Document No: ABL / DO/ PMS /03 Ashoka Buildcon Limite

Note : Please select from Drop down for the cells highlighted in light green colour
Name of the Employee
/ Appraisee MONTUSH HAZARIKA
Employee Code
Employee Latest 103576
Photo
Name of the Appraisor
MR.SUBECHANDRA RAJBHAR
Name of the Reviewer MR.VIVEK KENGE

Performance Appraisal For

Part A :- Assessment of Achivement of Targets

Major Targets / Assignements for the year 2016 - 17 Weightage

Sr. (Minimum 4 , Maximum 6) %
No. (Min 10% &
(To be filled up by the Appraisee) Max 30%)

33/11KV NEW PSS ERECTION & COMMISSIONING(MUNGER-1,BETTIAH-3 &

1 25%
SAMASTIPUR-1)

33/11KV ARRGUMENTATION PSS ERECTION & COMMISSIONING(MUNGER-1

2 25%
& SAMASTIPUR-2)

33/11K NEW PSS ALL CIVIL & ELECTRICAL DRWAING PREPARE &APPROVAL BY
3 25%
CLIENT(SAMASTIPUR-1)

4 SUB CONTRACTOR DRILLING FOR ALL ABOVE PSS 25%

Total to Sum upto 100% 100%

Levels of Performance for Major Targets / Assignments

BB AV- AE -
Below Expecation Average As per Expecation
Fell shoft of the expected results Meets many of the expected result Just met with the expected results in the current
in the assessment year (14-15). in current assessment year (14-15) assessment year (14-15). Gets 85% performance
Gets 0 performance score for the .Gets 50% performance score for score for the respective target.
respective target. the respective target.

* Appraisor shall be the immediate senior / section head to whom is reporting

* Reviewer shall be the immediate senior of appraisor & a person holding minimum designation of Sr. Manager & above
* In case of dual reporting of an employee the appraisal need to be done jointly by the administrative and functional head (with
reviewer in this case would be immediate senior of administartive appraisor holding minimum designation of Sr. Manager & abo
e.g. For HR employee at site, project incharge is the adminsitrative appraisor and concerned HR head at HO is the functional a
* For any queries on the topic please feel free to contact Prasad Jain Ph.9422758727 / 0253-3011936 e mail: prasadjain@redi
Signature of the Appraisee
Name -

Part B :- Assessment of Job related Competencies

Sr.
Comptencies (Details overleaf) Applicability Desired Level
No.

1 For arriving at
Customer Focus All Bands 1
actual level, please
refer to the
2 Ownership & Result Orientation All Bands Leadership 1

competancy
3 Innovation All Bands annexure embeded 1
below
4 Cost Consciousness & Sustainability All Bands 1

5 Agility & Team Work All Bands 1

6 People Development All Bands 1

7 Functional Competancy ( FC) 1 .. All Bands

8 Appraisor to specify the

FC2 . All Bands desired and actual level
of Functional
9 Competancies
FC3. All Bands

10 FC4. All Bands

Potential Rating Score Total on 1 to 5 scale

Potential score on a scale of 1 to 100 (B)
Part C:- Identification of specific Developmental Needs (You may refer to training Menu while identifying training need
Sr.
2 Major Areas of Strengths
No.
1
2
3

Sr.
Behavioural training recommended
No.
1
2
3

Overall Score #DIV/0!

Overall Rating Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory

Performance Scale
Excellent:- Employee Exceeded most of the
Organizational & Individual Goals, many by a significant
degree in a demanding work plan and exhibits high
potential to grow in the Organization
Very Good:- Employee is able to achieve most of the
Organizational & Individual Goals and deliver well in
demanding work plans. He exhibits higher potential for
growth than his current achievement.

Fair :- Overall Rating Remarks :

Failed to meet a number of requirements & Objectives in a normal work plan. Definable areas exist
where performance is below what is required. Requires close supervision substantial direction &
coaching.

Signature of the Appraiser Signature of the Reviewer

Name - Name -
Designation Designation
oka Buildcon Limited Rev. No: 02 Date 15.04.2017

DOJ 7/16/2016 Qualification Diploma(EEE)

Band selection
Designation SR.ENGINEER from drop down Department EQA
list is must refer
annexure
Band O Band Location SAMASTIPUR,MUNGER,BETTIAH
In this grade
Appraisal Period April 2016 - March 2017
since when
Latest Qualification
Diploma(EEE)
Acquired

nce Appraisal Form 2016 - 17

Self Appraisal
(Actual Achievement to Level of performance
Perform Performan
be described by (Appraisore to select Appraiser's Remarks on the status of
ance ce Score
employee. Annexure can the level from drop achievement
% %
be attached if the space down list)
found short)

0% 0%

0% 0%

0% 0%

0% 0%

Total Performance Score Page 1 out of 100% 0%

ed results in the current
). Gets 85% performance
arget.
EE -
Exceeds Expecation
Exceeds expectation. Surpassed expected
results in the current assessment year (14-15).
Gets 100% performance score for the
respective target

n of Sr. Manager & above

trative and functional head (with the final say of administrative head). The
designation of Sr. Manager & above
R head at HO is the functional appraisor.
011936 e mail: prasadjain@rediffmail.com
 Signature of the Appraiser
Name -

Actual Level C. Work related Critical incidents (Positive /

Competan Negative) during the appraisal year (if any)
(To be filled by Remarks by Reviewer
Appraisor)
cy Score

#DIV/0!
P.S. :- You may use separate sheet to
#DIV/0! accommodate the contents.

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
while identifying training needs for your employees)
Sr.
2 Major areas for development
No.
1
2
3

Sr.
Functional Training Recommended
No.
1
2
3

Overall Rating Score is arrived based on Performance score (70%

weightage) and Potential score (30% weightage). The Overall Rating to be
arrived by appraisor and reviewer by ranking the employees in their purview
Satisfactory Fair
based on descending order of overall rating scores and bell curve
guidelines.
 Good:- Employee is above average and meets all normal work Satisfactory:-
requirements. Able to deliver at basic level in challenging emerging Employee is average and meets many normal work
scenarios and exhibits reasonable potential to grow requirements and has experience to grow.

all Rating Remarks :

Signature of HR / PMS Team

Name -
Designation
ma(EEE)

EQA

MUNGER,BETTIAH

- March 2017

ma(EEE)

arks on the status of

vement
 nts (Positive /
l year (if any)

arate sheet to
contents.

score (70%
Overall Rating to be
ees in their purview
d bell curve
any normal work
o grow.