Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Case Prompt
A U.S. energy conglomerate is considering the acquisition of a publicly traded wind turbine manufacturer, EnerForce,
with manufacturing locations in China and Vietnam. Should the conglomerate acquire EnerForce?
Notes to Interviewer
Response can include the following and interviewer should probe the candidate to relay as comprehensive a list as
possible. Strong candidates will structure their brainstorming in mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive
categories:
Company Information Market Information
Financials Market conditions (from market experts)
Past profitability (from financial statements) Tariffs on exports (from government websites)
Financial health of the target (from financial statements) Technological specifications (from market experts)
Revenue and cost breakdown by product (may not be Customer preferences (from market experts)
available but could ask market experts) Competitors and their market shares (from market
Operations experts or industry reports)
Current product range (from customers and/or target
website)
Targets customer list (from target testimonials or may be
public information for utility customers)
Location of targets plants (most likely public information)
If target is sought by competitors (may not be available
but prior bids may have been made public)
Supply chain (may not be available but client may share
some suppliers)
NYU Stern MCA - All rights reserved 36
Case 1: EnerForce
Key elements to analyze
Question #2
Can you walk me through the following three charts? What market would you suggest is most attractive for
EnerForces upcoming product, the EnerForce 100 KW Turbine, in the next year? (Show candidate Exhibits 1,2 and 3
at the same time)
Notes to Interviewer
Exhibit 1 analysis:
Notes to Interviewer
To calculate Enerforces sales, we will multiply the number of turbines needed in each market next year by the projected market share in
each market. If we do not have market share information, we can deduce it from a combination of Exhibits 1 and 2.
# of incremental turbines in EnerForce market share in target Expected EnerForce turbine sales
each market next year market next year
Notes to Interviewer
Assuming the capacity of both plants is maximized, production would be 5,000 turbines/year. Lets assume
EnerForce is able to sell all 5,000 turbines/year. We would need to multiply this by $100K to derive sales revenue.
Sales revenue multiplied by the 15% profit margin would give us profit/year. Profit/year divided by the discount
rate would give us the projected valuation of EnerForce (assuming this is their only product)
5,000 turbines/year * $100k turbine = $500M/year
$500M/year * 15% profit margin = $75M/year
$75M/10% discount rate = $750M value price
Acquisition go/no go should be determined via whether the asking price for EnerForce is higher or lower
than the derived valuation
*assuming perpetuity
NYU Stern MCA - All rights reserved 40
Case 1: EnerForce
Solution and Recommendations
Recommendations Risks Next Steps
Acquire EnerForce given a Competitive response: already saw that Further understand
valuation of $750M and a competitors in Chinese market entering other EnerForces other
price of $700M although markets could be a serious threat products and assets
an understanding of Country specific costs: to reach 5,000/turbines
EnerForces other a year would need access to US or Europe; Investigate competitive
products (if any) and there could be tariffs or there could be quotas landscape in more detail,
assets is most likely in these countries with a focus on the
necessary prior to Customers: there might not be support in U.S. competitors in China
acquisition. and Europe for renewables due to the
indebtedness of Western governments
Technology: competitors could develop
technology to make EnerForce products
obsolete rendering the acquisition overvalued
due to the assumption of perpetuity
10
9 9
8 8 8
5 5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
# of Total
Market Industry Rank 100 KW EnerForce Turbine
Competitors
Asia 9 #2 #6 #7 #4 #7 #7
US 4 #2 #3 #2 #1 #4 #4
Europe 6 #3 #1 #6 #2 #3 #3
Asia 4.5 2%
U.S. 5 9%
Europe 6 -13%