NA
HILAD.LIT 167412017
Monday 3 July 2017
MR WONG TUNK HING
Company Secretary
MARIN MATAHARI SDN BHD (1154398-W) (Fax : 07/2244 016)
Suite LPO2 & 05 BY HAND
Menara TU8
Jalan Syed Mohd Mufti
30000 Johor Banru
Dear sir
MARIN MATAHARI SDN BHD (1154398-W)
RESOLUTION DATED 3 JULY 2017 PURSUANT TO S.297(1)
Reterence is mede to the above matter.
‘As stated in our earlier notice dated 21 June 2017, we have been
instructed that the above proposed resolution by the majority
shareholders to pursue further illegally and/or unreasonably. to
oppress our client
ur client again dispute the authencity of the signature of Chang
Soon Jin. Ih the absence of a valid signature, the proposed
fesolution is irvalid. Furthermore, in the terms of sharahoiding,
there is tie and no single majority
Our client also disputes that you have fully complied with other
requirements under the Companies Act
Our client besides being the Chairman / Share Holder and founder
member of Marin Matahari Sdn Bhd disputes the sharenelding of the
other directors namely Mr Ong Soon Liong and Nr Chang Soon Jin.
Our client have reported this matter to Suruhanjaya Syarikat
Malaysia and also pursuing legal action henceforth
Yours sincerely ee. clientNA
HLLAD.LIT 167412017
Monday 3 July 2017
MR WONG TUNK HING
Company Secretary
MARIN MATAHARI SDN BHD (1154398-W) (Fax - 07/2244 016)
Suite LPO? & 05 BY HAND
Menara Te
Jalan Syed Mond Mutt
80000 Johar Bahru
Dear Sir
MARIN MATAHARI SON BHD (1154398-W)
RESOLUTION DATED 3 JULY 2017 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 3(4)
Reference is mede to the above matter,
We have been instructed that our cllent maintains that the initial
Fesolution is invalid andor illegal ae par our letter dated 21 June
2017 based on the varlous reasons given therein
[As the initial resolution dated 15.08.2017 is invalid, the question of
extending any legal resolution does not_arise. Furthermore, Our
client as the equal share holder cum Chairman , Member and
Director does net agree to this subsequent proposed resolution.
Our client again dispute the authencity of the signature of Cheng
Soon Jin in the above proposed resolution. Again, ihe flagrant
actions by your cliont shows a clear pattern of oppression
Gonsigering the resolution to remove our client as # Director ang
the earlier resolutions,
Furthermore, in the terms of shareholding, there is a tle and there
fare no single majority. Our client also disputes that you have fully
complied with aiher requirements under the Companies Act
Our client have also reported this matter to Suruhanjaya Syarikat
Malaysia and also pursuing legal action henceforth