Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Home Forums Structural Engineers Activities Structural engineering other technical topics Forum
I am tasked with performing a preliminary visual condition assessment of an existing structure. After I perform the inspection of
the structural components, I need to write a report and rate the condition of each structural component as Good, Satisfactory,
Fair, Poor, Critical, or Failed.
However, I am unable to find any official references in ASCE, ASTM, or IBC that actually describes the standards for each
condition. For example, I am arbitrarily defining a Critical Condition as "most major (critical) components are severely
deteriorated. Component or system is barely able to perform. Facility should close until repaired." These are my own words to
describe the standards that I believe define a critical condition, and thus I have no official reference to back-up my description.
Can someone please help me to find an ASCE/ASTM/IBC or other reference to a design standard or building code that describes
the standards for each condition? I tried ASCE 11-99 (Guideline for Structural Condition Assessment of Existing Buildings) but it
does not have what I'm looking for.
I don't think there is anything wrong with creating your own definitions--just define them at the beginning of your report.
DaveAtkins
Have a look at New York City's local law 11 for faade inspection. The assessment conditions are action oriented - unsafe
means what it says, safe with maintenance requires the Owner to schedule a program before the next inspection or as soon as
you tell him to and safe means no action required. If you have to use your language, get rid of good, satisfactory and failed and
reassign fair, poor, and critical with safe, safe with maintenance and unsafe.
Thank you so much for the replies. I found NYC Local 11 to be useful and I plan to adopt that rating system for the facade.
For anyone else reading this thread looking for the same answers as I was:
I ended up referencing the FHWA Bridge Inspector's Reference Manual (Pub. No. FHWA NHI 12-049, December 2012).
Specifically Section 4.2 (Condition and Appraisal) which gives general component condition rating guidelines obtained from the
1995 edition of the FHWA Coding Guide. Section 4.2 (Condition and Appraisal) has code ratings from 0 to 9. 0 pertains to failed
condition and 9 pertains to excellent condition. They also describe what would qualify for a given rating. For example, a 5
pertains to a FAIR condition in which all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking,
spalling, or scour.
Even though this rating system is technically for bridges, I believe I can apply to most, if not all structures even if they aren't
bridges.
I disagree with Teguci. I'd be fairly leery using terms like 'safe' and 'unsafe' unless you absolutely have to (like on a standard
form). Would certainly hate for you to call a structure safe and then it fails due to something outside of your control or that you
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=401951 1/2
7/4/2017 Structural Condition Assessment - Structural engineering other technical topics - Eng-Tips
weren't even tasked to look at. You would have had no clue, yet declared it safe.
No matter what you do, would probably be a good idea to run it by your insurance and/or attorney first. Especially if you're
creating something new. Make sure your tone is right from the beginning.
Take a look at ASCE 11, "GUIDELINE FOR STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING BUILDINGS"
http://www.asce.org/templates/publications-book-de...
Advertise
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=401951 2/2