Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
x---------------------------------------------------------x
APPEAL
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
4
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
SO ORDERED
SGD.
ROMEO D. ALBERTO
Regional Vice-President PhROIX
3.) Per said Order, the Motion for Reconsideration was denied due to
ground that the case is not compensable considering the HOP
NOT ALLOWED TO PERFORM OPTHALMIC PROCEDURES;
4.) Under Section 9, Rule II of Philhealth Circular No. 03, Series of
2008, the above decision of the Regional Office of Philhealth PRO
IX may be appealed to the Honorable Office based on the
ground/s of any error of fact or law. The said provision is
hereunder cited thusly:
RULE II - FINAL APPEAL WITH THE PARD:
xxx
Section 9. A final appeal may be filed on the ground of any
error of fact or law or both on the part of the PRO or Office
of the Area Head in denying an MR.
5.) Under Section 13, Rule IV of Philhealth Circular No. 03, Series of
2008, the liberal construction of the guidelines is allowed in order
to serve the ends of substantial justice and equity over matters of
form and technicality;
7.) It is hereby submitted that there was an error of the denial of the
claim considering that the Appellant substantially complied with the
requirements in relation to the processing of claim and that
Appellant had rendered its services in favor of the
member/claimant. Moreover, per letter of the Billing & Claims Unit
of the appellant, it stated through MICHELLE C. INSO-LIBAGO
that said unit does not have the capabilities to detect the
exhaustion of 45 compensable days and violation of single period
of confinement due to the following reasons:
a.) That the system (Portal) provided for by the corporation does
not include eligibility to the rule of Single Period of
Confinement (SPC), sample of PhilHealth Benefit Eligibility
Form is attached herein;
8.) The Appellant was able to submit all the documents in connection
with the processing of the claim.
PRAYER
Other reliefs that are just and equitable under the premises are
likewise prayed for.
VERIFICATION/CERTIFICATION
8
Copy furnished:
PhilHealth PRO IX, Zamboanga City
EXPLANATION
9