Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Engineering
(FChE)
SEPARATION PROCESSES II
LABORATORY
PREFACE
In this course, chemical engineering students will be introduced to the application of the
semi-industry scale equipments as a preparation before entering the actual workplaces.
This course will give a hands on experience to the students on how to handle the
equipments and to interpret the data taken from the experiments, which provides practical
and informative exposure about operational mechanisms of separation systems that can
be used in the chemical/bio-process industries.
This course is not only focused on conducting experimental works but it also emphasizes
on the development of team working skills. Maximal efficient use of teamwork skills is
required to complete each experiment on time and produce a quality work product. By
providing conducive laboratory environment, it enables promotion of positive interaction
and communication among students and lab personnel, which then can train them to be a
responsible and discipline person in any given situation. With these proactive attitudes,
the aim of creating professionalism at work can be achieved.
In order to be a successful process engineer, a student should have a clear vision and
make the best use of this subject to gain as much knowledge and experience as possible.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
CONTENTS
1. Preface
2. Table of Contents
3. Introduction and Basics
4. Guidelines for Preparing Lab Report
5. List of Experiments
6. Experiment 1: Sieving
7. Experiment 2: Fluidized Beds
8. Experiment 3: Vacuum Filtration
9. Experiment 4: Tray Dryer
10 Experiment 5: Spray Dryer
11. Experiment 6: Evaporation Column
12. Experiment 7: Vapour-Liquid Equilibrium (VLE)
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Ensuring the safety of personnel and protection of facilities are paramount in any
laboratory experience.
1. Every student must wear lab coat and shoes (slippers or sandals are totally
prohibited) and student must always be in a good manner.
2. Practice good housekeeping. Make sure all tables and experimental surroundings
are in a clean and organized condition and all tools should be placed in order before
leaving the laboratory.
3. All the specific safety precautions in the laboratory must be obeyed.
4. Students should be responsible on the equipments. Do not leave the lab while
apparatus is on.
5. Every student is prohibited from smoking, drinking or eating in the laboratory.
6. Pay attention and be careful when running the experiment to govern the accuracy
of the results and to avoid accidents.
7. Students are not allowed to run experiment after the scheduled time except for
cases where it is ordered by the supervisor and the student is monitored by lecturer
and laboratory technicians.
8. All litters and wastes from the experiment must be thrown away in a dust bin or a
special designated area. Do not throw litters and wastes in wash bin or urinal.
9. Do not make noise in the laboratory.
10. Students must familiarize themselves with the location of emergency aids e.g. fire
extinguisher, emergency shower etc.
11. Any accident must be reported immediately and verbally to lecturer and/or
laboratory technicians.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Safety attire
1. Every student must wear proper safety equipments at all times when running an
experiment. Most of the experiments involve chemicals, high temperature and
pressure. Therefore, safety glasses must be put on to protect the eyes.
2. Safety helmet must be used if students need to climb; e.g. distillation column to
collect data and record the observation.
Laboratory equipments
1. Students are prohibited from using the experimental equipments before receiving
a comprehensive explanation from lecturer/laboratory assistants. This is not only
dangerous to the students and other lab personnel in the laboratory, but can also
damage the equipments.
2. Before using the equipments, make sure of the appropriate and correct power
source and plug for the equipments.
3. Sensitive equipments cannot be moved. Use the equipments in the designated
area.
4. Any damage to the equipment while using it must be reported immediately to the
responsible laboratory technician. Do not try to repair it yourself.
5. Students are forbidden from using damaged equipments.
1. Students are held responsible for cleaning the table area, equipments that they
used as well as the laboratory surroundings to avoid hazards to other users.
2. Wastes must be properly labeled and disposed in a designated area.
1. All sources of gas, fuel and gas flow valve must be turned off tightly before
leaving the laboratory and when they are not in use. The cover of a fume
chamber must be lowered to the lowest level.
2. Make sure the right power source is used with the equipment to be
engaged. Equipments which are not in use must be switched off.
3. If students intend to leave an operating equipment, make sure the equipment can
operate safely. Students also need to inform their absence to the laboratory
technicians.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
The nature of laboratory studies is not only the limited time, activity intensive but also
limited in resources. Therefore, attendance at the regularly scheduled class sessions is
vital to successfully produce the required deliverables. Team members depend on the
availability of the entire team to maximize the value of the teams products. In addition
to that, the following rules must be complied:
The first 15 min Students briefly read the experimental procedure and theory
as well as identifying the equipments and apparatus needed.
The next 1.5 hrs Students run the experiment
The next 1 hr Students must complete the lab report
The last 15 min Students clean up the working area and the equipments
used.
Grading
The final grade of this course is determined from all graded objects with weighting and
grading as follows.
Summative assessment
The date, time and venue of the test will be announced once after all the experiments
are completed.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
1 System
System identification sheet 5%
Identification*
2 Lab Preparation
Experimental sheet 5%
Report**
3 Q&A on lab
preparation report (based on Lab Preparation
5%
explanation and Report)
justification*
4 Final Report** Group report 80%
*individual assessment
**team assessment
**Team-based Lab work will be multiplied with a grade adjustment factor from peer
rating to assess students team-working ability. Students have to submit the peer rating
form after each experiment. Otherwise they will get a factor of zero.
Accountability
Participation
Clothing
Ethics
Safety
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
The lab reports will be assessed by proportionally weighting performance in the following
categories.
No. Assessment % each
1 Technical Aspects 5%
2 Abstract 10%
3 Introduction 10%
5 Methodology 10%
6 Results 10%
7 Discussion 30%
8 Conclusion 10%
9 References 5%
Overall Total 100%
Lab reports should be submitted not later than 1 week after the experimental work.
Students are responsible to submit all lab report on time. Failure to do that will be penalised
10% per day.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Basically, your Lab Report should tell what you did, why you did it, what you learned and
the significance of your results. The report does not have to be extremely long. In fact,
the key to writing an excellent report lies in presenting concisely your response to the
objectives of the project and justifying that response with appropriate documentation. The
Lab Report should consist of the following sections:
1. Title page
This page should include the title of the experiment, experiment date, submission date,
name of the supervisor, section no, group no, name of the group members.
2. Abstract
The abstract is the report in miniature. It summarizes the whole report in one, concise
paragraph of about 100-200 words. As distinguished from the introduction, the abstract
tells the reader what will be done and lays the groundwork. Also, the abstract summarizes
the report itself, not the actual experiment. Hence, you cannot write the abstract until
after youve completed the report.
Before writing the abstract, it is often helpful to summarize each section of the report
(introduction, methods and materials, procedure, results, discussion, and conclusion) in
one sentence. Then try to arrange this information into a short paragraph. Remember, the
abstract should be a precise and specific summary.
3. Introduction
4. Literature Review/Theory
The Literature Review and/or Theory section is a brief review of relevant ideas from the
major field and a more intensive coverage of the specific topic at hand in your own
words. Only pertinent articles or textbook materials relevant to the assigned topics are
cited. The literature may reveal conflicting views and opinions on the topic; these are
included in the review in an unbiased way. The underlying physical principles, laws and
governing equations relevant to the problem are presented. State the assumptions and
limitations of the theory. Charts, diagrams, and other exhibits may be used in developing
and explaining the theory, especially if they aid clarity and conciseness. The relationship
between academic/laboratory and industrial perspectives (Connection and
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
application of concepts from the pilot-process to the real industrial processes) must be
explained.
5. Methodology
Assumption and justification involved while doing the experiment and preparing the
report may also included. Importance and information on precautious/safety aspect of
the experiment may also highlighted and discussed, if any. This rewrite should now
reflect the actual experimental program as implemented by your team, and thus be
consistent with the upcoming Results and Discussion sections.
6. Results
The Results section delivers the evidence that will help answer the questions raised by the
objectives of the investigation, should prepare readers for the more detailed upcoming
discussion, and justify the conclusions that will be drawn next.
Observations, data and calculated results (in consistent units) are often presented best as
graphs or charts, particularly if it will be important to illustrate trends. However, tables
make sense when you need to present accurate data and specific facts or demonstrate the
relationships between numerical and/or descriptive data. Figures and tables should include
whenever possible published, theoretical, and/or model/simulation values available
from the literature or produced programmatically. Tables of raw experimental data are not
placed in this section; they are reported in appendices. Other results that do not relate
directly to the upcoming discussion can either be reported in the Appendix, or by reference
to the Lab Prep Report. Data are often summarized or reduced for presentation.
Reducing the data allows generalizations to be made and trends to be pointed out.
Obviously, then, charts and tables must be accompanied by appropriate text. Every figure
or table itself is numbered and supplied with a brief but descriptive title or caption. Build
graphics and other visual displays so that, with their accompanying description, they are
self-explanatory. Consult a good reference for guidelines on producing quality graphs and
tables. The Results section text briefly explains how the results were obtained from the
experimental data, the associated quantitative uncertainty (e.g., confidence limits,
standard error, etc.), references to appropriate equations or sample calculations, and any
critical assumptions or approximations made in obtaining the results. However, best
practice in bringing together your exhibits and your words is accomplished by referring
readers to graphics explicitly and telling them what trends to notice.
7. Discussion
If the Results section delivers the evidence, the Discussion section makes the case in court.
In the Discussion section, you explain what your experimental results mean by relating
them to the concepts and ideas presented in the Introduction and Literature
Review/Theory sections.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
There are many questions that could be answered in this section so you should not limit
yourself to those offered here as examples. Answer the questions that make most sense
for your work.
Do the results agree with theory, with the work of others, with models/simulation?
If so, how? If not, why not? Can the disagreement be explained?
What are the most probable sources of experimental error and have these affected
your ability to draw conclusions? How might these errors have been reduced or
eliminated?
Did your results reveal problems with the experimental plan, method, or
equipment? How might these be improved?
Were your assumptions suspect or reliable?
What definite conclusions can you draw from your results? What conclusions are
more speculative?
What implications do your results have on theory and current industrial practices?
What questions remain unanswered? What questions should be answered next?
In this section, you may also criticize the lab experiment and make recommendations or
improvement. Such criticisms and recommendations, however, should focus on the lab as
a learning experience; mere complaints about faulty equipment or amount of time spent
are not appropriate.
8. Conclusion
Draw conclusion from the results and discussion that answer the objectives of the
experiment. Then go on to explain your conclusions that summarizes and reflects the
results and discussion.
9. Nomenclature
All symbols and acronyms used in the report and its appendices must be listed and
defined in a Nomenclature section with the consistent set of units used for
calculation/reporting of results. Symbols are arranged in alphabetical order, Latin terms
(e.g., a, b, D, Re, Pr, etc.) first, followed by Greek (e.g., , , , etc.), and finally
subscripts (e.g., i, j, k, etc.). Greek and subscript sets are headed by the titles Greek
and Subscripts.
In addition to the Nomenclature section proper, introduce these symbols where they first
appear using either running text or a list set off from the running text. If a dozen or fewer
symbols are used in this report, you may rely on the in-text introduction of symbols and
acronyms alone and forego a separate Nomenclature section altogether.
10.References
The Literature Cited section includes all references from which material in this report was
taken. It does not include materials consulted but not cited. It does include citations listed
in any appendix document (e.g., citing of handbooks from which properties data have been
taken). A report without ANY cited literature is typically not a
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
credible piece of work. Citing the literature typically strengthens any case you are making
in your own reporting.
The in-text citations themselves should give the page number(s) relevant to the actual
material cited. The in-text citation plus the full reference in the Literature Cited section
make it possible for the reader to find the material.
11.Appendices
Appendices may include raw data, calculations, graphs, and other quantitative materials
that were part of the experiment, but not reported in any of the above sections. Refer to
each appendix at the appropriate point (or points) in your report. For example, at the end
of your results section, you might have the note, See Appendix A: Raw Data Chart.
Adapted from: Unit Operations Laboratory Syllabus, Cain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State
University; Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Polymer Engineering Laboratory 2, Faculty of Chemical Engineering,
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
LIST OF EXPERIMENTS
EXPERIMENT 1: SIEVING
EXPERIMENT 6: EVAPORATION
EXPERIMENT 1
SIEVING
Background of Experiment
Sieving refers to the separation of a mixture of particles of different sizes using sieves each
with a uniform sized opening. Standard sieves of specified opening sizes are used. Sieves
are stacked with the sieve with the largest opening on the top and the material is separated
into fractions by shaking. The material between two sieves is smaller than the upper sieve
opening but larger than the smaller sieve opening.
Many natural and manufactured materials occur in a disperse form, which means that it
consist of differently shaped and sized particles. The particle size distribution, i.e. the
number of particles of different sizes, is responsible for the determination of important
physical and chemical properties such as:
This list could be continued at great length. The examples clearly show how important it
is to have knowledge of the particle distribution, particularly within the context of quality
assurance in the production of bulk goods. If the particle distribution changes during the
manufacturing process then the quality of the finished product will also change. Only a
continuous monitoring of the particle size distribution can guarantee a constant product
quality.
Objective of Experiment
In this experiment, students will determine the particle distribution using sieving method.
Scopes of Experiment
Given a sample of particulate solid, you are assigned to conduct sieving experiment using
sieve shaker with designated dimension (with mesh openings that reveal particle
distribution at critical sizes). If the particle range of material representing feed to a screen
or product from a crusher is wide, you have to use a large sample (from 500 to 1,000
grams). If the material is finely ground, use a smaller sample of 25 to 100 grams. From
this experiment, you should determine the particle distribution. The steps required must
be repeated at least three times to get more accurate result.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Description of Experiment
There are different methods in determining the particle distribution (Figure 1.1). The choice
of a particular method depends primarily on the dispersion status, i.e. on the degree of
fineness of the sample.
Figure 1.1: Particle Size Determination Methods (Retsch; Solution in Milling & Sieving,
15th Dec 2010)
The oldest and best-known method is particle size determination by sieve analysis. The
particle size distribution is defined via the mass or volume. Sieve analysis used to divide
the granular material into size fractions and then to determine the weight of these fractions.
In this way a relatively broad particle size spectrum can be analyzed quickly and reliably
(Retsch; Solution in Milling & Sieving, 15th Dec 2010).
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
(a) (b)
Figure 1.2: (a) Sieve shaker (b) Sieves with different mesh openings (Retsch; Solution
in Milling & Sieving, 15th Dec 2010)
Experimental Procedures
You can begin your particle size distribution analysis after you properly collect, prepare
and size a sample. Select test sieves with mesh openings that reveal particle distribution
at critical sizes. These are usually stated in a product specification or determined by
material processing requirements.
1. Stack the sieves on top of each other with the coarsest (largest opening) on the
top of the stack.
2. Put the bottom pan under the finest (smallest) opening sieve. This pan collects
fine material that passes through the last one.
3. Use a laboratory scale (accurate to .1 gram) to weigh an empty container (such as
an extra empty bottom pan) and establish the tare weight.
4. Weigh the sample material.
5. Empty the sample into the top of the stack. Make sure you do not overload the
surface as this causes blinding or blocking of the openings.
6. Put the stack into the sieve shaker.
7. Place a cover on the top of the stack. (If do not have the cover, you need to
determine the sieving loss)
8. Make sure the stack is securely in place.
9. Set the proper length of time to agitate the material.
10. Turn on the shaker and run the test.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
11. After the shaker stops, empty the material from the coarsest sieve into the empty
container that you weighed in step (3). Use a soft bristle brush to gently brush the
underside of the sieve to remove all of the particles.
12. Tap the side of the frame with the handle of the brush to clean the remaining
material from the sieve.
13. Weigh the contents in the part to the nearest 1/10 gram and record the data.
14. Return the material to its original sample container.
15. Repeat steps 11 through 14, using the container referenced in step (3) for each
sieve, including the fine material in the bottom pan.
16. Total the weights to make sure the sum of the retained material and the material
in the bottom pan is as close as possible to the original weight. Check your
specification for allowable variation.
17. Divide the weight obtained from each sieve by the weight of the original sample.
Record the percentage for each sieve.
18. Calculate and record the cumulative percentages as required.
19. Repeat all the steps above for 3 times.
Experimental Result
Based on the above procedures, you need to identify what kind of data you should extract
from the experimental work. Then, all the data must be recorded in a table.
Example of the table of experimental result is as Table 1.1:
Cumulative
Mesh Mean Particle Mass fractions for
Sieving Loss
Run openings Size, Dpi Fraction, p3 particle size
(g)
(mm) (mm) (%) less than Dpi
(%)
3
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Result Discussion
Questions
1. What is the fractions, p3 of the samples in each class of particle size. (This can be
shown graphically in bar charts or histogram). Sample of the graph is as follows:
Figure 1.3: Fractions, p3 against the class of particle size (nominal sieve mesh), x
3. Plot the cumulative percentage of particle size that less than the mean particle size,
Dpi for each mesh opening of the sieve. Then, determine the particle size at the
cumulative percentage of 16%, 50% and 84%.
P84 P16
Particle Distributi on
2
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
EXPERIMENT 2
FLUIDIZED BED
Background of Experiment
The upward flow of fluid through a bed of particles is a situation encountered both in nature, as with
the natural movement of ground water, crude petroleum or natural gas, through porous media, and
in industrial operations such as backwashing filters, ion- exchange processes, extraction of soluble
components from raw materials and for certain types of chemical reactor. It is well known that if the
particles are loosely packed and the pressure drop due to the flow through the bed is equivalent to
the weight of the bed, the phenomenon of fluidization occurs. The fluidized state occurs naturally is
so-called quick sand and industrially, use is made of the high rate of solids mixing that accompanies
fluidization for various operations such as drying, coating, heat transfer and chemical reaction.
This equipment is designed to allow the study of the characteristics of flow through both fixed and
fluidized bed of solid particles. Although the majority of fixed and fluidized bed situations encountered
by practicing engineers are three dimensional, in order that students can readily observe the
important phenomenon of bubbling that occurs in gas-solid systems when the gas velocity is in the
excess of that required for fluidization. The transparent walls allow studies to be made of bubble
behaviour in the gas-solid system.
Objective of Experiment
Scopes of Experiment
In this experiment, you have to investigate the principles of fluidization of fine sand using
fluidized bed. For different air flow rate supplied to the system, you need to further study
the characteristics of fluidized bed such as the thickness and the condition of fluidized bed
formed, and also the pressure drop.
Description of Experiment
Many important industrial processes rely upon intimate contact between a fluid (liquid or
gas) and a granular material. In early applications, the fluid flowed through a static bed of
granules supported on a grid provided the material is suitable, great improvement in
mixing and contact is achieved if the granule size is properly matched to the upward
velocity of the fluid. The particles of material will be supported by the drag forces and the
bed is said to be "fluidized". The fluidized beds show following liquid or fluid like properties.
The principle of operation of fluidized systems are based on the fact that if a gas is allowed
to flow through a bed of particulate solids at velocity greater than the settling velocity of
the particles and less than the terminal velocity for pneumatic conveying and equal to the
minimum velocity of fluidization (V mf ), the solids get partially suspended in
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
the stream of upward moving gas. The gas stream negates the gravitational pull due to
weight of particles to enable the suspended state of the solid.
The resultant mixture of solids and gas behave like a liquid and thus rightly solids are
called Fluidized. The solid particles are continually caught up in eddies and fall back in a
random boiling motion so that each fluidized particle is surrounded by the gas stream for
efficient drying or granulation or coating purpose. In the process of fluidization there occurs
an intense mixing between the solids or gas resulting in uniform condition of temperature,
composition and particle size distribution throughout the bed.
A mass of finely divided solids is transformed into a fluidized bed by lifting action of gas
passing through it. Thus three stages can be identified in the process of fluidizing a bed of
solids basing on the velocity of gas flow through it. They include:
Mobilized bed
As shown in Figure 2.1 below, the velocity of the fluid through the bed opposite to the
direction of gravity determines whether the bed is fixed, expanded, or is swept out. This
led to the development of the concept of minimum fluidization velocity (V mf ) at which the
bed just begins to fluidize. Thus the primary concern is to measure and optimize the V mf
for efficient fluidization.
(a) Slow flow rate (b) Intermediate flow rate (c) High flow rate
The fixed bed (a) occurs when the approach velocity or superficial velocity, ( V o ) , is
much smaller than the minimized fluidization velocity,( V mf ). The fluidized bed (b) occurs
when the approach velocity is intermediate between the minimum fluidization velocity and
the terminal velocity. The pneumatically mobilized bed (c) occurs when the approach
velocity is much greater than the particle terminal velocity, (U t ).
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Experimental Result
Based on the above objective, you need to identify the required data to investigate the
fluidization process. Then, all the data must be recorded in a table.
Result Discussion
Questions
1. Plot a graph of (log) pressure drop versus (log) air flow rate. Explain the curve
obtained from the experimental result based on the condition of fluidized bed of
fine sand observed during the experimental work.
2. Determine the fluidization point and what is the air flow rate at the fluidization
point?
3. Calculate the bed void fraction, M of the fluidized bed of the fine sand.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
EXPERIMENT 3
VACUUM FILTRATION
Background of Experiment
In another class of mechanical separations, placing a screen in the flow through which they
cannot pass imposes virtually total restraint on the particles above a given size. The fluid
in this case is subject to a force that moves it past the retained particles. This is called
filtration. The particles suspended in the fluid, which will not pass through the apertures,
are retained and build up into what is called a filter cake. Sometimes it is the fluid, the
filtrate that is the product, in other cases the filter cake.
The fine apertures necessary for filtration are provided by fabric filter cloths, by meshes
and screens of plastics or metals, or by beds of solid particles. In some cases, a thin
preliminary coat of cake, or of other fine particles, is put on the cloth prior to the main
filtration process. This preliminary coating is put on in order to have sufficiently fine pores
on the filter and it is known as a pre-coat.
Objective of Experiment
In this experiment, students will be carrying out the experiment of vacuum filtration to
characterize the flow through the cake in a simple laboratory test.
Scopes of Experiment
In this experiment, you will be doing a simple experiment on vacuum filtration. From this
experiment you need to record the time taken for the filtration process of various amount
of filtrate at different vacuum pressure. So that, at the end of experiment, you need to
study the relationship between the specific resistance of the filter cake and the medium,
and the vacuum pressure.
Description of Experiment
Cake Filtration
Cake filtration consists of passing a solid suspension (slurry) through a porous medium or
septum (e.g. a porous membrane, a woven wire). The solids in the slurry are retained on
the surface of the medium where they build up, forming an increasing thicker cake. As
more slurry is filtered the solids retained on the medium provide most of filtering action.
Head losses in the cake will control the filtrate flow rate. In cake filtration the cake is the
real filtering element. Vacuum filtration is one of cake-forming filters.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
To some extent one would expect that a high pressure driving force would be beneficial
for liquid removal, but the effect is limited because some cakes are compressible. In these
cases, then, vacuum filtration would be more efficient. With a compressible cake, the act
of forcing liquid through the already collected solids (the cake) result in these solids being
pressed together forming a dense matt. This dense matt, which requires a greater force
to penetrate, thus produces a denser matt, which requires even higher forces which
produce an even denser matt and so on. This problem multiplies exponentially with the
thickness of the cake layer. Figure 3.1 illustrates this phenomenon. Normally one can
expect a best overall efficiency if the cake thickness is kept well below its theoretical
maximum and the driving force is not the maximum available. This is true in general, but
especially so in those cases where the solids have to be washed, extracted or subsequently
impregnated.
Figure 3.1: Filter cake formation (BHS Filtration, 20th Dec 2010)
The analysis of filtration is largely a question of studying the flow system. The fluid asses
through the filter medium, which offers resistance to its passage, under the influence of
force which is the pressure differential across the filter. Thus, we can write the familiar
equation:
Resistance arises from the filter cloth, mesh, or bed, and to this is added the resistance of
the filter cake as it accumulates. The filter-cake resistance is obtained by multiplying the
specific resistance of the filter cake, that is its resistance per unit thickness, by the
thickness of the cake. The resistances of the filter material and pre-coat are combined into
a single resistance called the filter resistance. It is convenient to express the filter
resistance in terms of a fictitious thickness of filter cake. This thickness is multiplied by
the specific resistance of the filter cake to give the filter resistance. Thus the overall
equation giving the volumetric rate of flow dV/dt is:
dV/dt = (ADP)/R
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
As the total resistance is proportional to the viscosity of the fluid, we can write:
R = mr(Lc + L)
where R is the resistance to flow through the filter, m is the viscosity of the fluid, r is the
specific resistance of the filter cake, Lc is the thickness of the filter cake and L is the
fictitious equivalent thickness of the filter cloth and pre-coat, A is the filter area, and DP
is the pressure drop across the filter.
If the rate of flow of the liquid and its solid content are known and assuming that all solids
are retained on the filter, the thickness of the filter cake can be expressed by:
Lc = wV/A
where w is the fractional solid content per unit volume of liquid, V is the volume of fluid
that has passed through the filter and A is the area of filter surface on which the cake
forms.
R = mr[w(V/A) + L) (1)
and the equation for flow through the filter, under the driving force of the pressure drop
is then:
Equation 2 may be regarded as the fundamental equation for filtration. It expresses the
rate of filtration in terms of quantities that can be measured, found from tables, or in some
cases estimated. It can be used to predict the performance of large-scale filters on the
basis of laboratory or pilot scale tests. Two applications of Equation 2 are filtration at a
constant flow rate and filtration under constant pressure.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Experimental Result
Time, s Cumulative
Volume of 100 200 300 400 volume of
wastewater mmHg mmHg mmHg mmHg filtrate
fed, cm3 generated,
cm3
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
50
55
Where;
VF = Cumulative of filtrate generated
Result Discussion
Questions
2. Plot a graph of t/ VF versus VF for every vacuum pressure. From the graph,
determine the filtration constant.
3. Calculate the specific resistance of the filter cake and the specific resistance of the
medium.
4. Discuss the relationship of between the specific resistance of the filter cake and the
vacuum pressure; and between the specific resistance of the medium and the
vacuum pressure. Explain the effect of vacuum pressure on both parameters.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
EXPERIMENT 4
TRAY DRYER
Background of Experiment
The term "drying" is a relative one, and simply means that there is a further reduction in
the moisture content from some initial level provided by mechanical dewatering to some
acceptable lower level. For example, moisture content of 10-20% by volume would
normally allow particles to flow freely, yet suppress dust formation. The necessity for
drying may be to make a product suitable for sale or for subsequent processing, e.g.
example paint pigments; of for subsequent processing, e.g in pyrometallurgical operations.
These factors governing the rates of these processes determine the drying rate.
Commercial drying operations may utilize heat transfer by convection, conduction,
radiation, or a combination of these. Industrial dryers differ fundamentally by the methods
of heat transfer employed. However, irrespective of the mode of heat transfer, heat must
flow to the outer surface and then into the interior of the solid.
Careful consideration of many factors is necessary in the final selection of the most suitable
type of dryer for a particular application. Some of these factors are:
Objective of Experiment
In this experiment, students will be exposed to the operation of tray dryer whereby they
are required to study the drying behaviour of a non-porous solid.
Scopes of Experiment
After drying the solid experimentally using tray dryer, you need to analyse the
experimental data relating moisture content to time and it should be represented by typical
drying curves. Besides, the study of drying behaviour can be carried out further by
determining the drying rate of the solid and also by calculating the heat and mass transfer
coefficient during the constant rate period.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Description of Experiment
When a solid is dried experimentally, data are usually obtained relating moisture content
to time. Consider the drying of a non-porous, insoluble material such as sand or rice in a
tray. The surface of the rice is exposed to a drying medium such as hot dry air passing
over the surface. Figure 4.1 shows the typical drying curves in investigating the drying
behaviour of a substance.
To experimentally determine the rate of drying for a given material, a sample is usually
placed on a tray. If it is a solid material it should fill the tray so that only the top surface
is exposed to the drying air stream. By suspending the tray from a balance in a cabinet or
duct through which the air is flowing, the loss in weight of moisture during drying can be
determined at different time intervals without interrupting the operation. The velocity,
humidity, temperature, and direction of the air should be the same and constant to
simulate drying under constant drying conditions. In this course, a tray dryer as shown in
Figure 4.2 is used to perform this experimental work.
For each and every product, there is a representative curve that describes the drying
characteristics for that product at specific temperature, velocity and pressure conditions.
This curve is referred to as the drying curve for a specific product. Variations in the curve
will occur principally in rate relative to carrier velocity and temperature. The curve is
extremely valuable in understanding idiosyncrasies associated with the drying of each
unique product.
In discussing the drying process, typically, there two fundamental temperatures involved.
The dry bulb temperature is the temperature of a body or air as measured with a
conventional thermometer. In process applications, it is the process control set point of a
dryer. It is also referred to as just "temperature. Meanwhile, wet bulb temperature is
different. It is called wet because a permeable membrane such as wet gauze is used in
conjunction with a regular thermometer to obtain the reading. The gauze is wrapped
around the bulb of the thermometer and inserted into the gas stream. Because the water
is evaporating off the gauze in the gas stream, evaporative cooling ensures that the
temperature is lower than a dry bulb thermometer in the same gas stream. Physically
obtaining this reading is tricky because the reading is meaningful only at a constant rate
of evaporation. Too much or too little water will affect the reading, and it takes practice to
obtain the correct value. The dry and wet bulb temperatures are fundamentals in defining
the properties of the air.
Figure 4.3: Different phases in drying processes; initial period, constant rate period and
falling rate period. (Process Heating; The Drying Curve, 15 th Dec 2010)
Figure 4.3 represents a typical drying curve for virtually any product. Drying occurs in
three different periods, or phases, which can be clearly defined. The first phase, or initial
period, is where sensible heat is transferred to the product and the contained moisture.
This is the heating up of the product from the inlet condition to the process condition,
which enables the subsequent processes to take place. In some instances, pre-processing
can reduce or eliminate this phase. For example, if the feed material is
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
coming from a reactor or if the feed is preheated by a source of waste energy, the inlet
condition of the material will already be at a raised temperature. The rate of evaporation
increases dramatically during this period with mostly free moisture being removed.
During the second phase, or constant rate period, free moisture persists on the surfaces
and the rate of evaporation alters very little as the moisture content reduces. During this
period, drying rates are high, and higher inlet air temperatures than in subsequent drying
stages can be used without detrimental effect to the product. There is a gradual and
relatively small increase in the product temperature during this period.
Interestingly, a common occurrence is that the time scale of the constant rate period may
determine and affect the rate of drying in the next phase. The third phase, or falling rate
period, is the phase during which migration of moisture from the inner interstices of each
particle to the outer surface becomes the limiting factor that reduces
the drying rate.
Experimental Procedures
1. Weigh the cooked rice before adding some water. The rice should be removed from
the container and drained excess free water.
2. Distribute about 1000 g of the wet rice between all four trays. The initial moisture
content should be more than 10%. The total weight of the wet rice should be noted
before drying commences.
3. At some arbitrary time (t=0), switch on and set the fan speed control to mid-
position (5) and the heater power control to position 8, letting them remain
constant throughout the experiment.
4. Wait until the dryer reaches a steady state temperature.
5. Record the wet and dry bulb temperatures at the three locations (inlet air position,
and both before and after the drying trays, see positions 1,2 and 3 shown in Figure
4.4) for time = 0 s and record the air velocity.
6. While the material is being dried, record the following:
a. The total weight of rice in the trays at regular time intervals until drying is
complete, i.e., the weight remains constant. (At the beginning use short time
intervals since the drying is fast and then make it long as the drying becomes
slow).
b. The wet and dry bulb temperatures at the three locations and the air velocity.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Experimental Result
Based on the above procedures, you can plan the time intervals for the data recording. It
is recommended for you to record the data for every two minutes within the first 10
minutes, then you can increase the time interval as the drying progresses. You need to
record the experimental result until the process is complete i.e. the weight is constant.
Example of the table of experimental result is shown as Table 4.1 (you can modify the
table according to your needs):
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Time (min) 0 1 2 4 6 8 10 14 18 22 26 30 35 40 45
*1
Dry bulb
*2
temperature
*3
*1
Wet bulb
*2
temperature
*3
Weight of
wet rice
(kg)
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Result Discussion
Questions
1. Using the weights measured during the experiment calculate the dry basis moisture
content of the sample at given values of time:
W Ws kg total water
X ,
Ws kg dry solid
W is the weight of the wet solid (total water+dry solid) and Ws is the weight of
the dry solid.
3. Calculate the drying rate at given values of time. The drying rate R is calculated for
each point by:
Ws dX
R ,
A dt
4. Plot the drying rate curve (drying rate versus moisture content).
5. From the drying rate curve estimate the drying rate within the constant rate period,
Rc and the critical moisture content, Xc.
6. Calculate the heat and mass transfer coefficients during the constant rate period.
7. Estimate the time of drying during the constant-rate period and the falling period
and hence calculate the total drying time. Compare your results with the
experimentally measured one.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
EXPERIMENT 5
SPRAY DRYER
Background of Experiment
Spray drying is a very widely applied, technical method used to dry aqueous or organic
solutions, emulsions etc., in industrial chemistry and food industry. Dry milk powder,
detergents and dyes are just a few spray dried products currently available. Spray drying
can be used to preserve food or simply as a quick drying method. It also provides the
advantage of weight and volume reduction. It is the transformation of feed from a fluid
state into a dried particulate form by spraying the feed into a hot drying medium. Intensive
research and development during the last two decades has resulted in spray drying
becoming a highly competitive means of drying a wide variety of products. The range of
product applications continues to expand, so that today spray drying has connections with
many things we use daily.
The spray drying process transforms fluid feed into a dried product in a single operation.
Basically, spray drying is accomplished by atomizing feed liquid into a drying chamber
through a rotating wheel or nozzle, where the small droplets are subjected to a stream of
hot air and converted to powder particles as a result of moisture evaporation. The resulting
rapid evaporation maintains a low droplet temperature so that high drying air temperatures
can be applied without affecting the product. The drying proceeds until the desired
moisture level in the products is reached.
As the powder is discharged from the drying chamber, it is passed through a powder/air
separator and collected for packaging. Most spray dryers are equipped for primary powder
collection at efficiency of about 99.5%, and most can be supplied with secondary collection
equipment if necessary.
Objective of Experiment
In this experiment, students will study the process of spray drying which is applied to dry
aqueous or organic solutions, emulsion, etc.
Scopes of Experiment
In this experiment, you need to study spray drying process including its principles of
transformation of feed from liquid state into a dried particulate form, the application of the
process, the uses of spray dryer and type of spray dryers. You have to produce your own
product from the spray dryer, then the density of the product obtained from the experiment
should be compared to the standard density. You need to investigate the instrument
settings, namely inlet temperature, feed rate, spray air flow in order to further study the
product parameters such as temperature load, final humidity, particle size and yield.
Besides, you can also compare the density of the product obtained in this experiment to
the standard density.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Description of Experiment
Spray drying is suited for most real or colloidal solutions, for emulsions and dispersions as
long as the dried product behaves like a solid.
Figure 5.1: Spray drying of inorganic or organic product (BCHI Labortechnik AG, 2002)
As shown in Figure 5.1, an aqueous solution of the product (A) is dispersed into fine
droplets (B) using a two fluid nozzle. The solvent evaporates immediately surrounding the
product in a vapour cloud that protects the product from thermal load. As soon as the
critical concentration is exceeded, nucleation starts forming a solid shell. After the solvent
is dried away from the surface, the interface moves into the core (second step of
drying).The final product (C) is a fine, amorphous or crystallized material. Spraying highly
concentrated solution results in a more porous final product.
In principal, the spray drying process is dependent upon the solution flow rate, solution
temperature, air flow rate, air temperature and feed concentration. These instrument
settings are in a combined system influencing the product parameters; temperature load,
final humidity, particle size and yield. The time of drying the droplets is very short in
comparison with most other drying processes. Low product temperature and short drying
time allow spray drying of very heat-sensitive products. The optimisation of instrument
settings is usually made in trial and error process. Some initial conditions can be found in
the application database for equal or similar products.
Spray drying is used to dry pharmaceuticals, foods, dairy products, blood plasma,
numerous organic and inorganic chemicals, ceramic powders, detergents and other
products. The application depends on the kind of product used, such as viscosity, density,
additives etc. Therefore, the given parameters cannot precisely be overtaken. Table 5.1,
Table 5.2, Table 5.3 and Table 5.4 show some application of spray drying process.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Table 5.2: Aromas, cosmetics, cleaners and detergents (BCHI Labortechnik AG, 2002)
Table 5.3: Medical and pharmaceutical products (BCHI Labortechnik AG, 2002)
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Experimental Result
In this experiment, you need to identify what kind of data that should be extracted from
the experimental work. All the data must be recorded in a table.
Before you run the experiment, make sure the weight of beaker, inlet air temperature and
outlet temperature are recorded. If possible, during the process, you are required to record
the inside temperature of the spray dryer at steady state condition and the pressure of the
compressed air supplied to the atomizer. Then, after completing the experimental work,
record the total time required for the drying process and weigh the collected particulate
sample.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Example of the table of experimental result is shown as Table 5.5, Table 5.6, and Table
5.7:
Table 5.7: Experimental result of pressure, volume of particular powder and density of
particulate powder
Data #1 #2 #3
P1
P2
VP
Density of particulate
powder
Where;
Result Discussion
Questions
1. Draw the process block diagram (PBD) and process flow diagram (PFD) for the
entire spray drying system. Explained the process thoroughly.
2. Using the equation below, calculate the volume of particulate powder obtained in
this experiment, and then determine its density. Compare the calculate density and
the standard value, and discuss the difference.
P
VP VR 1 1
P2
3. Using the temperature measured during the experiment, calculate the performance
of spray drying which is measured in terms of thermal efficiency. If the drying
process is assumed to be adiabatic, that is, the heat loss is negligible; the overall
thermal efficiency (overall) can be approximated to the relation:
T TAo
overall Ai 100 %
TAi T
Where TAi and TAo are the inlet and outlet air temperatures, respectively and T
is the ambient air temperature.
4. What kind of modification of the existing system would you suggest to increase the
recovery percentage of product?
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
EXPERIMENT 6
EVAPORATION
Background of Experiment
Tradition leads us to believe that evaporation is one of the oldest techniques known to
humanity. It is nevertheless regarded now as an essential unit operation in modern
Chemical Engineering. The aim of evaporation is to concentrate a solution consisting of a
volatile solvent and a non-volatile solute. This unit operation is achieved by vaporizing part
of the solvent to produce a concentrated solution. Most evaporation operation used by
industry uses water as the solvent.
Objective of Experiment
Scopes of Experiment
In this experiment, you have to perform single effect evaporation experiments using a
climbing film evaporator under atmospheric pressure. Then, based on the collected data,
you are required to perform mass and energy balances for a single effect climbing film
evaporator.
Description of Experiment
The cascade takes vapour from the first unit and uses it to boil the solution. The same
concept is used for the second unit and can be followed by further contacting units. The
only requirement is that the pressure in each stage is lower than the previous one: this
allows the vapour to provide the necessary temperature driving force to boil the solution.
The optimal number of units in a multi-effect evaporation process requires a process
analysis of the trade off between energy savings and the capital costs for the contacting
units.
The experimental unit in the Unit Operations Laboratory is a single evaporation unit. It
allows a study of the heat transfer characteristic of the unit, essential for process design
and to provide the experimental data for the generation of a complete heat and material
balance.
The typical evaporator is made up of three functional sections: the heat exchanger, the
evaporating section, where the liquid boils and evaporates, and the separator in which the
vapour leaves the liquid and passes off to the condenser or to other equipment. In many
evaporators, all three sections are contained in a single vertical cylinder.
In the centre of the cylinder there is a steam heating section, with pipes passing through
it in which the evaporating liquors rise. At the top of the cylinder, there are baffles, which
allow the vapours to escape but check liquid droplets that may accompany the vapours
from the liquid surface. A diagram of this type of evaporator, which may be called the
conventional evaporator, is given in Figure 6.2.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
In the heat exchanger section, called a calandria in this type of evaporator, steam
condenses in the outer jacket and the liquid being evaporated boils on the inside of the
tubes and in the space above the upper tube plate. The resistance to heat flow is imposed
by the steam and liquid film coefficients and by the material of the tube walls. The
circulation of the liquid greatly affects evaporation rates, but circulation rates and patterns
are very difficult to predict in any detail. Values of overall heat transfer coefficients that
have been reported for evaporators are of the order of 1800-5000 J m-2 s-1 C-1 for the
evaporation of distilled water in a vertical-tube evaporator with heat supplied by
condensing steam. However, with dissolved solids in increasing quantities as evaporation
proceeds leading to increased viscosity and poorer circulation, heat transfer coefficients in
practice may be much lower than this.
As evaporation proceeds, the remaining liquors become more concentrated and because
of this the boiling temperatures rise. The rise in the temperature of boiling reduces the
available temperature drop, assuming no change in the heat source. And so the total rate
of heat transfer will drop accordingly. Also, with increasing solute concentration, the
viscosity of the liquid will increase, often quite substantially, and this affects circulation
and the heat transfer coefficients leading again to lower rates of boiling. Yet another
complication is that measured, overall, heat transfer coefficients have been found to vary
with the actual temperature drop, so that the design of an evaporator on theoretical
grounds is inevitably subject to wide margins of uncertainty.
Perhaps because of this uncertainty, many evaporator designs have tended to follow
traditional patterns of which the calandria type of Figure 6.2 is a typical example.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Experimental Result
Refractive index,
Pressure, Volume, ml
Time, s T1, oC T2, oC nD
bar
V3 V5 V3 V5
0
5
10
0.5 15
20
25
30
0
5
10
1.0 15
20
25
30
0
5
10
1.5 15
20
25
30
Result Discussion
Questions
1. Draw the process block diagram (PBD) and the process flow diagram (PFD) for the
entire evaporation system studied in this experiment. Explain the process
thoroughly.
2. A key aspect of this experiment is the heat and material balance. This is essential
information for any engineering process.
Total balance:
F=L+V
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Where;
F: feed mass flow rate
L: concentrated liquid mass flow rate
V: Evaporated water mass flow rate
Solute balance:
F xF = L xL
Where;
xF: mass fraction of solids in feed
xL: mass fraction of solids in concentrate
q = S(HS - hS ) = S
Where;
q: rate of heat transfer through heating surface from steam
HS: specific enthalpy of steam
hS: specific enthalpy of condensate
: latent heat of condensation of steam
S: mass flow rate of steam.
q = L hL + V HV F hF + heat losses
Where;
hL: specific enthalpy of concentrate
HV: specific enthalpy of vapor
HF: specific enthalpy of feed
4. The heat and material balance results can be used to calculate the process
efficiency:
The data also allows an analysis of the heat exchanger and a determination of the
overall heat transfer coefficient.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
5. Plot a graph of refractive index versus concentration of salt solution for the standard
mixture, and discuss the findings.
6. Plot a graph of steam pressure versus concentration of salt solution obtained from
the evaporation process, then discuss the result.
7. Compare the concentration of salt solution obtained at V3 and V5 and discuss the
difference and the factors that influence the findings.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
EXPERIMENT 7
VAPOUR-LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM
Background of Experiment
Vapour-liquid equilibrium are the fundamental properties whose knowledge is required, for
example, in the design of separation columns in chemical industries. Many experiments
are necessary to obtain such equilibrium data, at least for binary systems, where non-
idealities in both phases must be determined. Therefore further improvements to
theoretical models for describing and predicting these non-idealities are indispensable.
At low pressure, deviations from ideal behaviour are due mainly to the liquid phase. The
association of one or more components in a liquid mixture and the chemical forces due to
electrical charge exchange between an associating and an active compound influence
strongly the excess properties of associated solutions and the fluid phase equilibrium.
These effects are in many cases stronger than those due to physical forces.
Objective of Experiment
Scopes of Experiment
In this experiment, a mixture of methanol water will be used. From the experimental
result in terms of refractive index and the boiling point for different composition, you need
to produce a graph of vapour-liquid equilibrium for the mixture of methanol water.
Description of Experiment
The second diagram is a plot of x versus y. This diagram is also known as equilibrium
curve. These types of diagrams are generated at a constant pressure. Since the pressure
in a distillation column is relatively constant in most columns (the exception is vacuum
distillation, in which the pressures at the top and bottom are signicantly different in terms
of absolute pressure level), a Txy diagram, and an xy diagram are convenient for the
analysis of binary distillation systems. The Figure 7.1 below shows a constant pressure
phase diagram for an ideal solution (one that obey Raoult's Law).
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
Usually the mole fraction of the more volatile component is plotted on the horizontal axis,
whereby x is the mole fraction in the liquid phase and y is the mole fraction in the vapour
phase.
Since the boiling point of pure A (tA at xA = 1.0) is lower than boiling point of pure
B (tB at xA = 0.0, i.e. xB = 1.0), therefore component A is more volatile than
component B where A has a lower boiling point than B.
Boiling point and condensation point changes with concentration: Saturated liquid
curve : x vs. T, bubble point curve Saturated vapour curve : y vs. T, dew point
curve
Three different regions exist where only vapour, only liquid and a vapour-liquid
mixture can exist.
The upper curve in the diagram is called the dew-point curve while the lower one is called
the bubble-point curve. The dew-point is the temperature at which the saturated vapour
starts to condense. The bubble-point is the temperature at which the liquid starts to boil.
The region above the dew-point curve shows the equilibrium composition of the
superheated vapour while the region below the bubble-point curve shows the equilibrium
composition of the subcooled liquid.
SEPARATION PROCESSES LABORATORY II
For example, when a subcooled liquid with mole fraction of A=0.4 (point A) is heated, its
concentration remains constant until it reaches the bubble-point (point B), when it starts
to boil. The vapour evolved during the boiling has the equilibrium composition given by
point C, approximately 0.8 mole fraction A. This is approximately 50% richer in A than the
original liquid.
Meanwhile, Figure 7.2 below (left) showed an example of typical equilibrium curve for a
binary mixture on x-y plot. It contains less information than the phase diagram (i.e.
temperature is not included), but it is most commonly used. It is useful for graphical design
in determining the number of theoretical stages required for a distillation column.
Experimental Result
In this experiment, you need to identify the required data from the experimental work in
order to produce the graph of vapour-liquid equilibrium for the studied system. Then, all
the data must be recorded in a table.
Result Discussion
Questions
1. Draw the process flow diagram for the entire vapour-liquid equilibrium system.
Explain the process thoroughly.
2. Plot a graph of refractive index versus mol fraction of methanol (before heating).
Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium
of Methanol-Water System
P = 760 mm Hg; T = 64.6C - 72.0C
BP % by mole methanol
Temp.
C liquid vapor