Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

B O O K S

Pharmacologic Analysis of various approaches (e.g. it is not Langmuir equation from it. As well
DrugReceptor Interaction pointed out that Stephenson and as being wrong, this misses a good
operational models are identical opportunity to explain the difference
(3rd edn)
apart from one extra assumption in between microscopic and macro-
by T. Kenakin, Lippincott-Raven, the latter). One almost comes away scopic constants.
1997. $104.00 (xiii 1 491 pages) with the impression that the choice In the chapter on statistical meth-
ISBN 0 397 51815 3 between theories is a matter of the ods, there is a section on non-linear
aesthetics and personal preference, curve fitting, and this is to be wel-
rather than of truth and falsehood. comed because it is a topic that is not
This approach is apparent through- dealt with extensively in elementary
It would be useful to have a book out the book. For example, on p. 272 statistics books. Unfortunately, this
on the principles of drugreceptor we are told that measurements of section begins by confusing the sep-
interaction to which students could full-agonist affinity can be made by a arate issues of Gaussian distribu-
refer, and Kenakins book asks many procedure developed by Furchgott; tions and unequal variances at
of the right questions. For example, the method is then described in the different points on the curve (hetero-
it addresses issues such as how well standard way, without qualification. scedasticity), and the method for
does a drug bind to a receptor?, how But the next section, confusingly, dealing with the latter (weighted
well does it activate the receptor goes on to point out that the method least squares) is not mentioned,
once it has bound?, how can we doesnt work; this would have been although it is available in many com-
measure these things? and how better explained at the outset. mercial curve-fitting packages. It is a
can measurements of drug action There is, in many places, a blurring pity that it was not discussed prop-
aid understanding of transduction of the essential distinction between erly here, because the manuals for
mechanisms and drug develop- empirical curve fitting and physical the commercial packages appear to
ment? These questions are central to reality. The Hill equation is used have been written by people who
pharmacology. They are also central extensively (although it is referred know more about animated icons
(although this is not discussed) to to, incorrectly, as the logistic equa- than statistics, and are usually
understanding the effects of mu- tion), but its basis and its lack of incomprehensible.
tations in receptors, and hence to physical meaning are not explained. Finally, on p. 261, the description
understanding the function of pro- Worse still, the old chestnut of of the predictions of the ternary com-
tein domains (e.g. where is the bind- the general form of the Gaddum plex model seems to fall into the trap
ing site?). Many of these questions equation is described uncritically of thinking that, because there are
have been answered with some (p. 336). From time to time, it has two receptor species with agonist
degree of quantitative success for been suggested that this allows bound (with and without the G pro-
agonist-activated ion channels, which analysis of competitive antagonism tein bound), this means we expect to
are simpler than G protein-coupled when n molecules of agonist and m see two-component binding curves.
receptors (GPCRs). Therefore, it is molecules of antagonist interact with This is not the case. If there is plenty
surprising that the book ignores all the receptor. This equation lacks a of G protein present, then we expect
the evidence from ion-channel work, physical basis and certainly cannot simple Langmuirian agonist bind-
and deals almost entirely with be expected to provide useful infor- ing. If the supply of G protein is lim-
GPCRs. mation, but there is no indication of ited then its concentration will fall as
So, if the right questions are asked, this in the book. It is an error that agonist binds and the binding curve
what about the answers? Chapter 1 results from mistakenly taking the will be smeared out and shallow
goes through the usual list of mod- Hill equation as a description of (an example is shown in Fig. 8.11,
els, including occupation theory, physical reality rather than a con- but not explained). However, this
Stephenson, the operational model, venient empirical description. happens because of depletion of a
rate theory, two-state theory and There are a number of other errors reactant, not because there are two
ternary complex models. But it is not too. For example, on p. 248 the Adair sorts of binding site.
made clear which ones are merely equation is given. This describes the Almost all of the book is con-
history (occupation), which ones binding of a ligand to a molecule cerned with equilibria, a result, no
are wrong in principle (Stephenson; with n binding sites. If the micro- doubt, of its focusing on GPCRs
operational model), which are curi- scopic equilibrium constants for (measurement of rates has largely
osities that live on only in textbooks each step are equal then it reduces been confined to ion channels). The
like this (rate theory), what the re- exactly to the Langmuir equation1. final chapter deals with kinetics
lationship between the theories is However, Kenakin writes the Adair and mentions some of the problems
and, most importantly, what evidence equation in its original form with involved in measuring and inter-
exists for them. Incorrect assump- macroscopic equilibrium constants, preting rates. On p. 442 it is stated
tions are listed without comment, and thus appears to have to make that checking that the measured
and no attempt is made to relate the an approximation to obtain the ratio of rates agrees with the

TiPS December 1998 (Vol. 19) 515


B O O K S

independently determined equilib- On the positive side, Kenakins real regret, because if there existed a
rium constant can solve the problem book includes a large number of pic- clear and reliable textbook in this
of diffusion-limited rates. Unfortu- tures of experimental results (with a area it would save me a lot of time in
nately, there is no mention that this strong bias to work on isolated tis- writing handouts.
check does not work if an intact tis- sues), and a good account of the
sue is used and, as is often the case, complications that beset the study of David Colquhoun
Department of Pharmacology,
the diffusion rate is slow because of competitive antagonists in whole tis-
University College London,
the binding of drug to the receptors sues. Nevertheless, I have to say that Gower Street, London, UK WC1E 6BT.
as it diffuses. In this case, both I could not recommend it to our
numerator and denominator will be final-year students who would, I
Reference
wrong by much the same factor and fear, end up even more confused 1 Edsall, J. T. and Wyman, J. (1958)
the check is useless. than they already are. I say this with Biophysical Chemistry, Academic Press

Proinflammatory and Evidently, as the book is part of a that deal with anti-inflammatory
Antiinflammatory Peptides series on lung biology, the respira- peptides feature cytokines such as
tory tract is the organ of primary interleukin 4 (IL-4), IL-10 and
edited by Sami I. Said, interest, although other systems tumour necrosis factor a, natriuretic
Marcel Dekker, 1998. $195.00 are also considered if appropriate. peptides, melanocortins, and vaso-
(xxviii + 711 pages) Among the pro-inflammatory neuro- active intestinal polypeptide (VIP).
ISBN 0 8247 0120 8 peptides, tachykinins (substance P Among these it is the chapters on
and neurokinin A) take an important VIP in particular that represent a
place, as they are released by irrita- thorough overview of VIP-ergic
tive stimuli from sensory nerve control of inflammation and tissue
It is increasingly emerging that fibres and can cause broncho- homeostasis.
cytokines are not the only peptides constriction, increase vascular per- I need to record my regret, how-
that facilitate or inhibit inflam- meability, facilitate leukocyte adher- ever, that the books list of peptides
mation, as they are joined by a grow- ence and emigration, and stimulate that can dampen inflammatory reac-
ing number of neuropeptides that mucus secretion. In paying tribute to tions is by no means complete. There
can also influence the cellular sys- their advanced status of preclinical is growing evidence that somato-
tems involved in the inflammatory investigation, tachykinins are exten- statin1, galanin2, corticotropin-
process. To devote a whole book to sively dealt with in six chapters releasing factor3,4 and opioid pep-
these inflammation-related peptides which suffer from some redundancy tides4,5 display anti-inflammatory
is hence a worthwile enterprise that as far as their molecular biology and properties that can be exploited
provides novel perspectives on receptor pharmacology are con- therapeutically. Having been ex-
understanding and treating inflam- cerned. Some overlap is also inher- plored for quite some time, each of
mation. However, when I read that ent in the two chapters on endo- these peptides would have deserved
the book (Vol. 112 in the Lung thelins, which review the recent a concise overview of its impli-
Biology in Health and Disease series) progress in this field, as does the cations in inflammation, particularly
was based on a FASEB symposium chapter on kinins. since the title of the volume signifies
held in 1995, I was about to dis- A particular highlight of the book that the known pro- and anti-inflam-
respect it as another volume of meet- is its emphasis on the fact that matory peptides are treated in a
ing proceedings with their often inflammation, after being initiated comprehensive manner. However,
fragmentary and unsteady treat- by pro-inflammatory mediators, corticotropin-releasing factor and
ment of a subject. I changed my normally abates with time, a process opioid peptides are mentioned only in
attitude, though, when I realized that appears to be defective if passing, and somatostatin, galanin
that the 711-page book contains an chronic inflammation is to develop. and corticotropin-releasing factor are
88-page author index listing all Apoptosis of inflammatory cells is not even referred to in the subject
authors that are referenced any- discussed to be an important index.
where in the 23 chapters plus a mechanism by which inflammation All in all, this book is considerably
17-page subject index. Thus, con- is brought to an end, and it is pro- more than merely the proceedings of
siderable effort has gone into mak- posed that strategies to induce selec- a conference. For a large part, it is a
ing the book a useful source of refer- tive inflammatory cell apoptosis thorough and scholarly account of
ence, and this impression is borne could lead to novel approaches for the diverse roles that peptides can
out by most of the chapters. therapeutic gain. The book articles play in inflammation. The novice

516 TiPS December 1998 (Vol. 19)

View publication stats

Вам также может понравиться