - ACE-I :
- . -
, SAVE (the Sur- -

5. ACE-I

, 24 h
( , , I A 81, 82
, )
IIa 81, 82
(>24 ),
, I A 81, 82
(<45%)
I A 81, 82

: ; : ; :

12
- ,
: CONSENSUS-2 (The 2nd Cooperative New Lisinopril .
Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study)84, ISIS4(The CCS-157
4th International Study of Infarct Survival)85, GISSI- Captopril -
3 (The Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della .
Supravienza)86, CCS-1 (The 1st Chinese Cardiac 35- (9,1 9,6%)
Study).87 , - ( ).
- COCSENSUS-284 6 090 -
- - Enalapril
: SAVE (The Survival and Ventricular 24 h .
Enlargement)31, AIRE (The Acute Enlargement i.v.
Rami pril Efficacy)57,TRACE (The Trandolapril Car- Enalapril per os
diac Evaluation).73 .
- - -
(AIRE) (6,3 10,2% - 7,2
(SAVE, TRACE). 10,2% nalapril).
(<24-36 h) 12% nalapril
- 3% .
, - , Enalapril,
24 h -
. 180 .
- SMILE (The Survival
ACE-I - of Myocardial Infarction Long term Evaluation)88
. 1556 24 h -
ISIS-4 58 050
Captopril -
8 - Zofenopril . -
.85 5 -
, - -
Captopril (7,2% 7,7%), - Zofenopril (7,1
4,9 10,6%), -
- 1000 , - . -
Captopril 1 . - Zofenopril (10,0
(5,4 14,1%).
- 1000 )
- ACE-I
. - (The ACE-I in Myocardial Infarction Collaborative
- Group), 100 000 89
(18 30-
- 1000 ), 7,6% 7,1%
(14 ACE-I. 5 -
- 1000 ) - - 1000 , 4-6 -
. , ( =
- 200). - ( 10
. 1000) - ,
, , -
. - . , -
Captopril ,
, , -
,
(10,3 4,8%). . ACE-I -
GISSI-386 19 394 - (14,6 15,2%), -
, - , ACE-
Lisinopril . - I - -
- Lisinopril (17,6 9,3%) -
(6,3 7,1%) (1,3 0,6%). ,
. , -
, - 239

13
, , 200 , .
. 30- -
, ACE-I .
, - 53 -
, ACE-I
. - 29,1 23,4% -
, Enalapril . 2,6 . 57 -
- 1000 (
48 h - 18 2,5 .
. ).
. - , ACE-I
,
- . ACE-I -
(>48 h) , 13,2
- 10,8%
ACE-I. 15,5 11,9%.
SAVE31 2230
<40% 3-16 ACE-I -
Captopril . . -
42 - -
Captopril (20 25%). -
, -
- - . ,
Captopril, - -
, -
.
- -
, Aspirin -. . -
TRACE73 1749 HOPE (The
( Heart Outcomes Protection Evaluation)34 EUROPA
<35%), , - (The EURopean trial On reduction of cardiac Events
Trandolapril 3-7 . with Periondopril in Stable coronary Artery disease)90,
24-50 - CE-
- -
Trandolapril (34,7 42,3%; p<0,001). - ( -
Trandolapril - ) ( ).

, - ACE-I ee ( I,
. ) (. 6).91
6 . .74 -
4,6 . ,
, 6,2 . - ( - , -
Trandolapril. - ).91,92
15,3 - .
27% Trandolapril - -
, ,
- - : , -
. , ACE-I, , .
AIRE57 1986 -
- . -
-
Rami pril 3-
10- . .
6 15 . - -
- - ; -
, Rami pril (17% 23%). ; -
-
, / -

14
; - . Captpril -
. - -
, - (-
(. , -
, ...) - - ),
- - Captopril. ,
.92 -I -
- Captopril. -
, - -
, - -
ACE-I.
- UKPDS (The UK Prospective Diabetes Study)97,98
- ,
91-93 (. 6). ACE- Captopril --
STOP-2 (The Second Swedish Atenolol 2 . Captopril
Trial of Old Patients with hypertension)94 - Atenolol
70-84 -
- , , -
(Atenolol, Metoprolol, Pindolol . -
Hydrochlorothyazide Amiloride) --
(Enalapril Lisinopril, 9-
Felodi pine Isradi pine). e - . -
- -
. - . , -
, , - Captopril
- - Atenolol -
, - . -
. ,
, - , -
-
. - -
ABCD .
(The appropriate Blood pressure Control Diabetes)95 PROGRESS (The Perindopril Pro-
Nisoldi pine nalapril tection against Recurrent Stroke Study)99 6105
-
-

5 . 470 . - (Perindopril Indapamide -
- , ) . -
. .
Nisoldi pin - 4 -
- (10 14%),
nalapril, .
- -
. . . -
CAPPP (the Captopril Prevention Project)96 Perindopril Indapamide
ACE-I -
(, -) - - (43%) -
10 985 Perindopril.

6. ACE-I :

I A 91, 92
, , I 91, 92
,

15
- Chlorthalidone, Amlodi pine Lisinopril. -
. - -
- .
(The , -
blood pressure treatment trialists collaboration)100 - ,
- , -
ACE-I ( , 12 124 , - , - . -
) 4,9 .
(30%), (20%)
- (21%). -
- Lisinopril Chlorthalidone,
- Lisinopril - -
- (33,3 30,9%),
-. , - (6,3 5,6%) (8,7 7,7%)
, ACE-I , ACE-
- I
.
, , -
. - - -
, ACE-I , - , -
- -
STOP-2 BCD. - ACE-I
, -
, ACE-I, .

-
, - - ACE-I
. -
- -
, , - ( I, )
ACE - I. (. 7).
101 9 - ACE-I
, ( -
-), ACE-I 62 605
- - . Part-2104 600 -
ACE-I, -- , -
. Rami pril
ANBP-2 (The second Australian (6 mmHg)
National Blood Pressure study)102 - . carotis
6083 , - communis - -
ACE-I (Enalapril) .
(Hydrochlorothyazide). ,
-, - - ACE-I
- .
. QUIET (the Quinapril Ischemic Event
, 4,1 Trial)105 ,
- -
- - , - , Quinapril
ACE-I (56,1 59,8 1000 - 3 . -
), - .
, -
. . , 1750
ALLHAT
(The Antihypertensive and Li pid-Lowering treatment , . -
to prevent Heart Attack Trial),103 - SCAT (The Simvastatin/Enalapril Coronary
33 357 Atherosclerosis Trial)106 -
- . - (Simvastatin) ACE--
- (Enalapril) -

16
460 , ( 12,2
. Enalapril - 10,4% 5 .), e ,
, , -
. , -
- . , -
HOPE (Heart Outcomes Evaluation Trial), EUROPA Rami pril -
(European trial On Reduction of cardiac events with (3,3 mmHg
Perindopril in stable coronary Artery didease), PEACE )
(Prevention of Events with Angiotensin-Converting .110
Enzyme Inhibition) ONTARGET (Telmisartan -
alone and in combination with rami pril global end- ACE-I -
point trial), EUROPA,90
ACE-I - - 13 655
, -
. Perindopril -
HOPE 34,107-109 9297 4,2 .
( Perindopril - --
, (- , -
) - ).
(, , - 8 10% e
). 80% 50 , -
, 55% - - 4,2 .
, 52% - - . ACE-I
, 43% - , 25% .
- , 26% - - , HOPE EUROPA,
, 18% - -
11% - - -
- ACE-I
( ).
40% - .
. HOPE EUROPA
ACE-I (Rami pril) PEACE
5 . ( ACE-I (Trandolapril) -
, ) - - -
17,8% -
14,0% ACE-I .. 38 . -
- 1000 -
( 5 . = 26,3). ACE-I -
- ONTARGET (Telmisartan alone and in combina-
, - tion with rami pril global end-point trial).111 -

7. ACE-I

I A 34, 90
( -
)

8. ACE-I

I A 112, 113
I A 112, 113
I B 112, 113

17
I,
- (. 8).112,113
- ,
. -I -
.
20 54% -

-I , -
-
- .112,113

20. Lee AF, MacFadyen RJ, Struthers AD. Neurohormonal reacti-


vation in heart failure patients on chronic ACE inhibitor therapy:
1. The Task Force on Heart Failure of the European Society of a longitu dinal study. Eur J Heart Fail 1999;1:401-6.
Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis of heart failure. Eur Heart J 21. Boon WC, McDougall JG, Coghlan JP. Hypothesis: aldosterone is
1995;16:741-751. synthesized by an alternative pathway during severe sodium
1. Williams GH. Converting-enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of depletion. A new wine in an old bottle. Clin Exp Pharmacol
hypertension. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1517-25. Physiol 1998;25:369-78.
2. Kostis JB. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Emerging dif- 22. Lotshaw DP. Role of membrane depolarization and T-type Ca 2+
ferences and new compounds. Am J Hypertens 1989;2:57-64. channels in angiotensin II and K + stimulated aldosterone secre-
3. Brown NJ, Vaughan DE. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibi- tion. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;175:157-71.
tors. Circulation 1998;97:1411-20. 23. Paul M, Ganten D. The molecular basis of cardiovascular hyper-
4. Jackson EK. Renin and angiotensin. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, trophy: the role of the renin-angiotensin system. J Cardiovasc
Editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th Ed. Pharmacol 1992;19(Suppl. 5):S51-8.
New York; 2001:pp. 809-841. 24. Schiffrin E, Deng L. Comparison of effects of angiotensin l-
5. Hoyer J, Schulte KL, Lenz T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angio- converting enzyme inhibition and -blockade for 2 years on
tensin converting enzyme (AC) inhibitors in renal failure. Clin function of small arteries from hypertensive patients. Hyperten-
Pharmacokinet 1993;24:230-54. sion 1995;25:699-703.
6. Lonn EM, Yusuf S, Jha P et al. Emerging role of angiotensin- 25. Matsuda H, Hayashi K, Arakawa K. Zonal heterogeneity in
converting enzyme inhibitors in cardiac and vascular protec- action of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on renal micro-
tion. Circulation 1994;90:2056-69. circulation: role of intrarenal bradykinin. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;
7. Zimmerman BG, Sybertz EJ et al. Interaction between sympa- 10:2272-82.
thetic and renin-angiotensin system. J Hypertens 1984;2:581-92. 26. Keane WF, Shapiro BE. Renal protective effects of angiotensin-
8. Hornig H, Kohler C, Drexler H. Role of bradykinin in mediating converting enzyme inhibition. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:491-53.
vascular effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 27. Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Gherardi G et al. Renoprotective pro-
in humans. Circulation 1997;95:1115-8. perties of ACE-inhibition in non-diabetic nephropathies and
9. Linz W, Wohlfart P, Schoelkens BA et al. Interactions among non-nephrotic proteinuria. Lancet 1999;354:359-64.
ACE, kinins and NO. Cardiovasc Res 1999;43:549-61. 28. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP et al. The effect of angiotensin-
10. Dzau VA. The relevance of tissue angiotensin-converting-enzy- converting enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J
me: manifestations in mechanistic and endpoint data. Am J Med 1993;329:1456-62.
Cardiol 2001;88:1-20. 29. Pitt B. Potential role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibi-
11. Giannettasio C, Grassi G, Seravalle G et al. Investigation of tors in the treatment of atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J 1995;16:
reflexes from volume and baroreceptors during converting- 49-54.
enzyme inhibition in humans. Am Heart J 1989;117:740-5. 30. Schoelkens BA, Landgraf W. ACE inhibition and atherosclerosis.
12. Schmieder RE, Martus P, Klingbeil A. Reversal of left ventricu- Can J Physiol Phatmacol 2002;80:354-9.
cular hypertrophy in essential hypertension: A meta-analysis 31. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA et al. Effect of captopril on
of randomized double-blind studies. JAMA 1996;275:1507-13. mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfun-
13. Thadei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L et al. Effects of angiotensin ction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and
converting enzyme inhibition on endothelium-dependent vas- ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl
odilation in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens J Med 1992;327:669-77.
1998;16:447-56. 32. Yusuf S, Pepine CJ, Garces C et al. Effect of enalapril on
14. Hornig B, Landmesser U, Kohler C et al. Comparative effect myocardial infarction and unstable angina in patients with low
of ace inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism ejection fraction. Lancet 1993;340:1173-8.
on bioavailability of nitric oxide in patients with coronary artery 33. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Pfeffer M et al. for the ACE Inhibitors Colla-
disease: role of superoxide dismutase. Circulation 2001;103: borative Group. Effects of long-term treatment with angiotensin-
799-805. converting enzyme inhibitors in the presence or absence of
15. Hornig B, Arakawa N, Drexler H. Effect of ACE inhibition on aspirin: a systematic review. Lancet 2002;360:1037-43.
endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure. 34. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators
Eur Heart J 1998;19(Suppl G):G48-53. (HOPE). Effects of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor,
16. Francis GS, Benedict C, Johnstone DE et al. for the SOLVD ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl
Investigators. Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in pa- J Med 2000;342:145-53.
tients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without conges- 35. Lonn EM, Yusuf S, Dzavik V et al. Effects of ramipril and v i -
tive heart failure. A substudy of the studies of left ventricular tamin E on atherosclerosis: the study to evaluate carotid ultra-
dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation 1990;82:1724-9. sound changes in patients treated with ramipril and vitamin E
17. Swedberg K, Eneroth P, Kjekshus J et al. Hormones regulating (SECURE). Circulation 2001;103:919-25.
cardiovascular function in patients with severe congestive 36. Vaughan D. The renin-angiotensin system and fibrinolysis. Am J
heart failure and their relation to mortality. CONSENSUS Trial Cardiol 1997;79(Suppl. 5): 12-6.
Study Group. Circulation 1990;82:1730-6. 37. DiBianco R. Adverse reactions with angiotensin converting
18. Swedberg K. Importance of neuroendocrine activation in chro- enzyme inhibitors. Med Toxicol 1986;1:122-41.
nic heart failure. Impact on treatment strategies. Eur J Heart 38. Visser LE, Stricker BH, van der Velden J et al. Angiotensin
Fail 2000;2:229-33. converting enzyme inhibitor associated cough: a population-
19. Husain A. The chymase-angiotensin system in humans. based case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:851-7.
J Hyperten 1993;11:1155-9. 39. Wood R. Bronchospasm and cough as adverse reactions to

18
the ACE inhibitors captopril, enalapril and lisinopril. A controlled on exercise capacity of 12-weeks treatment with ramipril in pa-
retrospective cohort study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995;39:265-70. tients with moderate congestive heart failure. Ramipril Study
40. Charlon V, Dollow S, Fidel J et al. Reproducibility of angiotensin Group. Eur Heart J 1994;15:1659-65.
converting enzyme inhibitor induced cough: a double-blind ran- 61. Gundersen T, Wiklund I, Swedberg K. Effects of 12 weeks of
domised study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995;39:125-9. ramipril treatment on the quality of life in patients with modera-
41. Israili ZH, Hall WD. Cough and angioneurotic edema associated te congestive heart failure: results of a placebo-controlled trial.
with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. Ann Intern Raipril Study Group.: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (United States),
Med 1992;117:234-42. Aug 1995;9:589-94.
42. Ahuja TS, Freeman D, Mahnken JD et al. Predictors of the de- 62. Packer M, Poole-Wilson PA, MD, Armstrong PW et al., on behalf
velopment of hyperkalemia in patients using angiotensin-con- of the ATLAS study group. Comparative effects of low and high
verting enzyme inhibitors. Am J Nephrol 2000;20:268-72. doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril,
43. The RALES investigators. Effectiveness of spironolactone added on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. Circulation
to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a loop diure- 1999;100:2312-8.
tic for severe chronic congestive heart failure. (The randomized 63. The NETWORK investigators. Clinical outcome with enalapril in
aldactone evaluation study: RALES). Am J Cardiol 1996;78: symptomatic chronic heart failure, a dose comparison. Eur
902-7. Heart J 1998;19:481-9.
44. Wynckel A, Ebikili B, Melin J-P et al. Long-term follow-up of 64. MacMurray J, Cohen-Solal A, Dietz R et al. Practical recommenda-
acute renal failure caused by angiotensin converting enzyme tions for the use of ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers and spirono-
inhibitors. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11:1080-6. lactone in heart failure: putting guidelines into practice. Eur J
45. Brown N, Ray W, Snowden M et al. Black Americans have an Heart Failure 2001;3:495-502.
increased rate of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor-asso- 65. Pitt B, A Poole-Wilson PA, Segl R, on behalf of the ELITE II
ciated angioedema. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996;60:8-13. investigators Effect of losartan compared with captopril on
46. Sedman AB, Kershaw DB, Bunchman TE. Recognition and ma- mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised
nagement of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Pediatr trial - the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II. Lancet
Nephrol 1995;9:382-5. 2000:355:1582-7.
47. Brent RL, Beckman DA. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibi- 66. Dickstein K, Kjekshus J, and the OPTIMAAL Steering Committee
tors, an embryopathic class of drugs with unique properties: for the OPTIMAAL Study Group Effects of losartan and captopril
information for clinical theratology counselors. Teratology on mortality and morbidity high-risk patients after acute myocar-
1991;43:543-6. dial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Lancet 2002;
48. Oakley C, Child A, lung B, Prebitero P, Tornos P for the Task 360;752-60.
force on the management of cardiovascular diseases during 67. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJV, Velsquez EJ et al. for the Valsartan
pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology. Expert con- in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators Valsartan,
sensus document on management of cardiovascular diseases Captopril, or Both in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Heart
during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 2003;24:761-81. Failure, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, or Both. N Engl J Med
49. Maron BJ, McKenna WJ, Danielson GK, Kappenberger LJ, Kuhn 2003;349:1893-906.
HJ, Seidman CE, Shah PM et al. for the Task force on hyper- 68. McMurray JJV, stergren J, Swedberg K et al. Effects of can-
trophic cardiomyopathy. American College of Cardiology/ Euro- desartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-
pean Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin converting-
on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 2003;25:1965-91. enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet 2003;362:767-71.
50. Remme WJ, Swedberg K et al. for the task force for the dia- 69. Packer M, Califf RM, Konstam AAA for the OVERTURE Study
gnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure, European Socie- Group. Comparison of Omapatrilat and Enalapril in Patients With
ty of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Chronic Heart Failure, The Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Rando-
chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1527-60. mized Trial of Utility in Reducing Events (OVERTURE).
51. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Circulation 2002;920: 106-26.
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to 70. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and
Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with
of Heart Failure) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med 1992;
Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult 2002. 327:685-91.
Available from: http://www.acc.org. 71. Jong P, Yusuf S, Rousseau MF et al. Effect of nealapril on 12
52. Shekelle PG, Rich MW, Morton SC et al. Efficacy of angioten- year survival and life expectancy in patients with left ventricular
sin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers in the mana- systolic dysfunction: a follow-up study. Lancet 2003;361:1843-8.
gement of left ventricular systolic dysfunction according to 72. Vermes E, Ducharme A, Bourassa MG et al. Enalapril reduces
race, gender, and diabetic status. A metaanalysis of major the incidence of diabetes in patients with chronic heart failure.
clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1529-38. Insight from the studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD).
53. Flather M, Yusuf S, Kober L, Pfeffer M, Hall A, Murria G et al. Circulation 2003;107:1291-6.
for the ACE-lnhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group. 73. Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Carlsen JE et al. for the trandolapril
Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure cardiac evaluation (TRACE) study group: a clinical trial of the
or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor trandolapril in patients with
from individual patients. Lancet 2000;355:1575-781. left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J
54. The Consensus Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mor- Med 1995;33:1670-76.
tality in severe congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1 987; 74. Torp-Pedersen C, Kober L. Effect of ACE inhibitor trandolapril on life
316:1429-35. expectancy of patients with reduced left-ventricular function after
55. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in acute myocardial infarction. TRACE Study Group. Trandolapril
patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and Cardiac Evaluation. Lancet 1999;354:9-12.
congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:293-302. 75. Philbin EF, Rocco TA, Lindenmuth NW et al. Systolic versus diastolic
56. Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S et al. A comparison of enalapril heart failure in community practice: clinical features, outcomes,
with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Am J Med
conges-tive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:303-10. 2000;109:605-13.
57. Study Investigators. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbi- 76. Cleland JG. ACE inhibitors for diastolic heart failure? reasons not to
dity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical jump to premature conclusions about the efficacy of ACE inhibi-
evidence of heart failure. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Effica- tors among older patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail
cy. Lancet 1993;342:821-8. 2001;3:637-9.
58. Narang R, Swedberg K, Cleland JG. What is the ideal study 77. Effects of cardiac versus circulatory angiotensin-converting
design for evaluation of treatment for heart failure? Insights enzyme inhibition on left ventricular diastolic function and coro-
from trials assessing the effect of ACE inhibitors on exercise nary blood flow in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
capacity. Eur Heart J 1996;17:120-34. Circulation 1998;97:1342-47.
59. Northridge DB, Rose E, Raftery ED et al. A multicentre, double- 78. Devereux RB, Palmieri V, Sharpe N et al. Effects of once-
blind, placebo-controlled trial of quinapril in mild, chronic heart daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel
failure. Eur Heart J 1993;14:403-9. blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left
60. Gundersen T, Swedberg K, Amtorp O et al. Absence of effect ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension:

19
the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regres- Eur Heart J 2003;24:1601-10.
sion of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial. Circulation 94. Hansson L, Lindholm L, Ekbom T et al. Randomised trial of old
2001; 104:1248-54. and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular
79. Beltman F, Heesen W, Smit A et al. Two-year follow-up study and morbidity the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hyperten-
to evaluate the reduction of left ventricular mass and diastolic sion-2 study. Lancet 1999;354:1751-6.
function in mild to moderate diastolic hypertensive patients. 95. Estacio R, Jeffers B, Hiatt W et al. The effect of nisoldipine
J Hypertens Suppl 1998;16:S15-9. as compared with enalapril on outcomes in patients with non-
80. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger KB, Held P, McMurray insulin dependant diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med
JJV et al. for the CHARM Investigators and Committees. 1998;338: 645-52.
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure 96. Hansson L, Lindholm L, Niskanen L et al. Effect of angiotensin
and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM converting enzyme inhibition compared with conventional the-
Preserved Trial. Lancet 2003;362:777-781. rapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension:
81. Van de Werf et al. for the task force of the management of the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial.
acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardio- Lancet 1999;353: 611-6.
logy. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients 97. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Efficacy of atenolol and
presenting with ST segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2003;24:28-66. captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular
82. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. Br Med J 1998;317:
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Man-
713-20.
agement of Acute Myocardial Infarction) ACC/AHA Guidelines for
98. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control
the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type
American College of Cardiology; September 1999. Available from:
2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. Br Med J 1998;317:703-13.
www.acc.org.
99. Collaborative Group Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-
83. Gottlieb S, MD, Leor J, Shotan A, Harpaz D, Boyko V, Rott D
pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous
et al. Comparison of effectiveness of angiotensin-converting
stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2001;358:1033-41.
enzyme inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction in diabetic
100. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Effects
versus nondiabetic patients. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:1020-5.
of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other bloodpressure-
84. Swedberg K, Held P, Kjekshus J, y cols. Effects of early administra-
tion of enalapril on mortality in patients with acute myocardial lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of
infarction. Results of the Cooperative New Scandinavian randomised trials. Lancet 2000;355:1955-64.
Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSESSUS II). N Engl J Med 101. Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Cardiovascular protection and blood
1992;327:678-84. pressure reduction: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2001;358:1305-15.
85. Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative 102. Wing LM, Reid CM, Ryan P et al. A comparison of outcomes
Group. ISIS-IV: a randomised factorial trial assessing early with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for
oral captopril. Oral mononitrate and intravenous magnesium hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003;348(7):583-92.
sulphate in 58050 patients with suspected acute myocardial 103. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized
infarction. Lancet 1995;345:669-85. to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blo-
86. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nellInfarto cker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Tre-
Miocardico. GISSI-3. Effects of lisinopril and transdermal atment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. JAMA 2002;288:2981-97.
glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6 week mortality and 104. MacMahon S, Sharpe N, Gamble G et al. Randomised, placebo
ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet controlled trial of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor,
1994;343:1115-22. ramipril, in patients with coronary or other occlusive vascular
87. Chinese Cardiac Study Collaborative group. Oral captopril disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:438-43.
versus placebo among 13634 patients with suspected acute 105. Cashin-Hemphill L, Holmvang G, Chan R et al. Angiotensin conver-
myocardial infarction: interim report from the Chinese Cardiac ting enzyme inhibition as antiatherosclerotic therapy: no answer
Study. Lancet 1995;345:686-7. yet. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:43-7.
88. Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Magnani B for the survival of myocardial 106. Teo K, Burton J, Buller C et al. Long-term effects of cholesterol
infarction long term evaluation (SMILE) Study Investigators. lowering and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on coronary
The effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor on atherosclerosis: the Simvastatin/enalapril Coronary Atherosclero-
mortality and morbidity after anterior myocardial infarction. N sis Trial (SCAT). Circulation 2000;102:1748-54.
Engl J Med 1995;332:80-5. 107. Arnold JMO, Yusuf S, Young J et al. on behalf of the HOPE
89. ACE Inhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group. Indications Investigators. Prevention of heart failure in patients in the
for ACE inhibitors in the early treatment of acute myocardial Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study.
infarction: systematic overview of individual data from 100 000 Circulation 2003;107:1284-90.
patients in randomized trials. Circulation 1998;97:2202-12. 108. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study Investi-
90. The EURopean trial On reduction of cardiac events with Perindopril gators. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascu-
in stable coronary Artery disease Investigators. Efficacy of perin- lar outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the
dopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with HOPE study and MICROHOPE substudy. Lancet 2000;355:253-9.
stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo- 109. Bosch J, Yusuf S, Pogue J et al. Use of ramipril in preventing
controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study). Lancet 2003;362: stroke: double blind randomised trial. Br Med J 2002;324;699-
782-8. 702.
91. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G and 110. Sleight P, Yusuf S, Pogue J et al. Blood-pressure reduction
Pyorala K et al. for the Second Joint Task Force of European and cardiovascular risk in HOPE study. Lancet 2001;358:2130-1.
and other Societiesfon Coronary Prevention: European Society of
111. Yusuf S. From the HOPE to the ONTARGET and the TRANS-
Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society, European Society of
CEND studies: challenges in improving prognosis. Am J Cardiol
Hypertension, International Society of Behavioural Medicine,
2002;89:18A-25A.
European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine, European
112. Priori SG, Aliot E, Blomstrm-Lundqvist C et al. for the Task
Network. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice.
Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of
Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1434-503.
Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:1374-450.
92. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR et al. The seventh report of
113. Priori SG, Aliot E, Blomstrm-Lundqvist C et al. for the Task
the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation
Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of
and treatment of high blood pressure. JAMA 2003;289:2560-72.
Cardiology. Update on the guidelines for sudden cardiac death
93. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnses K et al. European
of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003;24:13-5.
guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.

20

Вам также может понравиться