Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • 182001-04 and Marquez vs. Sandiganbayan G.R. Nos. 182020-24, Sep. 2, 2009)

    Загружено:

    Krstn Qbd
    21 просмотров1 страница
    The document discusses a case where public bidding was not conducted for government procurements. While public bidding was not conducted, the lack of public bidding alone does not necessarily mean there was a manifest and gross disadvantage to the government. As a previous case declared, the absence of public bidding may simply mean the government did not secure the lowest price but does not automatically equate to disadvantage.

    Исходное описание:

    notes

    Оригинальное название

    notes

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    The document discusses a case where public bidding was not conducted for government procurements. While public bidding was not conducted, the lack of public bidding alone does not necessarily mean there was a manifest and gross disadvantage to the government. As a previous case declared, the absence of public bidding may simply mean the government did not secure the lowest price but does not automatically equate to disadvantage.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    21 просмотров1 страница

    182001-04 and Marquez vs. Sandiganbayan G.R. Nos. 182020-24, Sep. 2, 2009)

    Загружено:

    Krstn Qbd
    The document discusses a case where public bidding was not conducted for government procurements. While public bidding was not conducted, the lack of public bidding alone does not necessarily mean there was a manifest and gross disadvantage to the government. As a previous case declared, the absence of public bidding may simply mean the government did not secure the lowest price but does not automatically equate to disadvantage.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 1

    We are not unmindful of the fact that petitioners failed to conduct the requisite

    public bidding for the questioned procurements. However, the lack of public bidding
    alone does not automatically equate to a manifest and gross disadvantage to the
    government. As we had occasion to declare in Nava v. Sandiganbayan,[22] the
    absence of a public bidding may mean that the government was not able to secure
    the lowest bargain in its favor xxx (Caunan vs. People of the Phils G.R. Nos. 181999 &
    182001-04 and Marquez vs. Sandiganbayan G.R. Nos. 182020-24, Sep. 2, 2009)

    Вам также может понравиться