Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Grade : Y10T
Page 1 of 12 1
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
In order to calculate the rate of reaction, we will first time the amount of time needed for the
substances to reach 50mL when carrying out the experiment. The reaction time may be
calculated by using a timer or stopwatch. As the reaction time is calculate, the rate of
reaction of the substances could be calculated by using the following equation.
Level reached by the substances (mL)
rate of reaction (mL/s) = reaction time of the substances (s)
The relation between the independant, dependant and derived variable are quite strong. This
is because it concerns the properties of a substance. If one variable is changed, then the
other will change by it as well. For instance, if the potassium iodide has a low concentration,
then it will have a longer reaction time, hence a smaller rate of reaction.
"Clock Reaction - UW Dept. of Chemistry." Clock Reaction - UW Dept. of Chemistry. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Sept. 2016.
"Iodine Clock Reaction." Iodine Clock Reaction. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Sept. 2016.
Page 2 of 12 2
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Hypothesis Bii
The higher the concentration of Potassium Iodide, the shorter the reaction time, hence the
reaction for a higher concentration of Potassium Iodide would have a larger reaction. This is
because the number of atoms in the chemical will increase, thereby decreasing the rate of
reaction.
To support my hypothesis, the reaction time will be affected by the different concentration of
KI. Since a higher concentrated KI will consists of more atoms, it will result in a larger
reaction, therefore resulting in a shorter reaction time and larger rate of reaction.
Expectations of graph:
Page 3 of 12 3
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
VariablesBiii
Describe and explain The rate of reaction is the derived variable to this experiment.
the procedure to In order to compare the rate of reaction between the different
calculate the derived concentrations of Potassium Iodide, the rate of reaction should be
variable. calculated by using the equation below.
level reached by the substance (mL)
rate of reaction (mL/s) = reaction time of the substances (s)
Page 4 of 12 4
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Apparatus:
1000mL measuring cylinder x1
50mL measuring cylinder x2
50mL beaker x1
Plastic tray x1
Stopwatch x1
Pipette x6
50mL measuring cylinder x10
10mL measuring cylinder x4
Page 5 of 12 5
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Method / ProcedureBiv
1. Gather all apparatus and chemicals needed for the experiment as listed above
2. Put on safety goggles and lab coat for safety purposes as the experiment consists of
multiple chemicals as well as an exothermic reaction
3. Fill the 50mL measuring cylinder with roughly 2 to 3mL of detergent
4. Extract 5mL of Hydrogen Peroxide with a pipette and inset it into the 50mL measuring
cylinder
5. Pour 5mL of 2.0M Potassium Iodide into a 20mL measuring cylinder with a pipette
6. Pour the Potassium Iodide into the 50mL measuring cylinder once the Hydrogen
Peroxide is added
7. Start the stopwatch or timer once the potassium iodide is added
8. The reaction of the substances should produce a light yellow foam-like texture that will
slowly rise to a certain height, but then shoot out of the measuring cylinder in just
seconds
9. Stop the stopwatch or timer once the foam reaches 50mL
10. Repeat steps 3 to 6 until it has reached 5 trials
11. Repeat steps 3 to 6 and 6 with other concentrations of Potassium Iodide (0.4M, 0.8M,
1.2M, 1.6M)
12. Record down the results on a table
13. Clean up surroundings once finished with the experiment
14. With the reaction time, divide each average from each independent variable by 50 to
find the rate of reaction
15. Plot a graph by using the Independent with dependent variable and independent and
derived variable
16. Finalise findings through writing a conclusion
17. Evaluate the experiment and think about improvements
Page 6 of 12 6
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Results - Ci
The table below shows how changing the concentration of the Potassium Iodide (M) affects
the reaction time (s)
Potassium Reaction Time (s)
Iodide (M) Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 5 Average
0.0M 0.00s 0.00s 0.00s 0.00s 0.00s 0.00s
0.4M 59.20s 67.30s 65.57s 71.65s 60.90s 64.92s
0.8M 30.07s 25.55s 26.58s 25.90s 25.81s 26.78s
1.2M 16.10s 15.26s 15.50s 15.80s 15.42s 15.61s
1.6M 11.21s 11.91s 11.58s 11.67s 11.48s 11.57s
2.0M 6.89s 7.70s 8.00s 8.52s 8.44s 7.91s
Outlier:
Trial 4 for the testing of 0.4M was considered as an outlier because while I was timing the
experiments, I was timing 2 trials at the same time which got me distracted while I was
paying too much attention to trial 3. The timing of trial 4 might also have been impacted with
the portions of what my group mates and I added into each measuring cylinder.
Qualitative Observations- Ci
After adding the Potassium Iodide into the detergent and Hydrochloric Peroxide, it forms a
foam-like texture that slowly rises and about half way through the reaction time, the foam
Page 7 of 12 7
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
immediately shoots out of the measuring cylinder (e.g. if the reaction time is 6, the foam
starts shooting out of the measuring cylinder at 3 seconds.)
Ive also noticed in our first trial with 2M concentration of Potassium Iodide that the heat
released from the chemical reaction that it was hot enough to not only burned the paper, but
also ended up with staining the table when made contact.
During the trials with the 2M Potassium Iodide, the colour of the substances was more
vibrant compared to the others. Whereas the colour of the substances of 0.4M Potassium
Iodide has a lighter shade of yellow. Other than that, as the concentration of the Potassium
Iodide decreased, the substance also became more li
Processed data- Ci
Table 1 :
The table below showcases how changing independent variable (unit) affects the average of
the dependent variable / Derived variable (unit) and range of the dependent variable /
Derived variable (unit)
Concentration Reaction time (s)
of KI (M) Average (s) Range(s)
Min Max
0+0+0+0+0
0M 5 = 0s 0 0
59.20+67.30+65.57+71.65+60.90
0.4M 5 = 64.924s 59.20 71.56
30.07+25.55+26.58+25.90+25.81
0.8M 5 = 26.782s 25.55 30.07
16.10+15.26+15.50+15.80+15.42
1.2M 5 = 15.616s 15.26 16.10
11.21+11.91+11.58+11.67+11.48
1.6M 5 = 11.570s 11.21 11.91
6.89+7.70+8.00+8.52+8.44.
2.0M 5 = 7.910s 6.89 8.44
Page 8 of 12 8
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Graph- Ci
Page 9 of 12 9
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Conclusion - Cii
My results supports my hypothesis. This is because in my hypothesis, I mentioned that if the
concentration of the Potassium Iodide increased, it will have a larger reaction, which may
lead to a shorter reaction time and larger rate of reaction. Since according to the results, it
matches what I have predicted, my hypothesis was correct. The relationship that I have
found between the variables of the experiments is that the higher the concentration, the
shorter the reactions times, and the higher the rate of reaction.
Aside from only comparing the hypothesis and results through my observations, it has also
been shown through the two graphs that even my predictions for the graphs were accurate.
For instance, this was shown when the graph for the reaction time was a curved line heading
from the top left corner and gradually decreasing to the bottom right corner, which matched
my hypothesis. Another evidence was shown in the other graph on the rate of reaction. This
is because both my hypothesis and results matches. Both graphs start from the bottom left,
to the top right, although my expectation of the line in the graph is straight, it ended up being
a little curved inwards.
The data that my group has collect is reliable, since I did record with my group mates from
our experiment. However, some of the factors that might have impact the validity might be
the accurate proportions, this may be able to affect the result because we might have added
too much or too little detergent since it is a challenge to keep all the proportions to the same.
Overall, even though the amount of detergent added may not always be even, the results we
got for each trial in an independent variable are most likely similar and doesnt usually range
over 5cm, despite the results for 0.4M. Therefore, my hypothesis is most likely going to be
valid.
Page 10 of 12 10
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Breaking down my method, the first thing I told the reader to do is to collect all apparatus and
chemicals needed for the experiment. The validity might be affected due to the environment,
especially the temperature, since the hydrogen peroxide shouldve be kept indoors in order to
stay in room temperature. Aside from that, the validity might also be affected based on how
the reader conducts the experiment. Since the procedure was written down step by step,
readers should be able to following the steps and later repeating certain parts.
Another part of the method was to clean up his/her surroundings once theyre finished with
the experiment. This is because, in order to keep an environment safe and risk-free, it should
always be kept clean and tidy. This step is crucial to the experiment as it may help them
avoid accidents and prevent them from losing any apparatuses. Following the clean up, is the
analysation of the data collected. This is considered as one of the most significant steps in
the experiment as this not only helps justify the hypothesis and conclusion, but this step also
links all the variables from one to another.
The last and final step that I recorded was the evaluation and reflection. Although this may
not be as important as cleaning nor analysing, the evaluation helps him/her check for validity
for their hypothesis as well as method. The evaluation part of the process is used to help
them verify their knowledge towards the experiment. from the beginning, till the end.
Page 11 of 12 11
Years 9 and 10 Kitty Chin Y10T
Works Cited
"Iodine Clock Reaction- Learn Chemistry." Iodine Clock Reaction- Learn Chemistry. N.p., n.d.
Web. 26 Sept. 2016.
Page 12 of 12 12