Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com
ScienceDirect
Journal of Taibah University for Science 10 (2016) 700708
Abstract
The use of different cortex fruit wastes, including banana, kiwi and tangerine peels, for removing toxic and heavy element Cd+2 ,
Cr+3 and Zn+2 ions from aqueous solutions has been previously investigated. The ground material was powdered in a mortar and
passed through a screen to obtain two different particle sizes, 1 and 2 mm, for all of the powders. In preliminary experiments using
kiwi cortex, material with a 1-mm particle size showed a higher retention capability (up to 1016% of Cd+2 , Zn+2 and Cr+3 ) than
material with 2-mm particles. Considering these results, material with a 1-mm particle size was used in further experiments with the
other waste materials. For Cd+2 , Zn+2 and Cr+3 removal, it was determined that kiwi and tangerine cortex showed better biosorption
capability when compared with banana cortex (up to 35% more for Cd, 25% more for Zn and 35% more for Cr). The effects
of the initial concentration (10100 mg/l), pH (210), adsorbent dosage (0.12.0 g) and contact time (5120 min) were studied at
room temperature. A strong dependence of the adsorption capacity on the initial metal concentration was observed. The capacity
increased as the initial concentrations decreased. A maximum removal was observed at an adsorbent dosage of 2.0 g and an initial
concentration of 10 mg/l. The adsorption isotherms of the different cortex fruit wastes were determined. The equilibrium data were
tested using a Langmuir isotherm model, and the kinetics conformed to the pseudo-second equation. The order of the maximum
adsorption capacity of these metal ions on banana was Cr+3 < Cd+2 < Zn+2 , whereas it was Cd+2 < Cr+3 < Zn+2 for kiwi and tangerine.
Complexation is proposed as the adsorption mechanism. The experimental results show that the natural biosorbent was effective
for the removal of pollutants from an aqueous solution.
2015 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Taibah University. This is an open access article under
the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1. Introduction
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.09.001
1658-3655 2015 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Taibah University. This is an open access article under the
CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
K.M. Al-Qahtani / Journal of Taibah University for Science 10 (2016) 700708 701
a phenomenon called biomagnification [1]. The contam- microalgae and fungi [9,10]. Nevertheless, the term is
ination of water with substances that have an adverse now applied to all manners of organic and inorganic pol-
effect on human beings, animals and plants is called lutants, and the term biosorption can describe any system
water pollution. Water pollution is a worldwide prob- in which a sorbate (i.e., an atom, molecule, a molecular
lem, and its control has become increasingly important in ion) interacts with a biosorbent (i.e., a solid surface of a
recent years [2]. Municipal or industrial effluents treated biological matrix) and results in an accumulation at the
by wastewater treatment plants contain large amounts of sorbatebiosorbent interface and therefore a reduction of
organic matter and pollutants, including metals such as sorbent concentration in the solution [11]. Many differ-
Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb. The uptake of metals by sludge flocks ent approaches have been studied and developed for the
is of great significance in pollution control [3]. Lead is a effective removal of heavy metals using biosorbents such
very toxic heavy metal, and its target organs are bones, as peat [12], fly ash [13,14], microbial biomass and other
the brain, blood, kidneys, and the thyroid glands. The agricultural by-products such as sugarcane bagasse [15],
presence of lead in discharge and its toxic nature cause soya bean hulls [16], walnut hulls [17], cotton seed hulls
other adverse effects on receiving waters in the aquatic and corn cobs [18]. It has also been observed that these
system. Even a very low concentration of heavy metals in biosorbents require further modifications to increase the
water can be very toxic to aquatic life. The main source number of active binding sites and make them readily
of lead and cadmium in water is the effluents of process- available for sorption. Huang and Huang have stated
ing industries, i.e., electroplating, paint, pigment, basic that pre-treatment of the biomass removes the surface
steel work, textile industries, metal finishing and electric impurities on the biosorbents and exposes the available
accumulators batteries [4]. binding sites for metal sorption [19,20].
Conventional methods for removing metals from The main goal of this work was to demonstrate
aqueous solutions include chemical precipitation, chem- the use of modified waste materials from banana, kiwi
ical oxidation and reduction, ion exchange filtration, and tangerine cortex as an excellent source of biomass
electrochemical treatment, reverse osmosis, membrane for the chelating of heavy metals such as Cr+3 , Cd+2
technologies and evaporation. The major disadvan- and Zn+2 . The effects of the adsorbent dose, pH, con-
tage of conventional treatment technologies is the tact time and initial metal ion concentration on the
production of toxic chemical sludge, whose dis- adsorption capacity were investigated. The equilib-
posal/treatment becomes a costly affair and is not rium of adsorption was modelled using the Langmuir
eco-friendly. Therefore, removal of toxic heavy met- isotherm.
als to an environmentally safe level in a cost-effective
and environmentally friendly manner is of great impor-
tance [5,6]. In recent years, considerable attention has
been devoted to the study of the removal of heavy 2. Materials and methods
metal ions from solution by adsorption using agricul-
tural materials. Natural materials that are available in 2.1. Reagents
large quantities or certain wastes from agricultural oper-
ations may have the potential to be used as low-cost All of the chemicals used in this study were of analyt-
adsorbents, and they represent unused resources, which ical purity. Stock solutions of single heavy metals were
are widely available and are environmentally friendly. prepared as follows: the stock solutions of cadmium,
Some investigations on the removal of heavy metal chromium and zinc (1000 mg/l) were provided from the
ions with agricultural by-products have been previ- BDH Company; the working standard solutions of metal
ously reported [7]. Biosorption is defined as the ability ions were prepared by diluting 100 ml of the stock stan-
of biological materials to accommodate heavy metals dard solution of the selected ion to 1 l with distilled water
from wastewaters through the metabolically mediated (or by diluting 50 ml of the stock standard solution of the
physico-chemical pathways of uptake. Algae, fungi, bac- selected ion to a half litre with distilled water). A total
teria, parts of some higher plants and yeasts have proven of 5 ml of this solution was diluted to 50 ml with dis-
to be potential metal biosorbents. When the heavy metal tilled water to obtain a solution containing 10 mg/l of the
concentration exceeds the tolerance level, it will show selected ion. These concentrations were used throughout
harmful effects on human physiological and other bio- the experiments. The pH of the solution was adjusted
logical systems [8]. using 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH for fresh dilutions. All
Several biosorption studies have been conducted of the adsorption experiments were conducted at room
using microbial systems and mainly involve bacteria, temperature.
702 K.M. Al-Qahtani / Journal of Taibah University for Science 10 (2016) 700708
Table 1
Biosorption capacity of different fruit cortex powder.
Biosorbent/metal Cr (mg/g) Cd (mg/g) Zn (mg/g)
70
Zn
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
pH value
100
90 Cd Fig. 7. Effect of contact time on removal percentage of Cr+3 ion onto
80 (the black bars banana, the grey bars tangerine and the white bars kiwi)
Cr
% Metal Removal
70 cortex powder.
Zn
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
pH value
2 2
1.8 1.8
1.6 Cd 1.6 Cd
1.4 Cr 1.4 Cr
1.2 1.2
1 Zn 1 Zn
t/qt
t/qt
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
t ( min) t ( min)
Fig. 9. Pseudo second-order kinetics plots of adsorption kinetics of Fig. 11. Pseudo second-order kinetics plots of adsorption kinetics of
metal ions on banana cortex. metal ions on kiwi cortex.
2 60
1.8 55 Cd
1.6 Cd 50
Cr
45
1.4 Cr 40 Zn
1.2 35
%Metal Removal
1 Zn
30
t/qt
0.8 25
0.6 20
15
0.4
10
0.2
5
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
t ( min) Metal cncentraon (ppm)
Fig. 10. Pseudo second-order kinetics plots of adsorption kinetics of Fig. 12. Effect of initial concentration on removal percentage of Cd+2 ,
metal ions on tangerine cortex. Cr+3 and Zn+2 ions onto banana cortex.
120
proportional to the square of the number of remaining
free surface sites. This model can be written as [27]: 100
t 1 t Cd
% Metal Removal
= + (3) 80
Cr
qt k2 qe2 qe
Zn
60
where k2 (g/(mg min)) is the pseudo-second-order rate
constant. The relationship between t/qt and t is lin- 40
ear with a slope of 1/qe and an intercept of 1/(k2 qe2 ).
20
Figs. 911 show the application of the pseudo-second-
order model for the experimental data in Figs. 911. 0
The adsorption process was well described by the 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
pseudo-second-order equation, indicating that the pro- Metal concentraon (ppm)
cess mechanism was chemical adsorption [28].
Fig. 13. Effect of initial concentration on removal percentage of Cd+2 ,
Cr+3 and Zn+2 ions onto kiwi cortex.
3.4. Inuence of the heavy metal concentration in
the wastewater upon removal of heavy metals conical flasks were shaken for 60 min at 158 rpm. The
effect of the metal ion concentration on the removal of
The effect of metal concentration was studied by Cd+2 , Cr+3 and Zn+2 ions by banana, kiwi and tangerine
adding 0.5 g of fruit cortex powder to 25 ml aliquots of decreases with an increase in the initial concentration of
Cd+2 , Cr+3 and Zn+2 with concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 25, the metal ions. This indicates that adsorption is highly
50 and 100 ppm at pH 6.0, as shown in Figs. 1214. The dependent on the initial concentration of the metal ions.
706 K.M. Al-Qahtani / Journal of Taibah University for Science 10 (2016) 700708
100
90
80
Cd
70
% Metal Removal
Cr
60
Zn
50
40
30
20
10
Fig. 15. Langmuir isotherm for adsorption Cd+2 by different waste
0
fruit cortex.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Metal concentraon (ppm)
Table 2
Effect of adsorbent amount on metal removal of Cd+2 , Cr+3 and Zn+2 ions onto fruit cortex.
Adsorbent quantity (g) % metal removal
0.1 29 38 17 68 87 48 62 84 38
0.3 32 41 19 70 89 49 65 85 42
0.5 34 43 21 71 92 51 67 88 45
0.7 37 46 24 73 94 53 68 90 47
1.0 41 50 29 76 96 56 71 93 49
2.0 44 55 32 78 98 57 73 96 52
[3] G. Guibaud, E.V. Hullebusch, F. Bordas, Lead and cad- and equilibrium studies, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002)
mium biosorption by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) 20672073.
extracted from activated sludges: pH-sorption edge tests and [19] C. Huang, C.P. Huang, Application of Aspergillus oryzae and
mathematical equilibrium modelling, Chemosphere 4 (2006) Rhizopus oryzae for Cu(II) removal, Water Res. 30 (1996)
19551962. 19851990.
[4] T.M. Ansari, M.A. Hanif, A. Mahmood, U. Ijaz, M.A. Khan, R. [20] P.M. Huang, M.C. Wang, M.K. Wang,
Nadeem, M. Ali, Immobilization of rose waste biomass for uptake Mineralorganicmicrobial interactions, in: D. Hillel, C.
of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions, Biotechnol. Res. Int. 11 (2011) Rosenzweig, D.S. Powlson, K.M. Scow, M.J. Singer, D.L.
19. Sparks, J. Hatfield (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the
[5] S.S. Ahluwalia, D. Goyal, Microbial and plant derived biomass Environment, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004, pp. 486499.
for removal of heavy metals from wastewater, Bioresour. Technol. [21] A.E. Navarro, K.P. Ramos, H.J. Maldonado, Elucidacon del efecto
98 (2007) 22432257. del pH en la adsorcion de metales pesados mediante biopolmeros
[6] M.A. Hanif, R. Nadeem, M.N. Zafar, K. Akhtar, H.N. Bhatti, naturales: cationes divalentes y superficies activas, Rev. Iberoam.
Kinetic studies for Ni2+ biosorption from industrial wastewater Polim. 7 (2006) 113126.
by Cassia stula (Golden shower) biomass, J. Hazard. Mater. 139 [22] S.C. Fry, Primary cell wall metabolism: tracking the careers
(2007) 345355. of wall polymers in living plant cells, New Phytol. 61 (2004)
[7] D. Mohan, K.P. Singh, Single- and multi-component adsorption 641675.
of cadmium and zinc using activated carbon derived from bagasse [23] H.P.S. Khalil, M. Alwani, A.K. Mohd, Chemical composition,
an agricultural waste, Water Res. 36 (2002) 23042318. anatomy, lignin distribution, and cell wall structure of Malaysian
[8] M. Horsfall Jr., A.I. Spiff, Effect of metal ion concentration on plant waste fibers, BioResearch 1 (2006) 220232.
the biosorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ by Caladium bicolor (wild [24] B.M. Yapo, P. Lerouge, J.F. Thibault, M.C. Ralet, Pectins from
cocoyam), Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4 (2004) 191196. citrus peel cell walls contain homogalacturonans homogenous
[9] W. Bae, C.H. Wu, J. Kostal, A. Mulchandani, W. Chen, Enhanced with respect to molar mass, rhamnogalacturonan I and rhamno-
mercury biosorption by bacterial cells with surface displayed galacturonan II, Carbohydr. Polym. 69 (2007) 426435.
MerR, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69 (2003) 31763180. [25] B. Volesky, Z.R. Holand, Biosoprtion of heavy metals, Biotech-
[10] C.H. Wu, T.K. Wood, A. Mulchandani, W. Chen, Engineering nol. Prog. 11 (1995) 235250.
plantmicrobe symbiosis for rhizoremediation of heavy metals, [26] M.A. Barakat, New trends in removing heavy metals from indus-
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 (2006) 11291134. trial waste-water, Arab. J. Chem. 4 (2011) 361377.
[11] G.M. Gadd, Heavy metal pollutants: environmental and biotech- [27] S. Lagergern, About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble
nological aspects, in: M. Schaechter (Ed.), Encyclopedia of substances, K. Sven. Vetensk. Handl. 14 (1898) 139.
Microbiology, Elsevier, Oxford, 2009, pp. 321334. [28] N.G. Feng, X.Y. Liang, S. Liang, Adsorption study of copper(II)
[12] P. Brown, I.A. Jefcoat, D. Parrish, S. Gill, E. Graham, Evaluation by chemically modified orange peel, J. Hazard. Mater. 164 (2009)
of the adsorptive capacity of peanut hull pellets for heavy metals 12861292.
in solution, Adv. Environ. Res. 4 (2000) 1929. [29] F. Gode, E. Pehlivan, Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by
[13] P. Ricou-Hoeffer, I. Lecuyer, P. Le Cloirec, Experimental design tow Lewatit-anion exchange resins, J. Hazard. Mater. 119 (2005)
methodology applied to adsorption of metallic ions onto fly ash, 175182.
Water Res. 35 (2001) 965976. [30] O.L. Asubiojo, O.B. Ajelabi, Removal of heavy metals from aque-
[14] Y.S. Ho, J.C.Y. Ng, G. McKay, Kinetics of pollutant sorption by ous solution by sawdust adsorption, J. Environ. Chem. Toxicol.
biosorbents: review, Sep. Purif. Rev. 29 (2000) 189232. 91 (2009) 883890.
[15] A.C. Texier, Y. Andres, P. Le Cloirec, Selective biosorption of lan- [31] I. Khazaei, M. Aliabadi, H.T. Mosanian, Use of agricultural waste
thanide (La, Eu, Yb) ions by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Environ. for removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution, J. Chem. Eng. 8
Sci. Technol. 33 (1999) 489495. (2011) 1123.
[16] W.E. Marshall, L.H. Wartelle, D.E. Boler, C.A. Toles, Metal ion [32] M. Jain, V.K. Garg, K. Kadirvelu, Chromium removal from
adsorption by soybean hulls modified with citric acid: a compar- aqueous system and industrial wastewater by agricultural waste,
ative study, Environ. Technol. 21 (2000) 601607. Bioremediat. J. 17 (2013) 3039.
[17] L.H. Wartelle, W.E. Marshall, Citric acid modified agricultural [33] T.R. Chundhury, K.M. Pathen, M.D. Amin, S.B. Quaishi, A.L.
by-products as copper ion adsorbents, Adv. Environ. Res. 4 (2000) Mustafa, Adsorption of Cr(III) from aqueous solution by ground-
17. nut shell, J. Water Res. 1 (2010) 144150.
[18] Z. Reddad, C. Gerente, Y. Andres, P. Le Cloirec, Adsorp- [34] I. Langmuir, The constitution and fundamental properties of
tion of several metal ions onto a low-cost biosorbent: kinetic solids and liquids, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38 (1918) 22212295.